I don't think we should be rooting for the Bell Riots but the pin is funny
from bigfoot@lemm.ee to startrek@startrek.website on 17 Jun 13:36
https://lemm.ee/post/34838038

#startrek

threaded - newest

Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml on 17 Jun 15:28 next collapse

Critical support for the collection of Dims, Ghosts, and Gimmees just trying to make a better life for themselves.

optissima@possumpat.io on 17 Jun 15:52 next collapse

Why not? The bell riots themselves was one of the steps to class consciousness, something we desperately need now. Yeah people were hurt, but how different is that than BLM and other rights protests being mass arrested or openly fired upon these days?

bigfoot@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 16:43 collapse

That is a very machivellian attitude. I don’t believe that hurting people who aren’t a threat in the name of “progress” is justified, even if it were somehow a shortcut to utopia, which it’s not.

Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml on 17 Jun 18:07 next collapse

Nonviolence is an inherently privileged position in the modern context. Besides the fact that the typical pacifist is quite clearly white and middle class, pacifism as an ideology comes from a privileged context. It ignores that violence is already here; that violence is an unavoidable, structurally integral part of the current social hierarchy; and that it is people of color who are most affected by that violence. Pacifism assumes that white people who grew up in the suburbs with all their basic needs met can counsel oppressed people, many of whom are people of color, to suffer patiently under an inconceivably greater violence, until such time as the Great White Father is swayed by the movement’s demands or the pacifists achieve that legendary “critical mass. – How Nonviolence Serves the State

BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 18:52 next collapse

All of human political activity boils down to violence. If pacifism were a legitimate strategy then we wouldn’t be in our current situation.

bigfoot@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 21:34 collapse

I didn’t say anything about pacifism, but I also disagree with your proposition equating violence and politics. Violence is a breakdown of politics. Politics, almost definitionally, is how a people settle disputes without violence.

Politics is how how decisions are made in groups. If one person or group is forcing their will upon others, then no decision or compromise between the parties can be said to have been made freely. And therefore it cannot be truthfully described as following a political process.

BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 01:08 next collapse

Pacifism is an ideology centered on political change through nonviolence. Maybe you didn’t explicitly say it, but you might as well have. Can you provide a source on violence being a result of political breakdown and not intrinsic to politics itself? How do current regimes uphold their power?

Politics is, more or less, how decisions are made in groups. Making a decision doesn’t preclude violence. Wars are political and their entire point is violence. Colonialism was foundational to the politics of the last 3+ centuries and it was incredibly violent. Besides vibes, what evidence do you have to support the claim that politics aren’t violent?

luxyr42@lemmy.dormedas.com on 18 Jun 05:52 collapse

Diplomacy is settling disputes without violence.

bigfoot@lemm.ee on 18 Jun 18:39 collapse

It is, but diplomacy refers to disputes between peoples. Politics refers to disputes within a people.

optissima@possumpat.io on 17 Jun 19:11 next collapse

I believe that people should defend their right to exist. Do you feel otherwise?

bigfoot@lemm.ee on 17 Jun 21:16 collapse

I will engage with you in the context of your original proposition but I will not engage with Gish Galloping.

optissima@possumpat.io on 17 Jun 22:02 collapse

It’s only Gish galloping if you edit your original message so they appear disconnected. You’d said all hurting was wrong, and my question was a direct followup to that.

[deleted] on 17 Jun 19:13 next collapse

.

fern@lemmy.autism.place on 17 Jun 19:32 next collapse

OP looking like <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.autism.place/pictrs/image/2041a795-2711-4a04-a0bc-70a23c55cdfb.png">

[deleted] on 18 Jun 01:07 collapse

.

hopesdead@startrek.website on 17 Jun 17:15 next collapse

I have a bumper sticker from the same artist.<img alt="" src="https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/052b7caf-0a25-4383-bde0-4d0b37b316b4.jpeg">

Corgana@startrek.website on 17 Jun 22:48 next collapse

Looks like a window sticker but I’ll allow it this time.

Snowcano@startrek.website on 23 Jun 22:42 collapse

That Janeway sticker is melting my heart! If this isn’t added as a default emoji in the new iOS, Tim Cook is going to get a sternly worded letter from me!

AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 22:17 collapse

I didn’t know what they were and had to look it up

The Bell Riots were an event that took place in San Francisco on Earth in September 2024. They led to the end of the Sanctuary Districts and marked the real beginning of Humans working to find a lasting solution that would resolve social problems. This would set humanity on the path to founding the United Federation of Planets.

Hey, the date is coming up.

RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:37 collapse

How can you possibly not remember this? They happened 3 months from now.

AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world on 17 Jun 23:42 collapse

I’m old - there’s just so much that has and hasn’t happened…