theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
on 30 Jul 21:05
nextcollapse
Site is totally broken, from a bizarre cookies dialog pop-up autofilled with “yes” to infinite redirect to the terms and conditions. Not worth the time
My rationale is this is an Intrepid-based Miranda replacement attempt. The boom below the nacelles can be configured for extra weapons, sensors, or even as nacelles to allow an improved warp geometry for towing vessels below the ship (although good for towing, the ship has overall slower max speeds this way). They can also just be straight-up removed, the fastest configuration for the ship, as it get rid of the structural integrity field requirements for the boom.
SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
on 31 Jul 22:53
collapse
This is a great site. Trying to break it is fun. It’s possible to make a long neck giraffe ship with a giant cowcatcher on the front.
Aside: This is the first time I’ve ever seen a site ask for cookie consent via a submission box. Annoying. At least in EU if the cookies are purely functional, as seems to be the case here, you don’t need to ask permission and you can just notify when the user is about to save to local storage.
threaded - newest
<img alt="" src="https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/66343c66-0cd5-46fd-b091-2f07b498bb74.jpeg">
Does it generate the thing from what I type here? Do I keep the “yes”? Where’s Cancel? I’m confusion.
Got it to run. Good fun <3
<img alt="" src="https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/f858f0f1-e487-47d2-aa6a-3a9f35cffb30.jpeg">
It’s pretty great lol
My head hurts just looking at this one! 😂
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/c5c1d039-9e0d-4d53-96af-73534e75c04d.webp">
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/b17f84be-13e2-4cf9-9a54-6c55536a3098.webp">
lil guy is doing his best 😂
Site is totally broken, from a bizarre cookies dialog pop-up autofilled with “yes” to infinite redirect to the terms and conditions. Not worth the time
k sry
Here’s my go at it:
<img alt="Perseverance-class Starship, 45 degree view" src="https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/35b248f9-9fb3-417c-83a0-9e5440a3acf0.jpeg">
<img alt="Front of ship" src="https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/2229b373-4462-49a2-adbc-28cc6d6c0660.jpeg">
My rationale is this is an Intrepid-based Miranda replacement attempt. The boom below the nacelles can be configured for extra weapons, sensors, or even as nacelles to allow an improved warp geometry for towing vessels below the ship (although good for towing, the ship has overall slower max speeds this way). They can also just be straight-up removed, the fastest configuration for the ship, as it get rid of the structural integrity field requirements for the boom.
This is a great site. Trying to break it is fun. It’s possible to make a long neck giraffe ship with a giant cowcatcher on the front.
Aside: This is the first time I’ve ever seen a site ask for cookie consent via a submission box. Annoying. At least in EU if the cookies are purely functional, as seems to be the case here, you don’t need to ask permission and you can just notify when the user is about to save to local storage.