Star Trek: very Short Treks | "Holograms All the Way Down" (www.startrek.com)
from ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to startrek@startrek.website on 27 Sep 2023 17:21
https://startrek.website/post/2119943

This one was written by Star Trek: Prodigy’s Aaron J. Waltke.

Direct YouTube Link

Direct link to “The Scheimer Barrier, Chapter 4”

#startrek

threaded - newest

RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de on 27 Sep 2023 17:34 next collapse

Ugh, these are just all terrible. But maybe I am not part of the intended audience.

[deleted] on 27 Sep 2023 17:35 next collapse

.

USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website on 27 Sep 2023 17:46 collapse

This one was written by Aaron Waltke, the head writer on “Prodigy”.

And I agree there’s not much to write home about with this one, but unlike the previous entires, I personally did not find it actively terrible.

eva_sieve@startrek.website on 28 Sep 2023 00:33 next collapse

Ah, that explains why they actually acknowledged that Prodigy exists for once.

GoodAaron@startrek.website on 03 Oct 2023 23:53 collapse

I was going for silly and cute!

USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website on 04 Oct 2023 00:13 collapse

You know you’re not supposed to read the comments, right?
 

I was going for silly and cute!

I think you were successful. Building on the end of of ENT worked well. And I appreciated that you were able to get the Protogies in there. Really hoping that’s not the last time we get to see them.

UESPA_Sputnik@feddit.de on 27 Sep 2023 17:37 collapse

I found the others terrible too but this one was actually funny. I loved how they made fun of “These are the Voyages” at the beginning.

SJSmith@lemmy.world on 27 Sep 2023 17:45 collapse

And 'It’s been a long road…"

I agree, the others were terrible, but this one was just silly.

aperson@beehaw.org on 27 Sep 2023 17:53 next collapse

No EMH?

FaceDeer@kbin.social on 27 Sep 2023 18:47 collapse

And no Moriarty either. Still, I was amused.

Wooster@startrek.website on 27 Sep 2023 18:13 next collapse

What actually happened here!?

This one was actually funny?

Kyle@lemmy.ca on 27 Sep 2023 18:24 next collapse

I say this one is canon and it’s proof that Trip didn’t die in enterprise. The hologram just got super inaccurate and twisted as it got passed around with lossy compression in a game of telephone like an old meme.

[deleted] on 27 Sep 2023 19:55 collapse

.

Corgana@startrek.website on 27 Sep 2023 23:19 next collapse

This one was actually really good, didn’t expect that

Nmyownworld@startrek.website on 28 Sep 2023 00:20 next collapse

I’m surprised by this one. I think it is amusing. And, not offensive. This episode seems to actually get Star Trek, while gently poking fun. After the first two Very Short Treks, I wasn’t going to watch anymore of them. Didn’t watch the third one, and I don’t plan to do so. I’m glad I saw this one.

IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world on 28 Sep 2023 05:38 next collapse

I was a huge, “Too Many Cooks” (same creator/director) fan way back.

I enjoyed/laughed at what I have watched. The Spock episode was great. Bloopers!

CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world on 29 Sep 2023 03:54 collapse

“Too Many Cooks” (same creator/director)

That’s the only thing that could have explained this in some way. Love a good bit of absurdism.

the_sisko@startrek.website on 28 Sep 2023 07:57 next collapse

It’s not cannon but at least they are somewhat officially acknowledging the absolute dumpster fire that was the ENT finale.

jaelisp@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 28 Sep 2023 10:11 next collapse

This one wasn’t a dumpster fire like the last few, but I still feel it was a set up without a punchline. Something felt missing at the end for the payoff.

ieightpi@lemmy.world on 29 Sep 2023 03:47 next collapse

This one was the best yet

triktrek@startrek.website on 01 Oct 2023 13:13 collapse

This was actually funny (unlike the previous ones which were quite cringey).

StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website on 01 Oct 2023 14:04 collapse

@GoodAaron@startrek.website ’s one was the one I’d been most hoping for from the time the Very Short Treks were announced, and so far it’s the only one that hasn’t disappointed me.

I have the sense that they are as a whole targeting at a very narrow audience demographic, principally of Americans who were young adults and teens in the late 90s.

I never quite got how ‘drinking poop’ preschool to 9 year-old boy humour took mainstream hold in Austin Powers (which I otherwise loved), but acknowledge it as having been a thing. I can even recognize intellectually that its in a long tradition of low humour that goes back to the ‘great fart’ of ‘The Miller’s Tale’ in Chaucer.

What I don’t get is why the folks who didn’t age out of this kind of humour seem to thing that there’s currently a huge untapped audience that’s just looking for the kind of stuff we got in the earlier VSTs.