‘Forbidden Words’: Github Reveals How Software Engineers Are Purging Federal Databases (www.404media.co)
from schizoidman@lemm.ee to technology@beehaw.org on 04 Feb 2025 15:01
https://lemm.ee/post/54537981

cross-posted from: lemmy.today/post/23276792

A project called “Remove-DEI” shows the tweaks used to remove “forbidden words” from a database about childhood school readiness.

The updates, shown in Github commits, are to a database for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Head Start program. They show a project called “Remove-DEI,” which reveal some of the back-and-forth that is happening behind the scenes to align federal agencies with Donald Trump’s executive orders that forbid almost anything having to do with race or gender within federal agencies. The Github pages show software engineers discussing amongst themselves how to best remove all instances of “forbidden words” from a specific database, and the code updates they used to do it. The changes also show that, while thousands of government datasets are disappearing from the internet, even ones that remain are having parts of their utility deprecated or broken in a way that may not be visible to those outside the government.

#technology

threaded - newest

kbal@fedia.io on 04 Feb 2025 15:10 next collapse

So many mission statements will be lost when they accidentally delete everything containing the word "transparent."

beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org on 04 Feb 2025 15:18 collapse

The USGS has renamed “jadeite” to “jate”.

technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 04 Feb 2025 16:18 next collapse

If it’s still in git, then it’s not actually purged. Nobody tell the fash.

drwho@beehaw.org on 04 Feb 2025 18:01 next collapse

One of the Muskrat’s kits will undoubtedly tell him sooner or later. Then Github’ll get a takedown order.

jarfil@beehaw.org on 05 Feb 2025 02:57 collapse

Dropped branches get all their commit trees purged, unless the commits are also part of another branch.

absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz on 04 Feb 2025 17:11 next collapse

Ministry of truth

Kissaki@beehaw.org on 04 Feb 2025 21:33 next collapse

I wonder how many software devs and admins now weigh their morals. And how many reject to implement or not.

melp@beehaw.org on 05 Feb 2025 19:55 collapse

Can’t imagine many. Many didn’t have issues with 2016’s Cambridge Analytics shenanigans and with how their apps ignored queer and brown people being habitually targeted over the years. I’ve met a few “liberal” software devs here in LA and they’re at the same level of insufferable as gentrifying real estate agents. Sigh.

jarfil@beehaw.org on 05 Feb 2025 02:55 next collapse

First they came for the “master” branch name, but I didn’t care what the “reference” branch was called.

Then they came for “blacklist”, and while it was a BS mixup with the “black book”, I didn’t really care what the “deny/allow list” was called.

Now they’re coming for “Remove-DEI” and “forbidden words”… and they’re pushing it as a bigoted administrative mandate using the same censoring procedures in overdrive.

jagged_circle@feddit.nl on 05 Feb 2025 14:46 collapse

I dont understand.

The US government is using public git repos as a database? Huh?