Yeah given the fact that several LLM’s “accidentally” became racist, told people to kill themselves, gave instructions on how to make explosives, etc. I think you’re vastly overstating how “lobotomized” they are
Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org
on 05 May 20:01
nextcollapse
The knowledge is still there, it’s just that the LLM has been instructed not to divulge it, and these instructions are often imperfect and can sometimes be circumvented accidentally or on purpose.
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 06 May 11:54
collapse
Yeah, given that LLMs are trained from the internet, they all eventually devolve into “Hitler did nothing wrong” memes and/or hardcore racism.
Remember this thread is about a bot commodifying the production of cumshot videos from any person’s photo. I fail to see any nuance here. There is only one use: generating porn featuring people that don’t want to. Decency rules continues to apply to general use tools as it always did.
I found the bot promoted in a different Telegram channel dedicated to making and sharing AI-generated nonconsensual pornography which has about 50,000 members.
This isn’t thought policing… First off, these are actions, but second, no one’s policing it.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org
on 05 May 18:21
nextcollapse
threaded - newest
.
.
Yeah given the fact that several LLM’s “accidentally” became racist, told people to kill themselves, gave instructions on how to make explosives, etc. I think you’re vastly overstating how “lobotomized” they are
The knowledge is still there, it’s just that the LLM has been instructed not to divulge it, and these instructions are often imperfect and can sometimes be circumvented accidentally or on purpose.
Yeah, given that LLMs are trained from the internet, they all eventually devolve into “Hitler did nothing wrong” memes and/or hardcore racism.
Generating nonconsensual sexual videos is not something you think, it’s something you do.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I think we can all agree that stick figures with breasts are objectively funny.
Remember this thread is about a bot commodifying the production of cumshot videos from any person’s photo. I fail to see any nuance here. There is only one use: generating porn featuring people that don’t want to. Decency rules continues to apply to general use tools as it always did.
Like everyone is familiar with SSC. That’s an ongoing problem and has been since my introduction to BDSM, which was its own personal brand of hell.
I mean, I assume?
This isn’t thought policing… First off, these are actions, but second, no one’s policing it.
Disgusting.
.
This implies that bad things are comparable. They aren’t, they’re all bad in their own way.
.
.
.
Cancer cured! Climate change solved! Mideast at peace! Finally, we can get to what really matters: AI-generated cumshots.