Portable Network Graphics (PNG) New Specification (www.w3.org)
from Toes@ani.social to technology@beehaw.org on 28 Jun 2025 20:04
https://ani.social/post/15989327

#technology

threaded - newest

dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com on 28 Jun 2025 20:39 next collapse

I said in a previous article that this is great, but we should be adopting JPEG-XL as it is current and can now compress pixel-perfect / lossless images better than old PNG. IIRC this revision of the spec doesn’t improve compression yet but it’s coming.

[deleted] on 28 Jun 2025 23:25 collapse

.

dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com on 29 Jun 2025 04:57 collapse

JPEG-XL is only really in limbo because Google chose to kill it in Chrome in favor of AVIF. Had that not happened, there would have been far more demand for it to be properly implemented everywhere. Sucks, but you’re right that we’ll have to stick with AVIF/HEIG/WebP.

Midnitte@beehaw.org on 29 Jun 2025 09:54 collapse

And ain’t that the entire problem with 99.9% of the web using chromium…

Powderhorn@beehaw.org on 28 Jun 2025 21:17 collapse

Not seeing how this would affect uptake. Lossless is great for production images, but standard JPEG will do (at low compression) for most Web use cases. Until OS developers coalesce around PNG as a standard (Windows has for screenshots), this is that old standards xkcd.

Alpha channels are nice and all, but how many end users A) have a need for that and B) understand the underlying concept, let alone implementation?

fwygon@beehaw.org on 28 Jun 2025 21:27 next collapse

Alpha channels are critical. The ability to have images have transparency in them is much more useful than you believe it is. Many end users have a need for it, more than they know they do; so this argument really isn’t doing much for your stance supporting PNG. Similarly PNG has supported alpha channels for quite a while.

Powderhorn@beehaw.org on 28 Jun 2025 21:58 collapse

For production, yes. What percentage of images produced are for production, though? I know damn well how important alpha channels are, but for posting something on social media, which is orders of magnitude more output than image creation within the context of a larger presentation, no one cares.

The vast majority of people aren’t graphic artists. That you and I know what alpha channels are has no bearing on daily use by the masses.

[deleted] on 28 Jun 2025 23:13 next collapse

.

Powderhorn@beehaw.org on 29 Jun 2025 00:19 collapse

If you know why you need alpha channels, of course you’re going to save in an appropriate format. But most casual users aren’t going to care. They took a picture of their breakfast or dog and just want to upload now. I’m not arguing PNGs serve no purpose; I’m arguing that most people aren’t Web or app designers. They don’t care whether it’s lossy or lossless, let alone about transparency.

B0rax@feddit.org on 29 Jun 2025 10:30 collapse

You are talking about photos. PNG is not the right format for photos.

[deleted] on 28 Jun 2025 23:20 collapse

.

Powderhorn@beehaw.org on 28 Jun 2025 23:43 collapse

I’ll agree for those use cases, but not everyone is making icons, stickers and emoji.

FaceDeer@fedia.io on 29 Jun 2025 03:30 collapse

They are using them, however. They're visiting websites with them, using apps with them, and so forth.

Powderhorn@beehaw.org on 29 Jun 2025 05:31 collapse

OK, and the kernel is written in C and assembly. Should they know both of those as well?

B0rax@feddit.org on 29 Jun 2025 10:25 collapse

No, but it should still work. Getting rid of alpha channels would break all of that.