Supreme Court upholds law banning TikTok if it's not sold by its Chinese parent company (apnews.com)
from remington@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org on 17 Jan 16:17
https://beehaw.org/post/18059423

bye bye

#technology

threaded - newest

DdCno1@beehaw.org on 17 Jan 17:15 next collapse

Good riddance. I hope the EU follows suit and soon. Von der Leyen has indicated that this is on the table:

politico.eu/…/tiktok-ban-in-eu-is-not-excluded-vo…

In case people still think it’s just another social media app and that it’s only being banned, because “China bad”:

www.nullpt.rs/reverse-engineering-tiktok-vm-1

I have only ever seen this kind of obfuscation with malware before. This fits unconfirmed (but credible) reports that ByteDance will not permit any non-Chinese employees to even look at the backend in their foreign offices and instead fly in experts from China. That’s not normal.

scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech on 17 Jan 18:00 next collapse

Thanks for keeping the “if not sold”. They’ve had many opportunities to make it legal, and they’ve fought it all the way. It’s not a “ban” as much as it is a forced sale.

I’m guessing next week we’re going to hear they spun it off to a totally american company, or meta taking it over or something. Then everyone will celebrate that it’s back.

Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg on 17 Jan 18:03 collapse

I guess Biden isn’t going to enforce it and Trump has promised not to as well. So… This sucks.

testman@lemmy.ml on 17 Jan 22:08 collapse

Time to promote Loops all over the internet?