Unfortunately the ones that kept their guns are more likely to form the private armies of billionaires and after work be part of their personal fellatio-slave harem than fight for the rights of their fellow humans.
…you’re joking, right? Electing the convicted rapist, convicted fraudster, racist, sexist, wannabe dictator that literally tried to lead a coup four years ago didn’t tip you off?
Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
on 14 Jan 21:34
nextcollapse
There goes all of what remains of their integrity.
It just proves further and further that AI by itself is not a bad thing. It's the intent that man pours into it, that makes it a bad thing.
It was stupid to have that in there in the first place given that an absence of politics/political bias is impossible.
Just for one thing: the politics of the LLM’s training data will be reflected in the output. And the vast majority of the English-language corpus available will reflect Western, imperial core liberal politics. They’re pro-capitalist, pro-imperialist, anti-socialist, Western chauvinist politics.
And the vast majority of the English-language corpus available will reflect Western, imperial core liberal politics.
Oh, I’m sure that isn’t going to be a problem for their goals. They can always overrepresent training data from 2016-2020 and 2024-2028 to add some balance to the model’s political compass. /s
threaded - newest
Are we really just accelerating to full on dystopia at this point?
we’ve been living in 1984 since 2002
Why 2002 specifically?
passage of the PATRIOT ACT
Ah, gotcha.
Didn’t you as a country sacrifice thousands of children just so you could keep your guns for this exact moment?
RIGHT???
Unfortunately the ones that kept their guns are more likely to form the private armies of billionaires and after work be part of their personal fellatio-slave harem than fight for the rights of their fellow humans.
…you’re joking, right? Electing the convicted rapist, convicted fraudster, racist, sexist, wannabe dictator that literally tried to lead a coup four years ago didn’t tip you off?
There goes all of what remains of their integrity.
It just proves further and further that AI by itself is not a bad thing. It's the intent that man pours into it, that makes it a bad thing.
Whatever man touches, turns to rigor mortis.
It was stupid to have that in there in the first place given that an absence of politics/political bias is impossible.
Just for one thing: the politics of the LLM’s training data will be reflected in the output. And the vast majority of the English-language corpus available will reflect Western, imperial core liberal politics. They’re pro-capitalist, pro-imperialist, anti-socialist, Western chauvinist politics.
Oh, I’m sure that isn’t going to be a problem for their goals. They can always overrepresent training data from 2016-2020 and 2024-2028 to add some balance to the model’s political compass. /s
If you ain’t using version control for your policy, you ain’t a real one.
I hate seeing Altmans jerkoff face in my feed. I think I gotta block this community
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d9c13817-79ab-4265-91b4-11a7b5bf6d91.jpeg">
There’s no such thing as politically unbiased AI. Apolitical AI was always a pie in the sky.