neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 08 Oct 11:28
collapse
That is basically a list of, does your work require your body of not.
But I basically agree with the list, at least for a few more years. I expect robotics to quickly get better and start replacing some of the jobs on the left of the list.
Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
on 09 Oct 00:22
nextcollapse
We’ve just lost entry-level jobs.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
on 09 Oct 00:42
collapse
Surprisingly, they found that the rate of change in the labor market’s makeup in the wake of AI closely matches the pace when computers and the internet were first taking off. In other words, AI doesn’t appear to be more disruptive than those two technologies
Possibly two of the most disruptive technologies in the last 100 years. Who writes this shit?
threaded - newest
New study sheds light on what kinds of workers are losing jobs to AI
AI Kills Jobs, Stanford Study Finds, Especially For Young People
…stanford.edu/…/Canaries_BrynjolfssonChandarChen.…
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/60f3bc78-b249-4c16-9c2b-d697e9eda74b.jpeg">
(update: same list with better specs)
That is basically a list of, does your work require your body of not.
But I basically agree with the list, at least for a few more years. I expect robotics to quickly get better and start replacing some of the jobs on the left of the list.
Robotics has to get wildly cheaper and safer to replace any meaningful amount of work beyond factories or assembly lines
Robotics has already replaced jobs in commercial laboratory settings for decades. Autosamplers are pretty inexpensive.
You forgot robotic automation
We’ve just lost entry-level jobs.
Possibly two of the most disruptive technologies in the last 100 years. Who writes this shit?