Spyware Found in AceMagic Mini-PCs (www.guru3d.com)
from MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml to technology@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 06:31
https://lemmy.ml/post/11712233

#technology

threaded - newest

Helix@feddit.de on 10 Feb 2024 07:58 next collapse

Now check the other mini PCs from other random Aliexpress, Banggood, Gearbest and Temu vendors…

schizoidman@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 08:03 next collapse

Kinda low effort when just a windows defender scan can detect it.

Helix@feddit.de on 10 Feb 2024 09:26 collapse

imagine what they didn’t find!

sugartits@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 08:32 next collapse

It comes pre installed with Windows, so that’s a given isn’t it?

qaz@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 21:09 collapse

Yes, but this type also steals your credentials.

onlinepersona@programming.dev on 11 Feb 2024 11:07 collapse

You’re repeating what @sugartits@lemmy.world said 😉

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

helenslunch@feddit.nl on 10 Feb 2024 08:52 next collapse

This is why we do fresh installs on new hardware. Preferably Linux 🙂

astrsk@kbin.social on 10 Feb 2024 11:07 next collapse

Hopefully it’s not built into a rom chip on any number of custom components in these mini PCs making it software independent.

witx@lemmy.sdf.org on 10 Feb 2024 11:31 collapse

Unfortunetaly, that does close to nothing when the issue is spyware on firmware

Heratiki@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 14:40 next collapse

According to this Tom’s Hardware article (tomshardware.com/…/mini-pc-maker-ships-systems-wi…) it isn’t firmware based spyware but just existing on the machine drive.

They were also found on the restore partition so a full wipe and fresh install would eliminate the issue. AceMagic have also claimed that the issue was isolated to the first round of shipments.

Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org on 10 Feb 2024 14:51 next collapse

This article says the same thing, but it’s worth people being aware that firmware is a vector.

CaptObvious@literature.cafe on 10 Feb 2024 16:05 collapse

It’s reasonable to consider whether to trust a company that shipped spyware in the first place. I would have a hard time with that.

krolden@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 16:25 next collapse

Better stop using any modern cellphone ever then.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 11 Feb 2024 17:35 collapse

Trying to, but credible alternatives just don’t exist. I really want a Linux phone, but battery life and basic features just aren’t there.

Heratiki@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 19:33 collapse

It’s more than likely they “borrowed” some other Chinese company’s cloned Windows drive and used it for their install rather than roll their own. Could be they were malicious but coming out and claiming it was an error so quickly doesn’t really push that narrative hard.

CaptObvious@literature.cafe on 10 Feb 2024 20:56 next collapse

We’re going to agree to disagree about that. Being caught red-handed would trigger an immediate mea culpa if they want to preserve plausible deniability and try again later.

CaptObvious@literature.cafe on 10 Feb 2024 20:59 collapse

If they weren’t the original malicious actor, then their quality control sucks. Either way, they shipped a booby-trapped system. Trusting them again will be hard for a lot of people.

krolden@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 16:24 next collapse

Nothing in this article said anything about the device firmware being compromised

witx@lemmy.sdf.org on 11 Feb 2024 10:47 collapse

I didn’t say that

krolden@lemmy.ml on 11 Feb 2024 16:12 collapse

Unfortunetaly, that does close to nothing when the issue is spyware on firmware

helenslunch@feddit.nl on 10 Feb 2024 19:42 collapse

Yes but that’s not the issue

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 11 Feb 2024 17:33 collapse

How do you know? They find spyware not in firmware, but that doesn’t cover what they didn’t find.

helenslunch@feddit.nl on 11 Feb 2024 18:18 collapse

Because the issue is what they did find. If they hadn’t found it there would be no article.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 11 Feb 2024 18:49 collapse

Sure. I’m just saying that if a company is caught putting spyware into their products, I’m not going to trust them to suddenly fix it. If they cared, they should’ve caught this with internal QA.

So either they’re negligent or malicious. If the former, they’ll probably be negligent again. If the latter, they’ll be more sneaky next time. Either way I don’t trust them.

helenslunch@feddit.nl on 11 Feb 2024 18:51 collapse

I understand. I’m just not sure why you’re replying to me with this.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 11 Feb 2024 19:04 collapse

My point is that we know there’s spyware on the image, so we should suspect malware elsewhere as well. Until the hardware is audited, we should assume that hardware is compromised as well.

fin@sh.itjust.works on 10 Feb 2024 09:16 next collapse

Maybe we should have a working Linux live USB before we buy a new laptop so that we can set it up without connecting it to the home router.

ShortN0te@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 12:19 collapse

Does not help when the spyware is embedded in the firmware.

Gabu@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 21:25 collapse

Which, I would expect, happens to most of these shitty pcs from no-name Chinese brands.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 11 Feb 2024 17:36 collapse

Probably not most, but it’s still a risk that’s not worth taking. I’d rather buy from a company with brand image to uphold.

yggstyle@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 10:40 next collapse

Can’t wait until this spurs the security community into doing a deep look at the roms on these cheap Chinese boards. Yeah the malware was caught - but what’s more important is the intent. This is a country that is constantly behind breaches and botnets… and here we have these PCs being marketed as router replacents and mini servers. It doesn’t take much to figure out that this is free back door territory.

witx@lemmy.sdf.org on 10 Feb 2024 11:30 next collapse

Yes! I’ve been telling this to friends who keep buying Chinese boards to use as routers and NAS … wth

Heratiki@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 14:34 collapse

I mean depending on what board you’re using it’s unlikely it’s hardware level snooping that supersedes changing the firmware. Especially if you stick to those that run on open source firmware.

qaz@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 20:16 collapse

but what’s more important is the intent

Afaik, the problem was a trojan inside the cracked windows images they used to avoid paying for windows keys. I doubt the intent was to create a botnet, it seems more like generic cybercrime.

I personally always wipe the preinstalled OS to avoid issues like this. However, make sure to use a clean image directly from the source. Simply reinstalling from within Windows wouldn’t have helped in this case, because the malware was part of the recovery files.

The story originated from a video from the “The Net Guy Reviews” YouTube channel. Most articles I’ve seen so far oversimplify the issue and/or get facts wrong, therefore I recommend checking out the original video if you want to learn more.

yggstyle@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 21:03 collapse

Yeah malware is everywhere - This could simply be a product of an individual actor abusing their position in a supply chain… but this also goes for hardware as well. It is certainly a more difficult vector to attack from but due to its ‘level’ it’s a valuable position to compromise.

JCreazy@midwest.social on 10 Feb 2024 12:53 next collapse

Remember kids if you’re going to buy a Chinese pre-built, wipe that shit before use.

sylver_dragon@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 13:50 next collapse

Remember kids if you’re going to buy a Chinese pre-built, wipe that shit before use.

Always wipe and start fresh. Yes, Chinese brands seem to be worse about security, but there’s no reason to keep bloatware and FSM only know what other crapware the OEM installed.

onlinepersona@programming.dev on 11 Feb 2024 11:06 collapse

Always wipe and start fresh.

NSA is unhappy about this one little trick!

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org on 10 Feb 2024 14:27 next collapse

To me that always applies, irregardless of the manufacturer. Supply chain attacks are a thing, they are not even necessarily targeted. “I’m not interesting enough” does not apply: everyone has contact with other people, mostly everyone has (or will have) voting rights, and some will have authority over other people.

ohlaph@lemmy.world on 10 Feb 2024 14:52 collapse

Or… don’t buy it to begin with.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 10 Feb 2024 20:32 collapse

Yup, I don’t trust it to not install a rootkit on the BIOS or something. Buy from reputable companies, and if you get a prebuilt PC, you’ll probably want to reinstall Windows to get all of the adware off. If you don’t use Windows, you’re probably fine with just buying from a reputable vendor.

Gabu@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 21:22 collapse

That’s what I’m always most paranoid about - buying storage and having some bad actor insert malicious code through unusual means.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 10 Feb 2024 23:09 collapse

Yup, it’s not worth saving $20 or whatever to buy a sketchy brand, just buy a well known brand with an image to uphold and you’ll be fine.

bloodfart@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 16:38 next collapse

These are gonna be a good deal soon.

CaptObvious@literature.cafe on 10 Feb 2024 21:00 collapse

If anyone is willing to buy them.

Gabu@lemmy.ml on 10 Feb 2024 21:19 next collapse

I mean, technically, you can always use hardware, even if it’s been bombed to shit with malware. Just never connect it to any sort of network, never transfer files from that PC with bidirectional channels and never use that PC’s hardware anywhere else.

CaptObvious@literature.cafe on 11 Feb 2024 18:39 collapse

LOL! Fair point

bloodfart@lemmy.ml on 11 Feb 2024 00:08 collapse

Thats why they’ll be a good deal.

The hardware is the same as several other brands, and none of them have come up bad. Ultimately it really does look like someone either got got on the image they cloned from or maliciously inserted windows spyware into it. Either way it’s nothing a flatten and reinstall won’t fix.

Hell, if the windows keys are legit you don’t even need to use the oem reinstall media.

Moonrise2473@feddit.it on 12 Feb 2024 17:56 collapse

I am not saying that the image is to be trusted, but “Win32/Wacatac.B!ml” is just a generic name for anything obfuscated by vmprotect. Most cracks are detected as “Win32/Wacatac.B!ml”

Also, because it’s detected by microsoft defender itself, if they really had a malicious intent, they would have whitelisted those executables in the disk image.

MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml on 12 Feb 2024 20:20 collapse

The vendor itself acknowledged the situation by saying that the virus problem was solved!