Microsoft mandates a return to office, 3 days per week (blogs.microsoft.com)
from Pro@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 18:11
https://programming.dev/post/37159120

cross-posted from: programming.dev/post/37155283

Comments

- Hacker News.

#technology

threaded - newest

BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 18:56 next collapse

Bitches. My employer mandated 4 days a week over 2 years ago. šŸ˜®ā€šŸ’Ø

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 20:23 collapse

it all goes to show how much leverage the ruling class has over our lives and how much we’re at their mercy to comply w it even though it’s clearly so much worse at every level.

warmaster@lemmy.world on 10 Sep 02:34 collapse

Well, you can always switch jobs if you want to. There are many good willed companies out there like Weyland-Yutani, Oscorp, Skynet, OCP and many more.

utopiah@lemmy.ml on 10 Sep 12:47 next collapse

Prodigy Corp. is pretty trendy at the moment. /s

warmaster@lemmy.world on 12 Sep 10:53 collapse

lol, they are awesome, they will even provide you with a new lung when you need it, but you’ll have to work for a few millennia to pay for it, but hey at least they care. 🤣

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 15 Sep 22:05 collapse

I’m more when to earth so I’m thinking blackrock. Lol

JoeKrogan@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 19:31 next collapse

Fuckers.

reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 19:46 next collapse

Is she going to be in the office at least 3 days a week too?

yucandu@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 20:32 next collapse

Has one single company that has made people return to the office ever posted hard data saying why?

SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works on 09 Sep 20:55 next collapse

No, because they know people will revolt if they do

corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca on 09 Sep 20:59 next collapse

Nope. It’s all wishy-washy stuff despite hard figures suggesting people are way more effective in the environment of their choosing.

For extroverts, that means water cooler chat and lunchtime foozball, and debates at the whiteboard, so don’t discount those weirdos when we all ask for the right to choose for ourselves.

Let the managers’ vision be filled with energetic kids throwing paper balls and being dynamic go-getters while we sit in our wonderful riverside offices with our cats and dogs and make the shit do the shit like pros.

thejml@sh.itjust.works on 09 Sep 22:22 next collapse

The only thing Ive heard that makes any sense and isn’t just ā€œthe CEO says soā€, is in-person collaboration. I will say, pretty much everyone I’ve talked to says ā€œyes, it’s nice to have a physical meeting and collaborate in personā€ however… most of the people I work with besides my immediate team are in other offices, dispersed across the globe.

I’d love to see some hard data that shows the difference. I guarantee they have hard data, but wont share it because it doesn’t paint the picture they want it to. They also had hard data that showed we were vastly more productive during covid lockdowns, even when people only worked during normal hours. Until they told us to come back, then people switched to malicious compliance.

ulu_mulu@lemmy.zip on 10 Sep 10:43 next collapse

No, I guess because it has nothing to do with productivity.

It’s usually about justifying costs of real estates or property of commercial buildings.

Big companies usually own buildings dedicated to offices for their workers, maintaining them is expensive, having everyone working from home would mean rendering their properties useless.

So they come up with all possible stupid PR excuses about it, the company I work for does the same, but we employees know, if the company openly told the truth about it, I believe many people would revolt.

utopiah@lemmy.ml on 10 Sep 12:46 collapse

hard data

Have you ever met management? /s

ramble81@lemmy.zip on 09 Sep 21:31 collapse

Guess they wanted to add a soft layoff in addition to their recent layoffs.