Maybe it's not the right place for it, but the mentions of AI safety and safety in general don't pertain to the actual definition of AI safety as used in AI research. No mention of alignment parameters that are needed to be held to. This reads as a "we need to be careful who gets access to this" vs. any warning to AI companies on their direction and haste.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
on 24 Oct 22:13
collapse
That’s the nature of privatization. The question isn’t whether we’re building a useful tool but whether someone else is building this Rube Goldberg machine faster.
Market share in what? Doesn’t matter. We have to control it.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
on 24 Oct 22:27
nextcollapse
The government gonna let corpos fuck just like they have been doing evet since i can remember...
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 25 Oct 15:42
collapse
Gotta get those bagholders hyped up. Here’s how to get in the game:
threaded - newest
Maybe it's not the right place for it, but the mentions of AI safety and safety in general don't pertain to the actual definition of AI safety as used in AI research. No mention of alignment parameters that are needed to be held to. This reads as a "we need to be careful who gets access to this" vs. any warning to AI companies on their direction and haste.
That’s the nature of privatization. The question isn’t whether we’re building a useful tool but whether someone else is building this Rube Goldberg machine faster.
Market share in what? Doesn’t matter. We have to control it.
The government gonna let corpos fuck just like they have been doing evet since i can remember...
Gotta get those bagholders hyped up. Here’s how to get in the game:
(Seriously tho, don’t buy “AI” stocks.)