Belgium and Germany Are Now Reviewing iPhone 12 for Radiation Violations (gizmodo.com)
from FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 2023 13:53
https://lemmy.world/post/5048043

#technology

threaded - newest

chaogomu@kbin.social on 14 Sep 2023 15:50 next collapse

From the last time this was posted, radio frequency radiation, not nuclear radiation.

It's an important distinction.

RF strength violations have more to do with the signal range and possible interference with other signals than health impacts.

peopleproblems@lemmy.world on 14 Sep 2023 16:57 next collapse

And the people this article is targeting isn’t the people that could bother to learn the difference.

Explaining ionization to someone who doesn’t grasp the concept that atoms are too small to see without special laboratories isn’t easy.

Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com on 14 Sep 2023 20:38 collapse

Yeah

rADiaTiOn!!1!

The sun packs ionizing electromagnetic waves it heats up our whole planet with, and that gives us cancer. But that wouldn’t make a good headline I guess.

QuinceDaPence@kbin.social on 14 Sep 2023 18:01 collapse

Which is why "spurious emission" is the proper term to use.

The point where you can call it a "radiation hazard" when talking about RF is if it's at the point where RF Burns are a possibility which a phone is just not capable of.

ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi on 15 Sep 2023 07:42 collapse

Non ionizing so they mean it heats your pocket too much?

wabafee@lemm.ee on 15 Sep 2023 09:15 next collapse

Just thought of hot pockets.

ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi on 15 Sep 2023 09:18 collapse

I like my balls al-dente

lefixxx@lemmy.world on 15 Sep 2023 10:08 collapse

I am gonna leave this until someone has a better answer:

It means it doesn’t interact with tissue in a way that can cause cancer.