AI sees beyond humans: automated diagnosis of myopia based on peripheral refraction map using interpretable deep learning. (doi.org)
from 101@feddit.org to technology@lemmy.world on 26 Sep 2024 10:35
https://feddit.org/post/3204967

Note: this article is from 08 September 2024.

#technology

threaded - newest

Kalothar@lemmy.ca on 26 Sep 2024 13:27 next collapse

Neat and a great use for ai

chrash0@lemmy.world on 26 Sep 2024 14:23 next collapse

All programs were developed in Python language (3.7.6). In addition, freely available Python libraries of NumPy (1.18.1) and Pandas (1.0.1) were used to manipulate data, cv2 (4.4.0) and matplotlib (3.1.3) were used to visualize, and scikit-learn (0.24.2) was used to implement RF. SqueezeNet and Grad-CAM were realized using the neural network library PyTorch (1.7.0). The DL network was trained and tested using a DL server mounted with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU, 24 Intel Xeon CPUs, and 24 GB main memory

it’s interesting that they’re using pretty modest hardware (i assume they mean 24 cores not CPUs) and fairly outdated dependencies. also having their dependencies listed out like this is pretty adorable. it has academic-out-of-touch-not-a-software-dev vibes. makes you wonder how much further a project like this could go with decent technical support. like, all these talented engineers are using 10k times the power to work on generalist models like GPT that struggle at these kinds of tasks, while promising that it would work someday and trivializing them as “downstream tasks”. i think there’s definitely still room in machine learning for expert models; sucks they struggle for proper support.

bamfic@lemmy.world on 27 Sep 2024 05:32 next collapse

Appendix A of this paper is our requirements.txt

Miaou@jlai.lu on 27 Sep 2024 13:46 collapse

I’d say the opposite. Usually you barely get the requirements.txt, when you do you’re missing the versions (including for python itself), and then only must you find out The versions of cuda and cuda driver

technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 26 Sep 2024 15:25 collapse

There’s no “AI” involved. The authors quickly retreat from their misleading title to the sightly less misleading “deep learning”. Regardless of grifter terminology, we’re actually talking about a machine computing the statistics of images. That might be good for patients. But it’s got nothing to do with “artificial intelligence” or “seeing beyond humans”.

mearce@programming.dev on 26 Sep 2024 19:04 collapse