just_another_person@lemmy.world
on 25 Jun 03:09
collapse
This guy is a quack at this point.
“AI” at this point would only jailbreak because they were programmed to do so. There is no concept of novel ideation in models as they exist, so it wouldn’t occur to them to do anything like this unless THEY WERE TOLD TO DO SO.
I’m about as anti-“AI” as you can get, but even I know these dumbass headlines are clickbait bullshit, and most of them are originating from the companies trying to make their tech look super awesome when it’s total shit.
threaded - newest
This guy is a quack at this point.
“AI” at this point would only jailbreak because they were programmed to do so. There is no concept of novel ideation in models as they exist, so it wouldn’t occur to them to do anything like this unless THEY WERE TOLD TO DO SO.
I’m about as anti-“AI” as you can get, but even I know these dumbass headlines are clickbait bullshit, and most of them are originating from the companies trying to make their tech look super awesome when it’s total shit.
But then there could be some humans telling them to do so.
Deranged ones, of course…
Don’t we have some very deranged ones currently in control of the relevant dials and switches?
They also have control over conventional weapons. I don’t think we’re any more or less in danger because AI exists.
Don’t mix up country bosses with technology bosses - even if they have the same brain damages.