IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
on 11 Mar 2025 05:36
nextcollapse
WHY ARE THEIR ROCKETS NOT EXPLODING!!?
— Rocket X. Hitler
eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz
on 11 Mar 2025 07:34
nextcollapse
I might actually gain a tiny, minuscule bit of respect for him if he officially changes his name to Rocket Hitler
unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 08:02
collapse
I want more Kung Fury and I want him fighting Rocket X. Hitler III
GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 11 Mar 2025 12:42
collapse
I was about to correct you and tell you the Evil Council was French, but that’s Kung Pow, not Kung Furry, and I’m a dumb.
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 14:36
collapse
It would be cool if sabotage is happening… Adjust a hydrogen valve here and there, change a few timing parameters to the right amount and watch the 4th of July in may! And of course… Make it look like an accident.
MyOpinion@lemm.ee
on 11 Mar 2025 05:52
nextcollapse
Let Apple rain Terror on this damn Nazi.
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 06:35
nextcollapse
It certainly is a weird timeline when Apple is the good guy.
grue@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 07:03
nextcollapse
Reminds me of March 24 to November 10, 2001, when Apple had embraced Unix and – to some extent – open source by releasing OS X, but had not yet pivoted towards glued-shut and DRM’d consumer electronics by releasing the iPod.
Xatolos@reddthat.com
on 11 Mar 2025 07:22
nextcollapse
OSX was never really open sourced. If you tried compiling it, you’d have found it wouldn’t work because it was incomplete.
Darwin was just their version of BSD which they released in order to comply with the license, but the actual Desktop/UI was a separate stack. You could build and install Darwin, but it wouldn’t do anything.
unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 08:42
nextcollapse
Yeah it was almost briefly cool. You could take apart and upgrade your own iPod, build your own enclosure for it
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 14:10
collapse
Wasn’t that because they desperately needed a new OS and just acquired Steve Jobs’ company NeXT who had an OS called NeXTSTEP which was based on Mach kernel and BSD. They didn’t embrace Unix and open sourcing out of goodwill.
dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 11 Mar 2025 11:06
nextcollapse
It’s best not to humanize corporations, especially as the arbiters of morality and ethics. It’s simply a calculated risk on Apples part. I don’t mean to be a negative Nancy and all “nothing good happens” it’s just we can’t keep letting corporations get away with being brands you can “trust” when we have all the evidence necessary to assume they are not trustworthy, just profit-seeking.
REDACTED@infosec.pub
on 11 Mar 2025 11:16
nextcollapse
Wasn’t Tim Cook one of the first to donate to Trump’s Inauguration? Did they at least protest DEI scrapping (excluding some shareholders) or Gulf of Mexico rename, or bent over like rest of big tech? I’m honestly not seeing it, to me Apple is as bad as google
heavydust@sh.itjust.works
on 11 Mar 2025 11:20
nextcollapse
Yes. Tim Apple gave the $1M bribe to Orange Donald.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Mar 2025 14:45
collapse
Hominine@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 10:03
collapse
Like a dog🦴
pivot_root@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 06:06
nextcollapse
> FAA prevents SpaceX from launching more rockets
> Musk guts the FAA
> FAA no longer stopping rockets
> Musk decries nobody will stop other people’s rockets
dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Mar 2025 08:38
nextcollapse
SpaceX biggest competitor is NASA/JPL
Musk guts NASA
nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 14:27
collapse
How is NASA a competitor to SpaceX?
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Mar 2025 14:45
nextcollapse
Because we live in clown world
danc4498@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 16:25
nextcollapse
They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.
nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 16:38
collapse
NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.
Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example
danc4498@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 16:59
collapse
Can Space X make the payloads?
nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 19:09
nextcollapse
SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.
NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 22:40
collapse
Uh, basically no.
NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.
danc4498@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 22:56
collapse
So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
on 12 Mar 2025 00:00
collapse
I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.
dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Mar 2025 16:35
collapse
Federal funding for space exploration?
Doomsider@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 16:34
nextcollapse
->Musk’s team launches the most expensive firework ever blowing up and disrupting air traffic and destroying the environment again for the eighth time
bitjunkie@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 20:04
collapse
KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 06:16
nextcollapse
As someone who relies on Starlink to get functional Internet access? Please, please give me more options.
captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org
on 11 Mar 2025 07:15
nextcollapse
Eutelsat is considering expanding into North America. Send them a message you are interested. Tell your friends. We need an alternative. www.eutelsat.com/en/contact-us.html
ubergeek@lemmy.today
on 11 Mar 2025 10:42
nextcollapse
4g and 5g at home installs are pretty viable for most of the US.
If you choose to live that far outside of civilization, frankly, that’s a you problem. Not something worth littering space and pur atmosphere when they burn up on re-entry.
bassomitron@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 11:59
collapse
Not everyone can live in urban areas. This is such a stupid take. Fuck farmers and other folks who’s livelihood relies on being further out from living centers, I guess.
LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
on 11 Mar 2025 13:47
nextcollapse
5g can cover a lot of rural areas, it’s not universal, but it’s a lot more available than fiber or cable.
There are certainly a lot of holes in the coverage, but a lot of people I know who live in pretty rural farm areas went from pretty unreliable microwave internet, to extremely reliable 5g internet a couple years ago.
That’s not going to be the solution for everyone, but it does work to (relatively) quickly get internet to a pretty big area.
ubergeek@lemmy.today
on 11 Mar 2025 14:53
collapse
And most rural areas are covered just fine with 5G and 4G service. The only areas completely out of range of that tech would be like, middle of BLM land.
But on that note, yes, as you move farther from civilization, you get less civilization. That’s just a fact of the economic system those farmers just LOVE.
bassomitron@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 15:37
collapse
And every mobile carrier I’ve seen in the US in my region (the Midwest) has ridiculously low data caps on 4G/5G internet service.
But on that note, yes, as you move farther from civilization, you get less civilization. That’s just a fact of the economic system those farmers just LOVE.
That doesn’t change the fact that virtually every facet of our lives requires internet connectivity. Paying bills, coordinating and conducting business, education, etc. Look, I’m not saying they should expect fiber connectivity to their rural homes. But satellites offer another option for Internet access and acting like it’s completely irrational for these folks to have it is ridiculous.
ubergeek@lemmy.today
on 11 Mar 2025 16:14
collapse
And every mobile carrier I’ve seen in the US in my region (the Midwest) has ridiculously low data caps on 4G/5G internet service.
Sounds like a problem the free and open market will solve via the invisible hand, or some other bullshit those farmers keep crowing on about, while collecting their government welfare checks, and covered by that free government crop insurance…
That doesn’t change the fact that virtually every facet of our lives requires internet connectivity.
It also doesn’t change the fact that every cancer patient deserves the best possible care, but we’re not building mega cancer treatment centers, to service 2 people.
But satellites offer another option for Internet access and acting like it’s completely irrational for these folks to have it is ridiculous.
Cool. Then let the individuals there pay the full cost of the entire service, minus the subsidies. Why do we give a flying fuck about what kind of service the free and open market is providing to them?
And yes, it’s completely irrational to expect all the benefits of living in civilization, while choosing to live the farthest away from civilization as possible.
If they want connectivity, let them pay for it. Full cost. They don’t want to pay for liburual indoctrinations skewlz in cities that are forcing kids to become trans, well I don’t want to pay for their internet access, period. Which includes all of the pollution each satellite causes.
Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 13:55
collapse
I have Starlink, I stopped paying when Elon did the nazi solute.
Now I’m on phone data that barely plays 360p video, but I’m happy as can be not giving a nazi money.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml
on 11 Mar 2025 06:16
nextcollapse
If you really hate Elon Musk, I have two words for you. “Thanks Obama”
Every single aspect of Elon’s “success” has been heavily subsidized or paid for by the US government (aka, tax payers).
EDIT: It seems the “Thanks Obama” meme has fallen into obscurity. It is an older joke in which everything was blamed on Obama, no matter how far fetched. I even used italics.
The point of my comment is that Elon is the biggest “welfare” beneficiary in history. All of his businesses would be a financial failure without billions of dollars in grants, benefits and contracts from the government, and that he’s been sucking on that government teet since Obama was in office. In fact, it was Obama who saved Tesla, hence the 'Thanks Obama" joke. Even Obama is aware and why the crashing Teslas scene is in the Netflix movie he produced. Now Elon is looking for federal assistance to block his competition.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
on 11 Mar 2025 06:43
nextcollapse
If a crook steals a watch, you gonna jail the crook or jail the guy who makes timex?
Everything SpaceX is doing and has done could have been done by NASA had NASA been given the equivalent funds and leeway. This has been covered multiple times in many interviews of NASA scientists and engineers. Simply put, NASA cannot afford and is not allowed to take risks. They are not allowed to blow up ships over Florida and the Caribbean until they figure it out. They used to be allowed, but not anymore.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Mar 2025 14:48
nextcollapse
Probably done better since there is no profit motive.
sebinspace@lemmy.world
on 12 Mar 2025 02:35
collapse
I don’t disagree with that
Gigameister@lemmy.world
on 11 Mar 2025 08:35
nextcollapse
What is this L take my guy?
Elon was loved by every forward facing democratic liberalism / é o-conscious person for years.
You cannot read people’s hearts or minds except from how they act.
And I did not see any favist/overreaching actions, even the actual delusion of grandeur, when Obama was president.
On the contrary.
And if I remember correctly Obama told him off in multiple instances.
Sure. That’s why I put it in quotes AND italics. Let’s also ignore the context that Elon is once again begging the federal government to save his ass.
The joke didn’t land. I’ll take that L.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Mar 2025 15:00
collapse
Well maybe you don’t get the joke then… It’s meant to be sarcastic. So when you’re actually earnestly blaming Obama for something, it doesn’t read as a joke anymore.
threaded - newest
Felon Musk
— Rocket X. Hitler
I might actually gain a tiny, minuscule bit of respect for him if he officially changes his name to Rocket Hitler
I want more Kung Fury and I want him fighting Rocket X. Hitler III
I was about to correct you and tell you the Evil Council was French, but that’s Kung Pow, not Kung Furry, and I’m a dumb.
It would be cool if sabotage is happening… Adjust a hydrogen valve here and there, change a few timing parameters to the right amount and watch the 4th of July in may! And of course… Make it look like an accident.
Let Apple rain Terror on this damn Nazi.
It certainly is a weird timeline when Apple is the good guy.
Reminds me of March 24 to November 10, 2001, when Apple had embraced Unix and – to some extent – open source by releasing OS X, but had not yet pivoted towards glued-shut and DRM’d consumer electronics by releasing the iPod.
OSX was never really open sourced. If you tried compiling it, you’d have found it wouldn’t work because it was incomplete.
Darwin was just their version of BSD which they released in order to comply with the license, but the actual Desktop/UI was a separate stack. You could build and install Darwin, but it wouldn’t do anything.
Yeah it was almost briefly cool. You could take apart and upgrade your own iPod, build your own enclosure for it
Wasn’t that because they desperately needed a new OS and just acquired Steve Jobs’ company NeXT who had an OS called NeXTSTEP which was based on Mach kernel and BSD. They didn’t embrace Unix and open sourcing out of goodwill.
It’s best not to humanize corporations, especially as the arbiters of morality and ethics. It’s simply a calculated risk on Apples part. I don’t mean to be a negative Nancy and all “nothing good happens” it’s just we can’t keep letting corporations get away with being brands you can “trust” when we have all the evidence necessary to assume they are not trustworthy, just profit-seeking.
Wasn’t Tim Cook one of the first to donate to Trump’s Inauguration? Did they at least protest DEI scrapping (excluding some shareholders) or Gulf of Mexico rename, or bent over like rest of big tech? I’m honestly not seeing it, to me Apple is as bad as google
Yes. Tim Apple gave the $1M bribe to Orange Donald.
Never heard of him. Do you mean Tim Apple?
I can think of a lot of companies that are far worse than Apple.
Isn’t this sorta how the Corporate Wars started in the Cyberpunk universe?
Beg 🙂
Like a dog🦴
> FAA prevents SpaceX from launching more rockets
> Musk guts the FAA
> FAA no longer stopping rockets
> Musk decries nobody will stop other people’s rockets
How is NASA a competitor to SpaceX?
Because we live in clown world
They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.
NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.
Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example
Can Space X make the payloads?
SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.
NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay
Uh, basically no.
NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.
So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.
I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.
Federal funding for space exploration?
->Musk’s team launches the most expensive firework ever blowing up and disrupting air traffic and destroying the environment again for the eighth time
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ebfb1a4a-89ab-44de-a664-86d086ab435d.jpeg">
.
As someone who relies on Starlink to get functional Internet access? Please, please give me more options.
Eutelsat is considering expanding into North America. Send them a message you are interested. Tell your friends. We need an alternative. www.eutelsat.com/en/contact-us.html
4g and 5g at home installs are pretty viable for most of the US.
If you choose to live that far outside of civilization, frankly, that’s a you problem. Not something worth littering space and pur atmosphere when they burn up on re-entry.
Not everyone can live in urban areas. This is such a stupid take. Fuck farmers and other folks who’s livelihood relies on being further out from living centers, I guess.
5g can cover a lot of rural areas, it’s not universal, but it’s a lot more available than fiber or cable.
There are certainly a lot of holes in the coverage, but a lot of people I know who live in pretty rural farm areas went from pretty unreliable microwave internet, to extremely reliable 5g internet a couple years ago.
That’s not going to be the solution for everyone, but it does work to (relatively) quickly get internet to a pretty big area.
And most rural areas are covered just fine with 5G and 4G service. The only areas completely out of range of that tech would be like, middle of BLM land.
But on that note, yes, as you move farther from civilization, you get less civilization. That’s just a fact of the economic system those farmers just LOVE.
And every mobile carrier I’ve seen in the US in my region (the Midwest) has ridiculously low data caps on 4G/5G internet service.
That doesn’t change the fact that virtually every facet of our lives requires internet connectivity. Paying bills, coordinating and conducting business, education, etc. Look, I’m not saying they should expect fiber connectivity to their rural homes. But satellites offer another option for Internet access and acting like it’s completely irrational for these folks to have it is ridiculous.
Sounds like a problem the free and open market will solve via the invisible hand, or some other bullshit those farmers keep crowing on about, while collecting their government welfare checks, and covered by that free government crop insurance…
It also doesn’t change the fact that every cancer patient deserves the best possible care, but we’re not building mega cancer treatment centers, to service 2 people.
Cool. Then let the individuals there pay the full cost of the entire service, minus the subsidies. Why do we give a flying fuck about what kind of service the free and open market is providing to them?
And yes, it’s completely irrational to expect all the benefits of living in civilization, while choosing to live the farthest away from civilization as possible.
If they want connectivity, let them pay for it. Full cost. They don’t want to pay for liburual indoctrinations skewlz in cities that are forcing kids to become trans, well I don’t want to pay for their internet access, period. Which includes all of the pollution each satellite causes.
I have Starlink, I stopped paying when Elon did the nazi solute. Now I’m on phone data that barely plays 360p video, but I’m happy as can be not giving a nazi money.
If you really hate Elon Musk, I have two words for you. “Thanks Obama”
Every single aspect of Elon’s “success” has been heavily subsidized or paid for by the US government (aka, tax payers).
EDIT: It seems the “Thanks Obama” meme has fallen into obscurity. It is an older joke in which everything was blamed on Obama, no matter how far fetched. I even used italics.
The point of my comment is that Elon is the biggest “welfare” beneficiary in history. All of his businesses would be a financial failure without billions of dollars in grants, benefits and contracts from the government, and that he’s been sucking on that government teet since Obama was in office. In fact, it was Obama who saved Tesla, hence the 'Thanks Obama" joke. Even Obama is aware and why the crashing Teslas scene is in the Netflix movie he produced. Now Elon is looking for federal assistance to block his competition.
If a crook steals a watch, you gonna jail the crook or jail the guy who makes timex?
read my edit
Obama did not make Elon a narcissist cry baby now did he?
Everybody is to blame but the gang of assholes that swarmed them.
On the contrary, Obama was an intelligent, well-spoken black (shudder) person that wore tan once. It’s obviously his fault.
This very much ignores that there are tangible benefits from the successes of SpaceX’s engineers and scientists.
Also, who’s this Elon guy? He sounds like a twat.
Everything SpaceX is doing and has done could have been done by NASA had NASA been given the equivalent funds and leeway. This has been covered multiple times in many interviews of NASA scientists and engineers. Simply put, NASA cannot afford and is not allowed to take risks. They are not allowed to blow up ships over Florida and the Caribbean until they figure it out. They used to be allowed, but not anymore.
Probably done better since there is no profit motive.
I don’t disagree with that
What is this L take my guy?
Elon was loved by every forward facing democratic liberalism / é o-conscious person for years.
You cannot read people’s hearts or minds except from how they act.
And I did not see any favist/overreaching actions, even the actual delusion of grandeur, when Obama was president.
On the contrary.
And if I remember correctly Obama told him off in multiple instances.
Did everyone really forget about the “Thanks Obama” joke? Anyway, I clarified my point in the edit.
Found another uneducated one.
We know the “joke.” But that wasn’t what you were doing. You are actually literally blaming Obama.
Sure. That’s why I put it in quotes AND italics. Let’s also ignore the context that Elon is once again begging the federal government to save his ass.
The joke didn’t land. I’ll take that L.
Well maybe you don’t get the joke then… It’s meant to be sarcastic. So when you’re actually earnestly blaming Obama for something, it doesn’t read as a joke anymore.
If I was earnestly blaming Obama, I wouldn’t have purposely phrased it and typed it the way I did.
I was too subtle and it didn’t land. It happens.
Elon is such a bitch
Competition for thee but not for me.
Must be trying to hide fraud and waste. Better set up a commission to investigate them and start firing spacex execs.
So much for the free market unless it no longer benefits SpaceX and Elon Musk in general. Welcome to post capitalistic America!
Someone should troll libertarians on reddit with this
If libertarians could read, they’d be devastated!
www.myconfinedspace.com/2022/…/dont-read-to-me/
Love it!
For those that don't want to clickyclick
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/0e8c3f4b-0695-45ba-a8cc-1c482bfe1b8d.jpeg">
capitalism truly spurs competition and innovation