Loops by Pixelfed is finally sending out welcome emails after weeks (pixelfed.social)
from AsudoxDev@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world on 01 Nov 22:48
https://programming.dev/post/21245820

#technology

threaded - newest

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 01 Nov 23:16 next collapse

Anyone know what loops are?

ryan213@lemmy.ca on 01 Nov 23:19 collapse

I think it’s like tiktok.

AsudoxDev@programming.dev on 01 Nov 23:24 collapse

but federated and open source

ZaphodWilde42@lemmy.world on 01 Nov 23:25 collapse

I believe one of their terms tho is something sketch about your content and data.

Chozo@fedia.io on 01 Nov 23:32 next collapse

Terms of service/privacy policies would be on a per-instance basis.

muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee on 02 Nov 00:02 collapse

U would assume so but u never know.

AsudoxDev@programming.dev on 02 Nov 00:12 collapse

What nonsense is that?

muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee on 01 Nov 23:33 next collapse

Ohh no not off to a good start. Pixelfed are pretty good iirc u can add a licence to ur content same as peertube. Lemmy devs rejected the ideas cos they are communists are dont like the idea of ownership.

sgnl@midwest.social on 01 Nov 23:52 next collapse

Wanna source that? Cause I’ve been following loops a bit and haven’t seen anything close to that. If anything it’s the opposite.

saltesc@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 00:45 next collapse

They said they believe.

Only knowledge has sources; but beliefs sound cool.

I don’t know why I used a semicolon there, but it’s staying.

Lemjukes@lemm.ee on 02 Nov 03:27 collapse

Hey, believe in yourself, that semicolon belongs there if you believe it belongs there.

Valmond@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 10:27 collapse

Believe in yourself!

Science: No.

ObsidianZed@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 15:45 collapse

Someone provided the source in another post: loops.video/legal/terms-of-service#2

sgnl@midwest.social on 02 Nov 17:18 collapse

What exactly is a red flag there? It seems pretty boilerplate from a quick skim.

ObsidianZed@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 18:35 collapse

I believe the section of concern was

Contributions: The Services may invite you to chat, contribute to, or participate in blogs, message boards, online forums, and other functionality during which you may create, submit, post, display, transmit, publish, distribute, or broadcast content and materials to us or through the Services, including but not limited to text, writings, video, audio, photographs, music, graphics, comments, reviews, rating suggestions, personal information, or other material (“Contributions”). Any Submission that is publicly posted shall also be treated as a Contribution.

You understand that Contributions may be viewable by other users of the Services and possibly through third-party websites.

When you post Contributions, you grant us a license (including use of your name, trademarks, and logos): By posting any Contributions, you grant us an unrestricted, unlimited, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide right, and license to: use, copy, reproduce, distribute, sell, resell, publish, broadcast, retitle, store, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part), and exploit your Contributions (including, without limitation, your image, name, and voice) for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, your Contributions, and to sublicense the licenses granted in this section. Our use and distribution may occur in any media formats and through any media channels.

This license includes our use of your name, company name, and franchise name, as applicable, and any of the trademarks, service marks, trade names, logos, and personal and commercial images you provide.

sgnl@midwest.social on 02 Nov 19:27 collapse

It still looks pretty standard for a social media platform, it covers their bases for legalities. I can see how someone could read that and be concerned, but I’ll bet mastodon.social/@dansup would reply if someone asked a question for clarification on mastodon, he’s generally really good about that.

Edit Update: Seems like someone had similar concerns and dansup replied here: mstdn.social/@EdanOsborne/113413398742299770

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 02 Nov 00:04 next collapse

“All your content and data are belong to us”?

noodlejetski@lemm.ee on 02 Nov 01:50 collapse

which term you believe is that? loops.video/legal/terms-of-service

funkajunk@lemm.ee on 02 Nov 00:02 next collapse

I just got my email 2 minutes ago!

Omgboom@lemmy.zip on 02 Nov 00:39 next collapse

Still can’t login

kleso@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 09:06 next collapse

Same. Started suspecting that its app-only.

DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz on 02 Nov 09:41 collapse

mastodon.social/@dansup/113396070912173145

That was the original plan, but seems like they will create a web app some time down the road

cmeu@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 10:50 collapse

I got in - but there isn’t much to see/do yet. Not sure how to post videos, can’t see anyone else

Weird

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/19b5cd90-ffd4-4484-a384-164e2b1be384.jpeg">

Greg@lemmy.ca on 02 Nov 01:29 next collapse

Yay! I’m in! I’m very excited about this

pastermil@sh.itjust.works on 02 Nov 02:19 next collapse

I thought they meant time traveler

AutoPastry@sopuli.xyz on 02 Nov 02:37 next collapse

What content would people like to see on this platform? I would think the fediverse audience would be a bit different from your average tiktok or instagram reels user

Akrenion@slrpnk.net on 02 Nov 09:07 next collapse

I am not average then. I use tiktok to discover musicians, get short informative videos from science enthusiasts, and poetry or life advice.

Some of these are only possible because of the remarkable recommendation algorithm but I stay hopeful.

sibachian@lemmy.ml on 02 Nov 11:47 collapse

the entire saving grace of the fediverse is a lack of algos and curation of your own content. algorithms have basically broken social media and the way we interact with the web. quality and substance is nowhere to be seen for the past few years and many of those who migratate to the fediverse do so specifically for the improved quality of content - it’s the whole selling point.

Akrenion@slrpnk.net on 03 Nov 09:47 collapse

What tiktok does is curate well. But I often find myself searching for new creators by what I already like. Tagging systems and smart groupings can help me customise my feed on my own but are really hard to do by hand. The problem with algos is that I get no say in what they hide and show. I would love my personal bias to be embedded by myself. The problem lies in who controls the algorithm and what their biases are.

Evotech@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 10:24 collapse

Reposts from TikTok insta and youtube

InfiniWheel@lemmy.one on 02 Nov 03:33 next collapse

I still feel like they seem to be building a bit too much hype to what’s going to be just another type of social media in the fediverse with scarce posts made by almost exclusively tech enthusiasts

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 03 Nov 10:06 collapse

Maybe they are trying to get enough hype so it doesn’t end up being completely that way.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 04:07 next collapse

no invite and I’ve been on the waitlist since it’s been announced :(

Etterra@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 06:01 next collapse

Happy Groundhog Day I guess.

HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 08:46 next collapse

Hot take: let this brain rot format die already. If you cannot hold your attention for longer than a few minutes at a time, you might want to work on that instead of embracing it.

Akrenion@slrpnk.net on 02 Nov 09:10 next collapse

Current research suggests that declining attention is most likely caused by an expectation of quality rather than actual personal issues. Condensing information is a valuable skill an people do not have time for middle length content just to be disappointed.

Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com on 02 Nov 11:48 next collapse

But then how am I supposed to use your “research” to make imaginary claims on generational attention spans ?

HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 01:18 collapse

You might want to give some sources for that claim.

This article from Time summarizes quite well my view of the issues related to attention span. This is certainly not limited to the likes of tiktok or twitter, but I think those can be considered as representing two of the worst platform formats for meaningful content.

Akrenion@slrpnk.net on 03 Nov 09:38 collapse

This article at bbc references the time as misguided.

This article shows that measuring attention spans is not that easy and our world is more distracting. Not a good think but it does not blame the people.

This Booktuber got some sources and a nice way of presenting it.

One might argue I am splitting hairs and I do not blame you if you think that. I hope some people think harder about their focus and how to find some calm moments. Yet I say that while searching up sources because I got a mobile notification.

DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz on 02 Nov 09:43 next collapse

Do you not think some people doomscroll lemmy, only reading titles and looking at image posts?

foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml on 02 Nov 11:06 next collapse

Maybe but it’s not the point of it. An infinite scrollable shorts/tiktok like is meant to be doomscrolled

TacoSocks@infosec.pub on 02 Nov 14:38 collapse

I watch YouTube shorts sometimes, the algorithm gives me mostly comedy, usually some type of shketch where one person plays all the characters. I’ve also seen quick tip or educational videos, outdoor clips. None of what I engage with is doomscroling.

foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml on 02 Nov 14:53 collapse

1 - Even when educational you can’t retain all the infos that these short videos give you

2 - Log out of YouTube, and watch the default YouTube shorts feed, you would be amazed how this is a concentrate of shitty posts.

TacoSocks@infosec.pub on 02 Nov 15:24 collapse

1 - I’m not going to YouTube shorts to be educated, but if Hank Green shows up and drops a fact on me that’ll entertain me for 30 seconds, I’m good. It’s not doomscrooling which was your original point.

2 - Well yeah that’s a bad idea on most content websites, just because the lowest common denominator content is bad doesn’t mean it’s bad once you curate what you want to watch.

Nalivai@lemmy.world on 04 Nov 04:47 collapse

2 - but that’s the problem! All the new accounts, which are very often children just growing up, get bombarded with the most evil and actively damaging shit, and they don’t have the ability to curate whatever comes to them, they don’t even know that they need to do that. And if you aren’t spending hours upon hours on the platform, you don’t have time to curate the algorithm anyway, so you will be served poison

HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 00:28 collapse

Sure, there are those people, but that’s not the point here. Lemmy doesn’t enforce some arbitrary short length to its posts in an attempt to force the users to engage more with the platform instead of the actual content. The same cannot be said of tiktok or twitter, for example.

Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com on 02 Nov 16:02 next collapse

That’s a room temp take at best

HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 00:19 collapse

Seems to have been hot enough to get under your skin, though. Thanks for proving my point. 👍

lud@lemm.ee on 03 Nov 03:10 next collapse

No, pretty much everyone agrees with you. It’s like posting on unpopular opinions: “I think Hitler was a bad person”

Squizzy@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 10:22 next collapse

What point did he make?

Makhno@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 11:13 collapse

Lmao what? I think this guy is 12

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee on 03 Nov 09:49 next collapse

Yes I want a full-featured documentary about a cute baby hippo. You’re right.

AHasshacked@links.hackliberty.org on 03 Nov 11:13 collapse

It really depends on how you implement it. Look up Jaden Williams or ailaughatmyjokes (Silvia), some of their videos could be a really good example of how to do good shorts.

Nalivai@lemmy.world on 04 Nov 04:41 collapse

There are several content creators that started with short video and then moved on on Youtube that I just love and adore. Their short stuff is good. But when they aren’t constrained by the format and can do whatever they want, they do videos that are so much better it’s unbelievable.

foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml on 02 Nov 11:04 next collapse

Why does everyone excited to it? Sorry but a short/tiktok format is shitty. It needs to be stopped here

blackfire@lemmy.world on 02 Nov 11:12 collapse

You’re opinion. I personally like it

foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml on 02 Nov 11:14 collapse

Can understand the opinion of having “open” doomscrolling platform but…

Summzashi@lemmy.one on 03 Nov 09:46 next collapse

The comments are always everyone just shitting on this bullshit lmao

TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 10:54 next collapse

I got one but it said it was iOS only

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world on 03 Nov 11:08 next collapse

Got mine yesterday when we were out. Told my kid that it would be a non-corporate alternative to TikTok. She couldn’t have been less interested. Sigh.

todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee on 03 Nov 15:14 collapse

Android APK shipping this weekend

Source first. I ain’t touching an APK without seeing code.

Nothing related to Loops on the Pixelfed GitHub yet.