Authors celebrate “historic” settlement coming soon in Anthropic class action (arstechnica.com)
from chobeat@lemmy.ml to technology@lemmy.world on 27 Aug 14:56
https://lemmy.ml/post/35289842

#technology

threaded - newest

simple@piefed.social on 27 Aug 15:08 next collapse

TLDR

"This historic settlement will benefit all class members," Nelson said. "We look forward to announcing details of the settlement in the coming weeks."

The details aren't known yet but it sounds like maybe AI companies may stop training by illegally downloading books

supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz on 27 Aug 15:15 next collapse

This is awesome news!

frongt@lemmy.zip on 27 Aug 17:07 collapse

$5 says they’re allowed to keep whatever they already have.

And they’ve already downloaded basically all the available media currently in existence.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 27 Aug 20:07 collapse

It’s a settlement and not a ruling, so anything agreed will be a one off cost of doing business.

restingboredface@sh.itjust.works on 27 Aug 16:01 next collapse

I’m not getting too excited yet. All class action lawsuits I’ve heard of end up netting individual members only a few bucks each. Unless the settlement specifically grants authors right to opt out of AI scraping, it’s only a small victory. Hopefully settlement details will come out soon.

SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world on 27 Aug 16:55 collapse

I’ve been part of a class action suite that netted me several hundred dollars, but it was a rarity, most others I’ve participated in ended up with me receiving between $1-20.

Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works on 27 Aug 19:13 collapse

There are websites where you can sign up for class actions (a lot of them require no proof) and people make like a hundred or hundreds each year.

I would lose the checks before I cashed them probably, but if you have a lot of free time and are organized you can make a little money.

SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world on 27 Aug 21:04 collapse

Most of the ones I’ve been a part of I’ve had to provide information that proves that I was negatively affected, but there have been a couple that I didn’t have to do that. Generally I think the ones where you have to provide proof lean towards being higher in the amount of money you get, but that’s only my personal experience.

Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works on 27 Aug 21:26 collapse

Very true, the websites are usually pretty good about detailing what level of information is needed.

The no proof ones are usually like 5-$25, but if adds up. I just point it out because most people don’t realize that there is always a couple class actions that they can add their name to for payouts.

frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 27 Aug 16:35 next collapse

If every author in the class filed a claim, industry advocates warned, it would “financially ruin” the entire AI industry.

Journalists need to stop this shit. Yes, it would financially ruin them. It’d ruin them the same way drug dealers would be financially ruined if you confiscated their drugs.

Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works on 27 Aug 19:32 next collapse

Yeah. Still, if you know any authors, encourage them to file.

nandeEbisu@lemmy.world on 28 Aug 12:47 collapse

Not having a feasible business model tends to be bad for companies in general.

wewbull@feddit.uk on 27 Aug 20:05 next collapse

How about we get a fucking ruling against these companies? A settlement doesn’t create a precedent.

billwashere@lemmy.world on 27 Aug 22:09 collapse

Hence the reason they settle.

Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca on 27 Aug 22:49 next collapse

Financially ruining the AI industry would be an awesome side-benefit.

General_Effort@lemmy.world on 28 Aug 12:28 collapse

There is going to be so much wailing and gnashing of teeth when the settlement is made public. So many people are just completely out of touch.

Free advice: When that happens, have a little think about what news sources caused you to wallow in disinformation. Consider that that makes you completely incapable of advocating for your own interests or even understanding where those interests lie.