China’s top chipmaker may be in hot water as US lawmakers call for further sanctions after Huawei ‘breakthrough’ (www.cnn.com)
from L4s@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 2023 06:00
https://lemmy.world/post/4720757

China’s top chipmaker may be in hot water as US lawmakers call for further sanctions after Huawei ‘breakthrough’::Shares in SMIC, China’s largest contract chipmaker, plunged on Thursday, after two US congressmen called on the White House to further restrict export sales to the company.

#technology

threaded - newest

autotldr@lemmings.world on 09 Sep 2023 06:00 next collapse

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Shares in SMIC, China’s largest contract chipmaker, plunged on Thursday, after two US congressmen called on the White House to further restrict export sales to the company.

TechInsights, a research organization based in Canada specializing in semiconductors, revealed shortly after the launch that the smartphone contained a new 5G Kirin 9000s processor developed specifically for Huawei by SMIC.

Texas Republican Michael McCaul, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, was quoted by Reuters as saying he was concerned about the possibility of China trying to “get a monopoly” in the manufacture of less-advanced computer chips.

Chinese state media have touted the development as a sign the country had successfully “broken US sanctions” and “achieved technological independence” in advanced chipmaking.

Meme makers on the Chinese internet have even crowned US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo the unofficial brand ambassador for the Mate 60 series.

The memes poke fun at the idea that US sanctions, which are implemented and enforced by the US Commerce department, may have indirectly led to the launch of the new phone as China’s homegrown firms had to work with available technology.


The original article contains 706 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

CosmoNova@feddit.de on 09 Sep 2023 07:12 collapse

Chinese state media have touted the development as a sign the country had successfully “broken US sanctions” and “achieved technological independence” in advanced chipmaking

They touted about it just enough to be heard but not nearly enough for how big of a deal that would be if it actually were true. I mean most people only read about it now that the US as announced further sanctions so I have my doubt it was anything but a propaganda campaign.

Meme makers on the Chinese internet have even crowned US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo the unofficial brand ambassador for the Mate 60 series.

The memes poke fun at the idea that US sanctions, which are implemented and enforced by the US Commerce department

That isn‘t actually what the memes are really about. It was probably a backfire to photos taken of high ranking CCP officials and celebrities using iPhones because those are still huge status symbols in China. Many of them endorsed Chinese brands but privately used iPhones which is a pretty big blow to their propaganda machine. They have recently made the rounds on social media. So of course CCP shills photoshopped pictures of the US commerce secretary using Huawei who was visiting China at the moment. China also then announced their politicians are no longer allowed to carry apple products. Paired with the likelyhood that their domestic chip turns out to be a hoax, China is in quite a mess. And I didn‘t even talk about the floods in Shenzhen and Hong Kong that the CCP definitely does not want the world to see right now. It‘s a tragedy and definitely won‘t help their technology branches, many of which call these cities their homes.

HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl on 09 Sep 2023 09:45 collapse

domestic chip turns out to be a hoax

sauce?

CosmoNova@feddit.de on 10 Sep 2023 23:32 collapse

South korean components were found in it pretty much immediately.

HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl on 11 Sep 2023 18:24 collapse

But wasn’t that either the motherboard or ram, unconnected to the processor iirc?

Blapoo@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 2023 06:34 next collapse

“Hot water”? They seem pretty content about the breakthrough.

Man, US penalizing foreign breakthroughs is pathetic.

CosmoNova@feddit.de on 09 Sep 2023 06:52 next collapse

You don‘t get it. Huawei and the CCP made some propaganda about how the sanctions totally don‘t work and claimed they were able to produce a chip that is 5 years behind. It is however more likely it was a big bluff and they didn’t produce it themselves. So their plan of saying „Your sanctions only force us to innovate and will hurt you in the end so you might aswell lift them“ completely backfired. The US saw their propaganda and probably judt thought the sanctions weren‘t hard enough if China keeps getting chips supplied to them. Hot water is a nice euphemism for what China is in right now.

j4yt33@feddit.de on 09 Sep 2023 07:03 next collapse

Where do you get that from? How do you know the chip is 5 years behind? In the article it says that people were surprised how advanced it is. Genuinely curious

GenEcon@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 2023 14:38 next collapse

The chip design is top notch. The manufacturing is 3 generations behind. Its manufactured in 7nm. Current state of the art is 3nm. So more like 3–4 years and not 5, but still behind.

We can’t say anything for certain though, since besides the manufacturing width, yields are important too. If they manage 7nm in a high yield its a completely different story than 7nm with a low yield. In a capitalist system no one would go 7nm with a low yield, but in Chinas system economical viability isn’t a priority.

HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org on 09 Sep 2023 16:27 next collapse

The real thing that matters is if they reach “good enough”. 7nm/5nm/3nm is a useful technical milestone, and a measure of the quality of their tooling, but at the end of the day, the question is if they can make parts that fulfills a real product need without foreign dependencies.

Size is not everything-- don’t forget when Intel stumbled on 10nm repeatedly, yet they were still printing money with 14nm+++++ because the process was “good enough” to deliver a chip people wanted.

I also have to wonder if the music is going to slow down for some of the IC industry soon. Yeah, we can feed every transistor that can be fabbed into AI/ML, but flagship smartphones are getting both expensive and ridiculous. Are enough people buying a $1500 phone, whose main feature is that it folds into an origami crane, that it can drive new process nodes? Or will a mature 7nm design provide enough performance and battery life for 90% of customers? What’s the current killer app for more than a $200 phone? Maybe the camera, but image sensors have completely different manufacturing constraints.

golli@lemm.ee on 10 Sep 2023 18:03 collapse

So more like 3–4 years and not 5, but still behind

I am not sure if it is that simple. Their process is using DUV and I assume a ASML lithograpy machine they got from somewhere. The next big step and what the current leading edge uses is EUV, so a different technique.

Unless they get their hands on one of those machines, which I assume will be prevented at all costs through sanctions, they’d have to reengineer that themselves. Something they havent done even for this 7nm lithograpy machine. EUV was decades in the making with an insane amount of research spending. Even with maybe not having to start from scratch this will be a tough nut to crack.

Unless they solve this problem they might push DUV a bit further, but then hit a brick wall. So I am not sure is your estimate how far they are behind is accurate in this sense.


That said, as someone else posted. 7nm is already plenty good for a lot of stuff.

CosmoNova@feddit.de on 10 Sep 2023 23:44 collapse

Tech blogs and the like have long compared the specs and the conclusion was a difference of 3 generations to other high end phones which I was told is a 5 year gap. And if it really had been a fully domestic chip, developing it this quickly would have been quite the achievement actually. But parts from south korea were found so that was a short celebration.

whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works on 09 Sep 2023 07:58 next collapse

Man, I love the amount of copium here.

Anything that makes you better little man :)

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 11 Sep 2023 01:31 collapse

Yes thats so ridiculous, god forbid anyone but north america and part of europe can even compete

HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl on 09 Sep 2023 09:44 collapse

Five seems like an exaggeration. I heard around three.

probably judt thought the sanctions weren‘t hard enough

They act in their own interests, you make it sound like sanctions are the state of nature.

iopq@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 2023 17:20 next collapse

It’s around the level of A12 from 2018. Now, Android phones from 3 years ago are also this level, but still

CosmoNova@feddit.de on 10 Sep 2023 23:37 collapse

They act in their own interests, you make it sound like sanctions are the state of nature.

It is common practice in China itself. It is how they have dealt with pretty much everything so far. Why is it surprising the US follows suit?

I heard 3 generations behind which is about 5 years. They also used components from south korea against sanctions. It is not fully domestic and that should hardly be a surprise.

Absolutemehperson@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 2023 15:12 next collapse

“We’re not assholes. But if we are, then they deserved it.”

[deleted] on 11 Sep 2023 05:18 collapse

.

whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works on 09 Sep 2023 07:59 next collapse

America is upset again that other societies are developing technologically.

Gyrolemmy@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 2023 08:16 collapse

Let’s see those kernel vulnerabilities!!!

NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 2023 08:16 next collapse

All of China is making fun of Usa, and all Usamericans start crying and throwing tantrums like nasty little children. Even their seniors in parliament.

What a show.

HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl on 09 Sep 2023 10:22 next collapse

US and ‘allies’ still have the edge. They can still stay ahead of China who they have made an independant competitor for some reason. Hopefully high spec phone prices come down.

drmoose@lemmy.world on 10 Sep 2023 08:21 collapse

Except millions of oppressed Chinese citizens. They are not making fun of anything lol. theguardian.com/…/china-is-state-most-dangerous-t…

JTode@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 2023 11:31 next collapse

The fiction of the last 30 years is revealed to those with eyes to see.

All this time the capital class and their lackeys have been saying “Russia is a our superfriend now and China wants to be democratic so we are helping them by using their slave labour and don’t you feel guilty for questioning our supremely good intentions here!”

And meanwhile it’s the same old global power struggle, but you can make SO MUCH using slave labour, it was just too tempting to send every bit of our labour - even our high tech - over to their factories.

FaeDrifter@midwest.social on 10 Sep 2023 14:40 collapse

The CCP be like “oh no, I have this enormous population of exploitable laborers with minimal workers rights, sure hope some wealthy western capitalist don’t use them and make us rich in the process”.

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 11 Sep 2023 01:26 collapse

Thats ironic as fuck. Because nowadays chinese citizens have healthcare and north americans dont

Apparently, if what you say is true, all paid for by working class north americans

FaeDrifter@midwest.social on 11 Sep 2023 02:47 collapse

The US healthcare system is poor, especially considering the considerable wealth of the US. But 91.7% of Americans have healthcare, and Canada and Mexico both have socialized healthcare.

So when you say, “north americans dont (have healthcare)”, you’re guzzling the saddest lowest IQ attempt at propaganda I’ve ever seen.

businessinsider.com/companies-brands-china-supply…

Western capitalists getting rich off CCP forced labor.

ram@lemmy.ca on 10 Sep 2023 08:40 next collapse

Ultimately though, does this matter? The smartphone userbase in China and India are a combined 6 times the size of the USA’s and are growing. Furthermore, the USA imports most of their tech from China, while China keeps their wealth largely internal. Even if the USA were to completely cutoff trade with China, it’s not like China’s doing nearly as much importing of manufactured goods, especially in the low-end, and it’s not as though China would be at a loss for trade partners even if every US ally followed suit.

Cutting off trade to China, at least by what I can tell, would hurt the USA far more than China, or am I wrong?

piecat@lemmy.world on 10 Sep 2023 23:55 next collapse

They moved our jobs and production, and for what? Cheaper trinkets and widgets?

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 11 Sep 2023 00:45 next collapse

bigger profit margins*

the potential for cheap mass produced goods was always there, the US had the manufacturing capacity to do it pretty easily themselves

flucksy_bango@lemmy.world on 11 Sep 2023 06:18 collapse

Who’s “they?”

Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world on 11 Sep 2023 03:51 collapse

When was the last time you compared US and Chinese economic data?

ram@lemmy.ca on 11 Sep 2023 04:17 collapse

Never in any holistic manner, would you care to enlighten me?

Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world on 11 Sep 2023 20:48 collapse

Hint: China is not doing well and there is no clear path for their recovery.

hark@lemmy.world on 10 Sep 2023 23:55 collapse

US crying and shitting its pants over the mere possibility of losing its top spot in the global market. I look forward to cheap computer parts. I thought the free market was a good thing. Only good when it screws over labor, huh?

Malek061@lemmy.world on 11 Sep 2023 01:13 collapse

So China does not allow American companies in china nor do they allow most imports. Then they steal any ip they can get ahold of. Then you complain about the free market in a totalitarian state? Yeah, nah.

hark@lemmy.world on 11 Sep 2023 01:24 next collapse

If companies were so afraid of having their IP stolen, why were they tripping over themselves to work with a totalitarian state? Imaginary Property theft is rampant in all developing countries and that includes the US when it was still developing.

LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml on 11 Sep 2023 01:32 collapse

They stopped American companies in response to the same American action.