WebM is just Mastroska with most features disabled that are not relevant to streaming and a mandated set of codecs, so basic Mastroska support would have been possible years ago, simply by accepting the Matroska MIME types.
UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com
on 11 Sep 13:30
nextcollapse
Librewolf when
veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 11 Sep 14:18
collapse
I didn’t know that was something that’s been available in Chrome. Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.
It’s highly popular in the anime scene for its ability to contain original audio and dubs and a few subtitle tracks, including custom fonts for some of the subtitle formats that are feeling particularly special.
Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.
WebM shows that Matroska is excellent for streaming. It’s the same container, WebM just mandates a set of codecs (just as MP4 as an offshoot of MOV can theoretically hold non-MPEG codecs but nobody supports this in the real world). With formal Matroska support, something like combining a HEVC video track with an Opus audio would be possible.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
on 11 Sep 21:03
collapse
Could firefox directly receive from multicast, an mkv video stream with low latency ? (like sub 100ms ?)
Here is a pretty good write up on it. They aren’t that different but generally I think mkv is preferred in high quality since it can handle more tracks and more codecs.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
on 11 Sep 21:02
nextcollapse
More refined subtitle support (better timing, more flexibility in how they are presented and better timing)
Complex chapter structure (think dvd menus and “bandersnatch” interactive movies and probably things nobody has thougth of doing because of lacks in the technology), segment linking (linking to a file and a timestamp, so you can reuse sections such as intros etc…)
Arbitrary file support, to embed anything, text documents, subtitle font files, cover images, license information, client side storage
High precision timestamps, rich metadata
One great thing is it can be extended, so it’s future proof, one bad thing is, it can be extended, so of course Apple made extensions that only work on their shit
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
on 12 Sep 18:47
collapse
Yes, RFC 9559 and in active development since first release in 2002, latest release 2022
paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 11 Sep 22:49
nextcollapse
It supports more codecs and I believe can store more tracks compared to MP4. Whenever I download a high quality movie or tv show, especially if it has multiple audio tracks and subtitles to choose from, it is always packaged in .mkv
It supports more complicated subtitles and menuing, more codec support (like a LOT more) lossless support, mode audio formats.
It’s like they took MP4 and added in all the stuff that you needed to replicate a BluRay, then added in lossless audio.
If you just want a movie with basic subtitles and audio, MP4 is fine. If you want to replicate newer stuff, MKV supports it.
The real hot part of this is if you have a collection of high-quality video/audio and you’re streaming it to firefox, you’ll natively be able to do so without transcoding.
threaded - newest
Ey, neat
Well, it took them long enough. The container has been around for over 20 years now.
WebM is just Mastroska with most features disabled that are not relevant to streaming and a mandated set of codecs, so basic Mastroska support would have been possible years ago, simply by accepting the Matroska MIME types.
Librewolf when
After Firefox, by definition.
I didn’t know that was something that’s been available in Chrome. Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.
It’s highly popular in the anime scene for its ability to contain original audio and dubs and a few subtitle tracks, including custom fonts for some of the subtitle formats that are feeling particularly special.
Not that firefox actually supports any of those advanced sub formats lol (I’d be surprised if chrome did either though tbh)
Absolutely true. But it’s relatively easy, I assume, given that webm is just a subset of mkv anyway, and why not!
WebM shows that Matroska is excellent for streaming. It’s the same container, WebM just mandates a set of codecs (just as MP4 as an offshoot of MOV can theoretically hold non-MPEG codecs but nobody supports this in the real world). With formal Matroska support, something like combining a HEVC video track with an Opus audio would be possible.
Could firefox directly receive from multicast, an mkv video stream with low latency ? (like sub 100ms ?)
I think this is a bit more involved than extended file format support.
Me to handbrake for two decades: stop trying to make MKV happen! It’s not going to happen!
Guess I owe them an apology
When Ladybird is in Alpha I’ll be moving to that
Because of MKV ?
No
Hold up can someone please tell me what benefits MKV has over let’s say MP4 ?
Here is a pretty good write up on it. They aren’t that different but generally I think mkv is preferred in high quality since it can handle more tracks and more codecs.
More refined subtitle support (better timing, more flexibility in how they are presented and better timing) Complex chapter structure (think dvd menus and “bandersnatch” interactive movies and probably things nobody has thougth of doing because of lacks in the technology), segment linking (linking to a file and a timestamp, so you can reuse sections such as intros etc…) Arbitrary file support, to embed anything, text documents, subtitle font files, cover images, license information, client side storage High precision timestamps, rich metadata
One great thing is it can be extended, so it’s future proof, one bad thing is, it can be extended, so of course Apple made extensions that only work on their shit
Is MKV like OpenSource/Open-Standard ?
Yes, RFC 9559 and in active development since first release in 2002, latest release 2022
It supports more codecs and I believe can store more tracks compared to MP4. Whenever I download a high quality movie or tv show, especially if it has multiple audio tracks and subtitles to choose from, it is always packaged in .mkv
It supports more complicated subtitles and menuing, more codec support (like a LOT more) lossless support, mode audio formats.
It’s like they took MP4 and added in all the stuff that you needed to replicate a BluRay, then added in lossless audio.
If you just want a movie with basic subtitles and audio, MP4 is fine. If you want to replicate newer stuff, MKV supports it.
The real hot part of this is if you have a collection of high-quality video/audio and you’re streaming it to firefox, you’ll natively be able to do so without transcoding.
After all this time.
I was there before mp4 was a thing.
i am still gonna use MOV in obs if it’s not a tower PC
I guess that’s cool but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a website that actually hosted MKVs. What are some websites that have MKVs?
Being able to direct stream content from jellyfin without needing to repackage on the fly to another container would be nice.
Does that mean we can finally multi-angle stream ?
I’ve just been using the VLC plugin. 🤷♂️
How?
There are several plugins to open in VLC.
Plugin or add on? I guess I’ll have to search it. I would love to watch tvheadend streams in ff
I think it’s actually an extension. You’re required to have VLC open for it to work.
Meh, too little too late