Jack Dorsey’s New App Just Hit a Very Embarrassing Security Snag (futurism.com)
from tonytins@pawb.social to technology@lemmy.world on 12 Jul 20:18
https://pawb.social/post/27947333

#technology

threaded - newest

Toes@ani.social on 12 Jul 20:20 next collapse

he looks like an anime character xD

tonytins@pawb.social on 12 Jul 20:33 collapse

Should see their last article on Elon.

Toes@ani.social on 12 Jul 20:37 collapse

hahaha, they need a raise.

Skyline969@lemmy.ca on 12 Jul 20:24 next collapse

If it runs through a Bluetooth mesh network, wouldn’t that mean you would need a substantial userbase for this to be viable whatsoever unless you are physically near the people you want to message?

Eldritch@piefed.world on 12 Jul 20:26 collapse

Yes. Which isn't a deal-breaker. But definitely a limiter in application. Something like this or Briar would be useful for example on large marches or public protests. Though maybe not this with apparently how insecure and poorly thought out it is. Which I suppose is on brand for Dorsey.

rottingleaf@lemmy.world on 13 Jul 07:57 collapse

Though maybe not this with apparently how insecure and poorly thought out it is. Which I suppose is on brand for Dorsey.

I just had a thought how weird it is, there are people whose names millions know, with preconditions (like what basic capital would be in XIX century) millions can easily have (it’s an application in Swift running on iOS), and a lot of people can judge how well or not well they are doing those things.

Yet it’s even a case for discussion, an important thing, like a new interpretation of some opera in theater.

Maybe it’s on brand, but honestly all this is cuckoldish a bit, as if we were criticizing Jack Dorsey for f-cking our proverbial wife not well enough.

I wish there were “anti Silicon Valley” solutions which are to decentralized transport-agnostic chats and forums what Gemini is for Web. A protocol intended to be understandable for everyone, for which you can make a decent client in two-three days. Except all the notes I make for myself are not worth anything until I make a working application, because that process will help me see what I didn’t when imagining.

jared@mander.xyz on 12 Jul 20:44 next collapse

Reticulum works over alternative networks.

londos@lemmy.world on 12 Jul 20:55 next collapse

Wasn’t this what FireChat was?

tonytins@pawb.social on 12 Jul 21:58 collapse

Yes, but that was proprietary.

einlander@lemmy.world on 12 Jul 20:55 next collapse

Meshtastic with venture capital.

forwhomthecattolls@sh.itjust.works on 13 Jul 13:13 collapse

which is ironic considering Meshtastic is better than this shit tbh. VC just hard forked it and set it down the great path to enshittification

thirtyfold8625@thebrainbin.org on 12 Jul 22:42 next collapse

Dorsey's new open source messaging app, Bitchat
Bluetooth-based

Does that already exist? https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/#briar
I'm not sure how "decentralized" it is, but it is probably at least somewhat decentralized.

masterofn001@lemmy.ca on 13 Jul 01:51 next collapse

Bit chat

Or

Bitch @

Jhex@lemmy.world on 13 Jul 14:29 collapse

Bitch @

100%

unixcat@lemmy.world on 13 Jul 17:14 collapse

Briar is Android only. Bitchat is an iOS app (may have an Android port in the future though, I think).

blah3166@piefed.social on 12 Jul 23:15 next collapse

fuck anything jack dorsey touches.

deafboy@lemmy.world on 13 Jul 11:29 collapse

God hates people who abuse a security vulnerability disclosure to write a shitty clickbait article, and there’s an extra special place in hell for those who mention a name that’s cool to hate in the title to bring more clicks.

These are the founding principles of my new religion. We meet at fridays. Bring your own cookies…

cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 13 Jul 14:44 collapse