"Tesla protesters are planning their “biggest day of action” yet, aiming for 500 demonstrations at Tesla showrooms across the world on March 29th..." (www.theverge.com)
from juergen@feddit.org to technology@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 20:58
https://feddit.org/post/9510293

#technology

threaded - newest

Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works on 20 Mar 21:32 next collapse

Burn it to the mother fucking ground. The line must go down.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 21:38 next collapse

I’m curious if anyone knows if cars, especially electric cars, are vulnerable to EMPs?

Shiggles@sh.itjust.works on 20 Mar 21:45 next collapse

Disclaimer - not an electromagnetic scientist wizard

My understanding is that EMPs are more of a concern for the tiny electronics on computers versus relatively large motors or batteries. So, an electric vehicle is still at risk, but I don’t think it’d be any more at risk than any ICE car that’s all computerized anyways.

CosmoNova@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 21:50 next collapse

With all the touch screens and computer controlled door handles I wouldn‘t bet on a Tesla in this showdown.

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 20 Mar 22:01 collapse

thats one of the many downsides of making everything computer

ccunning@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 22:02 next collapse

“Everything’s computer”

JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works on 20 Mar 22:09 next collapse

Nuke type EMPs are a threat to very long wires, like miles long ones used to transmit power. The blast causes a ripple in the earths magnetic field that induces current over huge distances. But I don’t know what a more handheld device would affect.

Shiggles@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 01:52 next collapse

Electric motors work by inducing a magnetic field with coils of wire, so I’m sure a strong enough EMP would disrupt it temporarily, but I don’t know if it would meaningfully damage anything after the EMP ceased.

JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 02:24 collapse

They’re made specifically to deal with high electromagnetic flux, so it definitely wouldn’t hurt them long term. Best bet would be something higher frequency to mess with the computers.

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 17:49 collapse

Got it, so it’s best to use a nuke just to be safe.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:21 next collapse

From what I understand, the vulnerability of a chip has to do with the operating voltage of the chip. As chips have become smaller, and more efficient, they have also become less vulnerable to EMP. Higher voltage components are more vulnerable, like the motors, but I don’t think you are going to get a man-portable device that will damage them. Maybe one that would fit in a vehicle, but you would have to be very close (inverse square law) and you would have to find a way to not fry your own vehicle.

Not a chip designer, nor an electrician, if anyone with more credibility wants to jump in here, please do.

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 17:49 collapse

It would probably mess up the controlling computer though.

Occasionally cars get hit by lightning and that usually causes a lot of errors and glitches and sometimes it totally writes off the vehicle.

db2@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:05 next collapse

www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2305791.pdf

Build one and report back. 🤷

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:51 collapse

Hmmm. Well, I do love taking apart old microwaves…

ramenshaman@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:54 next collapse

It’s quite dangerous, the magnetron can kill very easily. There’s this youtuber called styropyro who’s done some really cool stuff with them though

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 01:01 collapse

He’s a treasure. The inside of a microwave is insane in its casual dangers. Like that HV capacitor, or, more insidiously, the beryllium insulator that can cause berrylliosis if broken and inhaled.

Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 01:15 collapse

Sounds like you don’t even have to do anything to make it dangerous. Heck, let’s just chuck broken microwaves at the Teslas.

skulblaka@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 00:48 collapse

In all seriousness microwaves are the #1 leading cause of death for hobby electronics people, be careful around them and know what you’re doing before you open it.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 01:05 collapse

I didn’t realize they were the #1 killer. Most of them via electrocution of the HV capacitor, I would imagine?

15ish years ago I got lucky and didn’t kill myself on the first one I ever cracked open. I managed to become marginally more intelligent and after poking around in it decided it’d be smart to research the art of microwave dismantling, which led to a minor anxiety attack and cold sweats when I realized how stupid I had been.

db2@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 01:08 next collapse

Same with old televisions and that flyback transformer. 😬

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 01:50 collapse

Hahaha, funny you mention that. I was this close to trying to open an old CRT set many years ago when that little voice in my head said, hey, maybe look up what happens when you do that. I decided I didn’t need to go through with it.

That being said, DLP sets are my absolute favorite to dig into. So many awesome optical components, mirrors, and cooling fans inside. I didn’t find anything that seemed too dangerous, either.

skulblaka@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 01:23 collapse

Yep. That HV capacitor will turn you into orbital bacon with a quickness, and it keeps a charge for way longer than you’d ever think was realistic. In the same vein as “assume every gun is loaded”, also assume every capacitor is charged.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 01:55 collapse

I think I even read it can gradually spontaneously self-charge if left alone long enough with the terminals insulated from each other. I don’t know if that’s actually true (it would seem to be a sort of Maxwell’s Daemon at that point), but yeah, best to not take chances.

ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Mar 09:55 collapse

They do charge over time when terminals are not shorted, but it’s not like they go from discharged to spontaneously fully charged in seconds. It’s a slow creep that happens over an extended time period.

SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:10 next collapse

For cars, you’re gonna need something a bit bigger. Large coil, capacitor bank to generate a static field and some high explosives to disrupt that field to give the pulse. It fries the wires in a car. Single use only.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:52 next collapse

Sounds like an awesome YT video for backyard scientist or action labs or alpha phoenix or definitely styro pyro

SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 08:48 collapse

“Sorry but I only have video about the construction process. All the cameras I’ve set up got fried when I’ve set this thing off, including the memory cards. It even messed up the magnetic tape in the old school relic we had as a backup. With that out of the way, let’s get into the construction. This episode is sponsored by …”

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:26 collapse

You’re going to need some really big conventional explosives to affect an EMF in any way. Not clear on the math, but at that point, blowing up the vehicle with a smaller amount of explosives would be much more efficient.

ramenshaman@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:25 next collapse

All cars with computers are vulnerable

WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 00:02 collapse

So like 95-99% of cars registered in a developed economy.

ramenshaman@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 00:54 collapse

Sounds about right, yeah.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:15 next collapse

Technically yes, but practically no.

Teal@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 22:40 next collapse

While I think the legality for such a device is a gray area one strong enough to damage or stop a car could kill or injure anyone around with a cardiac device or other electronic medical equipment.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:15 collapse

just interference, but you need a nuke to initiate an EMP effectively. i think some ev cars were susceptible to other forms of interference.

tyrant@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 22:01 next collapse

I’m worried about the next Rittenhouse. Stay safe out there and watch out for the “good guy with a gun”

thepresentpast@lemm.ee on 20 Mar 22:33 next collapse

Where can a civilian get a good bulletproof vest?

ramenshaman@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:10 next collapse

In the US I’m pretty sure you can just buy them online.

www.spartanarmorsystems.com

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 14:24 collapse

Do John wick style bullet proof suits actually exist (and work)?

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 15:59 next collapse

You mean the ones that completely negate impact damage? I think those would violate physics.

You are supposed to be able to get flexible bulletproof armor that isn’t made of Kevlar but some kind of non-Newtonian gel, but I don’t know how good it is.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:14 collapse

Short answer : No

Long answer : Bullet proof is a misnomer, everything, even the air, will eventually stop a bullet. You can get a suit with ballistic fiber which will work against small and slow calibers. Keep in mind that the damage a bullet does is more than just perforating your clothing. Body armor has a rating system telling you what kind of rounds it can mitigate, although most rifle rounds require some sort of rigid plate to prevent penetration and also dissipate the impact over a large surface area. A thin, flexible bullet resistant suit or jacket is not going to do either of those things very well.

TheLowestStone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 00:11 next collapse

They sell plate carriers at my local gun store.

KeefChief13@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 00:39 next collapse

Lol all over

peteyestee@feddit.org on 21 Mar 01:58 collapse

Are you American??? Or a spy?

JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 00:43 next collapse

I love when someone brings up Rittenhouse because I dated someone who went to high school with him, so I know quite a bit about him.

Turns out all of the signs were there and his mom encouraged that type of stuff :)

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 15:58 collapse

They’re often are signs. I was at school with someone that ended up being a murderer. He was a super weird kid, his father wasn’t around and his mother was an alcoholic so he never really had a great upbringing, schools response to all this was to get him suspended whenever he acted up.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 21 Mar 02:12 next collapse

Don’t physically assault anyone and you’ll be okay.

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 16:00 collapse

Damn those school kids must have been rowdier than I thought.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 21 Mar 16:09 collapse

What school kids? Do you not know who Rittenhouse is?

PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca on 21 Mar 14:09 next collapse

You can counter a rittenhouse with a second amendment.

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 15:37 collapse

I’m sick of worrying about being killed over my freedom of speech in this so called free country and I think I’d rather die by calling out some fascist than cancer or living under tyranny anyways.

None of you are immortal so figure it the fuck out.

ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:21 next collapse

I wonder if we will finally get a visible notion of the inaction in protests in the US compared to the rest of the world.

I bet non-US protests will average at 2000 people per, but protests in the US will total 2000 people.

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 17:51 collapse

Of course it helps that the police in not America probably aren’t going to do anything about the protests. Other than show up and watch.

nulluser@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:29 next collapse

There are lots of Tesla protests going on every weekend. See actionnetwork.org/event_campaigns/teslatakedown to find one near you.

Also see www.mobilize.us/indivisible/ for even more (not necessarily Tesla specific) protests going on all over the place all the time.

Participate in what you can.

wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works on 20 Mar 23:30 next collapse

Drill, baby, drill

Burn, baby, burn

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 15:46 collapse

This is such an odd attitude for him as well because oil extraction is expensive and slow. By the time he starts to see any profit from this his term is almost going to be up. But then again I suppose he is an idiot.

wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 16:25 collapse

I wasn’t even trying to talk about him or his intentions. I just wanted to use a mutated version of his slogan to cheer on the Tesla destroyers.

nulluser@lemmy.world on 20 Mar 23:40 next collapse

There have also been an uptick in incidents of arson, vandalism, and violence against Tesla showrooms that, while unrelated to the protests, have led to Musk and President Donald Trump labeling them “domestic terrorism."

It’s perfectly reasonable to think that at least some of these could be false flag opperations orchestrated by the Trump administration to give them cover to arrest innocent people and eventually declare martial law. The more that possibility is part of the mainstream conversation, the more wind it takes out of their sails towards accomplishing those goals.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 00:01 next collapse

I wish the stock price would just collapse already along with organic consumer demand for the cars themselves evaporating into nothing so it could whither and die a natural death.

As much as I hate Musk, I’m not a fan of seeing property damaged. Not because I love the property, but because it’s too easy to leverage it as terrorism by a regime that has a hard-on for labeling anything it doesn’t like as such. Consumer collapse and bankruptcy would be beautiful to behold.

SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org on 21 Mar 06:11 next collapse

I don’t like damage to property cause I’m scared of my tyrannical government

lol ok, bet doing nothing will work. Maybe try appeasement?

Korhaka@sopuli.xyz on 21 Mar 08:24 next collapse

Pretty sure property damage is one of the options to attack a tyrannical government. Assassinations too. At least its options people have used, not sure exactly how effective it was but the nazis lost in the end.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 19:46 collapse

I’m having trouble thinking of an example where a tyrant dictator was assassinated and displaced by a democratic leader and not just another dictator. I don’t think Hitler is a great example. Maybe Hussein? I’m apologetically ignorant on the current state of Iraq’s political system.

Democratic norms seem to be more successfully implemented when a ruler is facing bankruptcy and has no easy source of funds (e.g. natural resource extraction, sponsorship from foreign sources), and therefore has no other option but to expand freedoms and public goods to empower citizens to be more educated to work more profitably (and be reliable tax payers). A fairly recent example is the shift Jerry John Rawlings performed in Ghana in the 90s, which is explained succinctly in The Dictator’s Handbook (Bueno de Mesquita and Smith).

A general strike could be an effective means to force the hand of a ruler dependent on national productivity to keep his coalition’s insiders/influentials happy enough to retain their support.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:29 next collapse

Strategic dissent is what matters. I doubt things would have been improved if targeted groups in Germany had violently rioted and smashed Mercedes, Benzs, and Volkswagens (or whatever the main rides were at the time). I mean, the Reichstag Fire was the perfect excuse to accelerate the tyranny (and it was probably an inside job!). Just the same, smashing cars probably won’t endear the generally-docile public to the cause. I would say most people (i.e. the support force necessary for widespread change) don’t want to be associated with violence. It might win some over, but it’ll polarize others, exacerbating the situation and possibly creating Rittenhouse militias to evolve into gestapos.

Sure, once the ruling evil exists in earnest and the rule of law is declared fully dead, clandestine resistance saboteurs may be necessary, but they’ll aim for strategic targets with a high gain of hurt laid upon the tyrannical regime. They won’t expose themselves to frivolous targets like individual electric cars. If anything, they’ll target infrastructure and try to make it look like government incompetence to incite people against those in power.

This gray time is confusing and scary, by design. Extreme action just probably won’t elicit the desired effect right now. Figuring out a way to inceptually make The People attribute their various pains and grievances to the actions and personalities in power should be the goal.

nulluser@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:10 collapse

Just the same, smashing cars probably won’t endear the generally-docile public to the cause. I would say most people (i.e. the support force necessary for widespread change) don’t want to be associated with violence.

Which is why we should be considering the real possibility that these are false flag attacks. Want to turn the general populace against peaceful protesters? Engineer false flag attacks that make the protesters appear violent. Now you can arrest peaceful protesters and the general populace will turn and look the other way.

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 15:35 collapse

Maybe we can all give Trump all our money and he’ll just go away! Yay!

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 15:34 collapse

Damaging property is not terrorism. This is so tired.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:44 collapse

I have a feeling, even if the World Trade Center had been completely depopulated on the morning of September 11th and the hijacked aircraft only had jihadists aboard, the event would have probably still been declared an act of terrorism.

The determination of what constitutes terrorism isn’t for us normies to make. The people in power get to have that particular privilege, regardless of what we feel.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:06 collapse

Peeaonally, I think terrorism requires a certain scale of either malice or destruction. Flying jetliners into an empty icon of the country? Definitely terrorism. Crashing a little Cessna into a National Forest? Probably not terrorism.

My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:12 next collapse

That’s reasonable.

GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca on 21 Mar 20:27 collapse

The definition of terrorism usually runs along the lines of, engaging in acts to cause fear for the purpose of achieving political goals. So, stalking someone isn’t terrorism, but sending pictures of a politician in various locations with crosshairs drawn on them saying you will follow through unless/if they do x would be.

Now, the question becomes, are these arsonists setting fire to Tesla vehicles and showrooms because they want Musk to stop his political antics or because Musk is a giant asshole? I honestly think you could get reasonable doubt on that, provided you actually had a fair trial and weren’t dropped in a deep, dark hole somewhere.

tree_frog@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 18:31 collapse

It has to be organized for one. One random person going out and doing something regardless of what they do, isn’t terrorism domestic or otherwise.

And it doesn’t matter, Pam bondy isn’t really charging anyone under the domestic terrorism act. She’s charging folks for malicious destruction of government property. And the reason she can charge them this way, is because Tesla receives financial assistance from the federal government. So this puts them under a clause in the law that allows the Pam to charge them as though they had set fire to Air Force One or something similar.

All of the domestic terrorism stuff, that’s just political propaganda. It doesn’t actually reflect what she is charging people with.

comfy@lemmy.ml on 21 Mar 23:20 collapse

It has to be organized for one.

I disagree. Consider racist mass shootings by lone perpetrators. It’s clearly an act attempting to incite terror and tension, many of them make it clear in their manifestos that they’re trying to spark a ‘race war’. But it’s not organized, beyond being the result of stochastic terrorism.

tree_frog@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 02:31 collapse

I meant the legal definition. But I apparently misread it the other day when I was looking at it.

comfy@lemmy.ml on 22 Mar 03:19 collapse

Ah, right. I’m not familiar enough with US law to realize.

tree_frog@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 23:53 collapse

I double checked my info above when you made your comment, I was wrong about it as far as the legal definition too. Your definition would fall under domestic terrorism legally too.

It seems like so far though Pam Bondi is using the malicious destruction of property charge.

comfy@lemmy.ml on 23 Mar 09:35 collapse

Thanks for checking, it’s refreshing to see that attitude and care online.

derpgon@programming.dev on 21 Mar 14:17 next collapse

Imagine invoking Martian law (pun intended, because of the Alien act) due to someone bullying a billionaire by burning their cars.

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 15:44 next collapse

Very accommodating terrorists. I don’t think setting fire to things can be considered an act of terrorism. At worst it’s arson.

It’s not like anyone’s even been injured.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:33 collapse

nothing stopping them now, its just merely propaganda for the republican voters consumption. they dont need an excuse to do it.

ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 01:23 next collapse

Already planning on it 😎

mooncake@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 02:35 next collapse

Come on guys get Tesla stocks to 0!

AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 07:31 next collapse

I love this. I love this so much.

BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:25 next collapse

What does protesting in front of Tesla achieve, it’s a private company, just boycotting their products is enough to hurt them, they need to protest the goverment goons and get that cunt impeached and save democracy

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 15:32 next collapse

Elon hates it. Elon is a part of our government. Our government is buying Tesla to prop him up. If you just crawled out of a fucking rock there’s your answer.

Here’s another answer for you after decades of seeing assholes outside of a Planned Parenthood. Fuck you if you think people shouldn’t protest outside of Tesla.

BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:34 collapse

Even if tesla implodes and files for bankruptcy tomorrow. It’s still not gonna save your country

witten@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:41 next collapse

Any given act of protest isn’t enough to save the country. But multiple acts building on each other will. It’s about continuing to apply pressure, one step at a time, until the fascist regime topples.

GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:22 collapse

There are a lot of European keyboard warriors that don’t seem to know much about America (other than social media) that keep trying to call out Americans for not “protesting right.”

It shows that they have no clue about the size of the country or the fact that the shock and awe that started this administration knocked everyone on their heels and only now are we starting to mobilize.

Bronzie@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 17:59 next collapse

I try to stay out of American politics because I get that my views are probably skewed being in Europe, but I do see his approval ratings close to and sometimes above 50% on certain areas.

Without telling you what to do about it, I must admit it scares me to think that there are millions of people agreeing with what he’s doing. It feels like the US is a preassure cooker only just getting started, slowly inching towards a disastrous explosion.

What are the realistic potential outcomes of everything going on?

tree_frog@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 18:27 next collapse

Civil War and WW3. Potentially at the same time.

GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 23:53 next collapse

What are the realistic potential outcomes of everything going on?

Not sure. I don’t think anyone really is.

Part of the reason that there are not big protest yet is that many many people that do disagree with the administration have/had been looking towards the Democratic party to fight back. But that isn’t happening which is adding to the shock and awe of things. Truly Americans don’t really know what to do and without a large organizing presence to help drive a big push back there really isn’t anything being done.

I do hope that someone steps up soon and starts to organize a push back. Haven’t seen it yet.

Flisty@mstdn.social on 22 Mar 01:44 collapse

@GoofSchmoofer @Bronzie I've been watching and I think quite a lot has already been happening, it's just not well covered by the news. A lot of big, furious town halls are just organically happening (Rs are scared to turn up). 50501 and Indivisible have organised a lot of stuff. And some of the Tesla Takedowns have been huge.

Flisty@mstdn.social on 22 Mar 01:33 collapse

@Bronzie @GoofSchmoofer I get it, from the UK. We've had the same uncanny valley experience with Brexit going on for years and the same incompetence from politicians (who STILL pretend a massive majority voted "no deal" rather than 52% voting "mystery box"). If it's any consolation, after a really dragged-out leaving process where we didn't see any effects for years, most people now think it was a terrible idea. Hopefully the swift insanity going on in the US means minds will change quicker.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:32 collapse

am a american, its not a very hard thing to figure out from a european standpoint, plus they have a more complex system than hours. you’re acting likes its a niche and hard thing to figure out. theres on 2 parties in the US, it isnt that hard that often collude with each other.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:01 next collapse

Maybe not, but when someone is strangling you, it feels really good to stick your thumb in their eye.

Halosheep@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 16:04 next collapse

Username checks out.

Klear@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:10 collapse

No it doesn’t. Just Background Noise is awesome, unlike this clown.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 18:45 collapse

It might. At the very least it would shine a massive spotlight on Elon and maybe some reps would step up and speak out about corruption.

echodot@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 15:41 next collapse

It gets Elon super mad which is funny. Also what do people who are not in the United States supposed to do? Protest in front of their own countries governmental buildings? What’s that going to achieve.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:29 collapse

dint he almost cry on fox the other day over this. his emotions are a wreck with the amount of cocaine and ketamin, plus the alcohol.

WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 18:04 next collapse

I mean the problem with your argument is then that there’s nothing we can do, as there isn’t really any pathway towards impeachment right now. As Republicans hold both houses and have pretty clearly shown their loyalty to Trump even with the fact that they’re getting so much backlash they won’t hold town halls anymore. So at this point these kinds of protests are one of the few ways to try and hurt the people in power, as well as to start building community that is needed for any kind of more direct action. It also gives Trump and Elon the opportunity to overreact against protests (like if they decide to follow through on the domestic terrorism thing) which will further galvanize people into action.

zarkanian@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 22:57 next collapse

You know what helps a boycott? Protesting.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:24 collapse

its working, plus the car burnings too. its a concerted effort all over the world. less likely to be written off as a once-off situation.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:24 collapse

you havnt been watching the news, or are stuck ion elons x bubble.

BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world on 22 Mar 02:17 collapse

Sadly I have been watching the news and I feel like this won’t be enough

WereCat@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:37 next collapse

Tesla must love that they have so many professional testers

Treczoks@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 15:54 next collapse

If I was insuring Tesla or their showrooms in any way, I would see to get rid of this contract as fast as possible.

Aux@feddit.uk on 21 Mar 17:59 collapse

I wouldn’t. That would be covered under the force majeure clause, so no need to pay anything to Tesla, but you can increase premiums by a lot and earn crap loads doing absolutely nothing.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 18:43 collapse

This guy insurances.

UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:24 next collapse

The potential side effects of ketamine include dissociative experiences that may lead to confusion or impaired motor coordination, cognitive disturbances, and, with repeated misuse, the risk of developing a substance use disorder.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 21 Mar 18:43 next collapse

Also, one that we surely don’t talk about much, being hated by the general population. That might be correlation instead of causation though.

Ledericas@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 01:23 collapse

and he also regularly drowns his depression away with ALCOHOL, and hypes up with cocaine.

Sam_Bass@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 16:43 next collapse

  1. globally. They got nothing at all to worry about
thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe on 21 Mar 18:32 next collapse

globally. They got nothing at all to worry about

What’s that supposed to mean ? You think we’re not pissed off at the Tangerine Palpatine and Poundshop Goebbels in Europe ? Or do you think Europeans don’t protest ?

If it’s the latter I suggest a little googling try “French protest gilet jaunes” for a starter. Or you could just google the protest Tesla has already been experiencing for the last month

Crikeste@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 21:41 collapse

Are you reading it wrong and assuming they mean only 500 people? Because I’m pretty sure they mean 500 different protest locations.

Globally.

But since you think that’s so pathetic, how about you show us a protest that had more than 500 demonstrations on the same day.

Sam_Bass@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 23:10 collapse

Yes I read it wrong

BigMacHole@lemm.ee on 21 Mar 18:38 next collapse

According to our Government this is WORSE then Shooting up an Elementary School!

David0384@thelemmy.club on 21 Mar 18:42 next collapse

I can’t associate the term bombitup call bomber with real-world protests or events, as it’s linked to unethical activities. However, I can summarize the Tesla protest news:
Tesla protesters are organizing their largest global demonstration on March 29th. They aim to hold 500 protests at Tesla showrooms worldwide. The movement focuses on labor rights and environmental concerns. Activists criticize Tesla’s workplace conditions and union resistance. The protest seeks to pressure Tesla into better corporate practices.

Gammelfisch@lemmy.world on 21 Mar 23:12 next collapse

…and of course the local police will protect the fucking Nazi owned dealerships.

MonkeyBrawler@lemm.ee on 22 Mar 00:50 next collapse

That’s a lot of coverage they know they probably shouldn’t cover…

I’d say that’s a bad day to be near a Tesla dealership.

Etterra@discuss.online on 22 Mar 01:40 collapse

It’s a shame that lithium fires are hella toxic. Is love to grill up some hot dogs.