Likely because it’s $current_year and there are better choices available.
geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
on 05 Oct 2024 05:04
nextcollapse
So, a newspaper with a lot of extra steps? I understand the gee whizness of getting this all to work but not really sure there’s a solid “why” to this.
umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml
on 05 Oct 2024 05:07
nextcollapse
Because it is fun to him?
geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
on 05 Oct 2024 05:12
collapse
Maybe? But in the article he was talking about his priority being that he wanted to disconnect from his phone but still wanted news. Just seems there’s been a solution for that for a few centuries now. His solution seemed to me at least to be a lemon that wasn’t worth the squeeze as it were.
jqubed@lemmy.world
on 05 Oct 2024 05:42
nextcollapse
I’m assuming they still print newspapers, but I can’t remember when I last saw our local paper for sale at a store. The vending machines are long gone.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
on 05 Oct 2024 06:58
collapse
I’d actually be interested to see a cost breakdown between this and just buying a newspaper subscription; it looks like he spent about $100 on materials, plus then there’s the ongoing costs of electricity (negligible), printer ribbons, and paper. Ribbons appear to be about $1 / ea if you buy in bulk, and I don’t recall how much printing you get out of a single ribbon, but let’s assume a 24 pack is enough to last you a year. Paper seems to be about $30 / 1000 sheets, so assuming he sticks to the single-page-per-day format, that’ll last almost 3 years.
So up front costs, $100
Ongoing costs, $35 / year, roughly.
Newspaper subscription is about $150 / year, so this’ll actually be cost effective if he keeps it up. Of course, you’re getting a lot less news than you would from a newspaper subscription, so the relative value is questionable there.
Quik@infosec.pub
on 05 Oct 2024 08:11
nextcollapse
Yeah, but I don’t know whether you’ve recently taken a look in one of the local newspapers— being able to select topics you want to read about may very well be worth the extra effort (also, fun of course)
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
on 05 Oct 2024 14:22
collapse
You aren’t actually forced to read every article in a newspaper. Though you will have to scan over the headlines, so you will have a small awareness of things happening in the world. But is that a bad thing?
threaded - newest
I was interested until I hit this sentence:
Why?
Likely because it’s
$current_yearand there are better choices available.So, a newspaper with a lot of extra steps? I understand the gee whizness of getting this all to work but not really sure there’s a solid “why” to this.
Because it is fun to him?
Maybe? But in the article he was talking about his priority being that he wanted to disconnect from his phone but still wanted news. Just seems there’s been a solution for that for a few centuries now. His solution seemed to me at least to be a lemon that wasn’t worth the squeeze as it were.
I’m assuming they still print newspapers, but I can’t remember when I last saw our local paper for sale at a store. The vending machines are long gone.
.
I’d actually be interested to see a cost breakdown between this and just buying a newspaper subscription; it looks like he spent about $100 on materials, plus then there’s the ongoing costs of electricity (negligible), printer ribbons, and paper. Ribbons appear to be about $1 / ea if you buy in bulk, and I don’t recall how much printing you get out of a single ribbon, but let’s assume a 24 pack is enough to last you a year. Paper seems to be about $30 / 1000 sheets, so assuming he sticks to the single-page-per-day format, that’ll last almost 3 years.
So up front costs, $100 Ongoing costs, $35 / year, roughly.
Newspaper subscription is about $150 / year, so this’ll actually be cost effective if he keeps it up. Of course, you’re getting a lot less news than you would from a newspaper subscription, so the relative value is questionable there.
.
Yeah, but I don’t know whether you’ve recently taken a look in one of the local newspapers— being able to select topics you want to read about may very well be worth the extra effort (also, fun of course)
You aren’t actually forced to read every article in a newspaper. Though you will have to scan over the headlines, so you will have a small awareness of things happening in the world. But is that a bad thing?
There are pictures and ads in a newspaper. This is much more minimalistic.
I can’t stand the screeching of a dot matrix printer. The correct way to print the news is with a teletype.
Perhaps a daisy wheel printer is an acceptable middle ground
What about the Selectric Typing-ball?
youtu.be/sSiVYgot9SI
Not even two weeks ago.
Man, I wonder if it’s challenging to source a steady supply of paper for that thing…
And ink?
*ribbons
Haha yeah also that.
Apparently not… Is it somehow still widely used. It’s the most likely paper to give you paper cuts though physicsworld.com/…/researchers-cut-to-the-chase-o…
Yeah. Airlines still use it for log books and reports.
Wild would never have guessed. Maybe because it’s possible for it to print as a continuous sheet, and I guess it comes in big rolls, etc.
This is the future we were promised