Microsoft's OneDrive spots your mates, remembers their faces, and won't forget easily (www.theregister.com)
from schizoidman@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 03:17
https://lemmy.zip/post/50937777

According to Microsoft’s documentation, a user can only change the setting to enable or disable the new People section three times a year.

#technology

threaded - newest

Australis13@fedia.io on 14 Oct 03:28 next collapse

If I hadn't abandoned OneDrive already, this would make me do so.

HK65@sopuli.xyz on 14 Oct 11:33 collapse

Yeah but they are taking your data from the laptop your mum bought yesterday and put all the family vacation pictures on. Mum didn’t know she had to kill off OneDrive or Microsoft will hoover up and monetise your memories.

Taleya@aussie.zone on 14 Oct 12:18 next collapse

Jokes on them, the friends and family that aren’t techs are mac users. I’m the only w11 user and that’s only for work. (And you bet your fat arse that’s lobotomised)

Australis13@fedia.io on 14 Oct 12:28 collapse

Fortunately not... I'm generally the one responsible for IT maintenance with my parents' as they get older. Disabled OneDrive long ago since they don't use it.

ayyy@sh.itjust.works on 14 Oct 17:30 collapse

No, you really, truly can’t “rugged individualism” your way out of a societal problem. Remember that wedding you went to a few months ago? Someone uploaded this photos and now your social graph has been recorded. When your friend’s kid had a birthday party a few weeks ago? You were uploaded and graphed again. When you were out at that restaurant and you were in the background of someone’s date selfie? Graphed again.

The only solution to this problem is real data protection law, like the GDPR in the EU.

Australis13@fedia.io on 15 Oct 03:12 collapse

Oh, I definitely agree. We need better privacy and data protection laws here in Australia too. In the meantime, however, I do what I can to minimise my footprint. I'm well aware that other people are going to be the weak link!

floofloof@lemmy.ca on 14 Oct 03:35 next collapse

Ha, joke’s on you Microsoft: I don’t have any mates.

adespoton@lemmy.ca on 14 Oct 04:14 next collapse

By mates, do they mean buddies or procreative partners?

GreenShimada@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 05:27 next collapse

Yes

Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 14 Oct 06:05 next collapse

Both are good

markz@suppo.fi on 14 Oct 11:19 collapse

Australians

GreenShimada@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 05:29 next collapse

three times a year.

WTF is up with MS doing this rate limiting? I just learned that Win11 will lock you out of your own machine for 2 hours if you restart too many times, like if you have a dualboot and are doing something that requires restarts to resolve.

P1nkman@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 07:21 next collapse

What the shit? Ooh, I need to test this on my work computer!

mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz on 14 Oct 11:31 collapse

it’s a very good feature. if you have too much work and need a longer break, just restart a few times. i may need to change my work laptop from macbook to a windows

Prathas@lemmy.zip on 15 Oct 03:35 collapse

You have a work MacBook? Man, your company must be filthy stinkin’ rich.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 15 Oct 03:50 next collapse

We all have MacBook Pros because we don’t want to deal with IT. It’s better than Windows, but I miss Linux.

mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz on 15 Oct 16:05 collapse

we have macbooks, windows laptops and even ubuntus. they give us any hardware we want, even 50" ultrawides 😅

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 11:45 next collapse

This is why I decided to dual-boot Ubuntu and Win10 until I’m fully comfortable on Linux. Every single thing about Win11 just makes my skin crawl.

Last week it was the news that they’re eliminating methods to install the OS at all without being signed into a MS account. The degree of snooping had no plausible explanation other than for Microsoft to harvest and sell your data.

Junkernaught@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 14 Oct 18:40 next collapse

You won’t regret it! Ubuntu is a solid choice for your first foray into Linux.

markko@lemmy.world on 15 Oct 10:50 collapse

As someone who was in your exact position several years ago, nice!

I’d recommend Linux Mint to newcomers though. It’s based on Ubuntu and is even easier to get comfortable with (much better GUI for updates and app “store”), but it strips out all the Microsoft-like stuff that Canonical have been doing in recent years.

Pop!_OS (also based on Ubuntu) and Bazzite are also meant to be beginner friendly, and are particularly geared towards gaming on Linux, especially the latter.

eronth@lemmy.world on 15 Oct 21:21 next collapse

I started with mint, but the more I see about Bazzite the more I wish I had started there. It just seems slightly more aligned to my needs.

markko@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 03:59 collapse

Great thing about Linux is you can change your distro whenever you want.

If you’re uncertain, or not ready to go through the process just yet, you can always just boot Bazzite off a USB drive and play around with it for now.

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 18 Oct 15:00 collapse

I actually went with Tuxedo OS, which is based on the Ubuntu kernel but has a very noob-friendly desktop environment.

My daily driver laptop is a 12-year-old Hackintosh MBP that I’ve been repairing for years, but I’ve priced out a Tuxedo laptop for when it finally kicks the bucket. So I started dual booting Tuxedo on that as well to get my bearings.

Once I’m a little more experienced, I’m definitely interested to check out other distros! Right now it’s a lot of looking up terminal commands and learning the architecture. The firmware fan control in the MacBook is shot - fans blasting at full speed due to a failed GPU temp sensor that makes the computer assume it’s overheating - so I’ve already learned how to write to /sys/ with a custom fan control based on the working sensor in the CPU die.

It’s been really fun so far. You get the sense of just having vastly greater control over the hardware at a low level and the ability to control how it functions in a way that Windows and MacOS completely obfuscate. I still have very little idea what I’m doing in the terminal, but I’m starting to pick it up.

Routhinator@startrek.website on 16 Oct 00:44 collapse

Preventing their shitty brute force protection from allowing someone to get a users MS account password because they are FORCING users to use a non-local account?

The computer would have to store a hash locally to authenticate that account offline, so this is very likely why this is here. Because they’ve enabled a path to brute forcing their cloud accounts without their servers knowing.

The windows shithole is just layers of bad design all the way down.

GreenShimada@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 05:05 collapse

SMH a workaround for a workaround to enable their shitty surveillance. Pure genius.

CosmoNova@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 06:34 next collapse

I think that’s why it’s recommended to encrypt files containing personal information with a separate tool before uploading them to any cloud service. It prevents big data from automatically processing your Information and protects you from leaks.

Melusine@tarte.nuage-libre.fr on 14 Oct 11:16 next collapse

In Europe this probably goes against GDPR, right? If I don’t agree, they should not collect my face

Taleya@aussie.zone on 14 Oct 12:15 next collapse

The fuck is that goddamn thumbnail. You keep shalehket out of this shit.

Scrappy@feddit.nl on 14 Oct 13:36 collapse

Yeah it’s in awful taste; thanks for pointing it out. For those who are not familiar with the art installation: www.jmberlin.de/en/shalekhet-fallen-leaves

FenrirIII@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 13:34 next collapse

So, will this look through porn videos as well? Asking for a friend.

pirat@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 07:23 collapse

Now you can easily find all the porn videos you have collected of any of your friends!

Reygle@lemmy.world on 14 Oct 14:18 next collapse

I’m done defending idiots. Use sh%t, get hit.

lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com on 14 Oct 17:16 next collapse

Why are they using electricity for stuff no one asked for? It seems to be too cheap over there…

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world on 15 Oct 07:33 next collapse

But if we feed enough data to the AI slop machine, one day you can get your own Knight Rider car! /s

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 15 Oct 16:16 collapse

I’m holding out for an Airwolf or Street Hawk.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 15 Oct 10:00 next collapse

Why do you think no one asks for stuff like this? Facial recognition is one of the best features of photo storage systems as it lets you easily find all of your photos that have certain people in them. It’s fantastic for making shared albums with family members where any pics of certain people are automatically added once recognized.

Onedrive having it makes using Onedrive for photo storage and sharing a much better experience.

lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com on 15 Oct 15:59 next collapse

If you really want it, you should be able to enable it. No reason to do that with the other 90% who don’t need it.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 15 Oct 21:58 collapse

So your argument now is just that it should be disabled by default?

lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com on 16 Oct 04:59 collapse

Regarding electricity: yes

Regarding privacy: no, but my privacy views are based on what we have in Germany, where the feature might not be allowed at all.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 06:56 collapse

Does google photos have this feature in Germany like it does where I am?

I feel like people are misunderstanding what this actually is. When you upload photos, it detects faces and lets you tag those faces with a name, and then you can just click on that person and it will show you all the photos you have of that person. That’s it. It’s not sharing them with anyone. Why on earth would that be not allowed?

lightnsfw@reddthat.com on 15 Oct 19:06 collapse

Only if it can be done locally. I don’t want my fucking face going out to a bunch of asshole corporations databases any more than absolutely necessary. Shit like this is why I don’t let people take my picture.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 15 Oct 21:59 collapse

It’s not?

lightnsfw@reddthat.com on 15 Oct 23:04 collapse

Do you not understand how cloud services work?

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 03:17 collapse

Do you?

I don’t want my fucking face going out to a bunch of asshole corporations databases

What about this topic makes you think anything like this is happening?

lightnsfw@reddthat.com on 16 Oct 13:11 collapse

When you put your photos (or anything else) on onedrive they go to Microsoft’s servers. Microsoft now has your photos. That is how this works. They aren’t pushing so hard to coerce Windows users into using it for benevolent reasons.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 14:05 collapse

So you want it to be done locally against photos that are stored in the cloud?

This only happens for photos that you upload to onedrive. Why or how would it happen “locally”?

You said “a bunch of asshole corporations databases” - who are the “bunch of corporations”? Microsoft is only 1 corporation.

lightnsfw@reddthat.com on 16 Oct 15:03 collapse

So you want it to be done locally against photos that are stored in the cloud?

I don’t want my photos in the cloud period.

This only happens for photos that you upload to onedrive. Why or how would it happen “locally”?

Have the software run on the PC or a server that you own.

You said “a bunch of asshole corporations databases” - who are the “bunch of corporations”? Microsoft is only 1 corporation.

Any corporation that lets you upload photos. Onedrive, google, facebook, whoever. They’re all abusing your data.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 22:18 collapse

I song want my photos in the cloud period

So why are you uploading your photos to Onedrive? If you’re not then why are you complaining about this feature that only exists does people who do?

You seem to be arguing about something completely off topic. Doing the face recognition on your local machine only to have the photos and tagged faces uploaded to onedrive makes no sense because the point of it is to automatically identify all photos of the tagged people so you can then find them all with a simple search for their name, and make custom auto-updating albums of specific people.

What exactly is your point?

lightnsfw@reddthat.com on 16 Oct 23:08 collapse

why are you complaining about this feature that only exists does people who do?

To wake others up to the fact that it’s not a good service to use and to the fact that maybe the people in the pictures they are uploading also don’t want to have their image handed over to all these corporations. Have you ever asked the people in your pictures about this? I don’t even let anyone take my picture anymore because everyone and their grandma has been ignoring my wishes about that since fucking myspace.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 17 Oct 03:52 collapse

It’s not a good service to use? Why?

Lol you sound like a tonne of fun. What issue do you have with people having photos of you on their services?

lightnsfw@reddthat.com on 17 Oct 13:09 collapse

They are using your data to build profiles on everyone, train their AIs, helping the government spy on you, and god knows what else. Your right, it’s not fun that we have to worry about this but that’s not my fault.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 18 Oct 04:47 collapse

lol maybe make a new tin foil hat, your current one is a bit tight.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 22:24 collapse

Microsoft spend a fortune on funding “renewable” energy to power their data centres, and also have their own private on-site “renewable” power generation at many of their data centres.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 15 Oct 10:05 next collapse

Not sure why people are talking about the “you can only enable or disable it 3 times a year” as if it’s an issue? This is generally a thing you’d either turn off or on once, depending on what it defaults to. Why would anyone need to turn it on or off 3 times in a year?

nulluser@lemmy.world on 15 Oct 16:21 collapse

Why would anyone need to turn it on or off 3 times in a year?

Why would they need to limit you?

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 15 Oct 21:58 collapse

Irrelevant. Why would anyone need to turn it on or off 3 times in a year?

nulluser@lemmy.world on 15 Oct 23:09 next collapse

Why do you need to know how other people use software to understand why arbitrary limits are arbitrary?

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 03:19 collapse

I would assume that the “arbitrary limit” is actually based on something like the amount of processing power that it could take to go through every single photo/file that is uploaded.

Anyway, even if it is arbitrary - what reason would anyone have to turn it on and off more than 3x a year? It’s something you’d decide you either want or you don’t.

nulluser@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 11:21 collapse

what reason would anyone have

That’s none of your business. You don’t need to know why anyone wants to do a thing to advocate for their freedom to do it.

Just because you lack the imagination to think of reasons someone might have, doesn’t mean that they don’t have a perfectly good reason. But, they shouldn’t need to justify themselves to you.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 14:01 collapse

The don’t have to justify themselves to me, they have to figure out how to handle only changing it 3 times a year.

I’m trying to understand any reasons why someone would turn it on/off more than once. Not asking people to “justify”, just curious because it’s not something that makes sense to turn on and off multiple times.

nulluser@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 14:14 collapse

You don’t need to know why anyone wants to do a thing to advocate for their freedom to do it.

You don’t know why they might want to do this thing. I also don’t know why they would want to do this thing. The difference is, I 👏 Don’t 👏 Care 👏. My opinion of their reason to want to do it is irrelevant to my advocating their freedom to do it.

And that’s all I’m going to say on the subject. If you can’t understand that basic fact, then I don’t know what else I can say.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 22:10 collapse

I don’t care either though, I’m just asking why to try to understand the argument people like you are making.

The feature is a yes/no option, and it has no downsides for the user. It costs you nothing, it doesn’t affect performance, it doesn’t need extra privacy permissions or anything. I’m just trying to understand why anyone works firstly turn it off if it defaults to on, and then secondly why they would then turn it back on, then back off, and so on. Maybe there’s something I am missing about it that I don’t know? Maybe there’s something buried in the fine print?

Some when did trying to get more of an understanding become so offensive to some people?

It’s like if my health insurance said “we’ve just added elective surgeries to your plan at no cost. You can opt out/in up to 3 times a year” - I genuinely can’t see a reason why anyone would opt out once, let alone 3+ times a year, and so far no one has even attempted to give a reason why anyone would.

Unlike you, clearly, I like to learn things, especially about what makes people tick. I’m also a big believer in if you can’t explain your reasoning for your decision logically then you must have arrived at your decision illogically.

xep@discuss.online on 16 Oct 09:11 collapse

For someone called freedom advocate you sure don’t sound like one.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 16 Oct 10:04 collapse

What part of letting me name people in my uploaded photos so I can easily find all of the photos of them is somehow anti-freedom?

needanke@feddit.org on 15 Oct 18:59 next collapse

However, it is that seemingly arbitrary three-times-a-year limit applied to the People section that is most concerning. Why not four? Why not as many times as a user wants?

If it works the same way Immich does, probably because they have to retrain the models every time you turn it back on and want to aboid poeple turning it on when they need it, then off again, then back on, … Although a less shitty mehod would be to limit the amount of times you can turn it on but I guess that iterferes with their goal of harvesting your data.

Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 15 Oct 23:18 collapse

IMO current best case scenario

badbytes@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 01:33 next collapse

Give MS a bunch of fake mates. Fill their models with NOISE.

Jaysyn@lemmy.world on 16 Oct 03:23 next collapse

If you’re stuck with Windows 11, this removes OneDrive nicely.

DimberDamber@lemmy.ml on 16 Oct 12:02 next collapse

Jokes on them, I have no friends.

GaryGhost@lemmy.world on 17 Oct 02:20 collapse

Get a second drive, SD card, USB, ssd whatever and have it just for your back ups. If your back up drive fails, well, fuck