FLX1s is Launched (furilabs.com)
from cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to technology@lemmy.world on 21 Sep 06:36
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/53769139

cross-posted from: lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/53766411

Mobile phone Debian based

#technology

threaded - newest

Gueoris@lemmy.world on 21 Sep 08:17 next collapse

6.7" with 1600x720 is crazy in 2025.

notgold@aussie.zone on 21 Sep 09:28 next collapse

It sounds great but I have no idea what the resolution on my phone is right now. After 640x480 my brain stopped comprehension

cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Sep 09:40 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/4fc2493e-b383-4700-9b63-5ad29be61c20.webp">

notgold@aussie.zone on 21 Sep 13:02 collapse

Can’t even rent ultra porn 😒

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 14:56 collapse

phones are at least full-HD, so 1920x1080. computer displays too. It’s even more of a weird choice for that very large size, I imagine you can clearly see and count the pixels

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 11:41 next collapse

Crazy good or crazy bad?

ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Sep 12:08 collapse

Crazy terribly bad

Nima@leminal.space on 21 Sep 15:42 next collapse

my phone that came out in 2020 has better specs than this one and is so much cheaper.

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip on 22 Sep 11:50 collapse

I wouldn’t really care for that. OLED would be more import than screen resolution. But that surely depends on the use-case. I don’t game on it and don’t watch media. Even if I’d do, it would be fine on this tiny screen.

Gueoris@lemmy.world on 22 Sep 14:45 collapse

The screen is huge for a phone. This type of screen resolution can damage the eyes on a large screen (the lower the dpi, the greater the strain on the eyes to bring the screen into focus).

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip on 22 Sep 14:56 collapse

Sure sure, but it also depends on the use-case. I use mine as an emergency-phone and notifications from my own apps. Occasionally a chat. Couldn’t care less for eye strain. Besides I grew up with crt-screens that fried my retinas 😁

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip on 21 Sep 09:12 next collapse

Never heard of, but sounds great. I was also lucky to read “based in HK” as I feared it’d be us-based 😊

But…what about the camera? Is it worth anything?

cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Sep 09:33 collapse

More details: liliputing.com/flx1s-is-a-new-linux-phone-thats-m…

Not high spec but the concept is in the right direction

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip on 21 Sep 10:57 collapse

Oh dang…that really isn’t a good selling point. Would’ve bought the older one for more instead a downgrade for the same. Why the heck… More profit? My enthusiasm is slightly dampened. Not much competition anyway 😞

cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Sep 09:39 next collapse

more alternative sailmates.net/actors/

Companies selling phones with alternative mobile OSes

Name URL Available pre-installed OSes Furi Labs furilabs.com FuryOS Murena murena.com /e/OS Pine64 pine64.org, pine64eu.com postmarketOS, Mobian, Manjaro+Plasma Mobile Purism puri.sm PureOS Volla volla.online Ubuntu Touch, Volla OS Jolla/Reeder jolla.com Sailfish OS

Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org on 21 Sep 10:05 collapse

Also the Mudita Kompakt if you’re into e ink screens

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 11:55 next collapse

I am so irritated by my iPhone lately that I want to love this and adopt it, but…the specs are awful, and it’s made of plastic. Ugghh. I’m so conflicted

For context I did up a comparison of my iPhone to the FLX1s

iPhone 16 Pro vs FLX1S

Spec iPhone 16 Pro FLX1S
Display Size 6.3″ Super Retina XDR OLED 6.7″ IPS LCD
Resolution 2622 × 1206 (460 ppi) 1600 × 720
Refresh Rate 120Hz ProMotion 90Hz
Glass / Front Protection Ceramic Shield Dragontrail Glass
Always‑On Display Yes No
Dynamic Island Yes No
Processor / Chip Apple A18 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 900
CPU 6‑core (2 performance + 4 efficiency) 2× Cortex‑A78 @ 2.4 GHz + 6× A55 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU 6‑core Apple GPU Mali‑G68 MC4
RAM 8 GB LPDDR5X 8 GB LPDDR4x
Storage 128 GB ‑ 1 TB NVMe 128 GB UFS
SD Card Support No Yes (microSD up to 1 TB)
Rear Cameras 48MP Main + Ultra Wide + Telephoto 20MP Main + 2MP Macro
Front Camera 12MP TrueDepth 13MP
Video Recording Up to 4K @ 120fps (Dolby Vision, ProRes) Likely up to 1080p
Battery ~3582 mAh (not officially disclosed) 5,000 mAh Li‑Po
Charging & USB USB‑C (USB 3), MagSafe & Qi2 USB‑C (USB 2.0), Wired only
Wireless Charging Yes No
5G Support Yes (mmWave + Sub‑6) Yes
WiFi WiFi 7 WiFi 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
SIM / eSIM Dual eSIM only Dual SIM
Biometric Security Face ID (TrueDepth) Side‑mounted fingerprint
Materials / Frame Titanium frame, Ceramic Shield front Polycarbonate frame, glass back
Water / Splash Resistance IP68 (6m up to 30 min) Splash‑resistant
Weight 199 g 201 g
Price From US$999 US$550
cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Sep 12:04 next collapse

Same feeling thanks for the table comparison

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 12:08 collapse

I would pay double for better specs. Like, clearly, because I did. This Liquid Glass nonsense feels like a gimmick from the 00’s. Steve Jobs must be rolling over in his grave. He’s probably been rolling over since all the stock buybacks started.

cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Sep 13:08 collapse

Same.

victorz@lemmy.world on 21 Sep 13:25 next collapse

Why is dynamic island a feature? Seems like a good thing that something doesn’t have that nonsense, since the whole thing is a workaround for having a hole in your screen.

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 13:50 collapse

I wasn’t even sure what that was, honestly. Is that the oval space around the front camera?

victorz@lemmy.world on 21 Sep 18:08 collapse

Yeah exactly. The gimmick created around the fact that there’s a hole in the screen where the front-facing camera is, to mask the glaring hole like it’s a feature instead of a drawback.

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 19:42 collapse

“There’s a giant hole in the screen. And we think you’re gonna love it.”

“And if you don’t, then fuck you.”

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 14:53 next collapse

you have just proven that specifications wise it’s a viable phone lol

Reverendender@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 15:06 collapse

I never said it wasn’t?

WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works on 21 Sep 15:11 collapse

the specs are awful,

well the screen is weird, and why is this USB 2 (really, what’s behind this? the fairphone 6 got a downgrade to usb 2 too), but that’s it. oh and the plastic but I guess it depends on what kind, it can be ok

muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works on 22 Sep 17:02 collapse

I want tap to pay. It’s thing the mainstream phones have that Linux phones don’t that I want. Well that and wireless charging.

slamphear@lemmy.world on 22 Sep 17:58 collapse

The FLX1 had wireless charging. And a headphone jack. And a replaceable battery… 😔

Crozekiel@lemmy.zip on 22 Sep 17:32 collapse

This is hugely disappointing. They launched a worse all around phone and are trying to market it like good news. I was seriously considering them for my next phone purchase, but if this is all they offer when the time comes, I will have to skip it… The only “upgrade” is 2 more GB of ram, but the screen is worse (slightly bigger, significantly worse resolution), camera is worse, no headphone jack, not IP68… They also mention that existing orders for the old version are either being “upgraded” to this new version, or refunded. So it sounds like the original FLX1 is dead in the water. Very sad news.