Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2024 03:54
nextcollapse
Oh! I know him! Yeah! That’s Steve. He likes to steal peoples amazon packages.
admin@lemmy.my-box.dev
on 23 Jul 2024 05:27
collapse
Fortunately, the 2 people they are suing have been identified.
One of them actively drove their car into them, and tried to pin it on the waymo, and the other goes around slashing tires (and is claimed to have mental issues, which does make it more sucky if true).
FaceDeer@fedia.io
on 23 Jul 2024 03:21
nextcollapse
The intersection of "Luddite hooligan" and "stops to think about technological capabilities and future consequences before vandalizing stuff" is not large.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
on 23 Jul 2024 09:31
nextcollapse
Vandalism is an act without much thought behind it.
Etterra@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2024 05:59
nextcollapse
The remember kids, for your health and safety you should always wear a mask in public.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2024 06:19
nextcollapse
Ronaile Burton…allegedly slashed the tires of at least 19 Waymo vehicles. … Burton’s public defender, Adam Birka-White, says in a statement that Burton “is someone in need of help and not jail” …
IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2024 07:13
nextcollapse
Good. Idiots attack these things.
cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2024 15:11
nextcollapse
how would this not be considered double jeopardy if they’re already being charged for the crime?
PlantJam@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2024 15:55
collapse
Criminal prosecution and civil liability are different. If the criminal conviction also includes restitution (pay for the damages) then there likely wouldn’t be a need for a civil suit, but it’s possible that the suit is to go after additional damages. For example, the criminal conviction might include $1000 in restitution to cover the property damage, but the civil suit might ask for money to cover lost revenue for the time the car was out of service.
VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2024 20:49
collapse
A technology that’ll disproportionately benefit the disabled, drunk and disadvantaged while enabling an integrated transport network by making final mile economically feasible is attacked by selfish idiots and of course lemmy supports them because it’s a new technology and apparently people here hate anything new.
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2024 20:57
collapse
Most people on this website already have relative security in life and only pretend to care about the people who are worse off.
threaded - newest
Do the vandals not think there might be cameras? Like lots of cameras?
Yeah it was this guy:
<img alt="1000021577" src="https://links.hackliberty.org/pictrs/image/38fc4c8f-f951-4450-989a-e4184c7360c6.jpeg">
Oh! I know him! Yeah! That’s Steve. He likes to steal peoples amazon packages.
Fortunately, the 2 people they are suing have been identified.
One of them actively drove their car into them, and tried to pin it on the waymo, and the other goes around slashing tires (and is claimed to have mental issues, which does make it more sucky if true).
The intersection of "Luddite hooligan" and "stops to think about technological capabilities and future consequences before vandalizing stuff" is not large.
Vandalism is an act without much thought behind it.
Thinking is not vandals strong suit
Good.
The remember kids, for your health and safety you should always wear a mask in public.
<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/29ebd06c-8a18-41ef-8748-14264613aefe.jpeg">
Good. Idiots attack these things.
how would this not be considered double jeopardy if they’re already being charged for the crime?
Criminal prosecution and civil liability are different. If the criminal conviction also includes restitution (pay for the damages) then there likely wouldn’t be a need for a civil suit, but it’s possible that the suit is to go after additional damages. For example, the criminal conviction might include $1000 in restitution to cover the property damage, but the civil suit might ask for money to cover lost revenue for the time the car was out of service.
A technology that’ll disproportionately benefit the disabled, drunk and disadvantaged while enabling an integrated transport network by making final mile economically feasible is attacked by selfish idiots and of course lemmy supports them because it’s a new technology and apparently people here hate anything new.
Most people on this website already have relative security in life and only pretend to care about the people who are worse off.