Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca
on 23 Jul 2025 00:12
nextcollapse
That’s saying that he left Mozilla for that. He’s still CEO of Brave
overload@sopuli.xyz
on 23 Jul 2025 00:24
nextcollapse
Can’t believe this poor reading comprehension is getting upvoted.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 03:02
collapse
What’s amazing is they proved themselves wrong in their own post, thinking they proved themselves right. It’s actually impressive.
overload@sopuli.xyz
on 23 Jul 2025 04:40
nextcollapse
You don’t see it everyday that’s for sure.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 10:50
collapse
That’s pretty par for the course for Internet arguments in my experience. Then they get all huffy after you explain why their source doesn’t say what they claimed and try to complain that because you didn’t supply a source, they’re still right.
Indeed. The <“I’m right. There’s plenty of sources that back me up, do your own research” then fail to provide sources> crowd are my personal pet peeve.
arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 10:10
collapse
Tbh kinda explains why they use Brave
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:26
collapse
Thanks.
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 03:22
nextcollapse
He left Mozilla (chased out because he's a homophobe) and went on to found Brave, where he still remains
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:26
collapse
Ah, thank you for the clarification.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website
on 23 Jul 2025 04:55
collapse
Did you even read the text you shared? It just says he left mozilla.
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:26
collapse
I did, just made a mistake. Thank you and have a pleasant afternoon.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website
on 24 Jul 2025 16:06
collapse
wow why is this getting downvotes for admitting a mistake?
AbidanYre@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 01:28
nextcollapse
Also, their whole business model was (is?) just replacing ads with ads they get paid for.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 03:01
nextcollapse
Sure, but that’s opt-in. By default, it just blocks ads.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:25
collapse
Uh… no? It just puts sponsored backgrounds when you open new tabs or windows notifications if you opt-in
It never replaced ads in websites afaik
AbidanYre@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 17:49
collapse
People act like these fuckers dont influence anything, like they exist in some bubble away from reality. It matters what you use. What you use empowers the creator.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 24 Jul 2025 16:13
collapse
Peter Thiel was also a major, early investor in the project.
That’s another ‘this one thing should let you know this is radioactive.’
alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 04:34
nextcollapse
It’s okay, it’s never too late to switch.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 06:30
collapse
Not interacted doesnt mean it’s non-existant.
It exists and therefore it’s bad enough.
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 11:45
nextcollapse
Existent**
It’s fine as a browser and it does a good job at syncing across devices. Still my chrome based browser of choice.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 12:48
collapse
How mich actual difference (minus the crypto) is there to base-chromium?
Afaik chromium is capable pf being a browser. Does that also have syncing or is it not capable of that?
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 13:01
nextcollapse
Honestly not sure. I haven’t done a side by side with plain old chromium in years.
AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
on 23 Jul 2025 17:25
collapse
On iOS it’s one of very few browsers that has good adblocking built in
What other browsers are implementing this? It’s the first I’ve heard of it.
DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone
on 22 Jul 2025 21:17
nextcollapse
People are still using Windows!?
Ulrich@feddit.org
on 22 Jul 2025 21:24
nextcollapse
Until Macs become cheaper or Linux becomes easier, Windows will remain the largest OS.
nao@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Jul 2025 21:42
nextcollapse
What’s easier in Windows compared to Linux? Except the fact that you have to install it, since it doesn’t come preinstalled on as many PCs. But many people who think Windows is easy would probably still consider installing it difficult.
Ulrich@feddit.org
on 22 Jul 2025 21:52
nextcollapse
Doing anything requires the memorization of thousands of commands that must be formatted perfectly and are specific to your distribution, into a black box that rarely provides any feedback at all, and when it does it’s extremely generic.
I’m sure my inbox will be blown up by delusional people claiming you don’t need it but it’s just not true.
The simple act of installing software is crazy complicated and different on every distro.
My current distro has 2 separate system update apps and I don’t really know how to use either of them, nor do I understand why I need to use them at all. Why does the system need me to click buttons to make it go? Just do it in the background. Then as soon as it’s done I get another popup 3 minutes later saying another package needs to be updated.
Hardware compatibility is a huge problem, fingerprint readers, WiFi, facial recognition, Bluetooth, etc. etc. Very few companies make computers with Linux compatibility being considered at all. Everything will have drivers day 1 on Windows and then they’ll trickle down to Linux a year or two later.
Nvidia GPUs are by far and away the most popular and they’re still very painful to use. And even though that’s entirely Nvidia’s fault, the problem remains.
I dislike Linux the least but there’s no way I could recommend it to anyone who isn’t a giant nerd who likes fixing computers.
tane69@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 21:59
nextcollapse
I don’t use Linux except on my steamdeck and even I know there are a bunch of distros that look and act (minus lots of the bad stuff) just like windows
They act like Windows (minus lots of the good stuff) too.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
on 23 Jul 2025 01:47
collapse
i wouldnt know where to begin if i had to switch, since im not in the tech industry, only 2 of my bros would switch since they are programmers.
original_reader@lemmy.zip
on 22 Jul 2025 22:04
nextcollapse
Sadly, quite a few things. Here’s a few:
Application support; some popular software is built with Windows in mind.
One-click installers; Software usually comes with user-friendly installation wizards. No command lines or dependency juggling. Also better compatibility woth past versions
Driver availability; Linux is getting better, but Windows is superior
Better peripheral support like for printers, webcams, game controllers.
Gaming performance; although Linux is gaining ground, Windows is just better in this regard
Media codecs and formats; again, Linux is getting better, but this isn’t always an out-of-the-box experience
Business integration; Windows plays nicely with enterprise tools like Active Directory, Microsoft 365, and legacy business apps.
Don’t get me wrong. I use Linux as my daily driver. That also means I get frustrated on occasion when again I must consult man pages instead of just running a troubleshooter or fiddling with Nvidia drivers instead of just running the game.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 23:07
nextcollapse
(venting frustration)
I’d argue with the installer point - if it’s in the repo, and it almost always is for anything a newbie would be using, it’s actually easier. Search, click, done. BUT…
Drivers though, specifically companies not supporting Linux drivers, is shit. I’m helping a friend transition to Linux and am dual-booting myself so I can help with the actual os available for troubleshooting. And fuck me, sound drivers fucking suck ass on Linux. It’s because Creative is a bitch and won’t make Linux drivers, but also apparently literally nobody is both running a creative card and anything above 2.0 speaker setup. I have two creative cards, a decade apart, neither works with my 5.1 speaker setup. FL and FR work, the rest are some sort of fucked and come from an incorrect speaker(s). One of these cards is like 15 years old now, and nobody has noticed or rectified it. And if I reboot straight from windows to Linux, the sound is mangled. I need to shut the system down and boot it cold. Then FL and FR work. Hours of troubleshooting last week got me absolutely no progress.
Then I need software for my Logitech g903 (there is 3rd party software available) that does profiles and switches on the fly based on the application in the foreground (crickets).
Then there is an issue where if my monitor goes to sleep, when I wake it up I get patches of graphical artifacts. On the 2D desktop. Every few seconds, for about a quarter of a second. Random location each time. Random size. I’m on a Radeon 7900 XTX, which isn’t terribly new now. But the friend I’m helping, no issues at all with drivers or hardware. An older 6700 XT. But come the fuck on.
Both of us are on bazzite (I suggested it so they wouldn’t nuke the system as they learn) so it’s just Fedora silverblue with a few tweaks, not some out-there distro.
And, shit. If you need cellular connectivity on Linux, as far as I can tell you’re fucked if you don’t go the Ubuntu route. Debian doesn’t work, Fedora doesn’t work, Mint doesn’t work, I went down a rabbit-hole and tried a dozen distros. I ended up with kubuntu, since I wanted kde, but I tried anything just to see what would work. This is on a modern ThinkPad, still under (extended) warranty. I thought ThinkPads and Linux were supposed to be like this holy-grail of free-as-in-freedom computing? Ugh.
So yeah if you have a basic system, aged a bit, nothing special, it works well. Take one step outside of that perfect-scenario bubble, and paaaaaain.
Rhaedas@fedia.io
on 22 Jul 2025 23:29
nextcollapse
To be fair, a lot of those are due to a Windows legacy of dominating the market, which isn't going to change until there are more people elsewhere. It's a bit of a catch-22, and yet even being a small percent use in desktop Linux has started to get distros that feel and run similar to Windows enough so people who don't dabble in Windows specific software don't miss it. It's also a bit much to weigh Windows as better in many of those above features when it still have its own issues often, even though it is the dominate and supported OS.
I laughed at your last part. I have never not had to do the same for Windows as I have for Linux when a problem pops up. Google the problem. Those troubleshooters are such a waste of time, and honestly the only time I've had an automated fix that worked to resolve a situation was in Linux via purging the old driver and reloading it. The Windows troubleshooter is like the first tier on a tech support line, where you tell them, yeah, I already did all that.
Ulrich@feddit.org
on 23 Jul 2025 02:44
nextcollapse
Gaming performance; although Linux is gaining ground, Windows is just better in this regard
I mostly agree with you but this contradicts everything I’ve seen. Presumably you have evidence of this?
rakeshmondal@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 10:23
nextcollapse
Driver availability; Linux is getting better, but Windows is superior
Doesn’t Linux have pretty much every driver built into the kernel with the only notable exception being the NVIDIA closed source drivers. Even those drivers are a single command away from installation, it even configures itself correctly out of the box for Wayland support.
Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 17:45
collapse
Media codecs and formats
Got burned by this recently, was trying to use MPV for playing a YT vid, and it had no video but had audio. Turns out Fedora comes with an open-source or smth version of H264 encoders, so I had to uninstall those packages for the official Cisco ones. But I was on atomic and it wasn’t fun so I ran to forums for help.
Driver availability
Not sure if it’s the driver or the kernel (maybe dual-booting? But it worked on both partitions originally…) but my Bluetooth is nuked on my Linux partition. I tried to do rfkill, btusb, systemctl, etc. and the only solution I got was to rollback to an older release of Fedora atomic because it’s most likely a kernel issue. That just sucks man, having to be stuck on an older version to get my earbuds to work lol. I didn’t like atomic and now I’m on reg KDE Fedora, so I’m truly fucked as that’s not a rollback distro.
I still love using Fedora (every time I boot into Windows I cry) and it just makes me love my laptop like it’s brand-new. Tinkering is fun to me, I’ll literally sit at my desk and starve myself while trying to get something to work. But some days, I want my stuff to work with minimal tinkering, and not have to worry if it’ll break when I really need it down the line.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 22:25
nextcollapse
What’s easier in Windows compared to Linux?
Graphics drivers. I can’t say I ever had a graphics driver update in Windows that rendered my system borderline unusable, but I 100% blame Nvidia for me running windows until recently. I tried a dozen times over a decade and ended up back on windows when the Nvidia update trashed my system and I got sick of dealing with it.
installation of software on Linux is very bad. Literally everything else on Linux is very ready for the mass market, but installing apps is horrible to the point of making the whole OS not ready for the general public
voodooattack@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 00:27
collapse
What? When was the last time you tried Linux?
With flatpak, it’s usually a one-click process to install anything nowadays.
I can install apps well enough, but I'm very techie, the general population isn't gonna be able to do it reasonably
voodooattack@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 01:26
collapse
You don’t need to be “techie” to install stuff from a package manager with a GUI. People use app stores on every mobile device out there and they don’t have any problems with that
Ulrich@feddit.org
on 23 Jul 2025 01:19
nextcollapse
That would be totally true if every software was distributed as a flatpak and every distro had flatpak enabled in the package manager out of the box. That’s just not reality.
Not even then. For example the biggest Linux distribution in use is Ubuntu, and it doesn't have flatpak built in. So even if a flatpak of an app is available, a user of Ubuntu would have to already understand what a flatpak is, and already know that it would make the app installable on Ubuntu, and know that flatpak itself can be installed separately, and know how to use a different install method already just to get the flatpak system onto their computer in the first place
voodooattack@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 10:19
collapse
I said “usually”, and I’m talking about mainstream distros.
Also the original comment says “the whole OS is not ready for the general public”, which is also vague. I don’t expect the “general public” to install Gentoo and suffer from this issue.
voodooattack@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 01:23
collapse
While I agree with most of what you said, typical users won’t run into these issues unless they’re doing something more technical (e.g installing blender or something), in which case they can ask for help.
Can 800 year old grandma Doris use the feature? Can the average person who writes comments on YouTube videos? Minion meme posting facebook aunts? If not, it’s not ready for mainstream.
I don’t think these people can install Windows or are pros at using it either, and in which case it’s the responsibility of whoever installed the OS to guide them through it a little like I did with my parents (they’re in their 80s and they’ve been using Linux for the past five years just fine), and I imagine those kind of people to only care about browsing the web and maybe viewing a PDF every once in a while.
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 10:47
collapse
it’s easier because they’ve been using it all their life. If they’d been using linux all their life, they’d say that windows was too hard to use, nod oubt.
MehBlah@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 21:57
nextcollapse
True.
hisao@ani.social
on 22 Jul 2025 22:20
nextcollapse
Hmm, I have kinda opposite opinion, hardware is pretty good, build quality is great, but the OS itself is meh. File manager is bad and clunky, desktop customization is very limited, network manager is buggy, especially with VPNs, no built-in functionality to import VPN config files like in Linux. Also, I used it for years and still couldn’t get used to all the shortcuts and "Mac-way"s of doing things. Just not for me perhaps. Not bad, but in terms of UX worse than both Windows and Linux for me.
I'm the opposite of both of you. The build quality is good and the OS is good. I love having a familiat UNIX system while also having a polished desktop environment that supports 4k scaling very well (though the polish has been lacking a lot lately)
The issue for me is the insane price of their computers and the fact that you can't (officially) install MacOS on your own hardware. I have a Linux desktop and a MBP but I'd run MacOS on both if it was officially supported
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Jul 2025 22:45
nextcollapse
Modern Mac hardware is excellent. The software is good too, but’s more a matter of taste. Not everybody likes how macOS works but Asahi Linux has made incredible progress so it’s a daily driver option for some already.
Mac hardware is a fucking atrocity. $2k for a “pro” laptop with 8GB RAM and 256GB storage and no i/o except 4 USBC ports, that’s completely and intentionally irreparable and unupgradeable? SSDs and RAM that are marked up 3000%? That’s what you call “excellent”? If they were cheap I might not completely object to them being disposable but it’s the opposite. It’s fucking gaslighting. You’ll never convince me it’s anything other than a cult.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 03:41
collapse
I will give you the RAM and SSD capacities are atrociously priced. USBC is perfectly acceptable for the people apple is targeting. Nobody is trying to use a MacBook as a server. Ignore the “pro” name in any consumer electronic device. It has nothing to do with anything other than marketing, and that’s not exclusive to apple. Apple did give up on the 8GB bullshit already though.
You need to take a closer look at how the M-series chips work and why they work they way they do. There are design considerations in how PC does things and Apple does things and they are not 1 to 1. What makes sense the PC world doesn’t always make sense int he Mac world.
Apple does a lot of anti-consumer bullshit which we should absolutely club them over the head for, but many of the things they pulled off with the M-series Macs were NOT possible with traditional PC methodologies. One thing’s for sure though, the hardware performs and it does so with very little energy. It’s so great a difference the entire industry is changing course to try to outdo Apple. They eventually will too, but they haven’t yet. They are just cheaper.
USBC is perfectly acceptable for the people apple is targeting.
It’s literally called a “pro”, who do you think they’re targeting?
Ignore the “pro” name in any consumer electronic device.
I do, thanks to Apple. It doesn’t make it any less shameful or ridiculous.
You need to take a closer look at how the M-series chips work and why they work they way they do
You’re going to have to elaborate because I already have and I don’t understand what bearing that has on this discussion.
Apple does a lot of anti-consumer bullshit which we should absolutely club them over the head for,
You shouldn’t “club them over the head”, you should just stop buying their trash. That’s literally the only thing that will work.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 04:51
collapse
Daves garage actually had a good video on the shared memory architecture recently that gives some insights on why apple designed this way they did. Don’t dismiss “different” as “trash.” You sound like an idiot when you do and it makes it difficult for adults to take you seriously. PC and Mac are designed with different goals in mind, so they tend to make different choices in their engineering, and you aren’t going to like every decision either side makes.
The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 08:19
nextcollapse
Shared memory is different to unified memory, AMD’s got an implementation of the later with their “Ryzen AI MAX+” (ugh) systems, does quite well in benchmarks.
It also doesn’t hurt that Apple puts the RAM on the SoC and gives it a truckload of bandwidth. DDR5 is about 70GB/s, meanwhile the M4 Max is around 540GB/s.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 12:06
collapse
I didn’t know AMD had managed to switch over to unified memory too. Managing that while remaining x86 compatible is quite an achievement!
I think the next big thing will be when storage becomes as fast as ram and they unify that too, getting rid of separate RAM. Working with data directly in place could have massive efficiency boosts. But the industry has been trying to get it that fast for many years and still not succeeded. And once they do, separate SSDs wouldn’t be possible, at least not as a primary storage, so it wont be an advance that makes sense for every use case.
The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
on 25 Jul 2025 01:08
collapse
Yeah “universal memory” is the holy grail, seemingly as hard to find as it as well.
The articles on Wikipedia about the related tech is great, it’ll mention something like “Developers expect commercialisation to happen relatively soon” and then link to an article from 2004, or research papers from the 1980s.
This is not “different” this is “anti consumer non-sense” and you sound like a chud when you recite corporate propaganda.
Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 02:02
nextcollapse
Apple’s entire software design philosophy is god-awful. There’s only one way to do things and if you don’t like “The Apple Way”, fuck you. “It just works” only works for very basic normie stuff. If you try to do anything advanced, it most likely won’t work and it’ll give zero feedback as to why.
I mean I don’t particularly like it either but not having tons of choice is not always a complete negative, it simplifies a lot of things. And having an OS that mostly functions like an OS instead of a fucking billboard is nice. Just keeping things in context here.
Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 17:30
collapse
“It just works” only works for very basic normie stuff.
I think that was @Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world’s main point. Apple is great if you’re a normie, but if you even think about tinkering with things, have an unusual issue on your system, or creatures forbid… want to play games, you’re fucked.
My mom is an Apple diehard who has used Android and Windows in the past (2000s), but got burned by Window’s shitty security and really only switched to iPhone due to iMessage being more reliable than SMS at the time. She knows a little bit of tech stuff (I guess I get it from her), but overall, she’s a “normie” compared to me, so Apple (90% of the time) does what she needs.
It simplifies a lot of things
If this was me about 3 weeks ago, I wouldn’t have debated this as hard. But recently my grandma had to call my mom and I to help her get her iPhone pictures to work on her Windows laptop, and she almost thought she downloaded a virus when trying to get an HEIC app. Apple’s asinine proprietary file format is a plague on society, and I hated when I had to send pictures from my iPhone to my Google drive for school in HS. That’s not simple, and now we have to help grandparents understand that they need to screenshot their camera pictures or else literally no website will take their damn photos.
The little things add-up for me, and so yeah, it’s nice having something that “just works”, but only if you literally accept everything and never complain about any of their choices.
I despise their business model, their design decisions, and their walled garden. I will agree that the OS is fine. I was forced to use a MacBook at a software development job in the past. It being UNIX was a big point why I didn’t immediately hate it. I will still agree with the other users and say that their hardware is pretty nice and well thought-out (not praising the anti-consument measures like soldered RAM). Still, I would personally never buy their devices due to the aforementioned business practices.
tane69@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 21:30
nextcollapse
People are still using the os that has like 95% market penetration? Yeah man pretty sure
joe_archer@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 21:44
collapse
Interestingly, the percent of Windows goes down if you look at just the United States, where it's only 63% of OSes. And it also goes down similarly when you set it to the UK, or North America, or almost any other region. But it goes up to around 73% when you limit it to Europe or Asia. Weird, why is it higher in those areas?
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
on 23 Jul 2025 05:12
collapse
Because it’s mainly a measure of how much people use Macs. Apple products were always significantly more popular and “hype” in the Anglo world than anywhere else. 5,5% global vs 16% in USA, for example
KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
on 23 Jul 2025 06:06
collapse
Unless you’re tech-savvy and actively change your OS, people just use whatever is shipped with their computer and, yea, Apple isn’t nearly as popular outside of the English-speaking world as it is within it, at least when it comes to laptops. The share of Linux, and other smaller systems, is probably roughly the same.
darkkite@lemmy.ml
on 22 Jul 2025 21:48
nextcollapse
Games
pivot_root@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 01:02
nextcollapse
Aside from anticheat BS, Linux has come pretty far. It’s not perfect, but it’s not the frustrating mess like it used to be half a decade ago.
alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 04:39
collapse
I’ve been gamin on Linux for over a year with 0 issues, the only games that should be keeping people back are a small handful of competitive games with certain types of anticheat. (Most anticheat does work on Linux)
dev_null@lemmy.ml
on 23 Jul 2025 10:53
nextcollapse
And many VR games. Linux is not viable for VR gaming (without a lot of concessions).
voodooattack@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 01:34
collapse
Phantom Dust is distributed solely via the Microsoft Store, which requires a Windows environment to function. Compatibility layers such as Wine and Proton do not support the Microsoft Store, as it depends on Windows-specific services and APIs that are not replicated in these layers.
Delete only the boot partition? Doug kick him off the tour!
thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 02:51
nextcollapse
You gotta have your old files! But man does NTFS suck ass
RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org
on 23 Jul 2025 13:16
collapse
I only use Linux and I want Windows to just stay out of my way or it’ll pay, listen to what I say.
somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 08:14
nextcollapse
Heck, wipe the entire disk!
(based on a real life experience)
(windows just kept standing no matter what partition i deleted so i wiped the disk clean)
Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 17:12
collapse
I recently decided to switch from using Atomic Fedora to reg KDE Fedora (cause tinkering and bypassing atomic features got on my nerves), and I almost went through with wiping everything and only having Linux installed. And then I realized I probably wouldn’t be able to do some tests for college cause they use anti-cheating software (lockdown browser) which they probably wouldn’t like if I ran it in a VM or wine…
But man, once I’m out of college, I’m probably wiping Windows for good! Also gonna factory reset that partition so it at least takes way less space on my drive.
(Side note: the other hesitation is that I’m 90% kernel updates nuked Bluetooth for me around March (It worked when I rolled back to January/February releases) and I do have zoom classes sometimes. Like, do I just have to buy a Bluetooth dongle to deal with this?)
LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 22 Jul 2025 23:40
nextcollapse
Switching to Linux made me like computers again. Switching to Hyprland made me love computers again.
pivot_root@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 00:56
nextcollapse
Switching to TempleOS made me hear the voices again.
felbane@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 01:45
nextcollapse
Switching to Hannah Montana Linux made me hear The Best of Both Worlds again.
PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 20:10
collapse
I want to use Corey in the House Linux
Bluewing@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:45
collapse
They got pills for that. Just sayin’
bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 02:37
nextcollapse
Same story here! Im in love with computing all over again because of it. Too bad many are tricked into thinking Microsoft ia the only option.
eclipse@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 18:34
collapse
Hyprland made me suicidal again but we are all different
ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Jul 2025 23:56
nextcollapse
Running Linux would block this feature too.
Keep In mind that you can still be captured by this feature indirectly, Discord for example certainly doesn’t intend to do anything to hide your messages, they recently went public so in their eyes more tracking the better.
Tbf, anything that isn't AI Windows blocks the feature. Including regular Windows.
People just need to not fall for the scam edition and they don't have to deal with this shit.
Almacca@aussie.zone
on 22 Jul 2025 22:11
nextcollapse
Can Recall not just be turned off?
Zorque@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 22:18
nextcollapse
For an update or two, at least. Windows features tend to get turned back on after updates quite frequently.
Almacca@aussie.zone
on 22 Jul 2025 22:31
nextcollapse
I’m probably going to have to move to 11 at some point (Linux isn’t for me right now), but I would like to be able to disable as much bloatware as possible. Vigilance it is then.
Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Jul 2025 23:38
nextcollapse
I’m in the same boat waiting for Linux to be a bit more “feature complete,” for me to daily.
In the mean time, check out W11 Enterprise IoT LTSC. It’s the secret menu item equivalent W11 they don’t wanna sell to consumers. It feels like a fresh W7 install with no AI, no bloat, no bullshit, and can even disable all telemetry. Only comes with Edge and Defender.
massgrave.dev has the iso’s and permanent activators.
Edit: Adding that you can install the App Store and Xbox App to make use of Game Pass.
yucandu@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 23:58
nextcollapse
Yeah but then you can’t run Xbox Games Pass or anything fun like that.
Almacca@aussie.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 00:11
nextcollapse
I can live without Game Pass.
Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 00:32
collapse
You can install the Store and Xbox app, and use Gamepass. I have a friend that does this, after I showed them how.
unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
on 23 Jul 2025 00:06
nextcollapse
Lovely, thanks for the reminder on massgrave. I made the switch to Linux and haven’t looked back, but there are some games that require root kits that I’d like to play so I was considering virtualizing Windows and this would be perfect.
Thanks. I’ll look into that. My current version had been pushing me to update, which I’ve been postponing and I’m guessing is free, but I’m not sure it’ll give the choice of version. My work computer just updated to W11 Enterprise literally this morning, so I’ll get myself used to it here before making the leap.
neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 03:26
collapse
I’m in a similar boat, windows for work, linux for personal.
But since I’m freelance, it’s annoying juggling 2 computers. Just waiting for a single app to either work in wine or get a Linux port.
My home PC is purely for personal entertainment, so less of an issue, but there’s little to no Linux support for my simrig hardware.
sturmblast@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 01:15
collapse
That’s why you leverage group policy or local security policies to disable these features.
misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 01:47
collapse
Until they change those policy definitions.
GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 23:09
nextcollapse
When they rolled out the update that removed the toggle for it, I remember seeing steps for how to disable it via regedit or tools which would do that for you, all with the warnings of future updates may re-enable it.
I haven’t moved from W10 yet so I’m kinda ootl on it, but that’s what I remember
Ulrich@feddit.org
on 23 Jul 2025 01:14
nextcollapse
For now it is opt-in. It’s unlikely to remain that way.
Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 06:10
collapse
Also it’s not like windows doesn’t routinely “forgets” these settings with updates. Or harasses you to opt in again with every update, in the hopes that one day you’ll let it slip
sturmblast@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 01:15
collapse
Yes.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 22:41
nextcollapse
You might say that they are being so very… Brave.
🎤 tap tap … is this thing on?
Treczoks@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 23:08
nextcollapse
The sad thing is that you now have to protect yourself against the OS you are using. Feels a bit like in the movie TRON.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 03:03
collapse
I don’t, my OS doesn’t come with any nonsense.
Treczoks@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 10:02
collapse
Me neither, I just watch the shit show from the bleachers.
timewarp@lemmy.world
on 22 Jul 2025 23:11
nextcollapse
Brave’s CEO is a homophobic Trump supporter. No thanks.
Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
on 22 Jul 2025 23:56
nextcollapse
He invented JavaScript, so definitely don’t use that either. For real. JavaScript sucks.
hperrin@lemmy.ca
on 23 Jul 2025 02:17
nextcollapse
Ah, you beat me to it.
bdonvr@thelemmy.club
on 23 Jul 2025 04:08
nextcollapse
Does he run/have power over JavaScript right now?
Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
on 23 Jul 2025 04:19
collapse
No, not directly. Not any more than your average tech leader who goes to conferences and discusses it.
bdonvr@thelemmy.club
on 23 Jul 2025 04:21
collapse
Oh wait hey you’re on my instance. Cool! We’re such small one lol
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 06:34
nextcollapse
“It’s a small club and you ain’t in it”
—Warren Bullgates Lincolnham
Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
on 23 Jul 2025 13:28
collapse
JS is difficult to avoid. Brave is easy to avoid, just use another browser.
HowAbt2day@futurology.today
on 23 Jul 2025 02:14
nextcollapse
I need a better option then. What can yall suggest?
gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
on 23 Jul 2025 02:40
nextcollapse
Firefox
CosmoNova@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 07:28
nextcollapse
Sure I use that too but you should have at least one chromium based browser for certain features though.
hagelslager@feddit.nl
on 23 Jul 2025 07:47
nextcollapse
Vivaldi? (Sort of continuation of Opera, run by it’s former CTO.)
Bluewing@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:43
collapse
Vivaldi is OK, but I would replace it with something else. It’s a pretty busy UI and I have had issues with it freezing in Fedora 42 KDE.
x00z@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 08:49
nextcollapse
I use LibreWolf (FireFox fork) + Ungoogled Chromium
Zink@programming.dev
on 23 Jul 2025 13:35
collapse
This is my setup, and I never actually use ungoogled chromium.
If I have some kind of issue that I need to work around immediately rather then figure out, I usually just open Firefox and try that.
HorseFD@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 12:29
nextcollapse
Why should you? What are these certain features?
CosmoNova@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 14:53
collapse
Yes some tools do not work with Firefox. It‘s a niche but I‘ve run into it a few times just recently. For example with a gamepad enabler tool where Firefox simply won‘t be able to see your USB input.
The thing is, Firefox follows web standards. Chrome doesn’t always and websites put in custom code that works only with Chrome.
I’d rather use the browser that follows standards.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 07:29
collapse
Well I‘m not saying you should use chromium as your main browser. In fact I think you shouldn‘t. But sometimes there is no way around it. It‘s okay to be realistic about these things.
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev
on 23 Jul 2025 13:39
collapse
I personally haven’t had to use a chromium browser for anything yet since my swith to Firefox. Only to test a render bug in chromium that Google hasn’t bothered to fix in over 9 years for a case that works correctly in every other browser.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:19
collapse
Mozilla also has many problems
kerntucky@infosec.pub
on 24 Jul 2025 04:29
collapse
I’m out of the loop. What are the many problems with Mozilla?
I saw you mention the Mr. Robot extension in another comment. That looks to be a bad decision but what else are the “many problems?”
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 27 Jul 2025 13:36
collapse
Most problems are because of how Mozilla works. According to some devs, they gatekeep some contributions and they don’t really act and communicate with the community like FOSS projects are expected to. They also spend a lot of money on some - useless - stuff. They’re really slow to improve their software and Firefox defaults with some questionable stuff (regular pings, Google bullshit…)
The Better bird dev talks a bit about this, and you also have some other resources: youtu.be/ugnOM2mzgNU (I don’t remember every link and everything I’ve seen but this should be a good start)
captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org
on 23 Jul 2025 12:30
collapse
Thorium.
hperrin@lemmy.ca
on 23 Jul 2025 02:16
nextcollapse
That’s not even the worst thing about him. He also invented JavaScript.
OozingPositron@feddit.cl
on 23 Jul 2025 17:44
collapse
That’s it, brave is getting uninstalled from my PC NOW.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 02:59
nextcollapse
What does that have to do with the browser? Last I checked, browsers aren’t transphobic.
You do you, but I personally refuse to make product choices based on the person who makes it. Brave is the least bad chromium browser, so I use it as a backup to my main Gecko-based browser. I’m not a fan of Mozilla either, but that’s irrelevant since I pick my software based on what it does, not based on the management of the company that builds it.
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 03:21
nextcollapse
I would not choose to use a product made by people I disagree with but leaving that aside:
Is it the least bad? Why not degoogled chrome? Or chromium? Even vivaldi seems like a better choice.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 03:39
collapse
Ad blocking mostly. That’s literally all I need in a chromium browser, because I only use it on a handful of sites that don’t work properly in Firefox.
Chromium is also okay, but no ad blocker. I have that installed as well in the really unlikely case that the ad blocker gets in the way.
99% of my browsing is on a Firefox browser, and 99% of the rest is on Brave. I use it so infrequently the “time saved” metric is a merely seconds.
Engywuck@lemmy.zip
on 23 Jul 2025 03:57
nextcollapse
Actually, I consider Brave the best (or the least bed…) browser on the market. Period. The fact that it isn’t made by Mozilla is a plus for me.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 13:21
collapse
I don’t like Mozilla either, but here are my priorities in a web browser:
FOSS
Privacy tools - includes ad blocking; I’d actually be okay with ads if they didn’t track me
Promotes open web standards - rendering engine diversity is critical here, I don’t want a repeat of the IE era
Security
Performance
Firefox ticks all of them, and my issues with Mozilla as an org don’t really come into play. I use a fork on my phone, but I use Firefox on my laptop and desktop because I trust the binaries coming from my Linux distribution maintainers (part of 4).
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:22
nextcollapse
Brave also ticks all of them?
at this point, Firefox’s development is not very much more open than Chromium’s
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 18:11
collapse
It doesn’t tick #3, hence why I use a Firefox browser as my main. If they had their own rendering engine, I would consider it as my main. But for now, it’s my backup in case I need a website that doesn’t work on Firefox (i.e. they use something Chrome-specific).
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 18:54
collapse
Valid point then. We need compatibility with gecko, I always found it better looking than chromium
Good for you. I actively refuse to use it or any of its derivatives to avoid endorsing Mozilla by giving them market share. Additionally, I find that Brave just performs better (and needs one extension less to be functional).
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 18:21
collapse
I care a lot about rendering engine diversity, and Firefox is the largest non-chromium browser, so I use it. It’s fast enough for me, and my handful of extensions gives me what I need.
Vivaldi is not open source, so for me it doesn’t count as a valid option.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 07:37
nextcollapse
I‘m not even pro Brave but all that ad stuff is opt-in so it doesn‘t matter as long as you don‘t want to see ads. The arguments in this thread are starting to just loop in circles. Essentially using Brave is fine if you stick to the default. There‘s no sleazy stuff if you don‘t enable it and the CEO also doesn‘t make a dime from you if that‘s something you‘re concerned about. You could of course use a different chromium browser if you want but it‘s virtually the same thing.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 13:15
collapse
The only two there that bother me are the affiliate code thing (reminds me of the Honey drama) and installing extra software without consent. The first was a bad call and probably related with how their ad replacement stuff works (if anything, they should merely axe affiliate links; Firefox has that as an option), and this"solution" to the latter is pretty odd to me:
reinstall the browser without admin rights
Why would a browser need admin rights in the first place? I haven’t used Windows in well over a decade, so I don’t think that particular one would be an issue for me.
The rest can be grouped as:
bugs - bug fixes generally don’t get prioritized until enough users complain; I would be very picky if I was an at risk person (activist or whatever) and would probably only use Tor browser
opt-in services
their marketing department
My options for chromium browsers are:
something with ineffective ad blocking
Opera - I used it before it became a chromium browser, then it went downhill; not FOSS
Brave, with all its warts
Since ad blocking and FOSS are my prerequisites, Brave basically wins by default.
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
on 24 Jul 2025 05:23
collapse
Just block with unlock 🙉 why choose browser based on a ad block feature that is worse (injecting own ads/adware and therefore trying to dictate who is allowed to grab your attention) than the ad blocking extension?
I recommend Firefox, due to best compatibility with uBlock (fuck manifest v3) and additionally have a DNS filter in your network, like pihole or adguard.
On the go, use wireguard VPN to always be digitally home, and get your ads blocked (as well as tracking organisations) like that.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
on 24 Jul 2025 06:49
collapse
I recommend Firefox
So do I, that’s my main. Brave is my backup for the handful of sites that don’t like Firefox.
szymon@programming.dev
on 23 Jul 2025 09:54
collapse
He could be next husband of Ivanka Trump - I don’t care
If he provide good service for me - browser which fits my needs. I would even send him money every day
technohippie@slrpnk.net
on 23 Jul 2025 10:14
nextcollapse
That’s the logic of as long as it benefits ME I don’t care and I support them no matter what they do. This same logic has been applied to all the shitty things done in history like slavery, war and so forth, and the reason the world is the way it is.
mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
on 23 Jul 2025 11:52
collapse
Do you know all the personal histories of all the people related to all the services you use?
technohippie@slrpnk.net
on 23 Jul 2025 11:57
collapse
Of course that’s not possible, the issue here is being aware and not caring and in some cases supporting it for convenience and selfishness.
mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
on 23 Jul 2025 15:10
collapse
How does me using brave browser supports fascism?
technohippie@slrpnk.net
on 23 Jul 2025 16:05
collapse
In my country, one of the most successful supermarkets is run by a fascist and he uses part of his fortune to finance our local fascist party, which is gaining strength every year by the way. Do we support fascism by buying in that supermarket? What if we suddenly started to boycott the supermarket to hell?
My point is that they earn profits by using their services and in today’s society money is power. And from where the CEO got his power? From the millions of people with the mindset of “if it benefits me I don’t care”.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
on 23 Jul 2025 10:16
collapse
“I’ll support fascism as long as it’s convenient for me”
mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
on 23 Jul 2025 11:51
collapse
No. “I will support a good service and not mingle with politics”
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
on 23 Jul 2025 11:56
collapse
If fascism was a passive philosophy that didn’t hurt anyone then you might have a point. But as you can see recently it’s extremely dangerous and ruins lives.
You may not want to mingle with politics, but it doesn’t have the same view.
nothing is perfect, except the horseshoe crab. however both librewolf and cromite are great with ublock, and ltsc windows has no copilot since companies use that edition.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 18:53
collapse
Librewolf is too restrictive and not suitable for everyday browsing. I hate it.
im pretty sure you can disable a ton of stuff in the options menu
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 20:40
collapse
Yeah but for example fingerprinting is either fully on or fully off
Switching defaults hurt fingerprinting more than it helps so at that point might as well stay with the default firefox
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
on 23 Jul 2025 01:45
nextcollapse
funny thing is ban evaders(the ones that make hundreds of accounts for OF or links) use it for its anti-fingerprinting which is useful against reddit(temporarily) ability to read the browser. i used to temporarily, and kinda explains why my last acc was only shadowbanned much later than thier purges.(i was hit by thier AI moderation as soon as switched to a different browser fork of FF)
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:27
collapse
it has better anti fingerprinting than firefox? That’s nice to know
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
on 24 Jul 2025 03:32
collapse
oh yea i used pixel scan or something similar, ban evaders use these to check thier browser profile, and it partially shields it. there other similar browser scanners, but the thing is you also need proxies and anti-detect browsers to hide the rest of your activities, because reddit is just that invasive in detection.(hence all those bans.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 27 Jul 2025 13:31
collapse
Didn’t know reddit went that hard
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
on 28 Jul 2025 02:54
collapse
im just simplifying it, they have other methods at thier tools. since recently it come to my attention they also indiscrminately shadowban too for no reason at all/. V3 captcha, browser, time and date, location, components. they detect vpn quite easily now,
Flukas88@feddit.it
on 23 Jul 2025 05:33
nextcollapse
Very brave of them.
Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 06:03
nextcollapse
What a title. Made me think installing the browser blocked the feature machine-wide.
Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 06:08
collapse
Oh so they’re just doing whatever Firefox is doing in private mode on Android that makes screenshots all black
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 06:27
nextcollapse
A device that surreptitiously gathers information on a target is called a bug, not a feature.
peetabix@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 06:32
nextcollapse
More like malware
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 10:36
collapse
It’s actually super simple: even though the community is called “Technology”, there’s A LOT of tech-illiterate fear mongering going on here. People behave like Microsoft is trying to spy on them, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Recall is:
only available on devices with an NPU.
local only, nothing goes out to the Internet (hence the NPU requirement).
opt-in - you need to turn it on yourself.
There’s nothing malicious about it. Functionality is questionable, but acting like it’s malware is just showing ignorance.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk
on 23 Jul 2025 10:17
nextcollapse
Well, not really, a bug is unintentional. Even calling it a design flaw is a stretch, it’s a feature that isn’t for your benefit.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:38
collapse
“Bug” also means “listening device.”
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk
on 23 Jul 2025 12:59
collapse
If it was intentional double entendre then I retract my comment, but used in the context of “bugs and features” there’s a contextual implication.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 15:31
collapse
It was wordplay, yes.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk
on 23 Jul 2025 15:49
collapse
I retract.
jjlinux@lemmy.ml
on 23 Jul 2025 10:45
nextcollapse
So, you’re saying that browsing history, in literally any browser on the market, is a bug not a feature?
surreptitiously
Oh, wait, I actually missed that! How is something that you need to purposefully turn on “surreptitious”? Like… Holy fuck, people, this is supposed to be the community of tech-literate people, so maybe stop fear-mongering in read about Recall a bit? It’s opt-in, it’s limited to a (as of now) extremely small number of NPU-carrying devices, it’s offline.
If you don’t like it, just don’t fucking turn it on.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 06:28
collapse
It’s a good thing that microsoft is trustworthy and you can believe everything they say. And that malware never misuses resources of the system on which it is installed.
Recall sits in a secure vault behind BitLocker encryption secured with Windows Hello.
BitLocker+Windows Hello gets broken through, the world has a much larger problem than some screenshots, because that’s the foundation of, like, 80% of enterprise security.
If you’re afraid that an attacker sits on your PC and just waits for you to unlock the vault, then you already have the PC breached to the point where they don’t have to do that, they already have access to everything else.
If you’re afraid of the feature in anyway, don’t use it.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 07:57
collapse
You trust microsoft implicitly no matter what they do, I get it.
So you still think it’s 1990. Got it. Well, times have changed. We have better oversight. The EU has GDPR, user data is better protected. If they tried to pull off a “heist” and suddenly start grabbing these screenshots from users, the fine from EU would be historical.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 20:00
collapse
So you still think it’s 1990. Got it. Well, times have changed
Times may have. Microsoft has not.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 06:28
nextcollapse
“Feature”
blobchoice@feddit.uk
on 23 Jul 2025 07:33
nextcollapse
Unfortunately that would involve using the Brave browser, which is an antifeature in itself.
yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 17:10
collapse
Can you elaborate? I don’t use it.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:17
collapse
They shit on it because just like Mozilla, they made some shit decision by making some shady partnerships, and because the CEO is transphobic/homophobic/can’t remember
Apart from the usual bullshit and antifeatures it has, it’s still a great browser choice, just like Firefox
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz
on 23 Jul 2025 18:06
nextcollapse
“Just like Mozilla”.
Let’s compare.
Mozilla: installed a closed-source plugin once, and then apologised for it.
Brave CEO: actively supports homophobic organisations, donates money to them, injects affiliate links to stores, whenever given a microphone will say something bigoted and homophobic.
Yeah, it’s totally the same exact issue with both browsers!
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 18:21
collapse
Brave: injected affiliate links once, then apologised for it too. Developped a search engine to be less dependent on big companies
Mozilla is spending money like crazy, just like Wikipedia, has little to no democratic system which makes people fork the stuff they make, and prefer to use the money from donation to buy trips all over the world to educate about privacy and shit while they proceed to keep adding more telemetry and BS in firefox
They also make it close to impossible to install plugins outside their plugins website, which I’ve heard has some strict rules and take a lot of time to approve stuff. Closed garden bullshit again
Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
on 24 Jul 2025 08:50
collapse
I just think the idea of your alternative being partially coded by the company you’re attempting to avoid is a little stupid. I don’t give a shit who he is. I barely give a shit who runs Mozilla.
Brave and every other Chromium fork are at the mercy of Google to exist as an alternative to Google, which to me, defeats the point. Every bit of their effort would be better spent rolling their money over to donate to browser development rather than band-aids.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 27 Jul 2025 13:39
collapse
Tradeoffs have to be made. Android is an example of that…
Chromium can be worked on by anyone, it’s just that it’s too costly to do
SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
on 23 Jul 2025 08:23
nextcollapse
They haven’t blocked the windows feature, they’re using DRM to interfere with it. Microsoft could easily change how the DRM works any time they want, rendering all these hacks useless.
then people can complained it on Brave Github or their official forum and it will be fixed by their team
SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
on 23 Jul 2025 11:10
collapse
My point was that brave’s solution, like Signal’s, is dependent on microsoft playing fair. If microsoft decides they don’t want brave, signal, or anyone else using DRM to interfere with their screen scraping chatbot, there is not going to be an easy way to fix it.
No way they’d do that though, because then they’d have the mouse and the other members of the content mafia breathing down their necks.
Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 19:22
collapse
It’s an image every few seconds. Not that piracy is currently even interested in tech that reencodes the content.
And for training, copyrighted stuff is already everywhere; AI tools seem to be limited on the output side rather than raw training data.
Sure it wouldnt be rational to care about DRM being broken a small amount allowing limited amount of copyright material to be copied.
What do you think their response would be?
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 11:47
nextcollapse
People, ynless they are at work, can choose to use Linux any time. I will personally assist if needed.
thevoidzero@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 13:39
nextcollapse
Exactly, how do you even fight with the OS except just making it bit hard for them lol. You have to tell the OS what pixels to put in the screen, there’s literally no way you can hide things from the OS if they want to know.
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
on 24 Jul 2025 04:57
collapse
They could, but Disney…
rozodru@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 11:08
nextcollapse
yeah, no, i’m not using your shitty browser.
vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 12:12
nextcollapse
But it’s funded by an unrepentant homophobe! How can you pass on that?!
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 15:57
collapse
An unrepentant homophobe who accused people who dislike him for his homophobic views/actions as being closed-minded and bigoted for disliking him over it.
You can’t make this shit up
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:15
collapse
It’s probably the best chromium browser out there
Firefox has done shit too
sadly we don’t have a lot of choice, but they’re one of the least worse
Dojan@pawb.social
on 23 Jul 2025 17:38
nextcollapse
Just don’t use Chromium unless you for some reason absolutely have to. Mozilla is just another corporation, but they’re not exactly threatening to monopolise the internet. Google is, and using Chromium directly aids in their effort to do so.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:47
collapse
It’s not that bad. Sure, having more choice is good, but it’s not as life threatening as you make it seem
I think it’s a compounding issue, primarily of Google products just kind of being the “default.”
Google pays to be the primary search engine in Firefox, on iOS, and sets themselves as the default on their operating systems. They, wherever possible also set their browser as default. Yes, Chromium is open source, but they have the ultimate final say, and no one seems to have the interest in forking it. This puts Google in a similar position that Microsoft was in in the 90s and early 00s, where they can essentially hijack the web and force their ideas through whether others want to or not.
We saw this with Google forcing Manifest v3, all Chromium-based browsers essentially just had to follow suit. That was just Manifest v3 however, who’s to say what else they’ll do?
Then there’s my tinfoil hat worry that Google essentially being the window to the web for so many people, on an OS, browser, and discoverability level is just overall a cause for worry. That’s not even considering their communications and media platforms.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 18:19
collapse
I’m pretty sure if Firefox/Mozilla decides to change their policy on something, most forks of firefox will have no choice but follow the same path
afaik all firefox forks are really small, just like chromium forks
Mozilla might not have as much conflicting interests though, I admit it
Dojan@pawb.social
on 23 Jul 2025 20:53
nextcollapse
Oh yeah, absolutely. There are no good options for a truly libre web, unfortunately. :(
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
on 24 Jul 2025 04:55
collapse
Perfect is the enemy of good.
Gecko is still way more sympathetic than chromium, to me. Even if it is not perfect either.
kadup@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 17:40
nextcollapse
Firefox has done shit too
Firefox has injected my URLs with affiliate codes?
Electricd@lemmybefree.net
on 23 Jul 2025 17:46
collapse
Nope, but it put a closed source Mr Robot plugin without asking anyone
Yep, and you also have to be in a specific state of mind to be okay with “features” like something that takes screenshots of everything you do on your PC.
What feature? Recall?? That’s Windows 11-specific and hasn’t even launched yet??
Syltti@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 18:42
nextcollapse
The joke is that Linux blocks this by not doing it at all. Which is why people should switch to Linux. Which is a good idea. But that’s up to the people.
bytesonbike@discuss.online
on 23 Jul 2025 22:02
collapse
I love this comment so much
3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com
on 23 Jul 2025 15:53
nextcollapse
I still have literally thousands of clients that use Windows and want support… for these kinds of things. Firefox has recently stopped working on a few things and Brave works better for me right now. It’s not convenience when FF doesn’t work…
But I digress, Win 11 here and Brave. My choices, for lots of reasons. Lots of linux boxes as well though. Each to their own and all that
sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 15:55
nextcollapse
In this thread something I see a lot on lemmy is happening. Maybe someone can give me a hint on how that happens. The post itself is 90% upvotes, while the comment section is really anti-Brave (for good reasons). Do most upvotes come from people scrolling through without looking at the comment section and those with an opinion on the topic dive into it?
FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 16:40
nextcollapse
I’ve noticed this on political posts too, among others and I’ve wondered the same thing.
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
on 24 Jul 2025 04:50
collapse
I upvote posts that I think are worth being seen by more people. That includes posts about topics that I don’t like or agree with, but think people need to know is happening and I think to know that are not including disinformation or misinformation or opinion written as facts.
onnekas@sopuli.xyz
on 23 Jul 2025 16:51
nextcollapse
I think you should not downvote a post you have a negative opinion about.
If the post is worth to discuss then why should I not upvote the post and then say that I disagree in the comments.
If we all down vote those posts nobody will see it (apart of those who sort by controversial) and there will be no discussion.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 17:09
collapse
If the software in question is bad, then I’d like to reduce visibility of the post while explaining why in the comments.
Brave is connected to the BAT pay-to-surf scam. Its CEO donates to homophobic causes.
Trihilis@ani.social
on 23 Jul 2025 17:05
nextcollapse
The post itself is reasonable quality and informative so I find it upvote worthy. If a post is low quality or a shit post then I downvote.
To me the karma system is about quality. Not an “I agree/disagree” button.
For comments I only down vote obvious trolls, bigots/racism etc.
onnekas@sopuli.xyz
on 23 Jul 2025 20:23
nextcollapse
Well, one could argue if just posting a link with a title is a ‘quality’ post. But the topic is still worth a discussion so I don’t see why it should be downvoted.
macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 22:25
nextcollapse
The problem is that people routinely upvote bullshit, falsehoods, and flat out disinformation. Just because it was well written does not make it true.
To me the karma system is about quality. Not an “I agree/disagree” button.
That’s how it was meant to be. The original Rediquette from over 15 years ago has:
“Vote. If you think something contributes to conversation, upvote it. If you think it does not contribute to the subreddit it is posted in or is off-topic in a particular community, downvote it.
[Please don’t] Downvote an otherwise acceptable post because you don’t personally like it. Think before you downvote and take a moment to ensure you’re downvoting someone because they are not contributing to the community dialogue or discussion. If you simply take a moment to stop, think and examine your reasons for downvoting, rather than doing so out of an emotional reaction, you will ensure that your downvotes are given for good reasons.”
But 99% of people definitely use them as an Agree/Disagree button.
nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Jul 2025 17:21
nextcollapse
people just scroll around up voting headlines that they think sound good or support their identity
I try to counter this by randomly downvoting everything
Atomic@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 17:28
nextcollapse
Most people never bother to read anything beyond the title of the post. Let alone click the link to the article.
Now, i don’t know how everyone sees up/down votes. But I always thought that content and comments that is relevant and promotes discussion is good. And comments that aren’t are bad.
Rather than a measure of others opinions.
Demdaru@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 18:19
nextcollapse
It seems to me most people simply upvote the post to reward OP for bringing things up, exposing etc. Comments serve opinions on the topic itself, but upvote/downvote is more for if it’s good according to community rules and if the topic itself is interesting.
MaXsteri@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 20:00
collapse
I upvote the post because I support the feature, and would like to see more browsers implement more privacy focused features.
I upvote the anti-Brave comments, because fuck Brave.
Tattorack@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 16:01
nextcollapse
The better option would be to not use spyware as an operating system.
It’s anonymous and not malicious in nature. It’s a diagnostic and engagement measuring tool.
WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Jul 2025 20:18
nextcollapse
diagnostic
I think it is useful to send crash reports, but the user should have power over it (see: when macOS generates a crash report, it asks the user if they would like to send it)
engagement measuring
That is your data they are taking to make money off of without your consent, and I consider that malicious. There are ways to do that with consent. See: Steam’s annual hardware survey
That is your data they are taking to make money off of without your consent
I mean… They’re a for-profit company, so literally anything they do is to make money.
But it’s not “my data”, it’s anonymous. The “engagement” info is in relation to features. That’s why some features are removed - because nobody uses them. Or rather: not enough people use them to warrant maintenance.
Tattorack@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 21:23
nextcollapse
And how do you know it’s not malicious in nature? I’d like to know what your definition of “malicious” is if you’re just fine with letting a Corpo run system look at everything you’re doing.
I don’t know, maybe because I understand the definition of “spyware” and “telemetry”?
ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
on 23 Jul 2025 20:39
collapse
Well, semantically yes, not all telemetry is spyware. However regarding Windows telemetry it’s indistinguishable from spyware - you have no idea nor control over the data gathered, measured and processed.
The crux is that Windows telemetry is opt out, opting out can’t be done during installation, and historically opting out wasn’t sticky. Additionally some Windows telemetry is still being sent despite opting out.
That makes Windows telemetry fulfill all spyware criteria.
It’s not, but it’s also not spyware - it’s local, encrypted, AND optional.
ifmu@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 19:21
nextcollapse
Microsoft is known for making things “optional” at first then eventually forcing it down everyone’s throats. Removing offline accounts is one of them.
It’s not so much the technology itself is malware, but its behavior replicates that of malware.
Agent641@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 23:17
nextcollapse
Yes hello John Windows my microwave account name is Oobe\bypassnro
r_deckard@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 01:51
collapse
This also works:
shift-F10 before you get to the network configuration, then type this and press enter
start ms-cxh:localonly
For either method, if you configure networking during setup, e.g. plug in an ethernet cable or give it the wi-fi password, it’ll keep returning to the online account screen. You need to do it prior to network config.
If they somehow go through encryption, they won’t just have the EU on their arses, governments of the entire world will be after them, because they trust that this encryption system makes their data secure.
veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 21:39
nextcollapse
Optional like how it reminds me every 3 days that it wants my info for “customization” purposes, and I can only sleep the notification for another 3 days instead of telling it to fuck off?
They have been so predatory, at this point no one should see anything they do as benefiting end users.
So you’re saying you haven’t bothered to read about Recall at all, you just assumed it’s going to be enabled by default?
Landless2029@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 10:55
nextcollapse
Until a windows update kicks in and somehow turns it on for the world. thanks but no thanks. I’ll be disabling this not with a reg key but with local policy or DSC if I have to use a windows machine for personal again.
Until a windows update kicks in and somehow turns it on for the world.
I don’t know if this is a regional thing, but I’ve been using Windows since 3.11 and have NEVER had ONE instance of an update randomly turning on something that I’ve turned off before.
Doomsider@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 16:28
collapse
Look at this bootlicker ignoring history and saying trust Microsoft.
“Look at this fossil thinking it’s still 1990”, I guess?
Mate, did you miss how 30 years have passed? How the world change? Can you even begin to imagine the fine the EU would slap without a second thought on MS if they tried pulling something like suddenly grabbing these screenshots from users’ devices?
Doomsider@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 16:57
collapse
I will pass on being your mate. I don’t like shills.
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
on 24 Jul 2025 14:18
collapse
I believe they are talking about Windows, an OS that is spyware and no one should use
An example of Windows being spyware not standard telemetry is the Recall feature. A feature that doesn’t just tell you how the OS is used but actually takes screenshots every few seconds
Windows, an OS that is spyware and no one should use
Of, ffs, grow up.
An example of Windows being spyware not standard telemetry is the Recall feature. A feature that doesn’t just tell you how the OS is used but actually takes screenshots every few seconds
You have no clue what you’re talking about, do you?
Recall only works on devices with an NPU. Do you know why? Because it runs locally. It’s got NOTHING to do with telemetry, because it does NOT send data to Microsoft.
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
on 24 Jul 2025 18:29
collapse
Recall only works on devices with an NPU. Do you know why? Because it runs locally.
Again: if they did that, the EU’s GDPR would eat them alive.
MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 17:45
nextcollapse
This is about the Smart App Control feature in Win11 that takes screenshots periodically to check for “malicious activity”. its basically a glorified keylogger built into the OS. Firefox should really follow suit and block this too.
that takes screenshots periodically to check for “malicious activity”
It doesn’t. Smar App Control does code validation and reputation check. Recall makes screenshots, OCR’s them and keeps them in an encrypted vault for the user to interact with.
built into the OS
It’s not, you can turn both off at any time.
its basically a glorified keylogger
It’s not, it fundamentally is NOT, because it doesn’t log any keystrokes. SAC isn’t even in the picture here, while Recall literally only makes screenshots, runs OCR and encrypts that.
Fuck me, where do you people get this bullshit from? It used to be “oh no, Microsoft will be making screenshots of your activity and sending them to their servers” not so long ago which, while still bullshit, was at least in the same ballpark as what Recall does.
Now you’re throwing SAC into the mix somehow?
silasmariner@programming.dev
on 23 Jul 2025 18:57
collapse
I worry that the prevalence of ill-informed hot-takes dilutes the validity of complaints, and I appreciate your work here
Booboofinget@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 18:33
nextcollapse
All I have to say is I hope this catches on with other browsers.
PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 20:08
nextcollapse
Just avoid using an “AI” cpu.
flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
on 23 Jul 2025 22:11
nextcollapse
Let me know when it is discovered that they in fact replaced MS Recall with their own version that was scraping your data in yet another sketchy attempt to make money.
kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Jul 2025 22:15
nextcollapse
3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com
on 24 Jul 2025 08:17
collapse
BUT… most people really don’t care about that, they just want to remove ads from facebook or youtube or whatever…
My clients couldn’t care less about what the CEO does, heck they still think facebook is the dogs danglies and youtube is cutting edge plus Netflix is the best streaming service.
Fighting that is way harder than then trying to explain that some software is worse than others. Heck plenty still use Photoshop because they don’t understand that alternatives exist and “everyone at work uses it”
noxypaws@pawb.social
on 23 Jul 2025 23:42
nextcollapse
yeah but it’s run by an active opponent of LGBT folks
NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 04:41
nextcollapse
Simplewall allows direct control of internet access of any program and app; you can block CoPilot from accessing the internet.
3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com
on 24 Jul 2025 08:12
nextcollapse
Now whilst I enjoy all the comments I actually have to add something quickly that explains why this kind of thing happens. I recently worked with a rather old lady to find out why she was having so many issues with technology and stuff. I found out that when she started work in 1986 she was told that the shared password in her department at the local hospital was “password” and so she has used that on everything she can since to remember it… other gems that they used on whole departments included “qwerty” and “123456” and the best one of all “letmeinnow”. On whole shared networks of 100+ machines…
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
on 24 Jul 2025 12:32
nextcollapse
I used some stuff to block my location and windows recall BECAUSE FUCK YOU MICROSOFT!
Gemini24601@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 14:54
nextcollapse
You can’t block all of Windows spyware. The best case of action would be to install an alternative operating system like Linux or a BSD-derivative. It’s counter-intuitive to “fuck Microsoft” when you are still using their OS.
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
on 24 Jul 2025 15:42
collapse
I wonder why the fuck is am taking so long to do it…
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
on 24 Jul 2025 20:09
collapse
I recently switched, and would be happy to give whatever rudimentary pointers I can. I’ve found that Linux mint is the best option for me. You can also easily flash it onto a USB and try it out to confirm compatibility.
The biggest things are these:
you have to make sure to backup anything you want, because the installation wipes the hard drive.
you must (usually) completely erase the windows partition, since the windows updater will usually bork the Linux install the moment you try to boot windows.
you should turn off SecureBoot and bitlocker before you attempt an installation.
rather than dual-booting windows with Linux, it is comparatively simple to set up a Virtual Machine running windows inside Linux.
if you’re getting really serious about privacy, you’re going to have a TON of services that you may be unable to access, because they are full of trackers and spyware. Baby steps are recommended before trying to make a clean break from all telemetry, tracking and spyware.if you use an android, try installing TrackerControl from f-droid (or, for one that doesn’t break as much stuff, Duckduckgo’s app tracking protection) and enable it. You’ll begin to see just how many calls to add, data brokers, telemetry, and other shit gets caught, and DDG doesn’t even touch all the google spyware.
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
on 24 Jul 2025 20:21
collapse
I gave been wanting to go on linux mint for almost a year. Its time I fucking did it.
Edit: I have been doing a lot for privacy, but it just isn’t enough. For example I wanted to use venice.ai… but I didn’t just use a tutamail email, I even used a prepaid credit card. I live in canada where you don’t need to attach your name to a prepaid card, meaning it is as anonymous as possible if you want to buy something with a card (and yes, I paid for it in cash and it was activated by the store).
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
on 24 Jul 2025 20:23
collapse
Well, let me know if you’ve got any trouble. Oh, and do you have an HP? Those things SUCK at installing Linux. One of those things you have to find out from trying to install it on three separate HP devices.
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
on 25 Jul 2025 09:48
collapse
I am a Dell guy through and through. I flashed linux mint on a cheap ass USB I had lying around. I will start with my laptop this weekend.
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
on 25 Jul 2025 14:11
collapse
Nice
TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
on 24 Jul 2025 15:02
collapse
there are 100% fed backdoors for looking in your pc in Windows
articulatedstupidity@lemmy.cafe
on 24 Jul 2025 12:52
nextcollapse
This still doesn’t make brave a good privacy browser in the long run
BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
on 24 Jul 2025 17:21
nextcollapse
The founder of Brave browser got fired from Firefox because he was homophobic
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 24 Jul 2025 21:25
collapse
threaded - newest
Literally nothing will get me to use this crypto scam of a browser.
I’ve used this for years and have never interacted with any crypto feature
That you know of
That sounds like fear mongering, but ok.
Brave was found to inject crypto referral links into your
clicksurl auto complete.tomsguide.com/…/brave-affiliate-links-autocomplet…
They kind of just ignore that the crypto feature is opt-in.
The fact that the dev behind brave is a homophobe isn't opt in though...
.
That’s saying that he left Mozilla for that. He’s still CEO of Brave
Can’t believe this poor reading comprehension is getting upvoted.
What’s amazing is they proved themselves wrong in their own post, thinking they proved themselves right. It’s actually impressive.
You don’t see it everyday that’s for sure.
That’s pretty par for the course for Internet arguments in my experience. Then they get all huffy after you explain why their source doesn’t say what they claimed and try to complain that because you didn’t supply a source, they’re still right.
Indeed. The <“I’m right. There’s plenty of sources that back me up, do your own research” then fail to provide sources> crowd are my personal pet peeve.
Tbh kinda explains why they use Brave
Thanks.
He left Mozilla (chased out because he's a homophobe) and went on to found Brave, where he still remains
Ah, thank you for the clarification.
Did you even read the text you shared? It just says he left mozilla.
I did, just made a mistake. Thank you and have a pleasant afternoon.
wow why is this getting downvotes for admitting a mistake?
Also, their whole business model was (is?) just replacing ads with ads they get paid for.
Sure, but that’s opt-in. By default, it just blocks ads.
Uh… no? It just puts sponsored backgrounds when you open new tabs or windows notifications if you opt-in
It never replaced ads in websites afaik
ads.brave.com
They’re not actively replacing elements on a web page, but they’re still getting paid to show you ads and you can opt in for some crypto nonsense.
Sure, so? It’s still opt-in, and by default it sends the generated crypto money to creators and websites you visit
If you don’t like it, don’t enable it? They’re pretty transparent about how it works overall
They have pretty much abandoned this feature anyways
It’s opt-in for now, how many times do we have to play this game?
I’ll keep using Firefox with uBo to actually block ads instead of a browser that’s running its own ad delivery system.
Brave has a built in ad blocker
at this point you’re just hating on brave for nothing
Sure, that sucks, but the product is good
You can’t always agree with everyone
It’s also just another flavor of chromium so it still helps Google maintain their monopoly.
Anyone trying to de-google needs to be using Firefox.
If you only use software that is created by people you like… well… i guess your only choice will be an abacus…
I don't care if I like them. I very much care if I'm making money for people who are actively trying to take away my rights
People act like these fuckers dont influence anything, like they exist in some bubble away from reality. It matters what you use. What you use empowers the creator.
Peter Thiel was also a major, early investor in the project.
That’s another ‘this one thing should let you know this is radioactive.’
It’s okay, it’s never too late to switch.
Not interacted doesnt mean it’s non-existant.
It exists and therefore it’s bad enough.
Existent**
It’s fine as a browser and it does a good job at syncing across devices. Still my chrome based browser of choice.
How mich actual difference (minus the crypto) is there to base-chromium?
Afaik chromium is capable pf being a browser. Does that also have syncing or is it not capable of that?
Honestly not sure. I haven’t done a side by side with plain old chromium in years.
On iOS it’s one of very few browsers that has good adblocking built in
This is debatable. i find some that people hate on AI and crypto regardless of it’s implementation
Exactly this. They’re acting braindead and disliking things for no valid reason
Just massively spreading misinformation
I’m as crypto bro as they come. Fuck Brave, BAT is a pay-to-surf scam.
This isn’t unique to Brave.
for browser this is the first time tbh
What other browsers are implementing this? It’s the first I’ve heard of it.
People are still using Windows!?
Until Macs become cheaper or Linux becomes easier, Windows will remain the largest OS.
What’s easier in Windows compared to Linux? Except the fact that you have to install it, since it doesn’t come preinstalled on as many PCs. But many people who think Windows is easy would probably still consider installing it difficult.
Doing anything requires the memorization of thousands of commands that must be formatted perfectly and are specific to your distribution, into a black box that rarely provides any feedback at all, and when it does it’s extremely generic.
I’m sure my inbox will be blown up by delusional people claiming you don’t need it but it’s just not true.
The simple act of installing software is crazy complicated and different on every distro.
My current distro has 2 separate system update apps and I don’t really know how to use either of them, nor do I understand why I need to use them at all. Why does the system need me to click buttons to make it go? Just do it in the background. Then as soon as it’s done I get another popup 3 minutes later saying another package needs to be updated.
Hardware compatibility is a huge problem, fingerprint readers, WiFi, facial recognition, Bluetooth, etc. etc. Very few companies make computers with Linux compatibility being considered at all. Everything will have drivers day 1 on Windows and then they’ll trickle down to Linux a year or two later.
Nvidia GPUs are by far and away the most popular and they’re still very painful to use. And even though that’s entirely Nvidia’s fault, the problem remains.
I dislike Linux the least but there’s no way I could recommend it to anyone who isn’t a giant nerd who likes fixing computers.
I don’t use Linux except on my steamdeck and even I know there are a bunch of distros that look and act (minus lots of the bad stuff) just like windows
They act like Windows (minus lots of the good stuff) too.
i wouldnt know where to begin if i had to switch, since im not in the tech industry, only 2 of my bros would switch since they are programmers.
Sadly, quite a few things. Here’s a few:
Don’t get me wrong. I use Linux as my daily driver. That also means I get frustrated on occasion when again I must consult man pages instead of just running a troubleshooter or fiddling with Nvidia drivers instead of just running the game.
(venting frustration)
I’d argue with the installer point - if it’s in the repo, and it almost always is for anything a newbie would be using, it’s actually easier. Search, click, done. BUT…
Drivers though, specifically companies not supporting Linux drivers, is shit. I’m helping a friend transition to Linux and am dual-booting myself so I can help with the actual os available for troubleshooting. And fuck me, sound drivers fucking suck ass on Linux. It’s because Creative is a bitch and won’t make Linux drivers, but also apparently literally nobody is both running a creative card and anything above 2.0 speaker setup. I have two creative cards, a decade apart, neither works with my 5.1 speaker setup. FL and FR work, the rest are some sort of fucked and come from an incorrect speaker(s). One of these cards is like 15 years old now, and nobody has noticed or rectified it. And if I reboot straight from windows to Linux, the sound is mangled. I need to shut the system down and boot it cold. Then FL and FR work. Hours of troubleshooting last week got me absolutely no progress.
Then I need software for my Logitech g903 (there is 3rd party software available) that does profiles and switches on the fly based on the application in the foreground (crickets).
Then there is an issue where if my monitor goes to sleep, when I wake it up I get patches of graphical artifacts. On the 2D desktop. Every few seconds, for about a quarter of a second. Random location each time. Random size. I’m on a Radeon 7900 XTX, which isn’t terribly new now. But the friend I’m helping, no issues at all with drivers or hardware. An older 6700 XT. But come the fuck on.
Both of us are on bazzite (I suggested it so they wouldn’t nuke the system as they learn) so it’s just Fedora silverblue with a few tweaks, not some out-there distro.
And, shit. If you need cellular connectivity on Linux, as far as I can tell you’re fucked if you don’t go the Ubuntu route. Debian doesn’t work, Fedora doesn’t work, Mint doesn’t work, I went down a rabbit-hole and tried a dozen distros. I ended up with kubuntu, since I wanted kde, but I tried anything just to see what would work. This is on a modern ThinkPad, still under (extended) warranty. I thought ThinkPads and Linux were supposed to be like this holy-grail of free-as-in-freedom computing? Ugh.
So yeah if you have a basic system, aged a bit, nothing special, it works well. Take one step outside of that perfect-scenario bubble, and paaaaaain.
To be fair, a lot of those are due to a Windows legacy of dominating the market, which isn't going to change until there are more people elsewhere. It's a bit of a catch-22, and yet even being a small percent use in desktop Linux has started to get distros that feel and run similar to Windows enough so people who don't dabble in Windows specific software don't miss it. It's also a bit much to weigh Windows as better in many of those above features when it still have its own issues often, even though it is the dominate and supported OS.
I laughed at your last part. I have never not had to do the same for Windows as I have for Linux when a problem pops up. Google the problem. Those troubleshooters are such a waste of time, and honestly the only time I've had an automated fix that worked to resolve a situation was in Linux via purging the old driver and reloading it. The Windows troubleshooter is like the first tier on a tech support line, where you tell them, yeah, I already did all that.
I mostly agree with you but this contradicts everything I’ve seen. Presumably you have evidence of this?
Doesn’t Linux have pretty much every driver built into the kernel with the only notable exception being the NVIDIA closed source drivers. Even those drivers are a single command away from installation, it even configures itself correctly out of the box for Wayland support.
Got burned by this recently, was trying to use MPV for playing a YT vid, and it had no video but had audio. Turns out Fedora comes with an open-source or smth version of H264 encoders, so I had to uninstall those packages for the official Cisco ones. But I was on atomic and it wasn’t fun so I ran to forums for help.
Not sure if it’s the driver or the kernel (maybe dual-booting? But it worked on both partitions originally…) but my Bluetooth is nuked on my Linux partition. I tried to do rfkill, btusb, systemctl, etc. and the only solution I got was to rollback to an older release of Fedora atomic because it’s most likely a kernel issue. That just sucks man, having to be stuck on an older version to get my earbuds to work lol. I didn’t like atomic and now I’m on reg KDE Fedora, so I’m truly fucked as that’s not a rollback distro.
I still love using Fedora (every time I boot into Windows I cry) and it just makes me love my laptop like it’s brand-new. Tinkering is fun to me, I’ll literally sit at my desk and starve myself while trying to get something to work. But some days, I want my stuff to work with minimal tinkering, and not have to worry if it’ll break when I really need it down the line.
Graphics drivers. I can’t say I ever had a graphics driver update in Windows that rendered my system borderline unusable, but I 100% blame Nvidia for me running windows until recently. I tried a dozen times over a decade and ended up back on windows when the Nvidia update trashed my system and I got sick of dealing with it.
On team green and running Bazzite with no issues
That’s more of an Nvidia problem than a Linux problem.
installation of software on Linux is very bad. Literally everything else on Linux is very ready for the mass market, but installing apps is horrible to the point of making the whole OS not ready for the general public
What? When was the last time you tried Linux?
With flatpak, it’s usually a one-click process to install anything nowadays.
I use Linux regularly, and the last time i installed an app was probably within the past 365 days
Ah. I see. That’s very informative.
I can install apps well enough, but I'm very techie, the general population isn't gonna be able to do it reasonably
You don’t need to be “techie” to install stuff from a package manager with a GUI. People use app stores on every mobile device out there and they don’t have any problems with that
That would be totally true if every software was distributed as a flatpak and every distro had flatpak enabled in the package manager out of the box. That’s just not reality.
Not even then. For example the biggest Linux distribution in use is Ubuntu, and it doesn't have flatpak built in. So even if a flatpak of an app is available, a user of Ubuntu would have to already understand what a flatpak is, and already know that it would make the app installable on Ubuntu, and know that flatpak itself can be installed separately, and know how to use a different install method already just to get the flatpak system onto their computer in the first place
Me fail reading.
Me forgive. Reading hard.
I said “usually”, and I’m talking about mainstream distros.
Also the original comment says “the whole OS is not ready for the general public”, which is also vague. I don’t expect the “general public” to install Gentoo and suffer from this issue.
They don’t all have that either
And yet they all have a package manager of some kind to install packages from. It doesn’t have to be Flatpak specifically
No, but all of them have different repos out of the box, which will lead to confusion when consumers can’t find the one they need.
.
While I agree with most of what you said, typical users won’t run into these issues unless they’re doing something more technical (e.g installing blender or something), in which case they can ask for help.
I don’t think these people can install Windows or are pros at using it either, and in which case it’s the responsibility of whoever installed the OS to guide them through it a little like I did with my parents (they’re in their 80s and they’ve been using Linux for the past five years just fine), and I imagine those kind of people to only care about browsing the web and maybe viewing a PDF every once in a while.
.
it’s easier because they’ve been using it all their life. If they’d been using linux all their life, they’d say that windows was too hard to use, nod oubt.
I would rather be set on fire and have it put out with shovel than use a mac.
MacOS isn’t terrible, only the hardware is.
True.
Hmm, I have kinda opposite opinion, hardware is pretty good, build quality is great, but the OS itself is meh. File manager is bad and clunky, desktop customization is very limited, network manager is buggy, especially with VPNs, no built-in functionality to import VPN config files like in Linux. Also, I used it for years and still couldn’t get used to all the shortcuts and "Mac-way"s of doing things. Just not for me perhaps. Not bad, but in terms of UX worse than both Windows and Linux for me.
I'm the opposite of both of you. The build quality is good and the OS is good. I love having a familiat UNIX system while also having a polished desktop environment that supports 4k scaling very well (though the polish has been lacking a lot lately)
The issue for me is the insane price of their computers and the fact that you can't (officially) install MacOS on your own hardware. I have a Linux desktop and a MBP but I'd run MacOS on both if it was officially supported
Modern Mac hardware is excellent. The software is good too, but’s more a matter of taste. Not everybody likes how macOS works but Asahi Linux has made incredible progress so it’s a daily driver option for some already.
Mac hardware is a fucking atrocity. $2k for a “pro” laptop with 8GB RAM and 256GB storage and no i/o except 4 USBC ports, that’s completely and intentionally irreparable and unupgradeable? SSDs and RAM that are marked up 3000%? That’s what you call “excellent”? If they were cheap I might not completely object to them being disposable but it’s the opposite. It’s fucking gaslighting. You’ll never convince me it’s anything other than a cult.
I will give you the RAM and SSD capacities are atrociously priced. USBC is perfectly acceptable for the people apple is targeting. Nobody is trying to use a MacBook as a server. Ignore the “pro” name in any consumer electronic device. It has nothing to do with anything other than marketing, and that’s not exclusive to apple. Apple did give up on the 8GB bullshit already though.
You need to take a closer look at how the M-series chips work and why they work they way they do. There are design considerations in how PC does things and Apple does things and they are not 1 to 1. What makes sense the PC world doesn’t always make sense int he Mac world.
Apple does a lot of anti-consumer bullshit which we should absolutely club them over the head for, but many of the things they pulled off with the M-series Macs were NOT possible with traditional PC methodologies. One thing’s for sure though, the hardware performs and it does so with very little energy. It’s so great a difference the entire industry is changing course to try to outdo Apple. They eventually will too, but they haven’t yet. They are just cheaper.
It’s literally called a “pro”, who do you think they’re targeting?
I do, thanks to Apple. It doesn’t make it any less shameful or ridiculous.
You’re going to have to elaborate because I already have and I don’t understand what bearing that has on this discussion.
You shouldn’t “club them over the head”, you should just stop buying their trash. That’s literally the only thing that will work.
Daves garage actually had a good video on the shared memory architecture recently that gives some insights on why apple designed this way they did. Don’t dismiss “different” as “trash.” You sound like an idiot when you do and it makes it difficult for adults to take you seriously. PC and Mac are designed with different goals in mind, so they tend to make different choices in their engineering, and you aren’t going to like every decision either side makes.
youtu.be/Cn_nKxl8KE4
Shared memory is different to unified memory, AMD’s got an implementation of the later with their “Ryzen AI MAX+” (ugh) systems, does quite well in benchmarks.
It also doesn’t hurt that Apple puts the RAM on the SoC and gives it a truckload of bandwidth. DDR5 is about 70GB/s, meanwhile the M4 Max is around 540GB/s.
I didn’t know AMD had managed to switch over to unified memory too. Managing that while remaining x86 compatible is quite an achievement!
I think the next big thing will be when storage becomes as fast as ram and they unify that too, getting rid of separate RAM. Working with data directly in place could have massive efficiency boosts. But the industry has been trying to get it that fast for many years and still not succeeded. And once they do, separate SSDs wouldn’t be possible, at least not as a primary storage, so it wont be an advance that makes sense for every use case.
Yeah “universal memory” is the holy grail, seemingly as hard to find as it as well.
The articles on Wikipedia about the related tech is great, it’ll mention something like “Developers expect commercialisation to happen relatively soon” and then link to an article from 2004, or research papers from the 1980s.
This is not “different” this is “anti consumer non-sense” and you sound like a chud when you recite corporate propaganda.
Apple’s entire software design philosophy is god-awful. There’s only one way to do things and if you don’t like “The Apple Way”, fuck you. “It just works” only works for very basic normie stuff. If you try to do anything advanced, it most likely won’t work and it’ll give zero feedback as to why.
I mean I don’t particularly like it either but not having tons of choice is not always a complete negative, it simplifies a lot of things. And having an OS that mostly functions like an OS instead of a fucking billboard is nice. Just keeping things in context here.
I think that was @Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world’s main point. Apple is great if you’re a normie, but if you even think about tinkering with things, have an unusual issue on your system, or creatures forbid… want to play games, you’re fucked.
My mom is an Apple diehard who has used Android and Windows in the past (2000s), but got burned by Window’s shitty security and really only switched to iPhone due to iMessage being more reliable than SMS at the time. She knows a little bit of tech stuff (I guess I get it from her), but overall, she’s a “normie” compared to me, so Apple (90% of the time) does what she needs.
If this was me about 3 weeks ago, I wouldn’t have debated this as hard. But recently my grandma had to call my mom and I to help her get her iPhone pictures to work on her Windows laptop, and she almost thought she downloaded a virus when trying to get an HEIC app. Apple’s asinine proprietary file format is a plague on society, and I hated when I had to send pictures from my iPhone to my Google drive for school in HS. That’s not simple, and now we have to help grandparents understand that they need to screenshot their camera pictures or else literally no website will take their damn photos.
The little things add-up for me, and so yeah, it’s nice having something that “just works”, but only if you literally accept everything and never complain about any of their choices.
I despise their business model, their design decisions, and their walled garden. I will agree that the OS is fine. I was forced to use a MacBook at a software development job in the past. It being UNIX was a big point why I didn’t immediately hate it. I will still agree with the other users and say that their hardware is pretty nice and well thought-out (not praising the anti-consument measures like soldered RAM). Still, I would personally never buy their devices due to the aforementioned business practices.
People are still using the os that has like 95% market penetration? Yeah man pretty sure
70% but yeh.
gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/…/worldwide/
Interestingly, the percent of Windows goes down if you look at just the United States, where it's only 63% of OSes. And it also goes down similarly when you set it to the UK, or North America, or almost any other region. But it goes up to around 73% when you limit it to Europe or Asia. Weird, why is it higher in those areas?
(Click "edit chart" to pick a different region)
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/united-states-of-america/#monthly-202406-202506
Because it’s mainly a measure of how much people use Macs. Apple products were always significantly more popular and “hype” in the Anglo world than anywhere else. 5,5% global vs 16% in USA, for example
Interesting hypothesis
Unless you’re tech-savvy and actively change your OS, people just use whatever is shipped with their computer and, yea, Apple isn’t nearly as popular outside of the English-speaking world as it is within it, at least when it comes to laptops. The share of Linux, and other smaller systems, is probably roughly the same.
The situation is much different for gamers. They might have been thinking of the Steam survey where Windows does in fact have 95% adoption: <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4659c0a2-1ad7-4cc7-b3b0-0d2fd911de73.png">
Games
Aside from anticheat BS, Linux has come pretty far. It’s not perfect, but it’s not the frustrating mess like it used to be half a decade ago.
I’ve been gamin on Linux for over a year with 0 issues, the only games that should be keeping people back are a small handful of competitive games with certain types of anticheat. (Most anticheat does work on Linux)
And many VR games. Linux is not viable for VR gaming (without a lot of concessions).
It’s a work in progress. We’re getting there
One of my favorite games Phantom Dust only works with the microsoft store. Not really linux’s fault but that’s the reality
Have you actually tried to install it on Linux? I’d bet it would work.
Phantom Dust is distributed solely via the Microsoft Store, which requires a Windows environment to function. Compatibility layers such as Wine and Proton do not support the Microsoft Store, as it depends on Windows-specific services and APIs that are not replicated in these layers.
old.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/…/phantom_dust/
Ah yeah you’re right, I didn’t realize how baked in that stuff was.
Plenty of people still use it for work
Any workplace with halfway decent IT will disable it by default.
Which may be about 50% of workplaces, but still.
As much as I wish your estimates were true, you have no numbers to back you up. They seem wildly optimistic.
Running Linux would block this feature too.
Just reason sayin.
There’s one in every thread.
There are dozens of us! Dozens!
Thats 96% of lemmy users
One?
Actually, Linux doesn’t block windows, it just isn’t windows.
Just reason saying.
Actually it does! When youre installing, just delete the windows boot partition and your done!
Delete only the boot partition? Doug kick him off the tour!
You gotta have your old files! But man does NTFS suck ass
I only use Linux and I want Windows to just stay out of my way or it’ll pay, listen to what I say.
Heck, wipe the entire disk!
(based on a real life experience)
(windows just kept standing no matter what partition i deleted so i wiped the disk clean)
I recently decided to switch from using Atomic Fedora to reg KDE Fedora (cause tinkering and bypassing atomic features got on my nerves), and I almost went through with wiping everything and only having Linux installed. And then I realized I probably wouldn’t be able to do some tests for college cause they use anti-cheating software (lockdown browser) which they probably wouldn’t like if I ran it in a VM or wine…
But man, once I’m out of college, I’m probably wiping Windows for good! Also gonna factory reset that partition so it at least takes way less space on my drive.
(Side note: the other hesitation is that I’m 90% kernel updates nuked Bluetooth for me around March (It worked when I rolled back to January/February releases) and I do have zoom classes sometimes. Like, do I just have to buy a Bluetooth dongle to deal with this?)
Switching to Linux made me like computers again. Switching to Hyprland made me love computers again.
Switching to TempleOS made me hear the voices again.
Switching to Hannah Montana Linux made me hear The Best of Both Worlds again.
I want to use Corey in the House Linux
They got pills for that. Just sayin’
Same story here! Im in love with computing all over again because of it. Too bad many are tricked into thinking Microsoft ia the only option.
Hyprland made me suicidal again but we are all different
.
Keep In mind that you can still be captured by this feature indirectly,
Discord for example certainly doesn’t intend to do anything to hide your messages, they recently went public so in their eyes more tracking the better.I’m thankful to have made a feature request to Element/Matrix asking for them to prevent this exact thing.
Discord… Still isn’t public?
They’re certainly talking about it but they haven’t announced a date yet.
Having said that, element and matrix are both more privacy respecting so I do agree with the recommendation in general.
Apologies, I striked the lines out of my previous comment. It simply was an example of how you still can be captured.
Tbf, anything that isn't AI Windows blocks the feature. Including regular Windows.
People just need to not fall for the scam edition and they don't have to deal with this shit.
Can Recall not just be turned off?
For an update or two, at least. Windows features tend to get turned back on after updates quite frequently.
I’m probably going to have to move to 11 at some point (Linux isn’t for me right now), but I would like to be able to disable as much bloatware as possible. Vigilance it is then.
I’m in the same boat waiting for Linux to be a bit more “feature complete,” for me to daily.
In the mean time, check out W11 Enterprise IoT LTSC. It’s the secret menu item equivalent W11 they don’t wanna sell to consumers. It feels like a fresh W7 install with no AI, no bloat, no bullshit, and can even disable all telemetry. Only comes with Edge and Defender.
massgrave.dev has the iso’s and permanent activators.
Edit: Adding that you can install the App Store and Xbox App to make use of Game Pass.
Yeah but then you can’t run Xbox Games Pass or anything fun like that.
I can live without Game Pass.
You can install the Store and Xbox app, and use Gamepass. I have a friend that does this, after I showed them how.
Lovely, thanks for the reminder on massgrave. I made the switch to Linux and haven’t looked back, but there are some games that require root kits that I’d like to play so I was considering virtualizing Windows and this would be perfect.
Thanks. I’ll look into that. My current version had been pushing me to update, which I’ve been postponing and I’m guessing is free, but I’m not sure it’ll give the choice of version. My work computer just updated to W11 Enterprise literally this morning, so I’ll get myself used to it here before making the leap.
I’m in a similar boat, windows for work, linux for personal.
But since I’m freelance, it’s annoying juggling 2 computers. Just waiting for a single app to either work in wine or get a Linux port.
My home PC is purely for personal entertainment, so less of an issue, but there’s little to no Linux support for my simrig hardware.
That’s why you leverage group policy or local security policies to disable these features.
Until they change those policy definitions.
When they rolled out the update that removed the toggle for it, I remember seeing steps for how to disable it via regedit or tools which would do that for you, all with the warnings of future updates may re-enable it.
I haven’t moved from W10 yet so I’m kinda ootl on it, but that’s what I remember
For now it is opt-in. It’s unlikely to remain that way.
Also it’s not like windows doesn’t routinely “forgets” these settings with updates. Or harasses you to opt in again with every update, in the hopes that one day you’ll let it slip
Yes.
You might say that they are being so very… Brave.
🎤 tap tap … is this thing on?
The sad thing is that you now have to protect yourself against the OS you are using. Feels a bit like in the movie TRON.
I don’t, my OS doesn’t come with any nonsense.
Me neither, I just watch the shit show from the bleachers.
Brave’s CEO is a homophobic Trump supporter. No thanks.
He invented JavaScript, so definitely don’t use that either. For real. JavaScript sucks.
Ah, you beat me to it.
Does he run/have power over JavaScript right now?
No, not directly. Not any more than your average tech leader who goes to conferences and discusses it.
Oh wait hey you’re on my instance. Cool! We’re such small one lol
“It’s a small club and you
ain’tin it”—Warren Bullgates Lincolnham
😁 It’s an elite club.
I used to hate JS but barley had used it. Now I use it on a daily base and hate it even more.
JS is difficult to avoid. Brave is easy to avoid, just use another browser.
I need a better option then. What can yall suggest?
Firefox
Sure I use that too but you should have at least one chromium based browser for certain features though.
Vivaldi? (Sort of continuation of Opera, run by it’s former CTO.)
Vivaldi is OK, but I would replace it with something else. It’s a pretty busy UI and I have had issues with it freezing in Fedora 42 KDE.
I use LibreWolf (FireFox fork) + Ungoogled Chromium
This is my setup, and I never actually use ungoogled chromium.
If I have some kind of issue that I need to work around immediately rather then figure out, I usually just open Firefox and try that.
Why should you? What are these certain features?
Yes some tools do not work with Firefox. It‘s a niche but I‘ve run into it a few times just recently. For example with a gamepad enabler tool where Firefox simply won‘t be able to see your USB input.
The thing is, Firefox follows web standards. Chrome doesn’t always and websites put in custom code that works only with Chrome.
I’d rather use the browser that follows standards.
Well I‘m not saying you should use chromium as your main browser. In fact I think you shouldn‘t. But sometimes there is no way around it. It‘s okay to be realistic about these things.
I personally haven’t had to use a chromium browser for anything yet since my swith to Firefox. Only to test a render bug in chromium that Google hasn’t bothered to fix in over 9 years for a case that works correctly in every other browser.
Mozilla also has many problems
I’m out of the loop. What are the many problems with Mozilla?
I saw you mention the Mr. Robot extension in another comment. That looks to be a bad decision but what else are the “many problems?”
Most problems are because of how Mozilla works. According to some devs, they gatekeep some contributions and they don’t really act and communicate with the community like FOSS projects are expected to. They also spend a lot of money on some - useless - stuff. They’re really slow to improve their software and Firefox defaults with some questionable stuff (regular pings, Google bullshit…)
The Better bird dev talks a bit about this, and you also have some other resources: youtu.be/ugnOM2mzgNU (I don’t remember every link and everything I’ve seen but this should be a good start)
Thorium.
That’s not even the worst thing about him. He also invented JavaScript.
That’s it, brave is getting uninstalled from my PC NOW.
What does that have to do with the browser? Last I checked, browsers aren’t transphobic.
You do you, but I personally refuse to make product choices based on the person who makes it. Brave is the least bad chromium browser, so I use it as a backup to my main Gecko-based browser. I’m not a fan of Mozilla either, but that’s irrelevant since I pick my software based on what it does, not based on the management of the company that builds it.
I would not choose to use a product made by people I disagree with but leaving that aside:
Is it the least bad? Why not degoogled chrome? Or chromium? Even vivaldi seems like a better choice.
Ad blocking mostly. That’s literally all I need in a chromium browser, because I only use it on a handful of sites that don’t work properly in Firefox.
Chromium is also okay, but no ad blocker. I have that installed as well in the really unlikely case that the ad blocker gets in the way.
99% of my browsing is on a Firefox browser, and 99% of the rest is on Brave. I use it so infrequently the “time saved” metric is a merely seconds.
Actually, I consider Brave the best (or the least bed…) browser on the market. Period. The fact that it isn’t made by Mozilla is a plus for me.
I don’t like Mozilla either, but here are my priorities in a web browser:
Firefox ticks all of them, and my issues with Mozilla as an org don’t really come into play. I use a fork on my phone, but I use Firefox on my laptop and desktop because I trust the binaries coming from my Linux distribution maintainers (part of 4).
Brave also ticks all of them?
at this point, Firefox’s development is not very much more open than Chromium’s
It doesn’t tick #3, hence why I use a Firefox browser as my main. If they had their own rendering engine, I would consider it as my main. But for now, it’s my backup in case I need a website that doesn’t work on Firefox (i.e. they use something Chrome-specific).
Valid point then. We need compatibility with gecko, I always found it better looking than chromium
Good for you. I actively refuse to use it or any of its derivatives to avoid endorsing Mozilla by giving them market share. Additionally, I find that Brave just performs better (and needs one extension less to be functional).
I care a lot about rendering engine diversity, and Firefox is the largest non-chromium browser, so I use it. It’s fast enough for me, and my handful of extensions gives me what I need.
Again, good for you.
It’s pretty sleazy. Ungoogled Chromium or Vivaldi are probably less sleazy, if at all.
Vivaldi is not open source, so for me it doesn’t count as a valid option.
I‘m not even pro Brave but all that ad stuff is opt-in so it doesn‘t matter as long as you don‘t want to see ads. The arguments in this thread are starting to just loop in circles. Essentially using Brave is fine if you stick to the default. There‘s no sleazy stuff if you don‘t enable it and the CEO also doesn‘t make a dime from you if that‘s something you‘re concerned about. You could of course use a different chromium browser if you want but it‘s virtually the same thing.
The only two there that bother me are the affiliate code thing (reminds me of the Honey drama) and installing extra software without consent. The first was a bad call and probably related with how their ad replacement stuff works (if anything, they should merely axe affiliate links; Firefox has that as an option), and this"solution" to the latter is pretty odd to me:
Why would a browser need admin rights in the first place? I haven’t used Windows in well over a decade, so I don’t think that particular one would be an issue for me.
The rest can be grouped as:
My options for chromium browsers are:
Since ad blocking and FOSS are my prerequisites, Brave basically wins by default.
Just block with unlock 🙉 why choose browser based on a ad block feature that is worse (injecting own ads/adware and therefore trying to dictate who is allowed to grab your attention) than the ad blocking extension?
I recommend Firefox, due to best compatibility with uBlock (fuck manifest v3) and additionally have a DNS filter in your network, like pihole or adguard.
On the go, use wireguard VPN to always be digitally home, and get your ads blocked (as well as tracking organisations) like that.
So do I, that’s my main. Brave is my backup for the handful of sites that don’t like Firefox.
He could be next husband of Ivanka Trump - I don’t care
If he provide good service for me - browser which fits my needs. I would even send him money every day
That’s the logic of as long as it benefits ME I don’t care and I support them no matter what they do. This same logic has been applied to all the shitty things done in history like slavery, war and so forth, and the reason the world is the way it is.
Do you know all the personal histories of all the people related to all the services you use?
Of course that’s not possible, the issue here is being aware and not caring and in some cases supporting it for convenience and selfishness.
How does me using brave browser supports fascism?
In my country, one of the most successful supermarkets is run by a fascist and he uses part of his fortune to finance our local fascist party, which is gaining strength every year by the way. Do we support fascism by buying in that supermarket? What if we suddenly started to boycott the supermarket to hell?
My point is that they earn profits by using their services and in today’s society money is power. And from where the CEO got his power? From the millions of people with the mindset of “if it benefits me I don’t care”.
“I’ll support fascism as long as it’s convenient for me”
No. “I will support a good service and not mingle with politics”
If fascism was a passive philosophy that didn’t hurt anyone then you might have a point. But as you can see recently it’s extremely dangerous and ruins lives.
You may not want to mingle with politics, but it doesn’t have the same view.
Yep, everything is politics whether we like it or not.
Plato, The Republic bk. 1, 347c
Brave 🤮
Windows 🤮
“feature” 🤮
Truffle Shuffle 🤮
Kirby vacuuming blended spinach 🤮
Wait, what?
I mean Mozilla’s Firefox is 🤮 too… there’s no perfect browser
nothing is perfect, except the horseshoe crab. however both librewolf and cromite are great with ublock, and ltsc windows has no copilot since companies use that edition.
Librewolf is too restrictive and not suitable for everyday browsing. I hate it.
never tested cromite
im pretty sure you can disable a ton of stuff in the options menu
Yeah but for example fingerprinting is either fully on or fully off
Switching defaults hurt fingerprinting more than it helps so at that point might as well stay with the default firefox
funny thing is ban evaders(the ones that make hundreds of accounts for OF or links) use it for its anti-fingerprinting which is useful against reddit(temporarily) ability to read the browser. i used to temporarily, and kinda explains why my last acc was only shadowbanned much later than thier purges.(i was hit by thier AI moderation as soon as switched to a different browser fork of FF)
it has better anti fingerprinting than firefox? That’s nice to know
oh yea i used pixel scan or something similar, ban evaders use these to check thier browser profile, and it partially shields it. there other similar browser scanners, but the thing is you also need proxies and anti-detect browsers to hide the rest of your activities, because reddit is just that invasive in detection.(hence all those bans.
Didn’t know reddit went that hard
im just simplifying it, they have other methods at thier tools. since recently it come to my attention they also indiscrminately shadowban too for no reason at all/. V3 captcha, browser, time and date, location, components. they detect vpn quite easily now,
Very brave of them.
What a title. Made me think installing the browser blocked the feature machine-wide.
Oh so they’re just doing whatever Firefox is doing in private mode on Android that makes screenshots all black
A device that surreptitiously gathers information on a target is called a bug, not a feature.
More like malware
yup. how do people continue using Winblows :/
It’s actually super simple: even though the community is called “Technology”, there’s A LOT of tech-illiterate fear mongering going on here. People behave like Microsoft is trying to spy on them, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Recall is:
There’s nothing malicious about it. Functionality is questionable, but acting like it’s malware is just showing ignorance.
Well, not really, a bug is unintentional. Even calling it a design flaw is a stretch, it’s a feature that isn’t for your benefit.“Bug” also means “listening device.”
If it was intentional double entendre then I retract my comment, but used in the context of “bugs and features” there’s a contextual implication.
It was wordplay, yes.
I retract.
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature we don’t like 🤣
So, you’re saying that browsing history, in literally any browser on the market, is a bug not a feature?
Oh, wait, I actually missed that! How is something that you need to purposefully turn on “surreptitious”? Like… Holy fuck, people, this is supposed to be the community of tech-literate people, so maybe stop fear-mongering in read about Recall a bit? It’s opt-in, it’s limited to a (as of now) extremely small number of NPU-carrying devices, it’s offline.
If you don’t like it, just don’t fucking turn it on.
It’s a good thing that microsoft is trustworthy and you can believe everything they say. And that malware never misuses resources of the system on which it is installed.
Recall sits in a secure vault behind BitLocker encryption secured with Windows Hello.
BitLocker+Windows Hello gets broken through, the world has a much larger problem than some screenshots, because that’s the foundation of, like, 80% of enterprise security.
If you’re afraid that an attacker sits on your PC and just waits for you to unlock the vault, then you already have the PC breached to the point where they don’t have to do that, they already have access to everything else.
If you’re afraid of the feature in anyway, don’t use it.
You trust microsoft implicitly no matter what they do, I get it.
I don’t. I read tech specs and security analyses. You just stick your head in the sand whenever someone says “Microsoft”, though. It’s silly.
I don’t trust them and they have given me sufficient reason over the course of decades not to.
So you still think it’s 1990. Got it. Well, times have changed. We have better oversight. The EU has GDPR, user data is better protected. If they tried to pull off a “heist” and suddenly start grabbing these screenshots from users, the fine from EU would be historical.
Times may have. Microsoft has not.
“Feature”
Unfortunately that would involve using the Brave browser, which is an antifeature in itself.
Can you elaborate? I don’t use it.
They shit on it because just like Mozilla, they made some shit decision by making some shady partnerships, and because the CEO is transphobic/homophobic/can’t remember
Apart from the usual bullshit and antifeatures it has, it’s still a great browser choice, just like Firefox
“Just like Mozilla”.
Let’s compare.
Mozilla: installed a closed-source plugin once, and then apologised for it.
Brave CEO: actively supports homophobic organisations, donates money to them, injects affiliate links to stores, whenever given a microphone will say something bigoted and homophobic.
Yeah, it’s totally the same exact issue with both browsers!
Brave: injected affiliate links once, then apologised for it too. Developped a search engine to be less dependent on big companies
Mozilla is spending money like crazy, just like Wikipedia, has little to no democratic system which makes people fork the stuff they make, and prefer to use the money from donation to buy trips all over the world to educate about privacy and shit while they proceed to keep adding more telemetry and BS in firefox
They also make it close to impossible to install plugins outside their plugins website, which I’ve heard has some strict rules and take a lot of time to approve stuff. Closed garden bullshit again
I just think the idea of your alternative being partially coded by the company you’re attempting to avoid is a little stupid. I don’t give a shit who he is. I barely give a shit who runs Mozilla.
Brave and every other Chromium fork are at the mercy of Google to exist as an alternative to Google, which to me, defeats the point. Every bit of their effort would be better spent rolling their money over to donate to browser development rather than band-aids.
Tradeoffs have to be made. Android is an example of that…
Chromium can be worked on by anyone, it’s just that it’s too costly to do
They haven’t blocked the windows feature, they’re using DRM to interfere with it. Microsoft could easily change how the DRM works any time they want, rendering all these hacks useless.
then people can complained it on Brave Github or their official forum and it will be fixed by their team
My point was that brave’s solution, like Signal’s, is dependent on microsoft playing fair. If microsoft decides they don’t want brave, signal, or anyone else using DRM to interfere with their screen scraping chatbot, there is not going to be an easy way to fix it.
No way they’d do that though, because then they’d have the mouse and the other members of the content mafia breathing down their necks.
It’s an image every few seconds. Not that piracy is currently even interested in tech that reencodes the content.
And for training, copyrighted stuff is already everywhere; AI tools seem to be limited on the output side rather than raw training data.
Sure it wouldnt be rational to care about DRM being broken a small amount allowing limited amount of copyright material to be copied.
What do you think their response would be?
People, ynless they are at work, can choose to use Linux any time. I will personally assist if needed.
Exactly, how do you even fight with the OS except just making it bit hard for them lol. You have to tell the OS what pixels to put in the screen, there’s literally no way you can hide things from the OS if they want to know.
They could, but Disney…
yeah, no, i’m not using your shitty browser.
But it’s funded by an unrepentant homophobe! How can you pass on that?!
An unrepentant homophobe who accused people who dislike him for his homophobic views/actions as being closed-minded and bigoted for disliking him over it.
You can’t make this shit up
It’s probably the best chromium browser out there
Firefox has done shit too
sadly we don’t have a lot of choice, but they’re one of the least worse
Just don’t use Chromium unless you for some reason absolutely have to. Mozilla is just another corporation, but they’re not exactly threatening to monopolise the internet. Google is, and using Chromium directly aids in their effort to do so.
It’s not that bad. Sure, having more choice is good, but it’s not as life threatening as you make it seem
Using android and stock ROMs is a bigger problem
I think it’s a compounding issue, primarily of Google products just kind of being the “default.”
Google pays to be the primary search engine in Firefox, on iOS, and sets themselves as the default on their operating systems. They, wherever possible also set their browser as default. Yes, Chromium is open source, but they have the ultimate final say, and no one seems to have the interest in forking it. This puts Google in a similar position that Microsoft was in in the 90s and early 00s, where they can essentially hijack the web and force their ideas through whether others want to or not.
We saw this with Google forcing Manifest v3, all Chromium-based browsers essentially just had to follow suit. That was just Manifest v3 however, who’s to say what else they’ll do?
Then there’s my tinfoil hat worry that Google essentially being the window to the web for so many people, on an OS, browser, and discoverability level is just overall a cause for worry. That’s not even considering their communications and media platforms.
I’m pretty sure if Firefox/Mozilla decides to change their policy on something, most forks of firefox will have no choice but follow the same path
afaik all firefox forks are really small, just like chromium forks
Mozilla might not have as much conflicting interests though, I admit it
Oh yeah, absolutely. There are no good options for a truly libre web, unfortunately. :(
Perfect is the enemy of good.
Gecko is still way more sympathetic than chromium, to me. Even if it is not perfect either.
Firefox has injected my URLs with affiliate codes?
Nope, but it put a closed source Mr Robot plugin without asking anyone
sure there are choices. I don’t use either. if you believe there are only 2 choices out there…man you have no idea.
Usable and mainstream choices? I’m unsure
As does Linux.
You use Linux? Here take this you’ve earned it 🍪
What if they always decline cookies? Or is this cookie one of those necessary ones?
Someone who used Linux would know that
OK, you need to explain to me how tf does Linux block something that works only on Windows.
No Windows, no such Windows “features”.
Well, you certainly need to be in a specific state of mind for this to make any sense…
I’ve been dosing too much tux, doc. My mind’s all FOSSY.
Yep, and you also have to be in a specific state of mind to be okay with “features” like something that takes screenshots of everything you do on your PC.
Then don’t enable it.
But, you can’t disable Recall, that’s the point…
You can just not use Windows and use Linux instead.
Well… Technically you’re correct - because the feature is not out yet.
No idea WTF you people are reading here, but for a “Technology” community, the comments here are just plain ridiculous…
<img alt="" src="https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/1c283de4-4796-428e-a38b-ebad47daf440.gif">
Sometimes bad people do good things.
I would not call brave good…
Linux blocks that “feature” too…
What feature? Recall?? That’s Windows 11-specific and hasn’t even launched yet??
The joke is that Linux blocks this by not doing it at all. Which is why people should switch to Linux. Which is a good idea. But that’s up to the people.
I love this comment so much
I still have literally thousands of clients that use Windows and want support… for these kinds of things. Firefox has recently stopped working on a few things and Brave works better for me right now. It’s not convenience when FF doesn’t work…
But I digress, Win 11 here and Brave. My choices, for lots of reasons. Lots of linux boxes as well though. Each to their own and all that
In this thread something I see a lot on lemmy is happening. Maybe someone can give me a hint on how that happens. The post itself is 90% upvotes, while the comment section is really anti-Brave (for good reasons). Do most upvotes come from people scrolling through without looking at the comment section and those with an opinion on the topic dive into it?
I’ve noticed this on political posts too, among others and I’ve wondered the same thing.
I upvote posts that I think are worth being seen by more people. That includes posts about topics that I don’t like or agree with, but think people need to know is happening and I think to know that are not including disinformation or misinformation or opinion written as facts.
I think you should not downvote a post you have a negative opinion about. If the post is worth to discuss then why should I not upvote the post and then say that I disagree in the comments. If we all down vote those posts nobody will see it (apart of those who sort by controversial) and there will be no discussion.
If the software in question is bad, then I’d like to reduce visibility of the post while explaining why in the comments.
Brave is connected to the BAT pay-to-surf scam. Its CEO donates to homophobic causes.
The post itself is reasonable quality and informative so I find it upvote worthy. If a post is low quality or a shit post then I downvote.
To me the karma system is about quality. Not an “I agree/disagree” button.
For comments I only down vote obvious trolls, bigots/racism etc.
Well, one could argue if just posting a link with a title is a ‘quality’ post. But the topic is still worth a discussion so I don’t see why it should be downvoted.
The problem is that people routinely upvote bullshit, falsehoods, and flat out disinformation. Just because it was well written does not make it true.
That’s how it was meant to be. The original Rediquette from over 15 years ago has:
“Vote. If you think something contributes to conversation, upvote it. If you think it does not contribute to the subreddit it is posted in or is off-topic in a particular community, downvote it.
[Please don’t] Downvote an otherwise acceptable post because you don’t personally like it. Think before you downvote and take a moment to ensure you’re downvoting someone because they are not contributing to the community dialogue or discussion. If you simply take a moment to stop, think and examine your reasons for downvoting, rather than doing so out of an emotional reaction, you will ensure that your downvotes are given for good reasons.”
But 99% of people definitely use them as an Agree/Disagree button.
people just scroll around up voting headlines that they think sound good or support their identity
I try to counter this by randomly downvoting everything
Most people never bother to read anything beyond the title of the post. Let alone click the link to the article.
Now, i don’t know how everyone sees up/down votes. But I always thought that content and comments that is relevant and promotes discussion is good. And comments that aren’t are bad.
Rather than a measure of others opinions.
It seems to me most people simply upvote the post to reward OP for bringing things up, exposing etc. Comments serve opinions on the topic itself, but upvote/downvote is more for if it’s good according to community rules and if the topic itself is interesting.
I upvote the post because I support the feature, and would like to see more browsers implement more privacy focused features.
I upvote the anti-Brave comments, because fuck Brave.
The better option would be to not use spyware as an operating system.
Do you consider any form of telemetry “spyware”?
Honestly it largely is.
Personally I like sharing crash reports, but even then, the user should be able to turn that off if you like.
Telemetry should be 100% opt-in.
I mean, by definition, it isn’t.
It’s anonymous and not malicious in nature. It’s a diagnostic and engagement measuring tool.
I think it is useful to send crash reports, but the user should have power over it (see: when macOS generates a crash report, it asks the user if they would like to send it)
That is your data they are taking to make money off of without your consent, and I consider that malicious. There are ways to do that with consent. See: Steam’s annual hardware survey
I mean… They’re a for-profit company, so literally anything they do is to make money.
But it’s not “my data”, it’s anonymous. The “engagement” info is in relation to features. That’s why some features are removed - because nobody uses them. Or rather: not enough people use them to warrant maintenance.
And how do you know it’s not malicious in nature? I’d like to know what your definition of “malicious” is if you’re just fine with letting a Corpo run system look at everything you’re doing.
Because I have a functioning brain.
Malware is designed to hurt you by extracting your personal information or resources.
Telemetry is designed to give developers feedback about product/functionality usage and is anonymous.
I’m not, and it’s not. Unlike you, I actually checked what data telemetry gathers and I’m perfectly fine with it. It’s inconsequential and anonymous.
Haha, sure thing William
Are you a tech-illiterate person?
If not, explain how is it malicious.
how the hell do you not?
I don’t know, maybe because I understand the definition of “spyware” and “telemetry”?
Well, semantically yes, not all telemetry is spyware. However regarding Windows telemetry it’s indistinguishable from spyware - you have no idea nor control over the data gathered, measured and processed.
The crux is that Windows telemetry is opt out, opting out can’t be done during installation, and historically opting out wasn’t sticky. Additionally some Windows telemetry is still being sent despite opting out.
That makes Windows telemetry fulfill all spyware criteria.
Ah, so you’re another one of those fear-mongers?
Here’s the Required Diagnostic Events Fields (required telemetry) documentation.
Keeping in mind that it’s anonymous - which parts of this are you so vehemently against sending to Microsoft?
The shittiest spyware in history, I guess, considering it’s all anonymous…
lmao you believe that? What a simp
I don’t think taking screenshots of everything you do every few seconds is telemetry.
It’s not, but it’s also not spyware - it’s local, encrypted, AND optional.
Microsoft is known for making things “optional” at first then eventually forcing it down everyone’s throats. Removing offline accounts is one of them.
It’s not so much the technology itself is malware, but its behavior replicates that of malware.
Yes hello John Windows my microwave account name is Oobe\bypassnro
This also works: shift-F10 before you get to the network configuration, then type this and press enter start ms-cxh:localonly
For either method, if you configure networking during setup, e.g. plug in an ethernet cable or give it the wi-fi password, it’ll keep returning to the online account screen. You need to do it prior to network config.
Right. So you’re all panicking just in case.
That’s what’s being swept under the rug as “alarmists being loud”.
Good morning!
How’s my favorite genocide denialist scumbag today?
Still alive? Surprising
The same way you have a lock on your front door “just in case”. It’s not emotional. It’s logical.
The lock is there. The whole thing is encrypted.
If they somehow go through encryption, they won’t just have the EU on their arses, governments of the entire world will be after them, because they trust that this encryption system makes their data secure.
Optional like how it reminds me every 3 days that it wants my info for “customization” purposes, and I can only sleep the notification for another 3 days instead of telling it to fuck off?
They have been so predatory, at this point no one should see anything they do as benefiting end users.
If it does that, outrage will be understandable.
Getting outraged about something they said will be 100% optional and hasn’t even released yet is just childish.
Actual optional things are disabled by default.
So you’re saying you haven’t bothered to read about Recall at all, you just assumed it’s going to be enabled by default?
Until a windows update kicks in and somehow turns it on for the world. thanks but no thanks. I’ll be disabling this not with a reg key but with local policy or DSC if I have to use a windows machine for personal again.
I switched to Linux 2 months ago.
I don’t know if this is a regional thing, but I’ve been using Windows since 3.11 and have NEVER had ONE instance of an update randomly turning on something that I’ve turned off before.
Look at this bootlicker ignoring history and saying trust Microsoft.
“Look at this fossil thinking it’s still 1990”, I guess?
Mate, did you miss how 30 years have passed? How the world change? Can you even begin to imagine the fine the EU would slap without a second thought on MS if they tried pulling something like suddenly grabbing these screenshots from users’ devices?
I will pass on being your mate. I don’t like shills.
I am curious though, what do boots taste like?
Grow up, mate. And check the calendar.
Already told you I don’t want to be your mate. Maybe learn what consent is.
Also, go play devil’s advocate somewhere else. You suck at it.
You consider actual, literal spyware as being merely telemetry?
What are you talking about now?
I believe they are talking about Windows, an OS that is spyware and no one should use
An example of Windows being spyware not standard telemetry is the Recall feature. A feature that doesn’t just tell you how the OS is used but actually takes screenshots every few seconds
Of, ffs, grow up.
You have no clue what you’re talking about, do you?
Recall only works on devices with an NPU. Do you know why? Because it runs locally. It’s got NOTHING to do with telemetry, because it does NOT send data to Microsoft.
Show code or gtfo
LOL, this is hilarious :D
Imagine believing they can sneak gigabytes of network traffic without anyone noticing just because you can’t read the code! :D
They can process it locally to your point and send txt files of passwords/sensitive info
However, they don’t have to send anything while such a terrible feature is new. They just have to wait until enough retards accept such a feature
Again: if they did that, the EU’s GDPR would eat them alive.
This is about the Smart App Control feature in Win11 that takes screenshots periodically to check for “malicious activity”. its basically a glorified keylogger built into the OS. Firefox should really follow suit and block this too.
Holy shit, what a comment!
It’s not, it’s about Recall.
It doesn’t. Smar App Control does code validation and reputation check. Recall makes screenshots, OCR’s them and keeps them in an encrypted vault for the user to interact with.
It’s not, you can turn both off at any time.
It’s not, it fundamentally is NOT, because it doesn’t log any keystrokes. SAC isn’t even in the picture here, while Recall literally only makes screenshots, runs OCR and encrypts that.
Fuck me, where do you people get this bullshit from? It used to be “oh no, Microsoft will be making screenshots of your activity and sending them to their servers” not so long ago which, while still bullshit, was at least in the same ballpark as what Recall does.
Now you’re throwing SAC into the mix somehow?
I worry that the prevalence of ill-informed hot-takes dilutes the validity of complaints, and I appreciate your work here
All I have to say is I hope this catches on with other browsers.
Just avoid using an “AI” cpu.
Let me know when it is discovered that they in fact replaced MS Recall with their own version that was scraping your data in yet another sketchy attempt to make money.
www.spacebar.news/stop-using-brave-browser/
BUT… most people really don’t care about that, they just want to remove ads from facebook or youtube or whatever…
My clients couldn’t care less about what the CEO does, heck they still think facebook is the dogs danglies and youtube is cutting edge plus Netflix is the best streaming service.
Fighting that is way harder than then trying to explain that some software is worse than others. Heck plenty still use Photoshop because they don’t understand that alternatives exist and “everyone at work uses it”
yeah but it’s run by an active opponent of LGBT folks
Simplewall allows direct control of internet access of any program and app; you can block CoPilot from accessing the internet.
Now whilst I enjoy all the comments I actually have to add something quickly that explains why this kind of thing happens. I recently worked with a rather old lady to find out why she was having so many issues with technology and stuff. I found out that when she started work in 1986 she was told that the shared password in her department at the local hospital was “password” and so she has used that on everything she can since to remember it… other gems that they used on whole departments included “qwerty” and “123456” and the best one of all “letmeinnow”. On whole shared networks of 100+ machines…
I used some stuff to block my location and windows recall BECAUSE FUCK YOU MICROSOFT!
You can’t block all of Windows spyware. The best case of action would be to install an alternative operating system like Linux or a BSD-derivative. It’s counter-intuitive to “fuck Microsoft” when you are still using their OS.
I wonder why the fuck is am taking so long to do it…
I recently switched, and would be happy to give whatever rudimentary pointers I can. I’ve found that Linux mint is the best option for me. You can also easily flash it onto a USB and try it out to confirm compatibility.
The biggest things are these:
I gave been wanting to go on linux mint for almost a year. Its time I fucking did it.
Edit: I have been doing a lot for privacy, but it just isn’t enough. For example I wanted to use venice.ai… but I didn’t just use a tutamail email, I even used a prepaid credit card. I live in canada where you don’t need to attach your name to a prepaid card, meaning it is as anonymous as possible if you want to buy something with a card (and yes, I paid for it in cash and it was activated by the store).
Well, let me know if you’ve got any trouble. Oh, and do you have an HP? Those things SUCK at installing Linux. One of those things you have to find out from trying to install it on three separate HP devices.
I am a Dell guy through and through. I flashed linux mint on a cheap ass USB I had lying around. I will start with my laptop this weekend.
Nice
there are 100% fed backdoors for looking in your pc in Windows
This still doesn’t make brave a good privacy browser in the long run
The founder of Brave browser got fired from Firefox because he was homophobic
anarcho-…braveism ???