Renewable Power Helped the United States Survive the Hottest Summer Ever (cleantechnica.com)
from L4s@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 2023 10:00
https://lemmy.world/post/6089851

Renewable Power Helped the United States Survive the Hottest Summer Ever::This summer, the United States endured the two warmest months ever recorded, yet the system held because of renewable energy.

#technology

threaded - newest

Cabrio@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 2023 11:14 next collapse

Pfft. Not even going to be the hottest this year.

Hottest Summer 2: Australian Boogaloo

shortwavesurfer@monero.town on 01 Oct 2023 14:21 next collapse

This summer was really terrible and i am glad its over.

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 01 Oct 2023 15:14 next collapse

Did Texas not experience blackouts? I thought I read that.

pdxfed@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 2023 04:28 collapse

No, no blackouts what you say?? Grid strong, best privatization strength grid. China respect Ughurs, and Will bring peace to Taiwan with more military there. Also, best country North Korea, freedom freeest here in rich, happy country. Putin good for Ukraine, Ukraine people love new freedom thank you Putin! Trump help little man against rich billionaires like trump, you see I trust!

–definitely a normal, average internet user and not a shill

RealFknNito@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 2023 15:47 next collapse

Nuclear might have helped a bit more but yeah, glad renewable did something I suppose. The hotter solar panels get the less effective they are so not super excited for that one.

frezik@midwest.social on 01 Oct 2023 19:10 collapse

Nuclear would help it be really expensive. It doesn’t ramp up and down with demand.

Solar does plenty when the sun is out, even if the temperature means efficiency isn’t at its peak. In other words, you gain several fold for a sunny day, while losing a few percent due to heat. That pattern tends to correspond with AC usage, so it’s actually ideal.

RealFknNito@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 2023 00:04 collapse

I’ll keep it a buck with you, solar panels are more expensive relative to their energy output. I get solar and renewable energy is the dream for most but as someone unafraid of nuclear fission, the only dream for me is fusion. Widespread adoption and better batteries would make renewables better but from the information I’ve seen, nothing compares to nuclear power per kw/h. Not even all renewables combined on their best day.

frezik@midwest.social on 02 Oct 2023 00:21 collapse

And yet no one with money to invest in the energy sector is caring to put a dime into new nuclear. They looked at their options and picked the one that doesn’t have a long history of cost and schedule overruns.

RealFknNito@lemmy.world on 02 Oct 2023 23:31 collapse

And the overuse of materials for solar is going to drive up their price and repair costs but hey we’ll see

frezik@midwest.social on 03 Oct 2023 01:53 collapse

Which material do you think will be the limiting factor on photovoltaic production?

RealFknNito@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 2023 14:33 collapse

Perovskite.

frezik@midwest.social on 03 Oct 2023 15:57 collapse

Lol, no. Besides the fact that we’ve barely started scaled production of perovskite cells, and that we’re still working out their longevity issues, their main advantage is that the materials used are cheap and abundant.

RealFknNito@lemmy.world on 03 Oct 2023 18:01 collapse

Lol it’s a mineral that requires Titanium to form and last I checked that wasn’t cheap. Not only that, but every first person country all at once making Perovskite cells, it’ll end up like Lithium in time. But again, even now as they exist, they pale in comparison to what nuclear can produce.

frezik@midwest.social on 03 Oct 2023 19:21 collapse

It’s not even the most prominent means of production yet. It’s about at the same level as SMRs, which are years away if they work at all.

Edit: also, you’re thinking of perovskite minerals. What the yet-to-be solar panels use is perovskite crystal structures, which are abundant as hell.

RealFknNito@lemmy.world on 04 Oct 2023 20:23 collapse

“Prone to degradation due to salt” is the part that I’m trying to illustrate. Yes, we have the materials for the moment but as demand increases and solar cells fail, will maintaining them and making new ones still be as cost effective as a nuclear plant down the road? That’s the basis of my concern and why renewables, while a great step in the right direction, seem to need so much more space and maintaining for less power.

Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world on 01 Oct 2023 15:58 collapse

In Texas, ERCOT issued warning after warning of the possibility of failure due to “unreliable solar and wind generation” while raising rates and asking residents to set their thermostats to 80. Yet they keep investing in renewable energy. If it’s so fucking unreliable, why keep adding it to the shitty, delicate Texas grid?

It’s almost like conservatives (and their corporate masters) are liars who are incapable of even slight truths.

zoe@infosec.pub on 03 Oct 2023 08:29 collapse

how about (ol’reliable.jpeg) megapacks? with enough storage and solar capacity to cover surge consumption ?