Airlines Are Selling Your Data to ICE (jacobin.com)
from dominiquec@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 10 May 04:21
https://lemmy.world/post/29414662

A massive aviation industry clearinghouse that processes data for twelve billion passenger flights per year is selling that information to the Trump administration amid the White House’s new immigration crackdown, according to documents reviewed by the Lever.

The data — including “full flight itineraries, passenger name records, and financial details, which are otherwise difficult or impossible to obtain” for past and future flights — is fed into a secretive government intelligence operation called the Travel Intelligence Program and provided to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agencies, records reveal.

Details of this program were outlined in procurement documents released Wednesday by ICE, which is a division of the Department of Homeland Security.

#technology

threaded - newest

tal@lemmy.today on 10 May 04:29 next collapse

I’d think that they already have that due to the TSA.

ReiRose@lemmy.world on 10 May 09:59 collapse

Not the financial data I guess. Or perhaps none of it can be shared across agencies.

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 10 May 04:58 next collapse

Can we get the courts to determine that as an “unreasonable search” already?

ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world on 10 May 05:05 next collapse

The same courts that the government routinely ignores, and that has a sham, corrupt supreme court at it’s head? Yeah, good luck with that, unfortunately.

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 11 May 13:29 collapse

Still it’s good to get it on record. Either the court is compromised, or gives good rationale, or ice is in breach. At this point it’s stilll a question.

toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world on 10 May 07:25 next collapse

yo, the exec has said they’re actively trying to suspend habeas corpus. we’re going back in time now. i thought the tea tariffs on the UK would have been enough symbolism to work with.

CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 May 10:15 next collapse

Yeah so bad news. The government has routinely purchased data like this as an end run around the 4th Amendment. The data is collected by a third party, often with the customers “consent”.

This is why we need stricter privacy controls around our data. The fact that this data was collated in the first place is problematic. The fact that it’s being sold for profit is abhorrent.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 10 May 11:38 next collapse

The fact that it’s being sold for profit is abhorrent.

Not even just profit now, but literally for the furtherance of the cruelty and suffering being dispensed by ICE

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 10 May 13:15 next collapse

The mental trick that keeps on giving. When government does it - it’s automatically bad, but when a private business does it - it’s between the business and its customers. Then all the gov’t needs to do is become a customer on the B2B side.

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 10 May 13:46 collapse

It’s like that because we vote in weak mediators that don’t do shit.

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca on 10 May 16:28 next collapse

True. But I think to a great extent that’s the case because business funds the weak ones and spends good money to convince us to elect them. Then they keep the profits rolling. Rinse and repeat.

gradual@lemmings.world on 12 May 15:11 collapse

And we vote them in because the people that will do shit will inevitably fuck with the money of neo-liberals.

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 10 May 13:45 collapse

The government was voted by us so at this point you need to be telling your fellow citizens that there are fucking stupid and we must remove everyone from office at this point.

So we’re fucked. We’re fucked!

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 11 May 01:21 collapse

It’s not really a problem with the government though. This company collates and sells the data. They sold it to the government, who have every right to buy it if it’s being sold legally.

For those thinking this would only be a new thing under the current government, think again. These records are a goldmine for any and all intelligence agencies around the world, and it’s all been available for as long as online flight bookings have been a thing.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 11 May 01:33 collapse

Patriot Act just never stops giving

Idiots supported it because it was gonna be used against the "right people"

Literally provided political support for the machinery of oppression

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 11 May 02:10 collapse

It’s the same reason why I find the lefts calls for censorship, prosecution of political opponents, stuffing the courts, banning of political parties, etc to be so incredibly stupid and naive.

They don’t understand that while those things are “great” when it’s their beloved do-no-wrong party in power - they won’t be in power forever! When they aren’t in power, those very same laws will be used against them but 10x worse due to the effects of those laws being used against the now-in-power party.

rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works on 10 May 13:38 next collapse

Flock operates thier ALPR cameras the same way. They own the data but will happily hand it over to law enforcement. Cities are contracting with Flock to install the network of ALPRs.

If we had cops on the street recording everyone’s license plate as they drove by I’m sure a savvy lawyer could argue successfully that it’s an illegal search. Somehow, when a private company does it and makes the database accessible it’s not?

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 10 May 13:43 collapse

No you will have to physically do it yourself (a a group). Law is dead.

Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz on 10 May 04:59 next collapse

Someone trusts flying in these conditions? That’s insane.

[deleted] on 10 May 05:18 next collapse

.

myrmidex@slrpnk.net on 10 May 06:56 next collapse

Yea I feel the same, especially after reading this article.

sykaster@feddit.nl on 10 May 08:14 next collapse

Even if I trust the flying itself, I don’t trust not being detained upon entering the USA. I’m not flying there again anytime soon.

dzso@lemmy.world on 10 May 12:12 collapse

Even as a white male US born citizen, I also don’t see myself flying back any time soon. I’m nobody, but I’ve run my mouth against fascists online enough that I’ve probably triggered some flag in the system.

nodiratime@lemmy.world on 10 May 08:42 collapse

There are flights not in or out of the US…

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 10 May 13:57 collapse

Don’t fly American planes, either.

mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works on 10 May 05:17 next collapse

Can’t wait to read about the Palintir FAA merger

Sibbo@sopuli.xyz on 10 May 06:04 next collapse

Since when does a government agency have to pay for receiving a companies data? I guess there is no law for allowing ICE to access that data, and then they just pay instead?

ILoveUnions@lemmy.world on 10 May 06:37 next collapse

Yeah that’s one of the things that stood out as what the hell… the companies already have the data, if ICE wanted it legally they shouldn’t need to pay… Really shows how shady they’re being.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 11 May 01:24 collapse

The government can’t just take every companies data. They absolutely can buy it if that is an option though. Just like how they pay for licenses for software, they can and do pay for data.

ILoveUnions@lemmy.world on 12 May 06:29 collapse

Related to crimes, they kinda really can

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 12 May 07:49 collapse

Correct, but this is about collecting it without any crime.

gradual@lemmings.world on 12 May 15:13 collapse

Which is the problem.

ICE would not be able to legally subpoena these companies for our data, so they buy it from them as a loophole.

Using our tax dollars, of course.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 12 May 20:54 collapse

It’s not a loophole though.

nevm@lemmy.ml on 10 May 07:47 next collapse

At least for foreigners travelling into the US, you’re willingly giving the US govt most of this information up front anyway via the APIS. And paying for the privilege!

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 10 May 13:51 collapse

Well you could have easily not fucking come here.

Americans are just fucked (and they stole the election so we get to be hated for voting for him while we didn’t even vote for him, our allies have every excuse not to lift a finger to care. Really convenient.)

nevm@lemmy.ml on 10 May 17:20 collapse

Unless of course you’re forced to, like for your job. My place would have little to zero sympathy for my personal reasons not to travel unless it’s on a govt advisory not to.

pirat@lemmy.world on 10 May 23:55 collapse

Time to quit and find a better employer…

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 11 May 01:29 collapse

Always but this is also a naive. These parasites have the same incentive structures so they always exploit

FloMo@lemmy.world on 10 May 09:21 next collapse

If I had to guess, obtaining the data by force may require a court order or legal process.

Buying data that someone else is willingly selling bypasses those steps.

spankmonkey@lemmy.world on 10 May 12:27 collapse

Any reasonable court would equate requiring a warrant and requiring payment in the context of the 4th amendment (and similar rights/laws in other countries).

FloMo@lemmy.world on 10 May 13:51 collapse

I would think and hope that, but evidence tends to point to the contrary.

A quick search brings up multiple articles including:

arstechnica.com/…/nsa-finally-admits-to-spying-on…

Guess those EULAS we all agreed to but never read had some sneaky language about what they can do with the data.

keegomatic@lemmy.world on 11 May 02:18 collapse

Since always, without a subpoena. Until PRISM, at least.

nuko147@lemm.ee on 10 May 06:44 next collapse

The company is jointly owned by nine major airlines, most of which are US-based: Delta, Southwest, United, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, JetBlue, Air Canada, Lufthansa, and Air France.

I hope EU starts some investigation, because it doesn’t seem this follows the GDPR for European travelers.

mriswith@lemmy.world on 10 May 09:34 next collapse

Lufthansa and Air France might have some massive fines incoming.

JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz on 10 May 15:24 next collapse

Maximum GDPR fine is 4% of your revenue. For Lufthansa, that would be ~$1.4 billion, Air France ~$650 million, both of which are roughly their entire net income for one year.

Not sure if anyone has been hit with the maximum ever though, as everyone just keeps track of the dollars and not percentage of revenue.

rikudou@lemmings.world on 10 May 20:03 collapse

AFAIK no one has triggered the biggest fines (yet?). Can’t wait for it to happen.

mriswith@lemmy.world on 10 May 20:48 collapse

I think the biggest one by value is Meta with €1.2b. Although their revenue is in the $150b+ range, so not maxed out.

Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu on 10 May 21:36 collapse

They better, why tf is Air France collaborating with these ICEholes?

fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com on 11 May 01:23 next collapse

Assuming the data doesn’t include international departures or arrivals (only their domestic counterparts), would GDPR even apply?

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 11 May 13:27 collapse

I think it applies to eu citizens worldwide for online purposes. You only need to do business in eu with eu clients (seperate terms) for it to apply.

fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com on 11 May 13:42 collapse

Yea, I guess because they are “selling” vs being compensated for? If the US govt dictates terms to that business under homeland security, GDPR probably wouldn’t matter, but I can only assume since it’s a sale, that’s not the case.

NotSteve_@lemmy.ca on 11 May 01:48 collapse

Air Canada

Wtf Air Canada? Air France too

PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip on 10 May 10:37 next collapse

Nice racket. First you pay the airlines for their tickets, then the ICE with your tax dollars to buy your data from said airlines.

reiterationstation@lemm.ee on 10 May 13:42 next collapse

Soon they will be taking Americans to their death, too, and I assume no one will do fucking shit as usual.

Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world on 11 May 02:32 collapse

Did Germans do shit about Hitler? Nope, it was the rest of the world. And, well, one German who did shit about Hitler.

Xanthobilly@lemmy.world on 11 May 04:43 collapse

Too bad he didn’t act sooner.

WindyRebel@lemmy.world on 10 May 15:39 next collapse

It’s just the TIP of the ICEberg.

gradual@lemmings.world on 12 May 15:05 collapse

Fuck.

Great point. We need to be able to see the interconnections of this more often.

shalafi@lemmy.world on 10 May 14:32 next collapse

IBM supplied Nazis with the machines and punch cards to track the population. Throwing that out there for no particular reason. What where we talking about?

Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee on 10 May 15:00 next collapse

Cue the airlines come with hand-wringing to beg the Feds for more bailouts because “nobody is flying anymore.”

Parasitical business practices should lead to market exit.

NGC2346@sh.itjust.works on 10 May 16:12 next collapse

Twelve billion

I thought we we’re approximately 8.2 Billion on earth? Am i missing something?

JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca on 10 May 16:41 next collapse

One person can have multiple flights per year. Its still a huge number considering the billions in Asia who never fly.

y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 May 16:49 collapse

You’re right, everyone is only allowed one flight per year this doesn’t add up

NGC2346@sh.itjust.works on 10 May 23:50 collapse

12 billion passenger is a bad way of saying it, 12 billion flights would’ve been better.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 11 May 01:28 collapse

No, passengers is the correct way of saying it. A flight can have hundreds of passengers. A person is a passenger every time they fly a leg on a plane.

Also it’s “passenger flights” in the OP, which would be a record of a passenger on a flight. If a person took 4 flights in one journey, that would count as 4 “passenger flights”.

C1pher@lemmy.world on 10 May 23:29 next collapse

Jesus… well, avoid flying trough US if possible.

doingthestuff@lemy.lol on 11 May 00:46 next collapse

I drive everywhere. Yeah, I know, fuck cars. But honestly they’re tracking everyone’s movement. Have you noticed all of the intersection cameras that have popped up everywhere? Fuck the authoritarian surveillance state.

tomkatt@lemmy.world on 11 May 02:02 next collapse

You got one of those dongles, like State Farm’s Drive Safe and Save program? Carry a cell phone? You’re still being tracked.

doingthestuff@lemy.lol on 11 May 20:29 collapse

No dongle, and I don’t always carry my phone. I get nonstop work calls, sometimes I turn it off and leave it.

Jimmycakes@lemmy.world on 11 May 03:00 next collapse

Intersection cameras, license plate readers, face scanning. Expect some or all of it everytime you get behind the wheel.

moseschrute@lemmy.ml on 11 May 13:47 collapse

They don’t need cameras. Your phone is constantly connecting to cell towers and broadcasting its unique identifier. Those towers keep a record of who has connected. So long as your in range of 3 or more towers they can triangulate your location.

doingthestuff@lemy.lol on 11 May 20:27 collapse

True but I don’t like having my phone on me when I don’t want to be reachable. Sometimes it’s turned off at home.

moseschrute@lemmy.ml on 11 May 20:37 collapse

That is a skill that more of us could use. Myself included

SabinStargem@lemmy.today on 11 May 00:48 next collapse

Do foreign airlines that come into the country do this? Would an EU plane be safe from this bullshit?

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 11 May 01:09 next collapse

As long as programs like 5-Eyes exist you just have to assume every time you interact with a company it is in the hands of all of the governments.

gradual@lemmings.world on 12 May 15:08 collapse

But useful idiots on lemmy keep telling me it’s china doing all the surveillance through companies.

RangerJosey@lemmy.ml on 11 May 14:08 collapse

Everyone is stealing your data and selling it. Feeding it into AI. Building profiles on you to better send you ads.

Yes. Literally every company. There’s no regulation so to them it’s free money.