Gov. Landry signs new drone defense law; first in nation (www.kadn.com)
from AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee to technology@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 00:54
https://lemm.ee/post/67221665

Louisiana has become the first state to allow law enforcement to intercept and disable drones posing threats to public safety. Gov. Jeff Landry signed the groundbreaking “We Will Act” Act into law on Wednesday, June 18.

Well this is certainly odd timing… 😅

HB261 by Rep. Jack “Jay” Gallé Jr., R-District 104 (St. Tammany Parish) grants specially trained officers the authority to use both kinetic and non-kinetic methods to neutralize drones operating unlawfully near sensitive areas like schools and public events.

??? What that means??

“This law puts Louisiana on the front lines of drone defense,” Gov. Landry said. “We are taking bold steps now to protect our people and our skies before tragedy strikes.”

Violators face strict penalties, including fines up to $5,000, up to one year in jail, and mandatory forfeiture of the drone. The legislation comes amid growing concerns over unauthorized drone activities near sensitive locations.

Gov. Landry noted this move places Louisiana at the forefront of state-level drone policy, setting a precedent that may influence future legislation across the country.

This weird video of Landry signing the bill specifically mentions Louisiana’s nuclear power facilities, then Landry tries to make light of everything by saying “They tell me the president is getting ready to do an executive order on some of this stuff… I didn’t say that.”

… This is fine.

#technology

threaded - newest

untakenusername@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jun 01:00 next collapse

well this sorta makes sense

with all that stuff Ukraine managed to pull off, domestic drone terrorism is probably something the thinktanks already thought up, calculated the risks of, and told the guy to do something about

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net on 19 Jun 01:57 next collapse

I’ve thought of this years ago. Y’all are just lucky I’m not a terrorist.

untakenusername@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jun 02:01 collapse

<img alt="image" src="https://media1.tenor.com/m/g_YopdgUyLcAAAAd/joe-biden-presidential-debate.gif">

spoiler

some text here so the image federates right

AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee on 19 Jun 02:08 collapse

Its the timing of all this with Iran that has me most concerned and the fact that Trump just got rid of the only agency that does a thorough investigation into industrial explosions.

And the fact that the Mossad snuck in drones to Iran recently for their attack

And the video of Landry signing this bill and mentioning our nuclear power plants and saying Trump will be signing his own EO soon

And the fact that Trump also just fired a Biden appointee who was head of the Nuclear safety board that oversees America’s nuclear reactors

Hopefully all just part of a really weird series of coincidences

untakenusername@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jun 02:17 next collapse

I highly doubt that Iran would attack the US directly - the most they would do is cyberwar

the US has the military power to force Farsi to become a dead language, and I don’t think the Iranian government would want to mess with force that powerful like that

I think what your seeing is probably a bunch of coincidences, there’s other explainations for that stuff you listed, like trump replacing govt workers with his own or wanting more deregulation for power plants.

I wouldn’t worry too much of a threat like that from Iran.

AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee on 19 Jun 02:32 next collapse

I’m not worried about a threat from Iran. I’m worried about a false flag being blamed on Iran

HK65@sopuli.xyz on 19 Jun 04:18 collapse

Iran already tried to kill Trump before the election

shalafi@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 02:25 collapse

Nah. Bills don’t appear overnight, been in the works for a minute.

lurch@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jun 01:10 next collapse

kinetic and non-kinetic methods

??? What that means??

kinetic is shooting guns or throwing things like nets.

non-kinetic is jamming control signals (or maybe even GPS?) or threatening the operator, so he lands it.

empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jun 01:40 next collapse

Conveniently will cover any drone taking aerial footage of protests or police state suppression tactics

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 01:49 next collapse

“Moooooom! They’re looking at me!!!”

HK65@sopuli.xyz on 19 Jun 04:25 next collapse

This.

Hungary has this thing where the agitprop always gets some footage taken before the protest starts so the crowd looks smaller as it’s only the early people there from police drones.

You can’t fly your own drone to counter the narrative.

CosmoNova@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 07:11 collapse

For people who supposedly hate China and big government these MAGA fascist are trying to be a whole lot like the worst part of the Chinese Communist Party.

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 07:19 collapse

The US govt has always been worse, lol, what. Now they’re just bringing it home at full force, that’s all.

fubarx@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 03:06 next collapse

Drone meeting spear: www.youtube.com/watch?v=90TrnpsJiTE

PattyMcB@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 03:15 next collapse

Of course it’s LA. What a hell-hole

potatopotato@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jun 03:16 next collapse

Since nobody has mentioned it, all of this is turbo illegal and the federal courts will absolutely nuke this from orbit. State governments do not control airspace, full stop. The courts have been very clear on this. Manned vs unmanned doesn’t matter to the FAA, it’s still one hell of a PP slap from the feds for encroaching on their turf. Additionally, any form of jamming (desense, deauth, noise, location spoofing, fraudulent signals etc) is illegal and regulated by the FCC, and doing it with intent to take down an aircraft means you get strung up by both the FCC and FAA simultaneously. In particular doing literally anything to the GPS band will pose a massive and immediate risk to manned passenger aircraft and the feds aren’t going to look kindly on that.

aramova@infosec.pub on 19 Jun 04:38 next collapse

Yes, absolutely, 100%.

FAA has from the beginning been very forceful in asserting that it is the sole authority for things attempting to defy gravity.

On the flip side though, the GOP stopped caring about anything courts say.

So. Guess we’ll see how this plays out for the next few years at least.

acosmichippo@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 06:16 next collapse

they have also shown willingness to dismantle federal agencies for whatever agenda they want to accomplish.

j0ester@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 22:33 collapse

FAA: I don’t like what Louisiana is doing.

Donald: we’re going to dismantle FAA.

AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee on 19 Jun 04:47 next collapse

Things can change very quickly if there’s an “attack” on U.S. soil they totally didn’t know about in advance or anything when they signed this.

Federal regulations and protections can get pushed aside real fast in the name of security, especially when you have states like Louisiana already working so closely with DHS.

projectmoon@lemm.ee on 19 Jun 05:26 collapse

Or if you just ignore federal courts, which seems to be the current fashion.

pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip on 19 Jun 13:11 collapse

With the federal government gutting funding of it’s own agencies, we may see more of this.

Federal laws are effective if they’re effectively enforced. If states lose confidence in federal enforcement, it makes sense that they will try to do their own thing, and see if the federal courts are understaffed and lethargic or able to act.

And if the federal government succeeds in using AI instead of human staff, then all each state will need to do is pass the same law a few different times with slightly different wording to hit the right gap in the AI.

There’s interesting times ahead.

paraphrand@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 06:05 next collapse

Hmm, if laws do pass preventing states from making laws against AI, then we may have legal conflicts regarding laws against drones. They use AI.

RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 12:05 next collapse

leave it to the southern red states to try to pass laws that are completely illegal over and over and over again

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 19 Jun 15:28 next collapse

We Will Act law

What is it with Americans and their dumb innate need to give everything some weirdo name…

lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 19 Jun 20:16 collapse

Easier for the gullible maga base to remember and parrot as if the title actually means anything. You know they don’t actually read the bills, they only know what fox tells them.

RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 17:28 next collapse

Why do I get the feeling that this will end up like Chief Wiggum releasing the dogs?

youtu.be/EGWT5JMl3ns

Jimmycakes@lemmy.world on 19 Jun 23:23 collapse

I’m sure the 2 iq police in Louisiana will be able to figure any of this out. That equipment will be rotting in some storage unit in 3 months.