Exclusive: US lawmaker seeks answers on FDA inspection of Musk's Neuralink (www.reuters.com)
from catculation@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.world on 26 Mar 2024 23:34
https://lemmy.zip/post/12469265

#technology

threaded - newest

magnetosphere@fedia.io on 27 Mar 2024 01:03 next collapse

A U.S. lawmaker involved in health policy has asked the Food and Drug Administration why it did not inspect Elon Musk's Neuralink before allowing the brain implant company to test its device in humans.

That is a very, very good question.

swayevenly@lemm.ee on 27 Mar 2024 01:57 collapse

I think John Oliver has covered this one. In particular, how poorly the FDA handles food safety but discusses inadequate funding and bureaucratic inefficiencies as a whole.

elshandra@lemmy.world on 27 Mar 2024 09:44 collapse

You’re not wrong in any way, they definitely do need more funding. No matter how much you throw at it, the enormity of the task of making sure everything that wants to come to market is safe for humans… I can’t imagine how humans can even keep up.

Sure, the risks associated with brain implants are high, but it’s something you (hopefully) very consciously have to agree to. It’s more value to test some artificial sweetener to make sure it doesn’t give us diabetes.

ringwraithfish@startrek.website on 27 Mar 2024 02:56 collapse

Wouldn’t be surprised if they used the 510k loophole.

HessiaNerd@lemmy.world on 27 Mar 2024 04:32 collapse

No fucking way. It’s a PMA device. The rub is that M. it stands for market. As in clinical trials have a lower threshold.