There might be a small uptick of new Linux installs, but MS will just power on and the vast majority of Windows users will remain in that abusive relationship. :sigh:
It has more to do with corporations than individuals. Microsoft doesnât pay the bills from great grandma Ethelâs Windows license, they have a corporate revenue stream they need to keep locked in.
Are you going to pay for retraining 30,000 employees?
Or to make all your software work on Linux?
Autocad?
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 13:32
nextcollapse
Realistically, there are probably half of office workstations, maybe more, where the business users who use them can do everything they need through a browser.
In that sense most stuff already works on Linux, including basic productivity software, email and calendaring, real time communications through Slack or Teams or whatever.
More specialized jobs might need more specialized software, but for many workers they donât need that.
I didnât even mentioned Linux, did I? Can be MacOS or FreeBSD.
I guess you assumed I did since its the default answer to suggest Linux as Windows is a shitshow. However, I realize that ordinary people wonât change a thing. They will just use the OS that came installed with the computer. Thatâs (windows) 99 % of all computers sold.
And yes, I do use Linux but Iâm tech savy and a realist about the Windows situation.
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Oct 12:26
collapse
I mean, they could solve it by not making the mandatory successor an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. That would be a start. And also relax whatever the artificial requirement is that makes a lot of Win10 machines incompatible with 11.
trespasser69@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 11:43
nextcollapse
Nope, they wont. Micro$oft only cares money rather than basic OS for everyday and professional tasks
Theyâve been adding spyware and ads into W10 so itâs not the money. They could easily add all W11 ads/spyware into 10 with an update. Older CPUs have several hardware vulnerabilities unrelated to the TPU required by W11.
IMO, they should add a startup message listing the hardware vulnerabilities of the installed CPU and leave it up to the customer.
Yes but that could be added in a W10 update just like theyâve already done with previous W10 updates.
ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
on 22 Oct 12:12
nextcollapse
You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial. I believe Rufus has an option when creating Win11 install USBs to remove the TPM and other requirements.
But then again, itâs nice, because all I need to make sure Microsoft doesnât secretly update my Win10 machine in the night to Win11 is to turn off the TPM in the BIOS.
trespasser69@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 12:27
nextcollapse
But then you wonât receive any updates if you use unsupported hardware to run Win 11
clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 13:00
collapse
Well, not gonna get updates on 10 either, so is same-same
john117@lemmy.jmsquared.net
on 22 Oct 12:37
nextcollapse
You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial.
I think bypassing these checks would eventually render your PC vulnerable? for example, bitlocker support being void for computers that relies on TPM 2.0
There is no home-user need to run bitlocker. Thereâs dozens of alternatives, that do not rely on TPM, that are just as effective, and that you really should be using anyways since they arenât controlled by M$.
john117@lemmy.jmsquared.net
on 22 Oct 12:45
collapse
If you need encryption, veracrypt probably still works.
Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
on 22 Oct 13:22
nextcollapse
Rufus has that option, Iâve used it myself to update to Win11 because I didnât have a motherboard with TPM at the time.
Also wanna mention, the reason I updated was mostly because I thought Win10 was kinda ugly and I think Win11 was a huge update in that regard and also because of security reasons, since Win10 wonât receive any more updates in the near future. At the end of the day, I can count on one hand how often I boot Windows in a year (I almost exclusively use Linux), so I donât really care about all the Win11 bullshit anyway.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
on 22 Oct 18:57
collapse
You can bypass the requirements
Not all of them. Windows 11 stopped booting with Update 24H2 on CPUs that donât support the Instruction POPCNT. But thatâs only an issue for really old CPUs like Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD Athlon 64 X2
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 22 Oct 20:21
collapse
For a bit more context than âreally oldâ: I had an Intel Core 2 Duo in 2009.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
on 22 Oct 20:33
collapse
Another angle: Those were some of the first dual-core x86 processors, released 2006 and 2005 respectively. (Intel had the Pentium D as its first in 2005).
I donât remember which I had for sure. Iâm leaning more towards Core 2 Duo. It was my first PC, I was 12 and built it with my father.
I also got my first computer around then. I saved up for ages and bought the first gen Intel MacBook with an Intel Core Duo (2 cores, no hyperthreading).
I still have that laptop somewhereâŚ
It blew my mind it could run Windows, and Windows laptops couldnât compare at the time.
Maybe? I just said in another comment that I am pretty much exclusively Linux. I only occasionally use a W10 VM at work, and itâs enterprise/LTSB so I donât get a lot of that junk.
Every thread on lemmy is a windows hating thread by default :D
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 22 Oct 20:19
collapse
Iâve lost count of the amount of posts and comment threads on here about âall the horrible ads and spywareâ where the solution was to flip literally a single switch in Settings, Personalization.
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu
on 22 Oct 14:24
nextcollapse
Windows 10 is already an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. The problem with 11 is the ridiculous hardware requirements.
Windows 10 is trash and has always been. Windows 7 was the last good Windows, and I would still use it if it had security updates and DX12 support (I obviously mainly use Linux, but my gaming PC is on Windows, and no, some games I play and software I use 100% do not work on Linux).
Probably is. I use Linux for everything and only use Win10 at work on a VM with enterprise/LTSB version, so Iâve been shielded from most of its enshittification.
Amen. I am 100% convinced that the only reason Windows 10 was received this well was because of their tremendous marketing efforts around the release. People just accepted that itâs a great OS. Itâs exactly like that Windows Vista Mojave experiment, just in reverse. In my opinion Windows 10 is even worse than Windows 11. But they didnât do as much marketing around Windows 11.
FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Oct 15:38
collapse
Windows 11 = O.S. Ima Ad-Laden. Coincidence? I think notâŚ
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
on 22 Oct 11:53
nextcollapse
hahahahahah does anyone really think microsoft cares? their money is in business with all the big players already deploying 11 at least in modest amounts.
nothing stopped them when windows7 was still functional and they were pushing the tpm requirement, i dont see a difference here.
eestileib@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Oct 16:28
collapse
Their money is now in azure. Os and app suites are a declining business, but they help with azure lock in.
I know itâs not a hardware compatibility problem. People just donât want ads/tracking/AI bullshit, a removed control panel, settings that are hard to find/hidden, etc.
All intel processor 8th gen+ (and even some 7th gen IIRC) are win11 compatible, motherboard have TPM2 for years, even my intel 6th gen MB have TPM2.0.
Next year the intel 8th gen will have 8 years, people have PC/laptop more recent than that. Problem is that win10 will not get security updates and all.
Iâm using MX Linux BTW.
Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 12:33
nextcollapse
Iâm currently using a trick on my Windows 11 work machine to get the old UI for file explorer by going through the control panel and going up a directory.
Iâll be so pissed the day they strip it out, because their new design language is ridiculously slow and terrible for the sake of âcleanliness.â
Itâs not a hardware compatibility problem for you or people who have reasonably new computers. However, for the last decade or so, computers have kind of stagnated and old computers are still very functional, something I couldnât have said a decade or two ago.
Iâm typing this on a ThinkPad x201 which was released in 2010. TBF, Iâve updated it as much as I can (8GB of RAM and an SSD), itâs running Linux Mint because Windows drags, and even then itâs getting tired.
My Spouseâs laptop is an Acer with a 5th gen i3. A couple years ago, she was complaining it was getting a bit slow, so I threw an SSD in it and now sheâs happy with how it runs Windows 10, and Iâm sure it would run Windows 11 fine if a TPM2.0 chip wasnât required.
Itâs forced obsolesces for a hardware requirement most home users are never going to use.
6th gen intel and 1st gen ryzen run perfectly fucking fine still.
UnpledgedCatnapTipper@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 22 Oct 14:41
nextcollapse
My parents are using a 3rd gen i7 and it works fine. My brother has a few computers, one is a 2nd gen intel, but I think he put Linux on that one. My home server was running on my 4th gen i7 until I upgraded it to my second gen Ryzen earlier this year after I upgraded my gaming.
LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
on 22 Oct 15:24
collapse
CPUs from around 2005 onward are all perfectly usable IMO for the purposes of x86 desktops. As long as itâs got x86_64, SSE4 and at least two available threads. I would even wager that Pentium 4 hyperthreaded models (Wolfdale?) are still acceptable if weâre really pushing it.
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
on 22 Oct 19:02
nextcollapse
I still got a Ryzen 1600, that would be just fine for when my flatmate needs a PC for working remotely, but his company reqires Windows 11 :-(
Iâm still gaming on my 1600X, although it is starting to show its age
CommanderShepard@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 05:22
nextcollapse
Most people donât care or even know that it is AI/ad-infested. Iâve seen people just fighting through pop-up on multiple websites they use. When ci fronted by me, they just said that they have âtunnel visionâ and donât care.
My 80+ year old parents donât care about ads or AI. They just want a working PC, and W11 wonât install on the cheap machine they got a few years ago. Theyâre not going to buy a new one because this works perfectly fine.
And yes they tried Linux for several years, but went back to Windows because it was just too much hassle and not compatible with too many things.
It absolutely is a hardware problem.
just_another_person@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 12:59
nextcollapse
Lots of people moving to Linux over Win11 anyway.
DaddleDew@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 14:01
nextcollapse
A lot do myself included. But not enough to matter. Most ordinary Windows users donât even know what Linux is or understand why they should care.
Enthusiasts willing to get out of their comfort zone in whatever topic we choose are rare like kryptonite. The fact that you know 10 people, or a 1000 is by no means a lot considering the number of PC users.
sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 13:12
nextcollapse
Many years ago, I attended a Windows XP launch event. The Microsoft presenter had the perfect line to describe how MS views this:
âWhy should you upgrade to Windows XP? Because weâre going to stop supporting Windows 98!â
This was said completely unironically and with the expectation that people would just do what MS wanted them to do. That attitude hasnât changed in the years since. Win 10 is going to be left behind. You will either upgrade or be vulnerable. Also, MS doesnât care about the home users, they care about the businesses and the money to be had. And businesses will upgrade. They will invariably wait to the last minute and then scramble to get it done. But, whether because they actually give a shit about security or they have to comply with security frameworks (SOX, HIPAA, etc.), they will upgrade. Sure, they will insist on GPOs to disable 90% of the Ads and tracking shit, but they will upgrade.
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 13:28
nextcollapse
Because weâre going to stop supporting Windows 98!
At least there was a technical reason there, that Microsoft was merging the two separate codebases for consumer Windows and enterprise Windows, and building on the better NT codebase than the 95->98->ME codebase.
And XP was actually way better for the main thing that we were going to be using computers for going forward: networked with the actual internet.
Windows 11? Canât see any paradigm shift in how the operating system itself is supposed to work, at least not on anything that actually makes a difference in a favorable way.
sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 14:00
collapse
Ya, in fairness to MS, Windows XP was a good release (post SP1, like most âgoodâ MS releases). But, the fact is that MS is going to push the latest version, regardless of how ready it is for use. MS was hot for folks to switch to Windows ME. And holy fuck was that a terrible OS. MS also did everything short of bribery to get folks to switch to Vista (anyone remember Windows Mojave?). The âupgrade, or elseâ mantra has always been their way. Not that I blame them too much, it does need to happen. It just sucks when the reason for the new OS is more intrusive ads and user tracking.
leisesprecher@feddit.org
on 22 Oct 14:44
nextcollapse
Businesses (at least the larger ones) replace their hardware every few years anyway. They donât care whether their new Optiplexes run Windows 10 or 11 and most hardware bought since 2022 probably has Windows 11 installed already, probably all since 2020 supports it. So thereâs hardly a problem here. (Btw Iâm taking the management view here, I know that itâs a pain to actually deploy, but that doesnât matter to management).
Yes your right. Users only care if their software can run. Most could care less what OS is running under the hood.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
on 22 Oct 15:23
collapse
I think youâre wrong. Microsoft wonât end support on a system over or around half the worldâs pcâs run on.
Theyâre just pulling a scare tactic right now. Before the security end date of win 10 is up, theyâll announce continued support for another 2 years. Theyâre just trying to push 11 and right now theyâre bluffing.
My question is this: Do Microsoft ship crap-infested versions to people who could make their lives uncomfortable, like, say, intelligence agencies, or do those agencies take a crap-infested version and have their IT security strip all the crap out?
Because if I was in charge of an intelligence agency I'd be asking - with dangerous smile - for the crap-free version, turn IT loose on it anyway and then be, shall we say, horribly invasive to Microsoft if there's anything still left in it.
... and if I wanted Windows, I'd want whatever the end result of that is.
On the other hand, maybe this has already happened and that "horrible invasion" is the cause of all the spyware crap in the consumer release.
Both. The enterprise edition has less crap, but most big companies will use custom images and group policy to decrapify it further. I do the same thing at home since I used to be the guy doing it at work. I donât get any of the copilot or recall bullshit.
For Enterprise users they offer LTSC versions (bare minimum version of the OS) with extended support, and national agencies are able to get the source code of Windows under the program Shared Source Initiative.
Network traffic can be monitored, so a private intelligence agency also could watch any unwanted calls made solely by the OS and block them accordingly.
If there was ever a time for valve to push advertising out for the steam deck and steamOS itâs now. The final piece of the gaming puzzle is anticheat. If valve gets the proprietary anticheat makers on board then itâs all over. Every major hurdle wouldâve been overcome, but games like valorant and call of duty still donât work because of vanguard and ricochet.
With how terrible windows handhelds are, imagine how awesome it would be for those cod players to be able to play a round of warzone on the toilet? I joke, but seriously, thatâs the demographic that needs to adopt a platform like the steam deck. Thatâs the barrier valve has to overcome, and Iâm worried they just donât care or something even more legally gray is happening, like Microsoft giving game devs incentive to use proprietary anticheat or to just not flip that EAC flag in their code.
I answered someone here some months ago that they were testing out a native Linux client, donât have the link right now but you should be able to find it.
Upsidedownturtle@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 15:35
nextcollapse
Iâd guess that major UI revisions are a big reason for average users. People donât like having to relearn how to do something or find a setting. If M$ implemented a legacy UI setting that by and large mimicked the interface and controls in W10 theyâd clear a major hurdle preventing less technologically inclined users from upgrading.
I donât see the os switch happening unless microsoft stops existing in its entirety.
Abandoning home PCs could be a thing I guess, but i feel like that would happen either way for these people
InnerScientist@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 17:25
collapse
I doubt the os switch is happening too, some will probably switch but that will be a small amount, either they get Linux or afaik all other âpopularâ options require new hardware anyways (Macos)
I think many will just stay on windows 10 if their hardware doesnât support 11 but ehh
Difficult to say, thatâs why Iâm waiting on the EOL for headlines like âmillions of pcs vulnerable due to missing updatesâ or âmaybe we were a little hard on crowdstrikeâ
Linux has been gaining market share, itâs at 4.5% or so, itâs not much but just until recently it never even hit 3%
Maybe Valve has something to do with it but who knows⌠I think we will see a bigger jump and it will start being as common as os x or something⌠I plan to switch and have been trying out different things
This is one of those things where home users just default to PC = Windows. But apps are all online now. Probably 99% of the time all people need is a browser. Yeah some people think they have to have MS Office or some other niche windows program, but I consider myself a power-user and the only apps I open on my PC are Games, Discord, IntelliJ, VSCode, and then maybe fool around with local AI stuff. Photos and stuff are usually on our phones, but they can also all be backed up to the cloud from a computer easily enough.
Iâve already switched over to Linux because all of that stuff already works. (Caveat: I also have a PS5 for most gaming).
Most people just need someone to install Linux Mint or whatever and they wouldnât even notice the difference. The only thing really slowing Linux adoption is folks who donât want to field support calls from their friends and family.
trespasser69@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 17:21
nextcollapse
240 millions PC will become e-waste if Win10 reaches EoL
Sounds like homelabber paradise is headed for eBay
SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
on 22 Oct 19:59
collapse
EoL doesn't mean it will stop completely; people will probably keep using it till they can't anymore, like pc becoming too slow or their home banking site not working.
r_deckard@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 08:22
nextcollapse
Iâve got an Asus eeePC running WinXP. Itâs air-gapped and the wi-fi is disabled in BIOS. All it does is play music, connected to dumb speakers. I update the music periodically via USB. Remarkably reliable and long-lived hardware.
Realistically it will live for as long as Google Chrome still works and sites donât start getting picky about TLS 1.3.
Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org
on 22 Oct 18:35
nextcollapse
Or Win10 IoT LTSC till 2032
lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Oct 19:24
nextcollapse
â
Default_Defect@midwest.social
on 22 Oct 20:10
nextcollapse
6 is becoming increasingly more common. Anecdotally, almost all of the gamers I know use consoles and have a phone for all of their âcomputer needs.â One of my friends probably wouldnât even use his if it werenât for VR Chat.
SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
on 22 Oct 21:01
collapse
Iâm a computer gamer but my kids like XboxâŚtheyâre switching to Linux steam big picture mode.
huzzahunimpressively@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 20:19
nextcollapse
My bet is that they are gonna surrender and will remove restriccions to W11.
I doubt that a non-it person gonna install Linux, at least that, some companies decided to resell old~ computers with linux preinstalled thatâs the only way
The paid extended security update program is going to run until 2028, and Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 2021 LTSC is going to have extended support all the way until 2032.
They have stated that ESU is going to be available to consumers as well, though not for how much - but somewhere between the $61 of the commercial, and $1 (really) of the education license, with the price doubling every year.
Iâll save you the wait. Itâs 1 with quite a bit of 6.
Normal people just donât need PCs that much any more. Nearly everything that people did on a PC you can do on a phone.
If you canât do it on a phone, then itâs usually called work, and employers can replace things as needed. Although weâve still got customers using variants of Windows XP, so donât hold your breath. Some employers just arenât beholden to higher ups that demand security audits.
Wispy2891@lemmy.world
on 22 Oct 19:47
nextcollapse
Probably a lower adoption rate than Vista
SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
on 22 Oct 20:01
nextcollapse
That problem is that there isn't a better version (not that it was peak in the first place anyway..)
âOn Windows 10 PCs without an ESU subscription, however, any security flaws found from that day forward will remain unpatched, making those PCs increasingly vulnerable to online attacks.â
âWindows unpatched [âŚ] increasingly vulnerable to online attacksâ is a facetious statement since the operating system is inherently malware.
BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
on 23 Oct 22:35
collapse
Itâs only malware if wealthy companies arenât making money off of it.
Itâs funny, people said the exact same thing about Windows 10. It had ads and spyware. It also had Cortana, the AI garbage of its time. Consumers will never learn. Canât wait for Windows 12 to also be seen as the one where Microsoft has ruined Windows for real this time.
I hate 10. Iâd rather have 7 again. It really sucks being forced to change OS when itâs a bad switch, sucks even worse when itâs because thereâs no choice.
I remember the day I built my PC and realized the only Windows OS most new games would run on was 10. So much bloat and useless crap, so many intuitive features gone or moved to obtuse places.
Microsoft is really good at enshittifying things and has been for the last decade or so. If only it wasnât about the money.
At the risk of being unpopular, I think a lot of what people perceive as unintuitive or worse in terms of settings and OS features is just change. Iâm on Enterprise Windows 11 at work and I wouldnât willingly go back to Windows 10.
I think because itâs Enterprise Iâm dodging a lot of the worst of it - ads, telemetry, surprise updates, etc - but the unified settings are better once you learn them, tabbed File Explorer is better, dark mode switching is way better - thereâs plenty to like.
I want to see the rise of the Linux desktop as much as anyone, but implying Windows 11 is all bad isnât that fair an assessment.
Change is a big part of it certainly but the fact that Windows is coming dangerously close to only functioning online to serve you as many ads as possible and to extract more and more of your personal data to sell all the while owning a once not for profit AI company gives such megacorp vibes.
Iâm really not going to be happy about being forced to switch because a high end pc built years ago is suddenly âoutdatedâ.
By no means is it Ultra 4K HD compatible but it can still run anything AAA just fine. Thereâs no excuse for what Microsoft is doing in my eyes.
Agree with all of those points, I just donât love the reductive notion that every change is a bad change and nothingâs been for the better. In several ways itâs a better OS - but as you say, they are also getting more contemptuous of the end user with things like privacy, anticompetitivity, and ads.
I take issue with the settings menu still relying on the old menus while having shuffled things around so Iâm forced to look for settings. I donât really bother with tabbed file explorer because it doesnât bother saving my last open folders. I canât speak to dark mode.
I can say that the start menu is horrendously slow, it can take up to 5 seconds for it to load. Sometimes keystrokes disappear in the start menu only to magically appear some time later. They made the right click menu worse and only changeable in regedit. They made RDP credentials only saveable using CMD. They removed vertical taskbars. There are a lot of issues in going to windows 11 for me.
Iâm sure there are some improvements but at work we have a wiki page on how to unfuck up windows 11 so it works how you expect it to.
I take issue with the settings menu still relying on the old menus while having shuffled things around so Iâm forced to look for settings
This is still an issue, but I feel itâs diminishing as they (annoyingly slowly) do move all of the functionality to the new app. It was much worse in Windows 10, I think.
I can say that the start menu is horrendously slow, it can take up to 5 seconds for it to load.
âWorks on my machineâ is a profoundly unhelpful answer for me to give, but Iâm fortunate enough not to have experienced this. If youâre looking for a workaround and donât mind a further Microsoft app, the launcher in Powertoys is pretty solid.
Sometimes keystrokes disappear in the start menu only to magically appear some time later.
God, I hate the search from the start menu - but I would say that itâs been profoundly broken since Windows 8 and is marginally better in Windows 11.
They made the right click menu worse and only changeable in regedit.
100% agreed. I do think Windows 10 and earlier had a growing issue with the context menus getting unwieldy (Visual Studio is a great demo of how this can get really out of hand) but the solution Windows 11 have brought is annoying more than useful. I suspect at one point I made the registry change and forgot about it, because Iâm back to a big Win10-style list.
They made RDP credentials only saveable using CMD.
Agreed again. That said, youâre a masochist if youâre not using an RDP manager like mRemoteNG! I wish Microsoft had a decent RDP app that wasnât tied into Azure.
They removed vertical taskbars.
I found vertical taskbars incompatible with hotdesking on desks with different monitor configurations, but I do agree this one sucks.
how to unfuck up windows 11 so it works how you expect it to.
I think âhow you expect it toâ goes to the core of my point - needing to adapt to change isnât inherently bad. But Iâm not pretending Windows 11 is a wholesale improvement, and I do concede many of your arguments.
I only use windows at work rn so I donât really get into the guts of it much. It works well enough most of the time but Iâve had to adjust and most of the adjustments are dealing with annoyances like the start menu. I also canât just install arbitrary apps to solve all the issues. I appreciate the points youâve made but Iâve largely found the usability of this OS to be meaningfully worse than Windows 10 and incomparably worse than my recent linux experience.
Microsoft did ruin Windows with Windows 8, then they made it even worse with Windows 10 and now theyâre making it even fucking worse with 11. Windows 7 was the golden age of Windows.
I stopped following 11 news after they cancelled the native android framework, only thing that got me excited since a BlueStacks installation gets huge extremely fast, Iâm not going.
PetteriPano@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 04:54
nextcollapse
Three years ago, I bought my wife a laptop with Windows 10 to replace her 10yo windows 7 machine.
It had hardware issues out of the box, and went in on two repairs. It works fine now, AFAIK.
But, she still doesnât trust it, and she doesnât think that she can move her Adobe CS6 license over to itâŚ
I even bought her the affinity suite.
Iâm starting to think sheâll never move on from Windows 7.
I think the major browsers stopped supporting it sometime during the last year, so my best hope is that some included certificates will eventually make her favourite websites stop working. That has to force her over to something more recent⌠right?
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
on 23 Oct 05:07
nextcollapse
I use Win10 for one single program only and Iâm currently testing on how to take that machine offline, but still be accessible locally.
So far all I got is a blacklist regex in pihole. Blocking internet access to that machine via my router does not work for me, as I dual boot that machine with Linux for gaming. Tips per DM are very welcome actually.
MicrondeMMMMMMM@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Oct 05:15
nextcollapse
Maybe have a script change your local IP address? You could for instance change your IP after logging into Linux and change before powering off.
LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org
on 23 Oct 06:06
nextcollapse
Two options:
Change the DNS and gateway so theyâre pointing to 0.0.0.0
Give the Windows install a static IP or lease, and block that IP on the router
Make Linux use a random MAC address, then block the physical MAC in the DHCP section of the routerâe configuration. This will make Windows unablento recieve an IP address while Linux will be able to get ahold of one.
If windows uses tandom mac addresses, the feature should be able to be turned off.
Or, simply disable the network interfaces in Windowsâ control panel. Iâve never seen Windows reenable a network card by itself.
Static IP on the windows machine in a jailâd subnet, if you still want to be able to access it from the LAN but donât want it to have internet access.
If youâre happy with it not having any kind of network access (Iâm not sure if when you say âlocallyâ you mean just physically, or it needs LAN as well), just disable the network adapter in windows.
The only reason Iâm on 10 with my main pc is because the 7th gen intel in there isnât compatible with win11. I have another pc that is 7th gen, which I put windows 11 on and there is just something weird about it. When I do anything on that machine it doesnât do it immediately, it sits for a few seconds before actions are done. Really aggravating. Clicking on a program on the taskbar takes a few seconds before it opens. File explorer, firefox browser, settings pane, ⌠Once programs are running itâs fine to use said programs, but I wonder what they did to make it feel this way.
I have Linux on both machines as primary OS and they are super snappy, itâs not the hardware.
I had Windows 10 on an older (but not ancient) machine and it was literally unusable. 10-15 minute boot time and another 5 or so just to get a browser to open. The misery didnât end once things were open; everything was still slower than when I had windows 7 on what would now be considered a truly ancient machine. I put Linux on it and experienced a roughly 5x speedup.
If Linux didnât exist, we would actually end up with a lot of e-waste, and I mean a fuck ton of it. And itâs all thanks to you, Microsoft.
Hell, Linux does exist, and people just donât wanna use it because theyâre so used to Windows that anything else is basically as steep of a learning curve as a literal cliff. And to those people I say: âjust add some mint on it and life will be easy. Maybe even drizzle some cinnamon on it as wellâ
doingthestuff@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 14:19
nextcollapse
Iâve installed Linux mint cinnamon on some PCs for other people. Itâs okay. I still run into errors and difficulties but for your average non techie person it might work if someone else gets them started.
Started using linux mint 22 since 2 months great experience. Difficult with some software with wine winetricks and bottles and stuff. Iâm not in any tech field. Learnt from YouTube. Still more to learn⌠But itâs fun to figuring things out and chatgpt
Trying to get games to run without being a Linux pro is much harder than I was led to believe. Some games just work out of the box, but a lot of them absolutely do NOT, even if protondb says they will.
I have high hopes for the future. Itâs just not quite there yet.
a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 24 Oct 09:49
nextcollapse
i do not agree with that sentiment. iâm an avid gamer, and in the last few weeks since switching to nobara i only found 1 obscure game that didnât work, and 2 that needed an entry in the preferences of the game in steam. using heroic launcher for all amazon/epic/gog games and lutris for my piracy tryouts (would work in heroic too, but itâs cleaner that way)
but i must admit that the experience is smoother in windows; i miss my playnite launcher which integrated everything from steam to other stores, pirated games and all emulation needs.
Maybe Iâm just really unlucky when it comes to liking games that donât work on Linux.
a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 25 Oct 05:12
collapse
that might be. i am a pure single-player (with a bit of local coop mixed in) player, and i prefer roguelites, VNs with actual gaming elements and FPS / âImmersive Simâ-Style games, and currently the Vampire Survivor category with Yet another Zombie Survival and Halls of Torment. I try out a lot of games (If theres a Fitgirl or DODI release of it and even somewhere in my ballpark iâll test it).
Most issues i have stem from modding games without Workshop support, using external Mod Managers like Vortex sucks on Linux.
I have also encountered games that needed tweaking (like changing settings in an .ini file that werenât visible in the gameâs menu) to run in an acceptable way on windows. Does this mean that Windows is ânot quite there yetâ, or is the game to blame?
Sure, but itâs not impossible to play any Blizzard games because the launcher login page is broken like it is on Linux. Blaming the game will only get you so far when so many games just donât work and devs donât care.
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 12:52
nextcollapse
They should be required to release drivers such that massive e-waste wasnât generated suddenly. I mean, why does the government allow a software company to own an monopolize the hardware? Hello Google! Good luck đ¤ with the monopoly assholes!
I think that any operating system that mostly runs 3rd party software should be legally required to open-source at least the components necessary to run said 3rd party software. Also, OSes should just straight up not be allowed to show ads, full-stop. Making people buy hardware and then bloating the OS with ads in updates is a bait and switch and if our government had any balls, would be illegal.
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 21:36
collapse
Not to mention that we pay for the bandwidth they use to show us ads. Like WTF! Since when did NBC as people to chip in for them to show us McDonaldâs commercials?
I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but which drivers do you have in mind? You can install Linux on almost any machine, and if there are driver issues the culprits are usually nvidia, realtek, etc. for which Microsoft is hardly responsible.
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
on 24 Oct 14:39
collapse
Oh my gosh 𤯠you are definitely not old enough. Microsoft has hardware by the balls because they own the eyeball markets at work. They can make a company that makes Ethernet cards for example change their API. Itâs pretty simple to just end Linux by denying it hardware. So thatâs why we must defend against that sort of monopoly which kept modems unobtainable to Linux for example. That was the great awakening, the modem wars.
NutWrench@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 20:19
nextcollapse
Another vote for Linux Mint. I finally switched from Windows 10 months ago and I love it.
Iâm really enjoying the learning curve with Linux because Iâm not always fighting the operating system. On the other hand, every time Iâve had to go âunder the hoodâ with Windows (edit the Registry, change config files) itâs been to stop Microsoft from doing something sh*tty to me.
Rofl relatable. Me when i was trying to force uninstall edge or turn off windows activation logo
BingBong@sh.itjust.works
on 24 Oct 00:58
nextcollapse
I tossed Mint on a VM briefly and really disliked it. Specifically finding the terminal was painful. Did they bury it pretty deep or did I just overlook it?
By default there is a shortcut to the terminal shortcut on task bar. From memory it is one of three default shortcuts. (File browser, Terminal, Firefox.) You can also find it by pressing the menu button (the âstart menuâ). From there the terminal has a prominent special position where it is always accessible. And if you donât notice it there, you can always start typing to search for it - as with any other installed app. I find that if I type âtâ, then âTerminalâ is the top result; and obviously I can kept typing to eliminate the other results if I want.
So if your difficulty in finding the terminal is your main complaint about about Mint⌠Iâm not sure what to tell you. Do you want it to auto-launch or something?
Iâve just installed it on my Dell Latitude E6330. Itâs great, but am I the only one who gets his laptop restarted instead of powered off? It happened both on Mint and Zorin OS, never on Windows.
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
on 23 Oct 23:13
nextcollapse
Hits buzzer
The big windows 10 problem is that it updates to windows 11.
Muffi@programming.dev
on 24 Oct 06:05
nextcollapse
Imagine a world where we had politicians who understood technology enough to put proper rules and requirements in place, so that big dumb companies would actually be forced to act ethically and sustainablyâŚ
does it take a year to build an OS that doesnt track/sell you and try to hide its doing so?
cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
on 24 Oct 14:01
collapse
I have a feeling that Microsoft will release an update that will at the very least make Windows 10 miserable to use if not downright unbootable the day support ends
threaded - newest
Guys, is it the beginning downfall of Windows after October 24, 2025? đ¤
I wish.
There might be a small uptick of new Linux installs, but MS will just power on and the vast majority of Windows users will remain in that abusive relationship. :sigh:
Yeah. People just donât make the effort to âlearn a new OSâ.
They get crazy if the icons are in some other place than they are used to on Windows.
Letâs see the facts here ppl.
It has more to do with corporations than individuals. Microsoft doesnât pay the bills from great grandma Ethelâs Windows license, they have a corporate revenue stream they need to keep locked in.
Yes the real money is in corporations, of course. And large companies wonât change anytime soon.
But letâs face it, as i was refering on a individual level, is any of your non tech savy family and friends install an other OS other over Windows?
I find that rather hard to believe.
People are creatures of habit.
Are you going to pay for retraining 30,000 employees?
Or to make all your software work on Linux?
Autocad?
Realistically, there are probably half of office workstations, maybe more, where the business users who use them can do everything they need through a browser.
In that sense most stuff already works on Linux, including basic productivity software, email and calendaring, real time communications through Slack or Teams or whatever.
More specialized jobs might need more specialized software, but for many workers they donât need that.
Less than half. A good portion of those office workers rely on Office macros and other bullshit that doesnât run in the web version.
Unless they ditch Office for LibreOffice or OpenOffice
No, not me.
I didnât even mentioned Linux, did I? Can be MacOS or FreeBSD.
I guess you assumed I did since its the default answer to suggest Linux as Windows is a shitshow. However, I realize that ordinary people wonât change a thing. They will just use the OS that came installed with the computer. Thatâs (windows) 99 % of all computers sold.
And yes, I do use Linux but Iâm tech savy and a realist about the Windows situation.
Lol no.
I mean, they could solve it by not making the mandatory successor an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. That would be a start. And also relax whatever the artificial requirement is that makes a lot of Win10 machines incompatible with 11.
Nope, they wont. Micro$oft only cares money rather than basic OS for everyday and professional tasks
Theyâve been adding spyware and ads into W10 so itâs not the money. They could easily add all W11 ads/spyware into 10 with an update. Older CPUs have several hardware vulnerabilities unrelated to the TPU required by W11.
IMO, they should add a startup message listing the hardware vulnerabilities of the installed CPU and leave it up to the customer.
Windows 11 has more spyware and its more ens***tificated
Yes but that could be added in a W10 update just like theyâve already done with previous W10 updates.
You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial. I believe Rufus has an option when creating Win11 install USBs to remove the TPM and other requirements.
But then again, itâs nice, because all I need to make sure Microsoft doesnât secretly update my Win10 machine in the night to Win11 is to turn off the TPM in the BIOS.
But then you wonât receive any updates if you use unsupported hardware to run Win 11
Well, not gonna get updates on 10 either, so is same-same
I think bypassing these checks would eventually render your PC vulnerable? for example, bitlocker support being void for computers that relies on TPM 2.0
There is no home-user need to run bitlocker. Thereâs dozens of alternatives, that do not rely on TPM, that are just as effective, and that you really should be using anyways since they arenât controlled by M$.
I see, thanks
If you need encryption, veracrypt probably still works.
Rufus has that option, Iâve used it myself to update to Win11 because I didnât have a motherboard with TPM at the time.
Also wanna mention, the reason I updated was mostly because I thought Win10 was kinda ugly and I think Win11 was a huge update in that regard and also because of security reasons, since Win10 wonât receive any more updates in the near future. At the end of the day, I can count on one hand how often I boot Windows in a year (I almost exclusively use Linux), so I donât really care about all the Win11 bullshit anyway.
Not all of them. Windows 11 stopped booting with Update 24H2 on CPUs that donât support the Instruction POPCNT. But thatâs only an issue for really old CPUs like Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD Athlon 64 X2
For a bit more context than âreally oldâ: I had an Intel Core 2 Duo in 2009.
Another angle: Those were some of the first dual-core x86 processors, released 2006 and 2005 respectively. (Intel had the Pentium D as its first in 2005).
I donât remember which I had for sure. Iâm leaning more towards Core 2 Duo. It was my first PC, I was 12 and built it with my father.
I also got my first computer around then. I saved up for ages and bought the first gen Intel MacBook with an Intel Core Duo (2 cores, no hyperthreading). I still have that laptop somewhere⌠It blew my mind it could run Windows, and Windows laptops couldnât compare at the time.
Having used both, doesnât 11 have the same level of ads as 10 did? It seems like itâs really only OneDrive ads if you donât use it if anything?
Maybe? I just said in another comment that I am pretty much exclusively Linux. I only occasionally use a W10 VM at work, and itâs enterprise/LTSB so I donât get a lot of that junk.
100 point top thread based on the second and third hand opinions of a Windows non-user really sums up the quality of this discussion lol
Most Windows-hating threads on Lemmy in a nutshell tbh.
Every thread on lemmy is a windows hating thread by default :D
Iâve lost count of the amount of posts and comment threads on here about âall the horrible ads and spywareâ where the solution was to flip literally a single switch in Settings, Personalization.
Windows 10 is already an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. The problem with 11 is the ridiculous hardware requirements.
Windows 10 is trash and has always been. Windows 7 was the last good Windows, and I would still use it if it had security updates and DX12 support (I obviously mainly use Linux, but my gaming PC is on Windows, and no, some games I play and software I use 100% do not work on Linux).
Probably is. I use Linux for everything and only use Win10 at work on a VM with enterprise/LTSB version, so Iâve been shielded from most of its enshittification.
Amen. I am 100% convinced that the only reason Windows 10 was received this well was because of their tremendous marketing efforts around the release. People just accepted that itâs a great OS. Itâs exactly like that Windows Vista Mojave experiment, just in reverse. In my opinion Windows 10 is even worse than Windows 11. But they didnât do as much marketing around Windows 11.
Windows 11 = O.S. Ima Ad-Laden. Coincidence? I think notâŚ
hahahahahah does anyone really think microsoft cares? their money is in business with all the big players already deploying 11 at least in modest amounts.
nothing stopped them when windows7 was still functional and they were pushing the tpm requirement, i dont see a difference here.
Their money is now in azure. Os and app suites are a declining business, but they help with azure lock in.
I know itâs not a hardware compatibility problem. People just donât want ads/tracking/AI bullshit, a removed control panel, settings that are hard to find/hidden, etc.
All intel processor 8th gen+ (and even some 7th gen IIRC) are win11 compatible, motherboard have TPM2 for years, even my intel 6th gen MB have TPM2.0.
Next year the intel 8th gen will have 8 years, people have PC/laptop more recent than that. Problem is that win10 will not get security updates and all.
Iâm using MX Linux BTW.
Iâm currently using a trick on my Windows 11 work machine to get the old UI for file explorer by going through the control panel and going up a directory.
Iâll be so pissed the day they strip it out, because their new design language is ridiculously slow and terrible for the sake of âcleanliness.â
Itâs not a hardware compatibility problem for you or people who have reasonably new computers. However, for the last decade or so, computers have kind of stagnated and old computers are still very functional, something I couldnât have said a decade or two ago.
Iâm typing this on a ThinkPad x201 which was released in 2010. TBF, Iâve updated it as much as I can (8GB of RAM and an SSD), itâs running Linux Mint because Windows drags, and even then itâs getting tired.
My Spouseâs laptop is an Acer with a 5th gen i3. A couple years ago, she was complaining it was getting a bit slow, so I threw an SSD in it and now sheâs happy with how it runs Windows 10, and Iâm sure it would run Windows 11 fine if a TPM2.0 chip wasnât required.
Itâs forced obsolesces for a hardware requirement most home users are never going to use.
6th gen intel and 1st gen ryzen run perfectly fucking fine still.
My parents are using a 3rd gen i7 and it works fine. My brother has a few computers, one is a 2nd gen intel, but I think he put Linux on that one. My home server was running on my 4th gen i7 until I upgraded it to my second gen Ryzen earlier this year after I upgraded my gaming.
CPUs from around 2005 onward are all perfectly usable IMO for the purposes of x86 desktops. As long as itâs got x86_64, SSE4 and at least two available threads. I would even wager that Pentium 4 hyperthreaded models (Wolfdale?) are still acceptable if weâre really pushing it.
I still got a Ryzen 1600, that would be just fine for when my flatmate needs a PC for working remotely, but his company reqires Windows 11 :-(
Iâm still gaming on my 1600X, although it is starting to show its age
Most people donât care or even know that it is AI/ad-infested. Iâve seen people just fighting through pop-up on multiple websites they use. When ci fronted by me, they just said that they have âtunnel visionâ and donât care.
My 80+ year old parents donât care about ads or AI. They just want a working PC, and W11 wonât install on the cheap machine they got a few years ago. Theyâre not going to buy a new one because this works perfectly fine.
And yes they tried Linux for several years, but went back to Windows because it was just too much hassle and not compatible with too many things.
It absolutely is a hardware problem.
Lots of people moving to Linux over Win11 anyway.
A lot do myself included. But not enough to matter. Most ordinary Windows users donât even know what Linux is or understand why they should care.
Exactly - not enough to matter so not a lot.
Enthusiasts willing to get out of their comfort zone in whatever topic we choose are rare like kryptonite. The fact that you know 10 people, or a 1000 is by no means a lot considering the number of PC users.
Yeah, right. đ
Many years ago, I attended a Windows XP launch event. The Microsoft presenter had the perfect line to describe how MS views this:
âWhy should you upgrade to Windows XP? Because weâre going to stop supporting Windows 98!â
This was said completely unironically and with the expectation that people would just do what MS wanted them to do. That attitude hasnât changed in the years since. Win 10 is going to be left behind. You will either upgrade or be vulnerable. Also, MS doesnât care about the home users, they care about the businesses and the money to be had. And businesses will upgrade. They will invariably wait to the last minute and then scramble to get it done. But, whether because they actually give a shit about security or they have to comply with security frameworks (SOX, HIPAA, etc.), they will upgrade. Sure, they will insist on GPOs to disable 90% of the Ads and tracking shit, but they will upgrade.
At least there was a technical reason there, that Microsoft was merging the two separate codebases for consumer Windows and enterprise Windows, and building on the better NT codebase than the 95->98->ME codebase.
And XP was actually way better for the main thing that we were going to be using computers for going forward: networked with the actual internet.
Windows 11? Canât see any paradigm shift in how the operating system itself is supposed to work, at least not on anything that actually makes a difference in a favorable way.
Ya, in fairness to MS, Windows XP was a good release (post SP1, like most âgoodâ MS releases). But, the fact is that MS is going to push the latest version, regardless of how ready it is for use. MS was hot for folks to switch to Windows ME. And holy fuck was that a terrible OS. MS also did everything short of bribery to get folks to switch to Vista (anyone remember Windows Mojave?). The âupgrade, or elseâ mantra has always been their way. Not that I blame them too much, it does need to happen. It just sucks when the reason for the new OS is more intrusive ads and user tracking.
Businesses (at least the larger ones) replace their hardware every few years anyway. They donât care whether their new Optiplexes run Windows 10 or 11 and most hardware bought since 2022 probably has Windows 11 installed already, probably all since 2020 supports it. So thereâs hardly a problem here. (Btw Iâm taking the management view here, I know that itâs a pain to actually deploy, but that doesnât matter to management).
Yes your right. Users only care if their software can run. Most could care less what OS is running under the hood.
I think youâre wrong. Microsoft wonât end support on a system over or around half the worldâs pcâs run on.
Theyâre just pulling a scare tactic right now. Before the security end date of win 10 is up, theyâll announce continued support for another 2 years. Theyâre just trying to push 11 and right now theyâre bluffing.
Imagine a company with the power to break half the worlds computers with a business decision.
If it does actually happen next year, I look forward to the probably 10% gain or better to Linux. Mint will probably get the lions share.
Microsoft has a Windows 11 problem. Staying on Windows 10 is a symptom.
They only care money. Not their users (expect buisness users who stuck M$'s walled garden and pour millions, if not billions to it).
7 to 10 all over again
I love how youâre totally ignoring 8 existed.
Skip every other version
My question is this: Do Microsoft ship crap-infested versions to people who could make their lives uncomfortable, like, say, intelligence agencies, or do those agencies take a crap-infested version and have their IT security strip all the crap out?
Because if I was in charge of an intelligence agency I'd be asking - with dangerous smile - for the crap-free version, turn IT loose on it anyway and then be, shall we say, horribly invasive to Microsoft if there's anything still left in it.
... and if I wanted Windows, I'd want whatever the end result of that is.
On the other hand, maybe this has already happened and that "horrible invasion" is the cause of all the spyware crap in the consumer release.
Sigh.
Both. The enterprise edition has less crap, but most big companies will use custom images and group policy to decrapify it further. I do the same thing at home since I used to be the guy doing it at work. I donât get any of the copilot or recall bullshit.
No.
For Enterprise users they offer LTSC versions (bare minimum version of the OS) with extended support, and national agencies are able to get the source code of Windows under the program Shared Source Initiative.
Network traffic can be monitored, so a private intelligence agency also could watch any unwanted calls made solely by the OS and block them accordingly.
obligatory đ§ that must be in every thread
The author asks many questions, but never the most important one: âWhy donât people like Windows 11?â
Why would he? Anybody intersted already knows, rest doesnât give a flying duck.
If there was ever a time for valve to push advertising out for the steam deck and steamOS itâs now. The final piece of the gaming puzzle is anticheat. If valve gets the proprietary anticheat makers on board then itâs all over. Every major hurdle wouldâve been overcome, but games like valorant and call of duty still donât work because of vanguard and ricochet.
With how terrible windows handhelds are, imagine how awesome it would be for those cod players to be able to play a round of warzone on the toilet? I joke, but seriously, thatâs the demographic that needs to adopt a platform like the steam deck. Thatâs the barrier valve has to overcome, and Iâm worried they just donât care or something even more legally gray is happening, like Microsoft giving game devs incentive to use proprietary anticheat or to just not flip that EAC flag in their code.
Roblox still doesnât have native support : /
And unless youâre 12, what are you doing?
Continue living in your bubble. Between it and Fortnite, you capture a sweeping plurality of all computer game players.
Sober works well enough.
I answered someone here some months ago that they were testing out a native Linux client, donât have the link right now but you should be able to find it.
Bring Windows 12. Windows 11 is terrible.
Windows 12 will be even worse
YupâŚWindows 12? The evil monkeyâs paw demon is like, âIâll give you that wish for free.â
I they call it Windouze Iâll consider it.
Iâd guess that major UI revisions are a big reason for average users. People donât like having to relearn how to do something or find a setting. If M$ implemented a legacy UI setting that by and large mimicked the interface and controls in W10 theyâd clear a major hurdle preventing less technologically inclined users from upgrading.
My guess is that the average user doesnât care at all and just clicks away update notifications because they are annoyed by them
Iâm just waiting for the EOL of window 10 to see which of the following will happen:
I donât see the os switch happening unless microsoft stops existing in its entirety.
Abandoning home PCs could be a thing I guess, but i feel like that would happen either way for these people
I doubt the os switch is happening too, some will probably switch but that will be a small amount, either they get Linux or afaik all other âpopularâ options require new hardware anyways (Macos)
I think many will just stay on windows 10 if their hardware doesnât support 11 but ehh
Difficult to say, thatâs why Iâm waiting on the EOL for headlines like âmillions of pcs vulnerable due to missing updatesâ or âmaybe we were a little hard on crowdstrikeâ
Linux has been gaining market share, itâs at 4.5% or so, itâs not much but just until recently it never even hit 3%
Maybe Valve has something to do with it but who knows⌠I think we will see a bigger jump and it will start being as common as os x or something⌠I plan to switch and have been trying out different things
This is one of those things where home users just default to PC = Windows. But apps are all online now. Probably 99% of the time all people need is a browser. Yeah some people think they have to have MS Office or some other niche windows program, but I consider myself a power-user and the only apps I open on my PC are Games, Discord, IntelliJ, VSCode, and then maybe fool around with local AI stuff. Photos and stuff are usually on our phones, but they can also all be backed up to the cloud from a computer easily enough.
Iâve already switched over to Linux because all of that stuff already works. (Caveat: I also have a PS5 for most gaming).
Most people just need someone to install Linux Mint or whatever and they wouldnât even notice the difference. The only thing really slowing Linux adoption is folks who donât want to field support calls from their friends and family.
240 millions PC will become e-waste if Win10 reaches EoL
Sounds like homelabber paradise is headed for eBay
EoL doesn't mean it will stop completely; people will probably keep using it till they can't anymore, like pc becoming too slow or their home banking site not working.
Iâve got an Asus eeePC running WinXP. Itâs air-gapped and the wi-fi is disabled in BIOS. All it does is play music, connected to dumb speakers. I update the music periodically via USB. Remarkably reliable and long-lived hardware.
Realistically it will live for as long as Google Chrome still works and sites donât start getting picky about TLS 1.3.
Or Win10 IoT LTSC till 2032
6 is becoming increasingly more common. Anecdotally, almost all of the gamers I know use consoles and have a phone for all of their âcomputer needs.â One of my friends probably wouldnât even use his if it werenât for VR Chat.
Iâm a computer gamer but my kids like XboxâŚtheyâre switching to Linux steam big picture mode.
My bet is that they are gonna surrender and will remove restriccions to W11. I doubt that a non-it person gonna install Linux, at least that, some companies decided to resell old~ computers with linux preinstalled thatâs the only way
My money is on MS kicking the can down the road and adding another year or two to the support last minute, then not fixing any of the issues with 11.
The paid extended security update program is going to run until 2028, and Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 2021 LTSC is going to have extended support all the way until 2032.
They have stated that ESU is going to be available to consumers as well, though not for how much - but somewhere between the $61 of the commercial, and $1 (really) of the education license, with the price doubling every year.
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 Or wonât take long before it gets too expensive at that rate
1, 2, 4. Then itâs 2028 and ESU ends. No idea how the pricing for the IoT long term support thing is done though.
All those numbers will happen at the same time, at different proportions.
Iâll save you the wait. Itâs 1 with quite a bit of 6.
Normal people just donât need PCs that much any more. Nearly everything that people did on a PC you can do on a phone.
If you canât do it on a phone, then itâs usually called work, and employers can replace things as needed. Although weâve still got customers using variants of Windows XP, so donât hold your breath. Some employers just arenât beholden to higher ups that demand security audits.
Probably a lower adoption rate than Vista
That problem is that there isn't a better version (not that it was peak in the first place anyway..)
âWindows unpatched [âŚ] increasingly vulnerable to online attacksâ is a facetious statement since the operating system is inherently malware.
Itâs only malware if wealthy companies arenât making money off of it.
Well fuck Win 11, its a fucking downgrade. At Win 10 EOL Iâm going back to linux.
You and the rest of Lemmy.
There are dozens of us!
.
It means Iâm willing to put up with broken gpu drivers and wonky multidisplay setup rather than be on win11
Practically speaking, 10 vs 11 barely makes a difference.
The ads, AI garbage and spyware do though.
Itâs funny, people said the exact same thing about Windows 10. It had ads and spyware. It also had Cortana, the AI garbage of its time. Consumers will never learn. Canât wait for Windows 12 to also be seen as the one where Microsoft has ruined Windows for real this time.
I hate 10. Iâd rather have 7 again. It really sucks being forced to change OS when itâs a bad switch, sucks even worse when itâs because thereâs no choice.
I remember the day I built my PC and realized the only Windows OS most new games would run on was 10. So much bloat and useless crap, so many intuitive features gone or moved to obtuse places.
Microsoft is really good at enshittifying things and has been for the last decade or so. If only it wasnât about the money.
At the risk of being unpopular, I think a lot of what people perceive as unintuitive or worse in terms of settings and OS features is just change. Iâm on Enterprise Windows 11 at work and I wouldnât willingly go back to Windows 10.
I think because itâs Enterprise Iâm dodging a lot of the worst of it - ads, telemetry, surprise updates, etc - but the unified settings are better once you learn them, tabbed File Explorer is better, dark mode switching is way better - thereâs plenty to like.
I want to see the rise of the Linux desktop as much as anyone, but implying Windows 11 is all bad isnât that fair an assessment.
Change is a big part of it certainly but the fact that Windows is coming dangerously close to only functioning online to serve you as many ads as possible and to extract more and more of your personal data to sell all the while owning a once not for profit AI company gives such megacorp vibes.
Iâm really not going to be happy about being forced to switch because a high end pc built years ago is suddenly âoutdatedâ.
By no means is it Ultra 4K HD compatible but it can still run anything AAA just fine. Thereâs no excuse for what Microsoft is doing in my eyes.
Agree with all of those points, I just donât love the reductive notion that every change is a bad change and nothingâs been for the better. In several ways itâs a better OS - but as you say, they are also getting more contemptuous of the end user with things like privacy, anticompetitivity, and ads.
I take issue with the settings menu still relying on the old menus while having shuffled things around so Iâm forced to look for settings. I donât really bother with tabbed file explorer because it doesnât bother saving my last open folders. I canât speak to dark mode.
I can say that the start menu is horrendously slow, it can take up to 5 seconds for it to load. Sometimes keystrokes disappear in the start menu only to magically appear some time later. They made the right click menu worse and only changeable in regedit. They made RDP credentials only saveable using CMD. They removed vertical taskbars. There are a lot of issues in going to windows 11 for me.
Iâm sure there are some improvements but at work we have a wiki page on how to unfuck up windows 11 so it works how you expect it to.
Good list! We differ on some of themâŚ
This is still an issue, but I feel itâs diminishing as they (annoyingly slowly) do move all of the functionality to the new app. It was much worse in Windows 10, I think.
âWorks on my machineâ is a profoundly unhelpful answer for me to give, but Iâm fortunate enough not to have experienced this. If youâre looking for a workaround and donât mind a further Microsoft app, the launcher in Powertoys is pretty solid.
God, I hate the search from the start menu - but I would say that itâs been profoundly broken since Windows 8 and is marginally better in Windows 11.
100% agreed. I do think Windows 10 and earlier had a growing issue with the context menus getting unwieldy (Visual Studio is a great demo of how this can get really out of hand) but the solution Windows 11 have brought is annoying more than useful. I suspect at one point I made the registry change and forgot about it, because Iâm back to a big Win10-style list.
Agreed again. That said, youâre a masochist if youâre not using an RDP manager like mRemoteNG! I wish Microsoft had a decent RDP app that wasnât tied into Azure.
I found vertical taskbars incompatible with hotdesking on desks with different monitor configurations, but I do agree this one sucks.
I think âhow you expect it toâ goes to the core of my point - needing to adapt to change isnât inherently bad. But Iâm not pretending Windows 11 is a wholesale improvement, and I do concede many of your arguments.
I only use windows at work rn so I donât really get into the guts of it much. It works well enough most of the time but Iâve had to adjust and most of the adjustments are dealing with annoyances like the start menu. I also canât just install arbitrary apps to solve all the issues. I appreciate the points youâve made but Iâve largely found the usability of this OS to be meaningfully worse than Windows 10 and incomparably worse than my recent linux experience.
Microsoft did ruin Windows with Windows 8, then they made it even worse with Windows 10 and now theyâre making it even fucking worse with 11. Windows 7 was the golden age of Windows.
I stopped following 11 news after they cancelled the native android framework, only thing that got me excited since a BlueStacks installation gets huge extremely fast, Iâm not going.
Three years ago, I bought my wife a laptop with Windows 10 to replace her 10yo windows 7 machine.
It had hardware issues out of the box, and went in on two repairs. It works fine now, AFAIK.
But, she still doesnât trust it, and she doesnât think that she can move her Adobe CS6 license over to itâŚ
I even bought her the affinity suite.
Iâm starting to think sheâll never move on from Windows 7.
I think the major browsers stopped supporting it sometime during the last year, so my best hope is that some included certificates will eventually make her favourite websites stop working. That has to force her over to something more recent⌠right?
I use arch, btw.
github.com/win32ss/supermium
Here is a relatively up to date Chromium fork that supports Windows XP and newer (I am not affiliated with the project btw)
Iâll keep that secret from her đ
up vote for arch.
I also use arch btw.
Me too
I use Win10 for one single program only and Iâm currently testing on how to take that machine offline, but still be accessible locally. So far all I got is a blacklist regex in pihole. Blocking internet access to that machine via my router does not work for me, as I dual boot that machine with Linux for gaming. Tips per DM are very welcome actually.
Maybe have a script change your local IP address? You could for instance change your IP after logging into Linux and change before powering off.
Two options:
Make Linux use a random MAC address, then block the physical MAC in the DHCP section of the routerâe configuration. This will make Windows unablento recieve an IP address while Linux will be able to get ahold of one.
If windows uses tandom mac addresses, the feature should be able to be turned off.
Or, simply disable the network interfaces in Windowsâ control panel. Iâve never seen Windows reenable a network card by itself.
Static IP on the windows machine in a jailâd subnet, if you still want to be able to access it from the LAN but donât want it to have internet access.
If youâre happy with it not having any kind of network access (Iâm not sure if when you say âlocallyâ you mean just physically, or it needs LAN as well), just disable the network adapter in windows.
Yeah itâs convincing people that Windows 11 is actually good
The only reason Iâm on 10 with my main pc is because the 7th gen intel in there isnât compatible with win11. I have another pc that is 7th gen, which I put windows 11 on and there is just something weird about it. When I do anything on that machine it doesnât do it immediately, it sits for a few seconds before actions are done. Really aggravating. Clicking on a program on the taskbar takes a few seconds before it opens. File explorer, firefox browser, settings pane, ⌠Once programs are running itâs fine to use said programs, but I wonder what they did to make it feel this way.
I have Linux on both machines as primary OS and they are super snappy, itâs not the hardware.
How much RAM do the systems have? 8gb? The delay may be in the system making room in ram for the program. Win11 is so ram hungry. Itâs stupid.
They both have 16GB RAM.
The one with Windows 10 has a i5 7600k and GTX1060
The one with Windows 11 has a i7 7700k and GTX1080
Both with nvme ssd storage samsung evo (cant remember which exactly). The 7600k machine even has hdds and ssds via sata extra.
I had Windows 10 on an older (but not ancient) machine and it was literally unusable. 10-15 minute boot time and another 5 or so just to get a browser to open. The misery didnât end once things were open; everything was still slower than when I had windows 7 on what would now be considered a truly ancient machine. I put Linux on it and experienced a roughly 5x speedup.
If Linux didnât exist, we would actually end up with a lot of e-waste, and I mean a fuck ton of it. And itâs all thanks to you, Microsoft.
Hell, Linux does exist, and people just donât wanna use it because theyâre so used to Windows that anything else is basically as steep of a learning curve as a literal cliff. And to those people I say: âjust add some mint on it and life will be easy. Maybe even drizzle some cinnamon on it as wellâ
Iâve installed Linux mint cinnamon on some PCs for other people. Itâs okay. I still run into errors and difficulties but for your average non techie person it might work if someone else gets them started.
That alone is a great introduction to Linux.
Started using linux mint 22 since 2 months great experience. Difficult with some software with wine winetricks and bottles and stuff. Iâm not in any tech field. Learnt from YouTube. Still more to learn⌠But itâs fun to figuring things out and chatgpt
Iâm a recent Mint user as well. The transition felt pretty seamless so far.
Linux is in a weird spot, there is a valley you must not be in with it.
If you are a non-technical person who needs only a browser and solitaire, itâs perfect.
If you are a highly technical person, itâs great.
If youâre just in between, you are fucked.
Trying to get games to run without being a Linux pro is much harder than I was led to believe. Some games just work out of the box, but a lot of them absolutely do NOT, even if protondb says they will.
The Steam Deck is trying to make Linux gaming more hassle-free, but itâs not like weâve reached that stage yet. Still, weâre taking steps.
I have high hopes for the future. Itâs just not quite there yet.
i do not agree with that sentiment. iâm an avid gamer, and in the last few weeks since switching to nobara i only found 1 obscure game that didnât work, and 2 that needed an entry in the preferences of the game in steam. using heroic launcher for all amazon/epic/gog games and lutris for my piracy tryouts (would work in heroic too, but itâs cleaner that way)
but i must admit that the experience is smoother in windows; i miss my playnite launcher which integrated everything from steam to other stores, pirated games and all emulation needs.
I guess dual-booting is still a necessity for some of us, unless you have a single hard drive and your Windows installation decides to randomly break.
Maybe Iâm just really unlucky when it comes to liking games that donât work on Linux.
that might be. i am a pure single-player (with a bit of local coop mixed in) player, and i prefer roguelites, VNs with actual gaming elements and FPS / âImmersive Simâ-Style games, and currently the Vampire Survivor category with Yet another Zombie Survival and Halls of Torment. I try out a lot of games (If theres a Fitgirl or DODI release of it and even somewhere in my ballpark iâll test it).
Most issues i have stem from modding games without Workshop support, using external Mod Managers like Vortex sucks on Linux.
My experience has been that singleplayer and indie games work best, so thatâs not surprising!
I have also encountered games that needed tweaking (like changing settings in an .ini file that werenât visible in the gameâs menu) to run in an acceptable way on windows. Does this mean that Windows is ânot quite there yetâ, or is the game to blame?
Sure, but itâs not impossible to play any Blizzard games because the launcher login page is broken like it is on Linux. Blaming the game will only get you so far when so many games just donât work and devs donât care.
They should be required to release drivers such that massive e-waste wasnât generated suddenly. I mean, why does the government allow a software company to own an monopolize the hardware? Hello Google! Good luck đ¤ with the monopoly assholes!
I think that any operating system that mostly runs 3rd party software should be legally required to open-source at least the components necessary to run said 3rd party software. Also, OSes should just straight up not be allowed to show ads, full-stop. Making people buy hardware and then bloating the OS with ads in updates is a bait and switch and if our government had any balls, would be illegal.
Not to mention that we pay for the bandwidth they use to show us ads. Like WTF! Since when did NBC as people to chip in for them to show us McDonaldâs commercials?
Not just the bandwidth, but RAM usage, energy consumption, and cache storage space. Ads cost us money.
I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but which drivers do you have in mind? You can install Linux on almost any machine, and if there are driver issues the culprits are usually nvidia, realtek, etc. for which Microsoft is hardly responsible.
Oh my gosh 𤯠you are definitely not old enough. Microsoft has hardware by the balls because they own the eyeball markets at work. They can make a company that makes Ethernet cards for example change their API. Itâs pretty simple to just end Linux by denying it hardware. So thatâs why we must defend against that sort of monopoly which kept modems unobtainable to Linux for example. That was the great awakening, the modem wars.
Another vote for Linux Mint. I finally switched from Windows 10 months ago and I love it.
Iâm really enjoying the learning curve with Linux because Iâm not always fighting the operating system. On the other hand, every time Iâve had to go âunder the hoodâ with Windows (edit the Registry, change config files) itâs been to stop Microsoft from doing something sh*tty to me.
Rofl relatable. Me when i was trying to force uninstall edge or turn off windows activation logo
I tossed Mint on a VM briefly and really disliked it. Specifically finding the terminal was painful. Did they bury it pretty deep or did I just overlook it?
By default there is a shortcut to the terminal shortcut on task bar. From memory it is one of three default shortcuts. (File browser, Terminal, Firefox.) You can also find it by pressing the menu button (the âstart menuâ). From there the terminal has a prominent special position where it is always accessible. And if you donât notice it there, you can always start typing to search for it - as with any other installed app. I find that if I type âtâ, then âTerminalâ is the top result; and obviously I can kept typing to eliminate the other results if I want.
So if your difficulty in finding the terminal is your main complaint about about Mint⌠Iâm not sure what to tell you. Do you want it to auto-launch or something?
Ctrl + alt + t opens a terminal in most DE Iâve used as well
Iâve just installed it on my Dell Latitude E6330. Itâs great, but am I the only one who gets his laptop restarted instead of powered off? It happened both on Mint and Zorin OS, never on Windows.
Hits buzzer
The big windows 10 problem is that it updates to windows 11.
The big Windows 10 problem is that it is Windows.
Imagine a world where we had politicians who understood technology enough to put proper rules and requirements in place, so that big dumb companies would actually be forced to act ethically and sustainablyâŚ
While the understanding would be nice to have, I suspect it is more a lack of backbone than anything else.
Plus said corporations pay I mean lobby for themâŚ
does it take a year to build an OS that doesnt track/sell you and try to hide its doing so?
I have a feeling that Microsoft will release an update that will at the very least make Windows 10 miserable to use if not downright unbootable the day support ends