Right, didn’t even bother to do the bare minimum of finding out if that’s intentionally how they wanted the video or not, then even acknowledges that fact at the end of the article.
bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
on 24 Oct 18:56
nextcollapse
a fisheye lens-style view of a plane making an air trail.
The trail emerging from the tail of the plane, as if it was a rocket.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world
on 24 Oct 19:51
nextcollapse
Art is subjective, but this isn’t really art, it’s just AI slop. It’s incredible to me that this is what OpenAI thinks we should be excited about.
It was neat at first but now, two years later, as Schmidt is arguing we should abandon environmental goals to power AI, and billions in venture capital has been thrown away on this instead of actual, useful, functional technologies, it’s clear this isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.
This is their flagship video, already couched in “dreamy” and “fantastical” descriptors and it’s terrible. Generative AI is garbage. Actual data science and ML isn’t sexy and the profit margins are less.
threaded - newest
what a shining example of unbiased and impartial reporting 🙄
Right, didn’t even bother to do the bare minimum of finding out if that’s intentionally how they wanted the video or not, then even acknowledges that fact at the end of the article.
The trail emerging from the tail of the plane, as if it was a rocket.
It was neat at first but now, two years later, as Schmidt is arguing we should abandon environmental goals to power AI, and billions in venture capital has been thrown away on this instead of actual, useful, functional technologies, it’s clear this isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.
This is their flagship video, already couched in “dreamy” and “fantastical” descriptors and it’s terrible. Generative AI is garbage. Actual data science and ML isn’t sexy and the profit margins are less.
One of the planes in that video was straight up missing a wing.
That was utterly dire, and this is supposed to be a showcase of the technology?