Kroger’s plans to roll out facial recognition at its grocery stores is attracting criticism from lawmakers, who warn it could lead to surge pricing and put customers’ personal data at risk (therecord.media)
from ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 19:55
https://lemmy.world/post/21115178

In a letter Friday to Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) said the plans — which involve using facial recognition tools in digital displays to target advertising to customers and collect information on them — potentially pave the way for biased pricing discrimination.

“Studies have shown that facial recognition technology is flawed and can lead to discrimination in predominantly Black and Brown neighborhoods,” Tlaib wrote in the letter, which was posted on social media Tuesday. “The racial biases of facial recognition technology are well documented and should not be extended into our grocery stores.”

Kroger is the largest grocery store chain in the country with nearly 3,000 stores and $3.1 billion in profits in 2023. Kroger and other retailers already use electronic shelving labels instead of paper labels to rapidly adjust prices based on a variety of factors, including time of purchase, where a grocery store is located and other data.

The plan to use facial recognition technology could allow the retailer to build individual profiles on customers, based on data like their gender and shopping habits.

In an August letter sent to McMullen about the same plans, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bob Casey (D-PA) said they were concerned about the chain building “personalized profiles of each customer, and then use those profiles ‘to determine how much price hiking each of us can tolerate,’ quickly updating and displaying the customer’s maximum willingness to pay on the digital price tag.”

The use of facial recognition tools in Kroger stores also raises concerns about how Kroger intends to “adequately” safeguard customer data, the Warren and Casey letter said.

#technology

threaded - newest

dan@upvote.au on 21 Oct 20:09 next collapse

“To be clear, Kroger does not and has never engaged in ‘surge pricing,’” the statement said. “Any test of electronic shelf tags is designed to lower prices for more customers where it matters most.”

Isn’t that the same thing? It doesn’t matter if you raise prices on demand or lower them, the outcome is the same - different pricing at different times.

Letstakealook@lemm.ee on 21 Oct 20:13 next collapse

This is all a misunderstanding! The high price IS the regular price. We lower the prices at certain times to benefit our customers, who we love so very much. This is totally not surge pricing!

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 20:48 next collapse

“We are just figuring out though”

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 21 Oct 21:55 next collapse

"Well, you see, 'surge pricing' means raising prices during the most high-traffic times. Here at Kroger, we pride ourselves in raising prices slightly before and after the peak times, and that's technically not surge pricing! It's just dynamic pricing with surge characteristics."

Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:21 next collapse

Alternative prices

WoodScientist@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 04:40 collapse

“Alright you chucklefuckers. Here’s the new law. You are required to have paper tags, the only discount you can offer is paper coupons sent through the mail to everyone in an area, and you’re never allowed to alter your prices more than once per week.”

abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 03:30 next collapse

Yeah see it’s not surge pricing! We actually lower prices whentheresnobodyintheaisle so that the discounts are passed on to you! Also we list the lowered price in the ads and apps so when you come in you can be surprised by power of our tech! and the updated price

barsquid@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 13:28 collapse

“No, no, it’s totally different to lower prices when fixed income people are shopping and at all other times leave them the same, our lawyers were very certain of that.”

dan@upvote.au on 21 Oct 20:12 next collapse

In the USA, facial recognition isn’t legal in some states (e.g. the company needs written permission from the individual to collect their facial data in Illinois), and other stores have had issues with facial recognition (e.g. ftc.gov/…/rite-aid-banned-using-ai-facial-recogni…) so I’m not sure how Kroger think they’ll succeed with this.

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 22 Oct 01:50 collapse

Honestly, they’ll probably miss that and pay massive fines in Illinois. It seems to be the traditional approach by companies that get into facial recognition to also not bother to listen to anyone who could have told them not to.

EndOfLine@lemm.ee on 21 Oct 20:17 next collapse

Well, they wrote some letters. There’s nothing more the nations law makers can do to protect citizens from corporate greed and price gouging. /s

HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 20:25 next collapse

Kroger also owns: Ralphs, Dillons, Smith’s, King Soopers, Fred Myer, Fry’s, QFC, City Market, Owen’s, Jay C, Pay Less, Baker’s, Gerbes, Harris Teeter, Pick‘n Save, Metro Market and Mariano’s.

Coreidan@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 20:47 next collapse

Thank fuck I haven’t heard of a single one of those stores and have never shopped in them

littletoolshed@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 21:00 next collapse

That’s not surprising, if you live outside of the US. Otherwise, I do have a follow up query for you 😅

Coreidan@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 21:02 collapse

I’m in the us. Must be a west coast thing.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 21 Oct 23:11 collapse

Kroger is big in the east, the others are bigger in the west IIRC. And OP missed Fred Meyer, which is big in the PNW.

ArtieShaw@fedia.io on 21 Oct 21:11 collapse

More of a hardcore Jewel/Osco shopper?

No - I think Mariano's and PicknSave would be competitors in that region. I travel a bit through the US, and I'm flummoxed. My Kroger discount card works more times than not, no matter where my work takes me and no matter which the local branding is.

AlexanderESmith@social.alexanderesmith.com on 21 Oct 22:06 next collapse

Grew up in Chicago, you just reminded me of Dominick's

[deleted] on 21 Oct 23:05 collapse

.

BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world on 21 Oct 21:21 next collapse

And now Safeway!

But don’t worry, there’s still Walmart as an option.

TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee on 21 Oct 23:20 next collapse

As an aside, I personally don’t understand why people would choose Kroger over Walmart

atrielienz@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 02:24 collapse

Fuck Walmart.

nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org on 22 Oct 04:16 collapse

This is why. Kroger is terrible but Walmart is worse.

atrielienz@lemmy.world on 23 Oct 23:55 collapse

I wouldn’t necessarily even consider the quality better at Walmart than it is at Kroger so, while both are bad, Walmart is definitely worse for a lot of other reasons.

helenslunch@feddit.nl on 22 Oct 01:36 next collapse

One of the great benefits of living in Texas is HEB.

Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 22 Oct 05:17 collapse

May I introduce you to our lord and savior, Aldi?

BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world on 22 Oct 06:19 collapse

I wish you would! The closest one to me is just under 1,000 miles away.

Assman@sh.itjust.works on 21 Oct 22:48 next collapse

We switched from Kroger to a couple of international groceries. It’s hit and miss quality wise, but this way I’m only supporting at most a handful of greedy shitbags.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 21 Oct 23:12 collapse

Missed Fred Meyer, which is huge in the PNW.

I don’t shop at any of those, mostly because it’s not my closest grocery store. It is the biggest though, I just don’t want to drive the extra 10 min to go there vs my local one w/ competitive prices.

HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:16 next collapse

Added

abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 03:31 collapse

Isn’t there a whole big deal about Fred Meyer merging with them and some anti monopoly bs going on?

evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 09:24 collapse

They want to merge with Albertsons, who owns the other half of grocery stores: Acme, Safeway, jewel osco, and a bunch more.

abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world on 23 Oct 02:44 collapse

Ah that explains it

Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net on 21 Oct 20:26 next collapse

There’s no way lawmakers stop this, so anyone know a way to wear a mask in public without looking like a lunatic?

Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 21 Oct 20:42 next collapse

I haven’t stopped wearing an N95 in public since 2020. I’m not going to say nobody has ever been weird to me about it, but the vast majority of people are more interested in my colorful hat than my mask. YMMV depending on location.

Zerlyna@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 21:10 collapse

That’s a good idea. I don’t shop at Kroger but it’s only a matter of time for others to try this.

uid0gid0@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 00:04 next collapse

You could just become a fan of Insane Clown Posse

Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 16:22 collapse

Two choices:

  1. Medical mask and sunglasses (preferably those boxy ones people wear over regular glasses). Few people question medical masks these days.
  2. Embrace the lunacy, and wear whatever mask/facial covering you think is cool/funny. Life’s short and a lot of people would do well to embrace harmless weirdness.
just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 20:47 next collapse

We need a law in the US banning the use of computer assistance for identifying humans. Hands down. It’s not accurate, and it only emboldens people controlling resources.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 21 Oct 21:39 collapse

I donr think you underatand who rules the US...

This ia a featuee of the system, not a bug

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 21:46 collapse

Please inform us. Who rules the US in reality?

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 21 Oct 22:22 next collapse

The oligarchs who each own a large steak in critical enterprises for the economy, which permits them to dictate policy and extract value from the state via various transfers from the treasury via tax regimes, loans or other state aid.

Kinda weird for presumably an adult not to know this... but i guess we get politics we deserve after all

Common plebs can't even ID their owners 🤡

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 22:25 next collapse

Riiiight. Thank you for reminding me that I ALWAYS forget about those “five jew bankers”. Is it “four jew bankers”? How many Jewish people are in the mix here, and how mad should be about this?

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 21 Oct 22:29 collapse

you tell me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wealthiest_Americans_by_net_worth

also bringing up jews when the ruling regime is being criticized is a bad faith tactic attempting to derail the discussion. keep it up, regime whores!

Daddy dindu nuffin, mate! Enjoy your amazing healthcare, housing and education

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 22:48 collapse

Riiiight. Saying what you’re saying is totally equivalent to bringing up the same old bullshit that’s been used for hundreds of years.

So Oprah is in control of the community college classes I take and the AA meetings I go to which radicalize me? So confused. Where should I be going to find out the REAL TRUTH?

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 21 Oct 22:51 collapse

damn boy, who hurt u?

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 22:58 collapse

You.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 21 Oct 23:08 collapse

sorry bro

RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 14:21 collapse

Are we talking t-bone or ribeye?

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 14:24 collapse

I aint got no beef, I am a vegetarian!

PunnyName@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:19 collapse

Corporations

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:29 collapse

Well then just reference a Corporatocracy. Don’t add some weird mystery about what you mean.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:58 collapse

Corps are just orgs no matter what the court says.

They are owned by people and they are ran for the benefit of these people at expense of people who have to buy goods and services from them.

This arrangement is fundamentally an oligarchy, corporate layer is a maxipad for the plebs to cope.

whotookkarl@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 21:45 next collapse

Surge pricing=price gouging, there is no difference

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:55 collapse

They did with airline tix and rents....

Now time to bring this technology into your grocery store!

ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works on 21 Oct 21:47 next collapse

If companies can’t protect the information they collect now, (a large portion of it gathered without consent), how are they going to protect even more information; and where can I opt out?..smh

catloaf@lemm.ee on 21 Oct 22:55 next collapse

The opt out comes in the form of a can of spraypaint.

Linktank@lemmy.today on 22 Oct 00:59 collapse

No it comes from taking your money somewhere else. Why would you continue shopping at a place that makes you feel the need to vandalize their property to feel safe?

catloaf@lemm.ee on 22 Oct 01:18 collapse

What do you propose I do when every supermarket in the area is doing this?

Linktank@lemmy.today on 22 Oct 01:23 next collapse

Begin eating the rich.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 22 Oct 01:28 collapse

I think I’ll try vandalism before cannibalism actually thanks

Linktank@lemmy.today on 22 Oct 03:12 collapse

Your loss!

Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee on 22 Oct 01:41 collapse

Or when all the supermarkets in your area are owned by Kroger?

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 21 Oct 23:08 collapse

Two options:

  • wear something that prevents facial recognition (something like Reflectacles, for example)
  • don’t shop at Kroger

I’m doing the latter, but I’m probably going to pick up some anti-facial recognition stuff as well, just to screw with the various other orgs that do this (gonna try going through the airport w/ them as well the next time I travel).

PunnyName@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:17 next collapse

Kroger owns a number of stores, making it even harder to not shop there: www.scrapehero.com/…/Kroger_Company_USA.png

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 16:38 collapse

Fortunately we have a different chain in my area: Associated Food Stores.

grue@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 00:09 next collapse

Third option: force the government to outlaw this bullshit

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:54 next collapse

When was the last time peasants forced anything in the US?

Asking for a friend...

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 16:39 collapse

That can take months if not years. Civil disobedience can be done today.

grue@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 16:59 collapse

Okay, then that would be option #4 (because neither of the two things you previously mentioned are civil disobedience).

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 17:38 collapse

They are, just not disobedience against a government, but against what stores want you to do.

noxy@yiffit.net on 22 Oct 02:15 next collapse

I’ve thought about Reflectacles too, but I doubt the cameras use infrared in a store that’s already very well lit.

Great idea though, and I hope they work on countermeasures that work with visible light cameras too

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 16:41 collapse

My understanding is that’s how most facial recognition is done regardless of lighting, because they can blast it to get a better read without bothering people, and the more accurate facial recognition solutions use eyes (solves the problem of different skin tones, facial hair, etc).

They certainly use visible light cameras, but they don’t necessarily run their facial recognition w/ visible light.

TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com on 22 Oct 16:45 collapse

don’t shop at 75% of the grocery store in the USA == don’t shop Kroger

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 16:55 collapse

Is it? In my area, here are some alternatives:

Some of those are regional, so fill in whatever exists in your area (e.g. Aldi in the NE US). Kroger brands are maybe 20% of the stores in my area. I used to shop at them primarily (they were the closest), but they’re now less convenient than other stores (takes an extra 10 min to get there). Even when I lived right next to a Kroger-brand store, there were still at least two other options within 10 min drive.

And I’m not even in a particularly densely populated area, I’m in the suburbs in Utah, about 30-45 min from downtown.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 21 Oct 21:53 next collapse

What's the benefit to the customer here? Idk if a store where I live started doing this, I would just stop going there. I know that can be difficult with the grocery monopolies in a lot of places, but I would try my hardest.

I think facial recognition should be banned outright because it's highly inaccurate, racially biased, and used improperly by law enforcement. But in cases like this, even just a ban for all non-law enforcement applications would be really helpful. People don't benefit from this! Just corporations, and barely so.

In my work as a government contractor, I witnessed the use of facial recognition for access control (getting into certain parts of a building) in exactly 1 building (of several dozens) and it was so completely unnecessary that I was left wondering what kind of nepotism or budget surplus lead to the implementation of such a lame security tool.

socphoenix@midwest.social on 21 Oct 22:43 next collapse

The problem is everything is a massive chain so as one goes, so goes them all so to speak. I have Kroger, Albertsons, and Walmart as my only choices for grocery store. I don’t see any chance that if Kroger does this Albertsons (assuming the proposed Kroger Albertsons merger fails) and Walmart don’t do the same.

Tl;dr it doesn’t need to benefit the customer if the customer has no real choice in where they shop

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:53 collapse

Thats the beauty of oligopolies... The faq u gonna do about ut peasant? Go to a shop mile further to be profiled by their corpo surveillance apparatus?

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 22 Oct 01:51 collapse

What’s the benefit to the customer here?

There’s no intended benefit to the customer.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 22 Oct 02:28 collapse

Yes, it was a rhetorical question. Thanks for your input.

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 22 Oct 04:09 collapse

I still get the meaningless Internet points though, right?!

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:02 next collapse

Oh no, I accidentally smudged a little bit of paint over the facial recognition camera lens… Oops!

Linktank@lemmy.today on 22 Oct 00:58 collapse

Going to be hard to do when it’s under a little black dome 45 feet up in the air. Also there’s dozens of them…

shininghero@pawb.social on 22 Oct 01:13 next collapse

Oh no, I accidentally put paint in a super soaker and it squirted upwards on the camera! Silly me, I’m such a klutz!

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 01:21 next collapse

Be careful to never shine a 20mW green laser into the lens of a camera!!

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:51 collapse

Go on....

Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee on 22 Oct 01:39 next collapse

Paint ball gun ftw

explodicle@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 02:15 collapse

sounds like a sombrero situation

PunnyName@lemmy.world on 21 Oct 23:13 next collapse

And it definitely won’t negatively affect people of color, at all, will it?

Badeendje@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 00:17 next collapse

This is how you end up with laws mandating paper cards with pricing information.

helenslunch@feddit.nl on 22 Oct 01:31 next collapse

So this is where they draw the line? Interesting choice…

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 22 Oct 01:52 next collapse

I think they are absolutely, positively, going to breach their face database and everyone’s purchase history all over the Internet.

I’ve been watching for an event like this with popcorn ready.

I’ve got a good/bad/terrible feeling that they’re playing for keeps in the race to be the biggest consumer privacy headline public relations disaster.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:50 collapse

Purchase histories are already traded online i thought

atrielienz@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 02:20 next collapse

Mask mandates may not be in effect but I can wear one to the grocery store. This is stupid and I will not participate.

PushButton@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 04:00 next collapse

That might be ugly, but something like that

wrekone@lemmyf.uk on 22 Oct 08:09 next collapse

A Kroger spokesperson said in a statement that the company’s business model is built on a “foundation of lowering prices to attract more customers.” “To be clear, Kroger does not and has never engaged in ‘surge pricing,’” the statement said. “Any test of electronic shelf tags is designed to lower prices for more customers where it matters most.”

I know these PR people get paid a lot to tell bald-faced lies, but I just don’t understand how they live with themselves.

Etterra@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 09:37 next collapse

Because they’re high-functioning sociopaths. About 1 in 100 people are, and they tend to gravitate into executive, sales, legal, marketing, “law” enforcement, and other careers where having little to no empathy or conscience is a distinct advantage.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 12:50 collapse

And people who own shit prefer to hire them for this "talent"

interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml on 23 Oct 14:13 collapse

Discounts is just reverse surge pricing. Just think of the absence of discount as the surge.

lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 11:58 next collapse

This is appalling.

So nice to live in the Balkans where prices are still on paper, and in some stores you can still barter depending on the quantity you’re buying. 😄

futatorius@lemm.ee on 22 Oct 13:36 next collapse

This is a privacy intrusion that should be banned nationally.

Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee on 22 Oct 13:43 collapse

The US government should already be breaking up Kroger for its monopolistic practices.

I suspect most of the C Suite is simply waiting for whatever they see as the peak of their share price to sell off everything and move on to their next parasitic host.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 22 Oct 14:25 collapse

US government enables oligopolies, why would they stop now?

NateNate60@lemmy.world on 23 Oct 02:57 collapse

Because the “US Government” is not a monolithic entity but rather, a large and complex democratic organisation that citizens can influence the composition of through political participation.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 23 Oct 14:08 collapse

citizens can influence the composition of through political participation.

So much good housing, education and healthcare.... much influence, big access to power 🤡

NateNate60@lemmy.world on 23 Oct 15:27 collapse

Yeah, so It turns out fewer people care about and really want those things than you think…

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 23 Oct 15:32 collapse

Hurt me harder daddy

firepenny@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 13:50 next collapse

Kroger is one of the more expensive grocery stores in my area. Less reason to go now. Aldi is the way

shalafi@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 16:47 collapse

No lie, just don’t go there. American ignorance is a huge reason why capitalism is failing us, and the media is a huge part of that.

If this goes through, the media should be plastering the news everywhere. And customers should follow up by quitting Kroger. But neither will happen. Kroger could put signs out front saying, “Fuck you. We’re spying on your FACE.”, and customers would just nod and go on inside.

Look at all these comments. Yours is the only one saying go elsewhere.

RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works on 22 Oct 14:25 next collapse

…attracting criticism from lawmakers, who warn it could…

Oh my, if only there were someone with the resources and authority to do something about it.

aesthelete@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 15:08 next collapse

We need a large, well-organized movement to demand that the government add a right to privacy to the US Constitution.

SomeGuy69@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 15:30 next collapse

Thankfully that’s not allowed in my country. I’d be so pissed.

XaiwahBlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 22 Oct 16:51 next collapse

I’ve been pretty lazy about changing stores since they had the easiest pick up i had found in my area, but i guess this is the ass kick i need to make sure i never go back.

Sucks they own almost all the groceries in my area. But i can trust that it’s not a monopoly, right?

Groceries prices deeeeefinately aren’t inflated. Nope. All good here.

Snapz@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 16:57 next collapse

We all need to wear little bowties that spritz semi clear paint into the cameras as we browse price tags.

Or can someone start a tick tok trend where the kids go to stores and eat these little devices off the shelves as a real “just prank bro”?

Also, remember that corporate rats do these things to give each other cover. Kroger has to be the face of bad guy this time, but don’t you think for a second that Safeway and even the new “leadership” at Costco aren’t prepping the same right now.

sfxrlz@lemmy.world on 22 Oct 17:01 next collapse

Nothing to see here

interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml on 23 Oct 13:15 next collapse

Expropriate Kroger IMMEDIATELY

MehBlah@lemmy.world on 23 Oct 13:24 next collapse

Just don’t shop at kroger. Problem solved. In some cases this may be the only available store but in those cases the prices are usually higher anyway. No matter the company operating the store

dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world on 23 Oct 13:42 next collapse

The key phrase to remember here is: Price Discrimination.

Stores already possess the technology to track anyone’s shopping experience through loyalty cards. The “discounts” you get are really just a tax on everyone that doesn’t participate, and the benefits to the company for having your data are worth potentially losing business from un-tracked customers. That’s how valuable your data is.

So why aren’t we seeing per-customer targeting? This is not to suggest that businesses are benign here, but rather, just cautious about outright per-customer discounts and other price manipulation. Custom coupons are kinda/sorta a part of this. IMO, the door is still wide-open to find ways palatable to the customer (and courts) while dialing everyone in.

In that context, all cameras do is make the system practically impossible to dodge. Considering how much stores value that kind of information, it makes sense they’d invest to capture 100% of their retail activity.

interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml on 23 Oct 14:11 collapse

Ah, yes, the knob twiddlers. In a more just society we would amputate their fingers

mysticpickle@lemmy.ca on 23 Oct 16:17 collapse

If they carry through with this, everyone that plans on shopping at Kroger should be wearing Juggalo makeup

allure.com/…/juggalo-makeup-facial-recognition

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/373c3e5a-50b3-42da-84de-9fcc74f07bac.png">