California Judge Says Because Snapchat Has Disappearing Messages, Section 230 Doesn’t Apply To Lawsuits Over Snapchat Content
(www.techdirt.com)
from L4s@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 2024 14:00
https://lemmy.world/post/10348073
from L4s@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 05 Jan 2024 14:00
https://lemmy.world/post/10348073
California Judge Says Because Snapchat Has Disappearing Messages, Section 230 Doesn’t Apply To Lawsuits Over Snapchat Content::Well, this is dumb. As detailed by NBC News, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Lawrence Riff has rejected a perfectly reasonable attempt by SnapChat to have a lawsuit thrown out on Section 230 grounds. The case involves family members of kids who overdosed on illegal drugs like fentanyl, suing Snap for apparently providing the connection…
threaded - newest
Why can’t journalists inform instead of influence?
Why can’t people be smart enough to use their own heads for something more than keeping rain off their necks?
Editorializing is TechDirt’s whole thing. If you’re looking for objectivity over analysis you can tap the blue words on their post and read the original reporting.
ahh yes, a plug-my-ears this is how i feel it should be judge. fantastic.
I’m guessing this judge considers the telephone to be an example of negligent design as well. After all, the phone company doesn’t record every phone call I make and disconnect me if I mention an illegal drug.