WhatsApp is dropping its native Windows app in favor of an uglier web version (www.theverge.com)
from moe90@feddit.nl to technology@lemmy.world on 21 Jul 11:14
https://feddit.nl/post/38725063

#technology

threaded - newest

cRazi_man@europe.pub on 21 Jul 12:26 next collapse

I’m really happy that this is not relevant to me.

… because I don’t use Windows. I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

ChromaticMan@lemmy.world on 21 Jul 12:29 collapse

I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

Jup, impossible for me if I want to keep in contact with 90% of my friends.

chuso@fedia.io on 21 Jul 13:50 collapse

<img alt="A vintage Panasonic portable TV/VCR combo is shown, displaying the message "The convenience you demanded is now mandatory". Each word is in a separate line imitating the logos and corporate images of Facebook, Amazon, Google, Disney, YouTube and Netflix, respectively." src="https://i.redd.it/jiv1gwhpe3i91.jpg">

balder1991@lemmy.world on 21 Jul 12:29 next collapse

I’m just thinking now that the Mac is next.

I thought that as much as these companies preach about LLMs doing their coding, the cost of development would go down, no? So why does it need to reduce everything to a single code base to make it easier for developers?

zqwzzle@lemmy.ca on 21 Jul 13:37 collapse

Facebook also developed react native so I don’t know what their excuse is.

morrowind@lemmy.ml on 21 Jul 16:38 collapse

React native isn’t the same as native

HubertManne@piefed.social on 21 Jul 14:07 next collapse

The whole point of webapps was not to have os specific ones. somehow smartphones caused everything to move backwards.

Prove_your_argument@piefed.social on 21 Jul 14:34 next collapse

I've literally only ever used the web version on windows. It works fine, so what's the problem? what functionality is being lost?

More ram usage? oh no! I couldn't possibly have free Ram left!

RoadTrain@lemdro.id on 21 Jul 14:36 next collapse

It’s a shame. The app worked well, and it was nice to have a native look rather than a generic web one.

BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social on 21 Jul 14:37 next collapse

I never installed their app on Windows. I figured it could just randomly watch what I was doing, log keystrokes, view websites and history etc. I don't know if I'm misunderstanding how much Windows apps can spy on each other - they don't seem to ask for permissions etc.

Mhad1@lemmy.zip on 21 Jul 15:05 next collapse

Does anyone have any idea why, I thought it was also quite liked by the community, no need to open up the extreamly slow web browser just to post one image or pdf

imecth@fedia.io on 21 Jul 15:46 collapse

It's in the article. Each different version you maintain is an additional strain and added cost. It's why applications are increasingly moving towards web versions.

2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de on 21 Jul 15:15 next collapse

Waiter! waiter! more webslop please!

OmegaSunkey@ani.social on 21 Jul 16:33 next collapse

What’s so funny is that they were going to allow encrypted (they say) calls on the web app but then suddenly released a native windows client and told everyone if you wanted calls you need to use it, then removed all buttons for calls or video calls.

I guess they’re coming back on that.

Shape4985@lemmy.ml on 21 Jul 18:26 collapse

I dont mind the web app as i dont have to install anything and i can sandbox it to my browser.

Edit: using ublock in whatsapp ;)