Apple will avoid ban by selling latest Apple Watches without blood oxygen feature (www.cnbc.com)
from L4s@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 18:00
https://lemmy.world/post/10876051

Apple will avoid ban by selling latest Apple Watches without blood oxygen feature::Apple will be able to continue importing and selling Apple Watches as it battles with Masimo in court

#technology

threaded - newest

Telodzrum@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 19:07 next collapse

Aftermarket pricing on Watch Series 9 rev.1 and Watch Ultra 2 rev.1 is about to surge.

DBT@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 19:27 collapse

Aren’t they going to nerf rev 1 with a software update anyway?

Telodzrum@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 19:28 collapse

That was the rumor, but it’s tailor-made for a class action suit.

Ashyr@sh.itjust.works on 18 Jan 2024 19:26 next collapse

Interesting. That feature is pretty important to me. I’m not sure I’d be willing to upgrade without it.

a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 05:34 collapse

What’s your use case? The majority of people will be fine without it so I was just curious if you were doing something interesting with it

Ashyr@sh.itjust.works on 19 Jan 2024 07:28 collapse

Nothing exciting. I struggled with long COVID for years and my o2 was garbage. I’m mostly recovered, but still keep an eye on my o2.

bamboo@lemm.ee on 18 Jan 2024 19:36 next collapse

Is this a hardware revision or just disabling them in software? The swift timing makes it seem as if it’s just software, with the feature likely being flipped back on at some point in the future.

virr@lemmy.world on 18 Jan 2024 20:40 collapse

From the original ruling it sounded like having the even just the sensor in the watch would be infringing. It sounds like these are new watch they are importing, but the article doesn’t make it clear if that is the case.

Oderus@lemmy.world on 19 Jan 2024 23:21 collapse

So instead of paying for the rights to use it, they’re going to drop the feature?

God damn Apple are cheap fuckers.