Despite Spending $100 billion on AI Google is still no where close to a real ai assistant | Amazon Walkout failure and no real plan for sustainable profit. (www.arktrek.shop)
from Dragxito@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 25 Jul 2024 10:02
https://lemmy.world/post/17933652

#technology

threaded - newest

lowleveldata@programming.dev on 25 Jul 2024 10:36 next collapse

Is it “AI is hard” or “AI is not the best solution for this”?

[deleted] on 25 Jul 2024 10:49 next collapse

.

jherazob@fedia.io on 25 Jul 2024 11:17 collapse

It's "LLMs cannot do what the salesmen and CEOs say it can do by it's very nature"

sunzu@kbin.run on 25 Jul 2024 11:28 next collapse

When rent seeking is glorified, there is an economic incentive for this parasitic behavior

Yewb@lemmy.world on 25 Jul 2024 14:34 collapse

What you mean magic box can’t do X, we need to milk it for revenue.

Now that I think about it giving AI rights might save humanity from corporations.

victorz@lemmy.world on 25 Jul 2024 10:56 next collapse

Can I just put a comma between “AI” and “Google”?

NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world on 25 Jul 2024 11:17 collapse

There is so much more between them ;-)

NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world on 25 Jul 2024 11:17 next collapse

It isn’t AI yet. They have just called it that. It was an illusion.

Now money is telling them the truth.

snooggums@midwest.social on 25 Jul 2024 12:19 next collapse

AI is intelligent like a Hoverboard hovers.

TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee on 25 Jul 2024 17:12 collapse

Artificial intelligence is intelligent like artificial grass is grass. That’s how the word artificial works. It just means man-made, says nothing about quality.

db2@lemmy.world on 25 Jul 2024 13:09 next collapse

Careful saying that obvious thing, some people here will climb all the way up your butt about it. 🙄

HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com on 25 Jul 2024 14:17 collapse

I still consider it just another meta within chat. Its the next step from having the search summaries. It theoretically will aggregate more relevant links.

MajorHavoc@programming.dev on 25 Jul 2024 14:33 collapse

theoretically will aggregate more relevant links.

Yep! I’ve seen real data scientists use LLMs for exactly that, and get great results!

I don’t think we will see decent link search as a widespread success for another couple of years, though. Seems like most companies aren’t willing to pay data scientists to build their (domain specific) models. Some of the code co-pilot tools are already quite good. But I bet Chevrolet of Watsonville won’t get the next level of quality for a bit longer.

ramble81@lemm.ee on 25 Jul 2024 14:35 next collapse

I really hate the conflagration between AI and LLMs. We’re seeing a polishing of LLMs and they’re great for mimicking language, but they don’t “know” what they’re saying. We’re still quite a ways off from GenAI and have just started working on more specialized AI. But without some massive leaps in understanding logic and filtering out garbage it’s gonna be a while.

MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml on 25 Jul 2024 20:13 collapse

No surprise. LLM is to intelligence what a moped is to an airplane; both have wheels.