I’ve been trusting them for years. It’s a miracle that they were able to setup a webcam I’ve never owned in my life and have it filming where I always go to spank one out.
They did the same to me. I think they’ve got cameras set up all through my house. So I started walking around naked so they’ll have something nice to look at. I haven’t gotten a thank you yet though.
possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 05 Sep 20:20
nextcollapse
Damn, they got a picture of some gaffer tape, that’s cool.
cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 05 Sep 20:23
nextcollapse
Black Mirror had an episode about this.
Surprised it took someone this long to actually make it.
I forget the name of the episode. If you’re curious, it’s on Netflix, it’s in season 3, and it’s right before San Junipero. It was bleak AF, which is why the only happy (and arguably the best) Black Mirror episode came right after it.
Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
on 05 Sep 20:46
nextcollapse
It's Shut Up and Dance, my fav
the only
I disagree. For starters there's also
Episodes from the first five seasons with happy endings (the way they're presented, at least), spoilers duh
USS Callister
Hang the DJ
Be Right Back (though the stakes aren't that high either)
Arguably one from Bandersnatch
Also, I don't like San Junipero as much as others do because the final conflict goes way too fast and the way it was resolved felt abrupt. Still nice though
RATs existed for a long time but you needed to manually hit record I think? I’m assuming this is just some extra automation.
CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
on 06 Sep 13:44
nextcollapse
Yeah, with quite a plot twist. The entire time I was practically yelling at the tv “who cares, then let’s them release the video of you jerking off and own it. We all do it!” Then at the end, “… oh.”
cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 06 Sep 14:41
collapse
Right, the part I don’t get is, the video of you isn’t going to include what you’re looking at. And if it does you can say they faked it. They could put anything there. They don’t have a shot that includes both you and the screen. They can get sound though, so they can match sound, but that can be faked too. Strip out the audio. Separate the sounds of what you were really watching from the ambient sounds (and the grunts/moans from you) and then dub those sounds over the new audio and it should be passable.
Also, I just wouldn’t do anything embarrassing with a camera pointed at me. I’d cover the camera or point it away from me. Even sitting on the toilet browsing, back cameras point down at the floor, front camera points up, maybe gets the top of my face? Nothing private is seen by the camera by my best intentions. I just do this naturally. I guess others don’t?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
on 07 Sep 07:56
collapse
Yeah, so I have a paranoid (or maybe not) idea that somewhere in 2012 my classmates and teachers played a prank.
That they were insulted by what I said, and decided to check my words (on Silicon Valley people being more noble than Russian elite class). I thought I was talking to them, but they in fact were recording, translating and sending my words to some of those Silicon Valley people (very improbably high-level). And things pretty normal for me to say as almost a compliment (on democracy and meritocracy and freedom and on racism being bad, and MOST of all - on my privacy being more important than their dreams) insulted those people so much that I’ve got a lot of such privacy invasions. So - that in the end, eh, someone of said elite class solved the problem by wasting one of those Silicon Valley people (there was the added insult of that someone being blamed for the thing).
Dunno how to check and whether I should, cause if it happened, I don’t have a nuke.
jordanlund@lemmy.world
on 05 Sep 20:33
nextcollapse
The spam messages have been duly ignored for years. LOL.
“If you have access to my computer, why are you blackmailing me? You could just steal the money from the accounts.”
Seriously, go ahead and try to give someone that shit. No one would be surprised I watch porn and I don't do it in any sort of interesting way. I'm guessing no one would even want to watch it.
i get how usenet is better than streaming from a popup filled website, but i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
qbittorrent has built-in search as well
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
on 07 Sep 00:26
nextcollapse
You don’t understand the difference between Usenet and torrents.
i haven’t used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i’m wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
on 07 Sep 04:43
collapse
It’s better because it basically has everything that torrent sites have, since the same groups upload everything to both, but it’s all done over SSL encrypted connections so your ISP can’t see what you’re downloading, so you don’t need a VPN and you are downloading directly from servers so it’s much faster and you don’t have to worry about the number of seeders, nor do you have to seed yourself. You have many different providers you can sign up to, and many different indexers to help find what you are looking for. It also can download parts of the same content from different sources and combine them to make a whole.
Once you’ve tried it, torrenting feels so amateur and insecure and outdated. Ideally you just set up both, which is what I have done with transmission running in a docker container with a built in VPN, but the torrents are the “last resort” when the content I want can’t be found on Usenet - which is very rarely.
Doesn’t this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it’s distributed and more resilient?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
on 08 Sep 04:59
collapse
It’s not like it’s just some server in some persons house. They’re hosted by companies on server farms that have guaranteed uptime figures and most have 2000+ day retention of data. I’ve been using it for 10+ years and have never had any server failure type issues.
I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it’s hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
on 07 Sep 07:27
collapse
It’s also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it’d be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.
And no, torrenting isn’t outdated and isn’t amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.
Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 07 Sep 17:49
nextcollapse
Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett.
I haven’t touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin’, then it transfers the complete files to another folder.
But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
on 08 Sep 11:10
collapse
OK, I’ll try it.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
on 08 Sep 05:08
collapse
It’s also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it’d be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.
It’s really not. You pretty much need to just put in some api keys for your indexer, downloader, and provider, and away you go.
In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.
What downsides are you talking about in regards to downloading content from usenet?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
on 08 Sep 11:11
collapse
Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia …).
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
on 08 Sep 23:19
collapse
How does that apply to this comment of yours?
In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.
That’s not centralization - unless you also consider the fediverse centralized?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
on 09 Sep 06:26
collapse
That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste.
Surprised the UK age verification selfies haven’t been used to extort people yet. It’d be so easy (and is such an obvious reason why the law is bullshit).
SecurAge🛡️
“Log in with Google to verify your age.”
“Sorry, we weren’t able to verify you using your Google Account. Please take a selfie for verification.”
“Now give us £1000, or we’ll send your picture and details of the porn you were trying to access to everyone in your contacts.”
6stringringer@lemmy.zip
on 07 Sep 04:26
nextcollapse
These days it’s pretty weak blackmail shit. A little AI doctoring can create the same videos… So even if it’s possible, that doesn’t mean it’s plausible, and nobody cares what you do in your bedroom by yourself.
A friend of mine had this happen to him and he just told them to release it, nothing happened. He was willing to take the embarrassment if it did though is the crucial thing.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
on 07 Sep 09:11
nextcollapse
threaded - newest
Been receiving emails about this for years now. Finally can trust those messages.
I’ve been trusting them for years. It’s a miracle that they were able to setup a webcam I’ve never owned in my life and have it filming where I always go to spank one out.
They did the same to me. I think they’ve got cameras set up all through my house. So I started walking around naked so they’ll have something nice to look at. I haven’t gotten a thank you yet though.
Damn, they got a picture of some gaffer tape, that’s cool.
Weird kink but okay
Black Mirror had an episode about this.
Surprised it took someone this long to actually make it.
I forget the name of the episode. If you’re curious, it’s on Netflix, it’s in season 3, and it’s right before San Junipero. It was bleak AF, which is why the only happy (and arguably the best) Black Mirror episode came right after it.
It's Shut Up and Dance, my fav
I disagree. For starters there's also
Episodes from the first five seasons with happy endings (the way they're presented, at least), spoilers duh
USS Callister
Hang the DJ
Be Right Back (though the stakes aren't that high either)
Arguably one from Bandersnatch
Also, I don't like San Junipero as much as others do because the final conflict goes way too fast and the way it was resolved felt abrupt. Still nice though
RATs existed for a long time but you needed to manually hit record I think? I’m assuming this is just some extra automation.
Yeah, with quite a plot twist. The entire time I was practically yelling at the tv “who cares, then let’s them release the video of you jerking off and own it. We all do it!” Then at the end, “… oh.”
Right, the part I don’t get is, the video of you isn’t going to include what you’re looking at. And if it does you can say they faked it. They could put anything there. They don’t have a shot that includes both you and the screen. They can get sound though, so they can match sound, but that can be faked too. Strip out the audio. Separate the sounds of what you were really watching from the ambient sounds (and the grunts/moans from you) and then dub those sounds over the new audio and it should be passable.
Also, I just wouldn’t do anything embarrassing with a camera pointed at me. I’d cover the camera or point it away from me. Even sitting on the toilet browsing, back cameras point down at the floor, front camera points up, maybe gets the top of my face? Nothing private is seen by the camera by my best intentions. I just do this naturally. I guess others don’t?
Yeah, so I have a paranoid (or maybe not) idea that somewhere in 2012 my classmates and teachers played a prank.
That they were insulted by what I said, and decided to check my words (on Silicon Valley people being more noble than Russian elite class). I thought I was talking to them, but they in fact were recording, translating and sending my words to some of those Silicon Valley people (very improbably high-level). And things pretty normal for me to say as almost a compliment (on democracy and meritocracy and freedom and on racism being bad, and MOST of all - on my privacy being more important than their dreams) insulted those people so much that I’ve got a lot of such privacy invasions. So - that in the end, eh, someone of said elite class solved the problem by wasting one of those Silicon Valley people (there was the added insult of that someone being blamed for the thing).
Dunno how to check and whether I should, cause if it happened, I don’t have a nuke.
The spam messages have been duly ignored for years. LOL.
“If you have access to my computer, why are you blackmailing me? You could just steal the money from the accounts.”
No 2FA for transfers at your bank?
Just capture the code when they’re doing some actual shit
I haven’t touched a webcam in years but I just touched myself 5 minutes ago
Lots of folks I’d imagine use their phones, which has cameras on both sides
Why the hell can’t I get a phone without a front camera? I never use it and it creates an annoying hole in my screen
That only works if you're ashamed about rubbing one out.
Seriously, go ahead and try to give someone that shit. No one would be surprised I watch porn and I don't do it in any sort of interesting way. I'm guessing no one would even want to watch it.
Worst voyeur video ever.
hardware camera disablers.
Go on
tape
Doh.
also called two year old post it note that has never been taken off
This, thank you Framework! Mic too!
I’ll reply the same way I do to the scam attempts: Do it bitch.
Also if you are sending my family a copy, send it to my email address too. Thanks.
don’t stream, download your porn from usenet like a civilised person
empornium FTW!
i get how usenet is better than streaming from a popup filled website, but i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
qbittorrent has built-in search as well
You don’t understand the difference between Usenet and torrents.
i haven’t used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i’m wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
It’s better because it basically has everything that torrent sites have, since the same groups upload everything to both, but it’s all done over SSL encrypted connections so your ISP can’t see what you’re downloading, so you don’t need a VPN and you are downloading directly from servers so it’s much faster and you don’t have to worry about the number of seeders, nor do you have to seed yourself. You have many different providers you can sign up to, and many different indexers to help find what you are looking for. It also can download parts of the same content from different sources and combine them to make a whole.
Once you’ve tried it, torrenting feels so amateur and insecure and outdated. Ideally you just set up both, which is what I have done with transmission running in a docker container with a built in VPN, but the torrents are the “last resort” when the content I want can’t be found on Usenet - which is very rarely.
Doesn’t this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it’s distributed and more resilient?
It’s not like it’s just some server in some persons house. They’re hosted by companies on server farms that have guaranteed uptime figures and most have 2000+ day retention of data. I’ve been using it for 10+ years and have never had any server failure type issues.
I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it’s hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers?
It’s also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it’d be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.
And no, torrenting isn’t outdated and isn’t amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.
Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier.
Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett.
I haven’t touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin’, then it transfers the complete files to another folder.
But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself?
OK, I’ll try it.
It’s really not. You pretty much need to just put in some api keys for your indexer, downloader, and provider, and away you go.
What downsides are you talking about in regards to downloading content from usenet?
Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia …).
How does that apply to this comment of yours?
That’s not centralization - unless you also consider the fediverse centralized?
That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste.
Popups? In 2025?
In my day the popular kids would share it over bluetooth.
Bluetooth? I got mine from a dial-up BBS via a 1200 baud modem.
You could but you know there is nsfw content right here on Lemmy
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5797c21a-f14c-46ef-a638-46b5938fd588.jpeg">
Why am I not surprised that this shit’s freely available on GitHub.
well i hope they like ineffable husbands
Let them watch. Bwahahaha
Surprised the UK age verification selfies haven’t been used to extort people yet. It’d be so easy (and is such an obvious reason why the law is bullshit).
SecurAge🛡️
“Log in with Google to verify your age.”
“Sorry, we weren’t able to verify you using your Google Account. Please take a selfie for verification.”
“Now give us £1000, or we’ll send your picture and details of the porn you were trying to access to everyone in your contacts.”
This is what they would see if I was being targeted. <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/0dc91236-2272-4287-88fc-76ebc7b43cef.webp">
These days it’s pretty weak blackmail shit. A little AI doctoring can create the same videos… So even if it’s possible, that doesn’t mean it’s plausible, and nobody cares what you do in your bedroom by yourself.
A friend of mine had this happen to him and he just told them to release it, nothing happened. He was willing to take the embarrassment if it did though is the crucial thing.
<img alt="1000001986" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/99481f6f-4c23-4006-bde8-f3fb1f299e19.jpeg">
“Reaction videos” are already too common.
Is this a new thing? I remember hearing about this like a decade ago