Wanderer@lemm.ee
on 22 Feb 2024 08:48
nextcollapse
If a vote come to ban this in my city I’d go knock on doors and try get as much support for banning them as I can.
DarkenLM@kbin.social
on 22 Feb 2024 10:29
collapse
Sign my petition, damn it!
LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 2024 08:59
nextcollapse
No thanks . Cars are already super noisy . So a glorified quadcopter …
uzay@infosec.pub
on 22 Feb 2024 10:27
nextcollapse
2028 conveniently is just far enough away for us to have forgotten all about those claims by then
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Feb 2024 12:26
nextcollapse
That’s how visionaire-ism works!
TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
on 22 Feb 2024 14:56
collapse
The Elon strategy.
"FSD in two years..."
"Mars landing by 2024..."
JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
on 22 Feb 2024 10:55
nextcollapse
Hydrogen might actually make sense for these, since you need extreme energy density. But I doubt they’ll be very widespread because of airspace restrictions and faa approval. I don’t see how they’d be that much more common than city helicopters are now.
0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 22 Feb 2024 12:52
collapse
Oh the humanity…
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
on 22 Feb 2024 11:26
nextcollapse
rich people with too much money pretending to have a problem to solve. most people arent using the helicopters this use case covers
this is just bored rich people building stuff they think is cool, most of which is a dead end
rem26_art@kbin.social
on 22 Feb 2024 11:47
nextcollapse
and in 2029 TikTok teens are gonna be stealing them with USB drives
Deceptichum@kbin.social
on 22 Feb 2024 12:51
nextcollapse
“We”?
AbidanYre@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 2024 18:48
collapse
Himself, and other CEOs of multinational conglomerates.
eran_morad@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 2024 13:31
nextcollapse
Fuck off.
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com
on 22 Feb 2024 14:37
collapse
Can I just have a government subsidised EV so I can stop polluting pls
threaded - newest
Yeah maybe if the wars in the world subside.
If anything, wars are an amazing source of technological advancement.
This is not to say that I want war, but to acknowledge the fact that it absolutely fuel innovation
Broken window fallacy.
The same funds used to pay for wars and wartime rnd could just be spent directly on rnd.
That is fair, I mainly wanted to counter the claim that wars won’t advance tech
Could be, but usually aren’t.
…they think they’ll be flying them within 4 years despite battery tech being a fair way off? Huh?
Gotta pretend for the shareholders
If a vote come to ban this in my city I’d go knock on doors and try get as much support for banning them as I can.
Sign my petition, damn it!
No thanks . Cars are already super noisy . So a glorified quadcopter …
2028 conveniently is just far enough away for us to have forgotten all about those claims by then
That’s how visionaire-ism works!
The Elon strategy.
"FSD in two years..."
"Mars landing by 2024..."
Hydrogen might actually make sense for these, since you need extreme energy density. But I doubt they’ll be very widespread because of airspace restrictions and faa approval. I don’t see how they’d be that much more common than city helicopters are now.
Oh the humanity…
rich people with too much money pretending to have a problem to solve. most people arent using the helicopters this use case covers
this is just bored rich people building stuff they think is cool, most of which is a dead end
and in 2029 TikTok teens are gonna be stealing them with USB drives
“We”?
Himself, and other CEOs of multinational conglomerates.
Fuck off.
Can I just have a government subsidised EV so I can stop polluting pls