Exemplified by this being a rant in a video with sponsorships tacked on the description and comments. Probably in the video too, but obviously I’m not going to watch it.
There is a video for you to watch and get the context.
TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social
on 24 Jun 09:32
collapse
I’m not clicking on what looks like an AI slop YouTube video just to find out why a guy making a video about AI needed to use AI to make the video. Beyond seeing clippy for nostalgia, seeing that it’s likely a video about MS I care even less.
If you actually thought it was a video of value, you could have written (or just copy/pasta) a description of the video and why it might be of interest.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
on 24 Jun 13:06
collapse
Doubt. If I can type with one hand while chatting with those hot women in my area, this guy can type with nine fingers.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world
on 24 Jun 06:25
nextcollapse
Evolving backwards would be returning to ergonomic UIs with clear HIG being followed, having a scriptable variant for every class of applications, and any piece of software, OS UI included, not acting as an advert. Contrasts and colors and bright pictures are not what I need to see while working. It’s as if your screwdriver was built in the form of an alien fish dildo, and had a chain of ringing bells. Why is this bullshit considered normal and usual with computer interfaces, I dunno.
And a company’s website is its interface to the world, for the user. Not its advert. They’ve already seen the advert or don’t need it if they are on that website! They want to actually use it.
JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
on 24 Jun 11:44
nextcollapse
It’s a reference to “it is evolving, just backwards”
It’s simple - if your product or platform uses dark patterns, I will not use it. I will even use an inferior platform or product in order to be free to choose how I use my software.
I will, if I have no other option. Say, finding a working VPN service in Russia … sucks (mostly banned). I think I’ll end up with a VDS and an https tunnel.
threaded - newest
Clippy didn’t hallucinate. I think Clippy wins
“Looks like you’re writing a letter”
No I’m not, fuck off Clippy.
Turns out we just hadn’t coined the term for computer intelligence being wrong as hallucinating yet.
You know what, I think I remember that. You’re right. My bad
Clippy still wins though because you could have him duck off.
And he had bespoke animations that were kinda charming
and you could change him into something else. links the cat was mine.
I think the cat used to be all over XP.
.
youtu.be/Ifleu0VVAc0
Exemplified by this being a rant in a video with sponsorships tacked on the description and comments. Probably in the video too, but obviously I’m not going to watch it.
“Looks like you’re trying to be productive. Let me correct that for you”
The concept of a desktop assistant has always been there.
And it’s always been trash. That’s how you know it will always be there in the future too.
The word you’re looking for is “devolving”.
the irony is that title was probably AI generated.
He admitted that he had to use AI a little bit after a somewhat broken finger.
What? He kinda broke a finger and then suddenly needed to use AI? His one bad finger prevented him using the other 9? He couldn’t speech-to-text it?
Or did AI break his finger to get him to make the video?!
There is a video for you to watch and get the context.
I’m not clicking on what looks like an AI slop YouTube video just to find out why a guy making a video about AI needed to use AI to make the video. Beyond seeing clippy for nostalgia, seeing that it’s likely a video about MS I care even less.
If you actually thought it was a video of value, you could have written (or just copy/pasta) a description of the video and why it might be of interest.
I’m not your AI assistant.
Doubt. If I can type with one hand while chatting with those hot women in my area, this guy can type with nine fingers.
Evolving backwards would be returning to ergonomic UIs with clear HIG being followed, having a scriptable variant for every class of applications, and any piece of software, OS UI included, not acting as an advert. Contrasts and colors and bright pictures are not what I need to see while working. It’s as if your screwdriver was built in the form of an alien fish dildo, and had a chain of ringing bells. Why is this bullshit considered normal and usual with computer interfaces, I dunno.
And a company’s website is its interface to the world, for the user. Not its advert. They’ve already seen the advert or don’t need it if they are on that website! They want to actually use it.
It’s a reference to “it is evolving, just backwards”
I prefer “enshitification”
It’s simple - if your product or platform uses dark patterns, I will not use it. I will even use an inferior platform or product in order to be free to choose how I use my software.
I will, if I have no other option. Say, finding a working VPN service in Russia … sucks (mostly banned). I think I’ll end up with a VDS and an https tunnel.
Slava Ukraini
No, I can’t rent a Ukrainian VDS, it might even get me to jail.
But in general, I hope your leadership’s assholes fester and they die in horrible pain
That’s too easy.
Agreed
You forgot the second part. And a flashy salute to go with it.