Discord lowers free upload limit to 10MB: “Storage management is expensive” (www.dexerto.com)
from ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 17:46
https://lemmy.world/post/19510903

Discord isn’t exactly known for generous file-sharing limits, still, the messaging app offered a 25MB limit to free users. The company has now updated its support page to reflect the upload limit for free users has been lowered to 10MB.

#technology

threaded - newest

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 17:58 next collapse

It was a matter of time honestly

[deleted] on 07 Sep 18:19 next collapse

.

chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:28 next collapse

I think I found Trump’s Speech Writer’s account.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 18:35 next collapse

If Trump started saying this shit, he would get re elected

But you don't appear to have sufficient understanding of what I said, if you believe somebody like Trump would repeat this in public lol

chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:42 collapse

Oh. no, I’m not saying that this is something that Trump would say, it just has all the cadence of someone with early onset dementia. It is written like how he speaks, thus “Trump’s Speech Writer” and not Trump himself.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:43 collapse

the sly antisemitism was totally on brand for Trump as well.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 18:57 collapse

.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 19:00 collapse

You can fuck right off, too. The evidence is clear as day.

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goyslop

[deleted] on 07 Sep 19:17 collapse

.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 19:22 collapse

.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 19:38 collapse

.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 19:41 collapse

If you can’t explain your points without using antisemitic dogwhistles I don’t know what to tell you, man.

There’s literally tons of ways to describe the same thing without turning to antisemitic dogwhistles.

If you can’t think of them, and need to reach for the word that’s clearly rooted in racism, maybe that says something about you.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 19:53 next collapse

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_narrative_techniques

For when you are ready to learn

[deleted] on 07 Sep 19:58 collapse

.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 20:02 collapse

Said a guy having a melt down over an online comment.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 20:03 collapse

Lmao, got nothing else, huh?

[deleted] on 07 Sep 20:09 collapse

.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 20:16 collapse

You added nothing to the discuss

Hilarious projection and inability to write while claiming others just don’t understand their lofty ideas.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 21:19 collapse

.

KingJalopy@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 18:45 collapse

I dunno, that was at least coherent if not incredibly dumb.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:41 next collapse

goyslop

You gotta be fucking kidding me with this antisemitic shit.

NegativeInf@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:46 next collapse

I’ve never heard this word in my life and I somehow knew it was antisemitic?

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:47 next collapse

The “goy” is the giveaway. I had to google it to be sure, but seriously, what the fuck?

Neon@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:36 collapse

just googled it

it’s apparently a conspiracy that jews feed non-jews (goys) something called goyslop that makes them submissive / slaves

absolutely bonkers

kspatlas@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 17:35 next collapse

I didn’t know that, I assumed it was a corruption of “gay slop”

Neon@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 18:01 collapse

neither did I. That’s why I googled it.

Swampman@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 15:41 collapse

no

slop is just low quality garbage. It’s 4chan complaining that modern media is bad. And to add in a sprinkle of their beloved antisemitism, it’s bad on purpose because it’s intended for goys (non-jews)

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:56 next collapse

I recommend reporting the comment

Definitely not the kind of shit that should be welcome in this community

Also (after looking it up) I’m pretty sure that “goy” is a term used by jewish people to refer to non-jewish people. So in this case I think they’re saying that it is “non-jewish trash” by referring to it as “goyslop”.

I could be wrong though, they’re pretty incoherent and it’s definitely not the kind of comment reply I wanted to see when I woke up from my nap.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:58 collapse

Yeah, already reported it.

And yeah, “goyim” is anyone non-Jewish, so the implication is Jews control the world and they only give out the barest minimum of sustenance to goyim known as “goyslop.”

Like the amount of time and energy people put into these fucking slurs is ridiculous.

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 19:04 collapse

Ah gotcha

On a related tangent, I think my least favorite thing about my instance is that I only see the upvotes for that terrible comment. Which it has entirely too many of.

Honestly the amount of terrible comments and posts like that I see makes me want to switch to an instance with downvotes so that I can see that such shot isn’t popular.

tourist@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:07 collapse

If it brings you any solace, Mr Raised-by-4chan is getting absolutely thundercunted with downvotes.

Haven’t seen that many in a long while.

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 21:37 collapse

Happy to hear it, and also happy to see their comment disappear

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 19:30 next collapse

High schooler Reading comprehension spotted.

Melt down about one term that you didn't like and ignore the message lol

Either way my content speak for itsel, you could first do some basic diligence before spazzing out and trying to imply intent that ain't there.

We really so deserve the government we got with this genius

Rheee

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 19:32 collapse

Sorry bro, you’re the one unironically using antisemitic dogwhistles, as if you can’t get the same point across without them.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 19:40 collapse

That is your opinion and your entitled to express yourself here but learn to read lol

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 19:43 next collapse

Pretty funny from someone who could learn to learn to write better and maybe describe things without needing to lean on antisemitic dogwhitles, but I mean, you obviously think you won this argument, so whatever. I’m sure your arguments about why it’s really important to use the N-word to explain your points have just about as much substance.

MutilationWave@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 19:54 collapse

your

Somebody needs to get up on their high school education and it’s not the person you’re talking to.

lol

pandapoo@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 20:11 next collapse

This is one of those things where the concept is entirely appropriate and accurate, except for that one teeny tiny minor issue…

It’s not the Jews, it’s the WASPs and whatever weird Catholic sect/cult that Justice Barret was raised in…okay, and yes, there’s probably some Jews in the mix as well.

Because those are the main demographic groups of the .01%

So what’s the WASP equivalent for goy? Heathenslop?

Edit: I’m having a hard time imagining left-wing Jews being upset at this observation. I’m guessing at least some of these down votes are done in solidarity for people of Jewish heritage… like myself.

So…thank you and lol.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 20:19 collapse

Nah, they call them “white apps” and so since they are coming from a place of racism against whites, they feel it’s totally appropriate and okay to use a term like goyslop. It’s a shitty word to use and claiming it’s okay because you are actually racist against whites is stupid as fuck. That is still using antisemitic dog whistles. There are other ways to describe the same concept like “fast food slop.”

They think other people can’t read and don’t realize it still makes them a stupid racist.

pandapoo@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 20:40 collapse

But the concept isn’t just about fast food, it’s about the system that produces pink slime based chicken nuggets, and the people who sit up top of that system.

So they’ve correctly identified systemic problems that hurt people, and that those actions are done with intent, either maliciously or with indifference.

They’ve just confused capitalism working as intended, as being a Jewish conspiracy.

Also, “white apps” is just really bad racial propaganda. Whoever coined that term needs some new blood in their marketing team.

Regardless of who coined that phrase, I think you’re confused about WASP’s. It means White Anglo-Saxon Protestant i.e. the largest demographic group within America’s version of old money.

Alk@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 03:12 collapse

It makes me happy that I don’t even know what that means. Well, I didn’t until now.

militaryintelligence@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:18 collapse

Here we see the Common Incel in his natural habitat, trolling for reactions in his perpetually online state of being. Nature.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 20:24 collapse

Proper Nomanclature is "wage slave"

Thank you :)

orl0pl@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 19:47 collapse

You mean auto deleting?

dog_@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:07 next collapse

Well, it is better than 8, but still sad.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:07 next collapse

Discord continues down it’s path to total enshittification, which is exactly what I told everyone would happen when this fucking dogshit app got pushed on me around 2018 or so.

It’s a private company with a profit motive. Fucking shocker that it enshittifies. /s

Fucking dipshit gamers not knowing any better.

I was promoting Matrix/Riot.IM (now Element) and nobody gave a shit because it was too hard to use even though it mostly has the same interface as Discord. (Which, by the way, fuck this interface.)

simple@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 18:12 next collapse

What an overreaction. Also FYI the free file limit was 8MB two years ago before they raised the limit to 25MB, so if anything it’s gotten better.

Starbuncle@lemmy.ca on 07 Sep 20:19 next collapse

I saw this headline and was thinking, “Huh, I thought the limit was 8MB.”

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world on 07 Sep 22:10 collapse

Yeah the file limit on Skype is 300mb and has been for like a decade. Gamers are the dumbest fucking demographic on planet earth.

IntergalacticTurtleFucker@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:33 collapse

calm down man, no need to be so rude :(

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world on 07 Sep 22:43 collapse

You’re upset that I said the f-word @IntergalacticTurtleFucker@lemmy.world

Jk

[deleted] on 07 Sep 22:48 collapse

.

ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 01:41 collapse

Maybe it’s not even about you at all.

Intergalactic turtle, fucker.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 07 Sep 18:22 next collapse

Anything that wants to meaningfully compete with Discord will probably also need to be able to near-seamlessly port over existing Discord servers to the new platform, since it's so established now. Is there a competitor that can do that?

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:28 next collapse

Is there a competitor that can do that?

I say this with all due respect: Who gives a shit? If you were foolish enough to dump your entire community into Discord alone and don’t have an off-ramp, that’s your own fucking problem.

EDIT: Also, Matrix already has a bridge for Discord and has for a while:

matrix.org/ecosystem/bridges/discord/

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 07 Sep 18:32 collapse

Who gives a shit? The people who use it that you apparently want to switch to something else, for one. Shouldn't it be easy to switch, like going from Chrome to Firefox? That's how we get out of Discord hell.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 18:35 collapse

Shouldn’t it be easy to switch, like going from Chrome to Firefox?

Say you have no idea how any of this works without saying you have no idea how any of this works.

That’s how we get out of Discord hell.

Why is it our job to fix the problems of a private, profit-focused company?

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 07 Sep 18:44 collapse

We're not fixing Discord's problems, oh my god. We're trying to get their existing users to go somewhere else even though it's what's familiar and Discord works for them.

Also it's definitely possible to code an import tool that scrapes a given server for info on how to structure things on the new platform, so idk what you think you're gaining by insulting my comparison to an aspect of a service that makes users motivated to switch.

I don't know who shat in your coffee, but get a fucking new cup.

Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 19:12 collapse

Honestly the onboarding for a lot of alternatives to various to popular platforms/apps (Matrix, Mastodon, etc) seems to be the biggest impediment to more adoption of those platforms and apps.

By onboarding here I mean the communities that use those platforms recruiting others to join them and help build communities up.

Like goddamn if that users comment was the first time I’d heard of Matrix it would have turned me away for sure.

Not to mention Mastodon having a reputation that proceeds it.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 07 Sep 19:20 collapse

Yes, exactly! At this point, some of these communities have been on Discord for years and have specialized bots for certain tasks. They don't want to start over, and I don't want them to either - there's tons of real work that these communities have put in. I think that these messaging services that want to make headway in the space Discord occupies need to reduce the friction in switching because a lot of Discord admins do believe that the feature set is better, they just can't easily move over.

This happens to organizations all the time and it's a known issue - Discord communities are no different. I'm hoping something comes along in the next few years if it doesn't already exist in its infancy right now. Even at the user level, I know many people are confused about Matrix. I don't know how exactly to fix these issues, but they need to be priorities.

Tja@programming.dev on 07 Sep 18:30 collapse

I’m completely out of the loop, so I might as well ask you: where is discord so established? Never used it in my life. I used IRC, ICQ and MSN in their time. Now for work Slack, teams and zoom. Signal and Telegram privately. Email for everything.

What am I missing? What does discord provide?

NateSwift@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 18:37 next collapse

Discord is used a lot for gaming groups, modding, software development, and has largely replaced forums for lots of niche communities

zelifcam@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 19:14 collapse

Which is unfortunate. Hiding projects, code and support behind discord is just wrong.

There are Linux and open source communities on discord. I mean, just think about that for a second. These people have chosen to put their stuff on a platform that has refused to acknowledge the existence of their OS / development platform. Every other post on Reddit in the Linux community before I left was about some half assed discord workaround.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 07 Sep 18:40 next collapse

Unfortunately, a lot of fandom communities, video games, and (ugh) hobbyist development projects have Discard servers instead of a forum or similar.

It provides a weird IRC-but-not-really type experience that is similar to MSN in some ways. A lot of younger people flock to it because they find computer stuff difficult and they just want it to work, be easy, and have an app. The UI is trendy even though it's horrible to actually navigate due to all the wasted space and buttons.

I really just think it caught on at the right time, though the video calling is pretty good. What I have a problem with is that you need to join a server to access any information inside of it, so it's not searchable from outside of the Discord ecosystem. For dev projects or large communities, that sucks and makes the internet a worse place.

blackbelt352@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 19:22 next collapse

Personally I originally went to Discord because it was the alternative to skype which was increasingly becoming shittier and shittier when Microsoft bought it.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 07 Sep 19:25 next collapse

Yes, that's how I ended up there too. At the time, Skype sucked and Mumble/Ventrilo/etc. were seen as too old-school for my friends (and a lot of them didn't have PCs, just smartphones). We also tried Google Meet, Zoom, and Facebook Messenger at various points but Discord always seemed like the most reliable.

greenskye@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 04:25 collapse

Discord is great as chat program. It should’ve only ever been used for that. It completely sucks as forum replacement. Discord should’ve had very little value to any decent organization.

vithigar@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 03:37 collapse

I have a hobby development project with a modest community and maintain a Discord server basically because it’s necessary in order to avoid reducing my potential community reach by at least 50%.

I’m active on GitHub and respond to comments and issues there. I maintain an official thread for my project on the official forum for the game it’s related to. I also keep all documentation, downloads, and guides off Discord and on the clearnet. Discord is still easily 80% or more of where people look for information about the project.

rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com on 08 Sep 03:43 collapse

That's great - I am obviously not talking about you in that case. I understand why people want to use it, I just don't think Discord's features are good enough to justify the mass adoption and the walled garden and UI are bad.

vithigar@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 12:54 collapse

Yeah, I’m just sort of also complaining because it feels like I have to use it.

SouthFresh@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 18:51 next collapse

ICQ

You sure about that part? I thought they shut down. I guess they might have some user-based servers?

fuzzy_feeling@programming.dev on 07 Sep 19:00 collapse

if you read the whole sentence it might make more sense…

i used […] in their time.

SouthFresh@lemmy.ml on 07 Sep 20:49 collapse

Whoops, I certainly missed that. Thank you!

YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca on 07 Sep 18:52 next collapse

A really ugly and confusing UI.

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world on 07 Sep 22:11 next collapse

Discord is fashionable. That’s it. The whole app is fantastically impractical if you want to use file or screen sharing. It’s just a bunch of gamers circle-jerking each other, which is a perfect way to keep them from infesting the rest of the internet.

greenskye@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 04:23 collapse

Every single small game I play has effectively the entirety of their support, community and forums run through discord. Instead of easy to search and discover forums, I have to use crappy infinite chat logs. It sucks.

CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:22 next collapse

Ok but why are you so angry about it?

I’ve been using it for years and haven’t had to pay a dime.

How have they harmed you with their free app?

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 20:25 collapse

Because if you didn’t expect this path when you signed up you were naive.

Now everyone complains about it but for people who had already been paying attention: this was par for the course. Of course this was going to be the outcome. Why should I be happy that everyone fell for the promises of a for-profit private company again?

Like why do you think we are on Lemmy for fucks sake? Is it not for the same reasons??

How many times do we have to be fucked by private corporations for people to learn they don’t care about us?

But every time its all “but they have a better feature set so its okay that they might enshittify in the long-run!” Literally same shit is being said about Bluesky over Mastodon right now. Bluesky being a Public Benefit Corporation means about as much as OpenAI being a non-profit.

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 20:31 next collapse

The problem being, there aren’t many alternatives around for discord. And even the ones that exist have issues of their own. Mostly relating to use base and entry barrier, in the case of the open source alternatives.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 20:34 collapse

No, literally the problem is most people would rather give in and use a sleek corporate option every time.

No matter how many times they get fucked by doing that.

It’s a choice to keep getting fucked.

IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 21:33 collapse

Lololol y’all are insane.

I’ve been using discord for free for like 8 years now. But now I can only share 10mb files and I’M FUCKED 🤣

So much entitlement.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 22:09 collapse

.

IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:11 collapse

No one is preventing you from using Skype. You are unhinged over discord 🤣.

Incredibly weird.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 22:14 collapse

.

CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:49 collapse

You didn’t even come close to answering the question. So I’ll ask again.

How were you harmed by Discord?

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 23:41 collapse

That wooshing sound you hear over your head is you willfully missing the point entirely.

Like why do you think we are on Lemmy for fucks sake? Is it not for the same reasons??

*woosh

IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 21:30 next collapse

LITERALLY UNUSABLE 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Discord is fine for 99% of users.

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world on 07 Sep 22:06 next collapse

The people downvoting you are the ones who eat up the enshittificaion. Discord is unusable for anyone who wants file or screen sharing. Skype, by contrast, has screen sharing that’s smoother and higher quality, and a file sharing limit of 300mb, all free for the last decade.

But yeah most users are barely computer literate so Discord keeps humming along.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 23:39 next collapse

Oh, I know. It’s squarely aimed at fucking tools who don’t even own a PC, which is why it has that “mobile first” design ethos even though their mobile apps are absolute trash.

It doesn’t matter how many times this happens, people would rather get fucked by corpos than spend time learning anything.

sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 00:09 collapse

Skype was annoying to use and so is element

ArchRecord@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:22 collapse

Look, I’m as upset as you are about the enshittification of everything, but this is a bit too far.

There was always legitimate issues with Discord’s storage management, and they at least seem to be taking it seriously now.

I’m not a massive fan of Discord, but this is a bit of an overreaction.

FireWire400@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 18:40 next collapse

I guess locking basic features behind a paywall didn’t work for them after all, eh?

recursive_recursion@programming.dev on 07 Sep 19:14 next collapse

Does anyone know of a Discord alternative?

TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 19:26 next collapse

My vote is for Matrix

ZeroTwo@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 19:48 next collapse

I haven’t heard of Matrix but I’ve heard of Revolt.

Matrix any good?

L_Acacia@lemmy.one on 07 Sep 20:44 collapse

Revolt tries to be a discord clone/replacement and suffer from some of the same issues. Matrix happens to have a lot of feature in common, but is focused on privacy and security at its core.

Starbuncle@lemmy.ca on 07 Sep 20:18 collapse

Matrix is a laggy dumpsterfire. Messages take longer to send in Matrix than they do in Lemmy, and Lemmy isn’t even supposed to be a real-time chat app.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 07 Sep 20:31 next collapse

It works tho!

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 07 Sep 20:36 next collapse

Did you blindly sign up for matrix.org?

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 20:45 next collapse

Yeah, pick literally any other instance. I went with Mozilla’s, but there are plenty of alternatives. Or host your own!

Starbuncle@lemmy.ca on 07 Sep 21:20 next collapse

The first time yeah, but I tried it again on another instance and it was better (at least it didn’t fail to load half the time), but still super slow. The 2nd time is what I was talking about.

DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 00:44 collapse

What is the best instance with the largest user base?

Edit: and …yes I did

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 01:04 collapse

I don’t know. Why do you want a large user base?

brbposting@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 04:15 collapse

Guessing at one reason:

It feels good to know that you’re not signing up for someone’s instance that they’re just trying out admining for the first time and maybe if they’re too busy to do the proper updates next weekend they’ll just close shop.

(And by shop I mean fantastic free volunteering effort of course!)

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 08 Sep 04:44 collapse

Matrix.im maybe? I wouldn’t know.

bitwolf@lemmy.one on 08 Sep 01:23 next collapse

Try Element X if you have a mobile. It’s rebuilt on the new sdk and offers a new architecture that has messages come in way faster than on Element (original)

everypizza@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 02:51 next collapse

Homeserver issue most likely.

EngineerGaming@feddit.nl on 08 Sep 05:57 collapse

My homeserver is a one-person Conduit installation, and slowness is not something I have encountered. However, in groupchats that happened to be encrypted there were moments when my messages failed to decrypt for others. That might’ve been due to my own carelessness with the VPS though.

ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net on 07 Sep 19:41 next collapse

Matrix is the closest replacement, and XMPP can replicate some functionality too.

MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Sep 20:01 next collapse

There isn’t a full alternative, but if you just want text chat with some voice chat added on there are options like Matrix.

Telodzrum@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:38 next collapse

Revolt is the only feature-rich swap in option.

[deleted] on 07 Sep 22:01 collapse

.

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 07 Sep 20:28 next collapse

25 MB wasn’t even enough to send a single full res screenshot of my desktop.

Its 2024 and we still lack the basic functionality of file sharing between peers without a corp dictator restricting and snooping.

Not that the functionality does not exist (p2p, literally) but if my grandma cant receive the family pictures its not basic.

EDIT: it is possible i am remembering this from when it was 8MB.

Empty desktop is just a few kb but it was not that hard to open enough stuff to exceed 10MB

Til that i have been sending screenshots of only half my screen for not reason

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 07 Sep 20:35 next collapse

The issue is the absence of being able to port forward in a lot of places. UPNP exists on some networks but it’s usually disabled. But if we want actual peer to peer we’re going to need to implement some way to accept incoming connections EVERYWHERE.

Telodzrum@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 20:37 next collapse

IPv6

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 07 Sep 21:28 collapse

What about it

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 23:06 collapse

it doesn’t need NAT topology, at all. There is literally zero reason to use it. Direct P2P networking is so much easier over ipv6

LodeMike@lemmy.today on 07 Sep 23:56 collapse

Huh. I did not know that.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 01:35 collapse

yeah, under IPv6 based home networking, you just assign a block of addresses to a home, 512 or something, for example, and then you just use a stateful firewall to do the same exact thing that a NAT + a stateful firewall would be doing on a traditional IPv4 network.

Nothing stops you from using a NAT if you felt like you wanted your networking to be more complicated for no reason. But you probably shouldn’t.

There are potential benefits for the anonymization of traffic (though this is probably easy enough to defeat by simply sniffing for all traffic across the IP block) a denial of service wouldn’t be super important anymore, as you could just engage in round robin across the other IPs, unless of course you DOS’d every IP all at once, but that would be super fucking obvious and trivial to deal with. Though it might kill an individual computer in the network due to traffic influx.

You could still engage in DHCP IP handouts, which would actually be beneficial in terms of traffic anonymization in this case. Especially on a high frequency basis. Similar to the effects of NATing on an IPv4 network.

Plus you could still grab a static IP address per device, and then just pass through firewall rules to allow external connections or whatever you please. No forwarding required.

GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca on 07 Sep 21:19 next collapse

Once an end-to-end, encrypted, connection is established between a pair of peers then anything can be sent through it. The establishment proces is generally facilitated by a server of some description so neither peer needs to allow inbound connections. (I’m a long, long way from being an expert on this and happy to be corrected - but this seems like network fundamentals?)

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 23:08 collapse

this is true, but the problem is that it’s really complicated, and not always reliable. Mostly due to NATing within the networks. Firewalls don’t help but you can get around those easily enough.

There’s no guarantee that you’ll get a reliable P2P network connection over a NAT unless one peer isn’t NATed. Which is unlikely.

TL;DR we would probably ddos the internet very quickly if we tried at the scale of something like discord.

AbidanYre@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:38 next collapse

Isn’t that what things like wormhole are made to deal with?

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 08 Sep 11:41 collapse

Firefox: Browser missing required feature. This application needs support for WebSockets, WebRTC, and WebAssembly.

AbidanYre@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 14:25 collapse

Where do you see that? I just sent a file from Firefox on Debian to Vivaldi on Android with it to test.

There’s also just plain wormhole (github.com/magic-wormhole/magic-wormhole) as an application for Windows, Mac, and Linux if that web instance doesn’t work.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 23:05 collapse

IF ONLY WE COULD USE IPV6 WE WOULDNT BE HAVING THIS PROBLEM

YES FUCK YOU TOO COMCAST.

Archer@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 00:13 next collapse

Comcast is one of the biggest IPv6 ISPs though?

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 01:29 collapse

not big enough.

Strykker@programming.dev on 08 Sep 02:30 collapse

Gonna be real here, I’m in tech, there is no fucking way I’m gonna open my PC to the entire fucking internet. Vulnerabilities are everywhere and no code is perfect. Firewalls and nat help stop so many attacks from the start.

Even if ipv6 is common I will assume most implementations will be nat based.

maxwellfire@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 06:07 next collapse

You definitely use a firewall, but there’s no need for NAT in almost all cases with ipv6. But even with a firewall, p2p becomes easier even if you still have to do firewall hole punching

FrederikNJS@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 09:00 next collapse

IPv6 does not require you to open your machine to the Internet, even without making use of a NAT. Sure you get an IP that’s valid on the whole internet, but that doesn’t mean that anyone can send you traffic.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 20:42 collapse

brother, use a firewall. NAT does nothing for this, a single stateful firewall will do more for device security than a NAT existing solely by itself.

A nat doesn’t even do anything other than provide some basic level of device anonymity. If you didn’t have a firewall it would still be accessible, you would just need to either be really good at guessing ports, or sniff for traffic that’s relevant lol.

Strykker@programming.dev on 08 Sep 21:11 collapse

Except the NAT device will stonewall traffic on every port except the ones I open, for my entire network, and then I can just worry about securing the software listening on those few ports, instead of having to worry about the firewalls on every device I own.

Tldr default nat behavior is a state full firewall.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 09 Sep 00:04 collapse

that’s literally what a stateful firewall does.

It only allows corresponding return traffic to outgoing traffic that a device has internally sent outwards.

if you disabled that, it wouldn’t do that. But even a NAT without a stateful firewall might end up doing this depending on how it’s configured and your open ports due to how the forwarding is handled. This is how we get around NATing for P2P traffic, though the trick is to just send two NATed users to the others ip and port at the same time to establish a connection that can “isAlive” from there. If you had no firewall you would only need to know the IP and port to do this.

plus not to mention you can run internal firewalls on each device specifically which would do basically the same thing anyway. But then again i don’t use windows so that’s way easier.

Strykker@programming.dev on 09 Sep 00:18 collapse

Yes, thank you for repeating what I just said, and justifying my desire for a nat. I do infact actually know a few things about computer networks and tcp/ip since I spent 7 years writing software to interface with and monitor them.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 09 Sep 00:28 collapse

the only realistic scenario in which you would use a NAT under IPv6 is if you felt like using IPv4 addresses internally. Outside of that it serves very little purpose.

catloaf@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 21:37 next collapse

That sounds like a you problem, because a PNG screenshot of my full 5120x1440 desktop is about 850 kB.

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 07 Sep 21:55 collapse

Interesting. Mine is 3840x1600 which should be ever so slightly less pixels.

I have noticed the content does matter, is your background native resolution or mostly one color?

catloaf@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 22:58 next collapse

I specifically opened a few apps to break up any large blocks of one color.

barsoap@lemm.ee on 07 Sep 23:06 collapse

3840 * 1600 * 4B / 1024 / 1024 = 23.4375MiB for uncompressed RGBA (four bytes per pixel).

That is, even if that thing was pure random pixels and would have to be stored uncompressed and you’d use a completely useless alpha channel you still don’t hit 25M.

ramble81@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 02:58 next collapse

Guys out here sending BMPs…

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 08 Sep 10:38 collapse

I did some test, i was speaking from memory.

it depends on whats on screen.

Just desktop is 128kb but irl that rarely what i send to people.

Just my game launcher will bump that up to 5MB

But the 100% real experience i have is that is try to show someone a screenshot and i get a message that files are “too powerful” so i have conditioned myself to only show the relevant half of my screen.

So either that 25MB was a lie or i do frequently exceed it?

Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 22:43 next collapse

Da fuck is your resolution?

emax_gomax@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 00:10 next collapse

I kinda wish we could go back to the world of people hosting their own servers and having subsets of their homedirs on ftp urls. Of course none of that is really approachable to a lot of a people :-(.

NaoPb@eviltoast.org on 08 Sep 01:01 collapse

I am considering this. I am just looking into what uses the least power.

darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl on 09 Sep 00:35 collapse

You can easily use something like a raspberry pi (or something else ARM-based like Friendlyelec CM3588) and attach some storage to it. It’s really not difficult to setup a web server to share a directory.

NaoPb@eviltoast.org on 09 Sep 00:39 collapse

Thanks, I will be looking into these.

stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 02:27 next collapse

That makes no sense. The 24MP RAW files from my camera at 25MB, no way a PNG or JPEG of a 4K (8MP) monitor are anywhere close to that big.

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 08 Sep 10:37 collapse

I did some test, i was speaking from memory so not very accurate.

it depends on whats on screen.

Just desktop is 128kb but irl that rarely what i send to people.

Just my game launcher will bump that up to 5MB

But the 100% real experience i have is that is try to show someone a screenshot and i get a message that file size is to big so i have conditioned myself to only show the relevant half of my screen.

dezmd@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 03:26 next collapse

Reimplement the old WASTE client from the Nullsoft dude, this time with proper encryption and security and let’s call it a day.

dan@upvote.au on 08 Sep 04:48 next collapse

Not that the functionality does not exist (p2p, literally) but if my grandma cant receive the family pictures its not basic.

What about encrypted messaging apps? Maybe your grandma can’t figure out Signal, but she could probably work out how to use WhatsApp (which uses the same encryption protocol) given how popular it is in some countries.

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 08 Sep 10:27 collapse

Whatsapp is a product of Meta and files would still pass their proprietary servers. Let alone the metadata they collect. I refuse to use Facebook related products on principle. (Mostly stopped using google and microsoft products also)

Singal can do actual p2p userdevice to userdevice. Only if thats not possible it will use temporary servers for storage. But i am actually against that, id prefer if the file would not send until a p2p connection is established.

On paper the encryption of whatsapp is about as secure as Signal but can we trust Facebook to not implement a backdoor?. There open source llm-ai (llama) is by far the most intelligent model for its size. I plore people to ask what data Meta used to archive that result.

randombullet@programming.dev on 08 Sep 13:06 collapse

No way 3,840 × 2,160x2=16,588,800 pixels 16,588,800 x 10 bits = 165,888,000 bits

165,888,000 bits / 8 bits/byte = 20,736,000 bytes

webghost0101@sopuli.xyz on 08 Sep 14:29 collapse

See my edit.

I am probably remembering this from when the limit was 8MB, which cant be that long ago i only own this monitor for a year.

peopleproblems@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 21:56 next collapse

It… Is?

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:01 next collapse

“Storage management is expensive”

It’s really not, though.

//////

ETA: I stick by my premise and my conclusion (storage management isn’t expensive, and it’s probably a Nitro thing), but my math may be wrong and my usage is apparently not normative. The costs are probably not so negligible, but I would still assume they aren’t as low as they want us to think.

/////

Discord has 200,000,000 MAU. If every single one of them uploaded a file every month (of pretty much any size) and Discord tossed it into an AWS S3 IA bucket, it would cost them $500 to store that data. Their total S3 bill for storage would be five hundred US dollars. Storage is dirt cheap. AWS doesn’t even charge per gigabyte on that storage type, it’s so cheap; they charge for downloads.

So, ok. Let’s talk downloads. If each of those files were 25GB and downloaded twice (probably an underestimate, but not everyone is uploading files, so I’m going to make the completely unfounded assumption that it’ll all shake out), it would cost them a couple hundred thousand dollars. Which, ok, that’s much more significant than $500. But Discord made $575 million last year—so the S3 download costs would be 0.03% of their total revenue. They probably spend 2-3 times more on coffee.

Storage management is emphatically not expensive.

My guess? They just saw that the higher upload limit was eating into their Nitro subscriptions.

Frozengyro@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:12 next collapse

You think they spend 400000 on coffee? You lost me there.

After looking at their number of employees and some math, I could actually see that as plausible.

brbposting@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 04:43 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/44e803d5-b2cb-4003-947c-7f2411cb304e.jpeg">

  • Discord has ~1,000 employees… let’s say 0% remote (heh, is it 100% or what?)
  • Avg of ~65% of employees (650 employees) drink coffee
  • Average of 3 cups of coffee per day per employee
  • 260 work days per year

Cups per year:

  • 650 employees x 3 cups per day x 260 work days = 507,000 cups per year

  • For medium-sized office of 100 employees, cost of a turnkey delivery service is $15,000/yr ($0.68/cup)

So for Discord:

$0.68 per cup x 507,000 cups per year = $344,760 per year

LostXOR@fedia.io on 07 Sep 22:15 collapse

If every one of those users uploads one 10MB file, that would be two petabytes of data. At S3's IA prices that's $25k/month. And people are uploading far, far more data than that.

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 23:09 collapse

I’ll have to check my math again. But are people uploading more than that? On my friend server, with 50 people, we’ve had about a dozen uploads all year, and they’re all pretty small PDFs and images. Everything else is rich links.

ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 01:46 next collapse

It’s heavily used at many universities. Think notes, images of whiteboards, full textbooks, pictures of tests, shared multiples times daily by tens of thousands of people. It adds up very fast.

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 15:01 collapse

Ahh, right. I’ve made the classic mistake of thinking my usage was normative.

conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 10:30 collapse

Pictures.

Which are automatically downloaded by every active user of the chat on every individual client, and many people do at least tens per day.

ilinamorato@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 15:01 collapse

Interesting. We don’t upload many pictures, either; though admittedly I hadn’t thought about it, and that probably doubles my total.

IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world on 07 Sep 22:19 next collapse

I’m sure there are dozens of you caring about screen share!

Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works on 07 Sep 22:58 next collapse

Huh, I wonder how enshitified it has to get before I stop seeing discord on FOSS projects.

It begins lol.

dan@upvote.au on 08 Sep 04:47 next collapse

discord on FOSS projects

I don’t understand why this was even a thing to begin with. FOSS projects using non-FOSS platforms is kinda weird, especially platforms with unclear financial situations like Discord.

Kayana@ttrpg.network on 08 Sep 05:30 next collapse

Because you don’t need to have significant experience or rent a VPS in order to do that, and I can respect that. We don’t need to force FOSS developers to become proficient in everything.

What needs to happen is some kind of tool (ideally FOSS) that lets you spin up an actual forum with the same difficulty to set it up as Discord.

dan@upvote.au on 08 Sep 17:25 collapse

Because you don’t need to have significant experience or rent a VPS in order to do that, and I can respect that

I’m not saying you have to self-host… You could still use something that’s open-source and remotely hosted.

Sentry (error logging and bug reporting system) is like this for example. They have a hosted plan, including a generous free plan for open-source projects, but Sentry itself is open-source.

namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev on 08 Sep 22:09 collapse

That looks like a really nice policy. But my question then becomes, what happens if the company sells out someday? What if they get bought out by a larger company, or a private equity firm? Did they take funding, and if so, how much leverage do the funders have to influence them to make money and cut out programs like this?

It’s great to see companies trying to break that trend and I highly commend them for it! But we have already seen this pattern a million times before and it always ends due to something similar to this.

narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 07:18 collapse

It is, but then again many (most) are hosted on GitHub.

KeenFlame@feddit.nu on 11 Sep 18:08 collapse

That they don’t collect as much user data is not enshittification. That is when greed kills it. They have been greedy a long time but not being able to hoard as much free user data is a good thing

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Sep 23:04 next collapse

yknow, i would like to see reported figures as to why discord isn’t actually able to host file sizes over a certain size…

axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 08 Sep 01:01 collapse

The problem is discord never deletes files, no matter how old they are. So they have a perpetually growing storage need

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 01:28 collapse

seems like a skill issue to me. Surely they would delete them on the banishment of a server, old servers die pretty frequently. Channels are deleted. Etc.

GreatDong3000@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 05:38 collapse

These companies hoard data they might have an use for but not even know how yet. Training AI and shit. Deleting stuff ain’t in their dictionary.

ArchRecord@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:18 next collapse

For real.

I emailed them once asking about how they were complying with GDPR regulations if they didn’t allow users a way to delete all their message details, and didn’t even have a procedure for GDPR requests, only their standard, much worse privacy-wise account deletion process. They claimed it was because they had a legitimate interest to keep any messages not individually deleted, so the chats would still look coherent after an account was deleted.

They only delete your message if you delete it individually, so naturally, I was concerned, since you can’t delete messages in a server you were banned from, or left, and Discord provides no way for you to identify old messages in servers you’re not currently in.

They eventually, supposedly, sent my concerns to their data privacy team.

They were then sued for 800,000 euros about a month or two later.

They still don’t allow you to mass delete your message data. They really want to hold onto it for as long as they can.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 20:39 collapse

we really do live in a dystopia don’t we.

Anyway this seems like a great excuse to not limit the file uploads, and just pay for more storage considering you could like, sell it, but what do i know.

GreatDong3000@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 22:41 collapse

It is more like the data could make money in the future but is not making money right now so they don’t have infinite money for storage. If they had I am sure they would be happy to increase free storage limits.

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 23:59 collapse

i guess we should ask google how they’re doing with the 15gb of free storage thing.

GreatDong3000@lemm.ee on 09 Sep 01:43 collapse

Google has a lot more money

KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 09 Sep 02:20 collapse

this is also true, but they do have a very successful platform, even though their two primary ventures youtube, and google, don’t seem to be immediately productive, though i guess google drive storage is probably a different cost to a platform like discord since it’s something people use every day.

praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 01:01 next collapse

Beware: old files sonner or later being removed is next. People use Discord like CDN(there are even bunch of clients for that usage) and that is never going to work indefinitely. Honestly, it’s very impressive that deletion wasn’t their first choice.

ArchRecord@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:10 collapse

Same here, honestly. I would have thought they’d say something like “hey, we’re going to delete anything 1 year or older starting next month, and reduce that amount slowly down to 6 months with time” just to give people a general warning in case there was anything they were storing through Discord that they wanted to keep.

There’s also just a ton of optimizations they could have done. Are people repeatedly uploading the same file, with the same name and contents? merge them into one CDN link. They’d probably save hundreds of terabytes of data just from reposted memes alone through a hash matching algorithm.

independantiste@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 07:03 collapse

I mean… couldn’t they just move the old files from the hot CDN to cold storage? I bet the few people that go check at old messages care that much about the loading speed of a screenshot. And honestly I think PR wise deleting memories from people makes for worse article titles than smaller files

ArchRecord@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 20:25 collapse

I suppose they could, but even cold storage has a cost, and with the scale Discord’s operating at, they definitely have many terabytes of data that comes into the CDN every day, and that cost adds up if you’re storing it permanently.

I also think the vast majority of users would prefer being able to upload much higher resolution images and videos, to being able to see the image they sent with their messages a year ago. I don’t often go back through my messages, but I often find myself compressing or lowering the quality of the things I’m uploading on a regular basis.

They could also do the other common sense thing, which is to, on the client side of things, compress images and videos before sending them.

tron@midwest.social on 08 Sep 02:19 next collapse

I moved a big group off Discord last year to Matrix chat (Element). It’s been largely pretty alright. 100mb upload limit, we have a bot that downloads tiktoks/Instagram/reddit videos and uploads them to the channel so you never have to visit the sites. Pretty nice! Open source and federated, you guys should give it a try!

brbposting@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 04:20 next collapse

we have a bot that downloads tiktoks/Instagram/reddit videos and uploads them to the channel

Would love to see the implementation!

I like bringing stuff to the fediverse by way of cobalt.tools -> catbox.moe (shoutout Catbox for so much 100% free hotlink bandwidth) (also the owner’s trying to find a CSAM content ID solution that’s not super expensive FYI y’all)

tron@midwest.social on 08 Sep 13:37 collapse

Would love to see the implementation!

<img alt="" src="https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/661a23b8-2565-4a83-918e-8339e1b9b5c6.jpeg">

I’m using Maubot in a docker container with the Social Media Download Plugin. Here is a list of all the plugins: plugins.mau.bot

ArchRecord@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 06:13 collapse

Matrix is nice, but it’s still very bad UX wise.

I’ve used it on and off for years now, and about 2-4 times a month it loses my chat view encryption keys, and loses me my entire chat history. It also regularly has sync issues between devices signed into the same account, and is relatively slow sometimes to send messages.

Of course, that’s just my anecdotal experience, but I’ve tried many messaging platforms over the years, and while Matrix (and multiple of its clients, primarily Element) is the most feature-complete compared to Discord, it’s nowhere near properly usable long-term for a mass-market audience.

Flipper@feddit.org on 08 Sep 06:40 next collapse

I don’t know how you loose your keys all the time. But in that case you really should use a key backup.

Lightsong@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 23:30 collapse

Lose*

tron@midwest.social on 08 Sep 13:56 collapse

I agree, the security key thing is a bit of an issue. However this might a bit of a user error as well. The thing to understand is that Encryption keys are not stored on Matrix.org. If they were, then Matrix.org (or whatever homeserver you’re using) would be able to decrypt everything you can decrypt, thus making Matrix pretty useless. The solution is that keys are only stored locally on your devices. Keys are shared to other devices using the Verification process and Emoji matching thing. The problem is most users just go “Whatever!” And ignore the verification process and then have a bad experience because they don’t have Encryption keys.

ArchRecord@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 20:12 collapse

The thing is, I did have encryption keys set up. The problem was that Element would repeatedly forget the very encryption keys passed by the other user, and would then have to request the keys again. Any historical message history would be permanently encrypted forever, and wouldn’t decrypt with the new view key.

After this happened about 4 times, I stopped using it, because it was impossible to maintain conversations for longer than 1-2 weeks before they’d inevitably be lost, and I’d then have to spend about an hour waiting for Element to receive the new encryption keys from the people I was contacting, even when they were already actively online.

I have no clue what was causing it, but it happened on multiple accounts, on multiple devices, all the time, and there was no conceivable fix. I’m not sure if this is fixed now, but I haven’t had a good reason to go back, especially with other encrypted messaging options out there.

SomeGuy69@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 02:45 next collapse

It’s a big lie. Why not offer the option to delete automatically after 24h if 15mb extra is so much storage?

Or is it about bandwidth? Why no automatic compression on desktop? Oh wait, that feature existed in the past was scrapped. They think you’re fools.

cmrn@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 03:42 next collapse

Mine changed back to 8MB from 25MB a few weeks ago and it really does cut the amount of stuff you can send without having to run them through compression or just host externally.

rolling_resistance@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 04:24 next collapse

I’d be down if Discord offered optional/default compression for images/videos. Yeah maybe my photos are 10 MB each, but with a slight quality loss they can get under 1 MB. Telegram does it well.

the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 12:32 collapse

Discord offers automatic compression for images uploaded from mobile, but not from desktop IIRC. It’s weird.

kuneho@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 04:31 next collapse

on mobile it’s just a huge pile of stinky shit anyway

Persen@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 15:42 collapse

*everywhere

Just use signal or any e2e instant messanger instead of it.

endofline@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 07:43 next collapse

Removed by author

endofline@lemmy.ca on 08 Sep 13:00 next collapse

That’s shitty times thar you have to use tools for pirating like torrent, Usenet to share big files . For smaller ones even email providers have bigger limits at least 15 megabytes

Alpha71@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 13:03 next collapse

Could anyone explain the attraction of discord? To me it’s UX is atrocious.

Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 13:09 next collapse

It’s the place where things like game communities use primarily for instant chat.

GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 13:54 next collapse

Discord got big in online gaming because they offered a VOIP and text chat browser cliemt. Just copy or type the short link and you’re in in a minute. They also did free hosting which was huge.

Compared to Teamspeak or Ventrilo, literally just eliminating the steps of downloading a client, installing it, and typing in an IP address caused them to explode overnight. Also you could “host” without changing router settings (most kids/students have to ask their parents or jump through hoops for this).

Technically there was stuff like Skype but that never had the convenient team speak style chat rooms to drop in and out of freely.

Within months of suddenly getting popular, discord had a huge userbase that everybody was using already, and that momentum got us to the point where in some aspects its even replacing the role of wiki’s and forums even though its terrible at it.

pop@lemmy.ml on 08 Sep 15:46 collapse

Also I remember while teamspeak was paid, discord was free.

Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com on 09 Sep 00:39 collapse

Eh. There were free licenses. As long as you could show you weren’t using it commercially.

BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 13:59 next collapse

I don’t get it either. They aggressively try to sell nitro, they have ads embedded in their ui. I have no idea why people don’t hate it.

thermal_shock@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 14:40 collapse

they didn’t 5 years ago. enshittification at its finest.

ayyy@sh.itjust.works on 08 Sep 16:33 next collapse

There’s no open source equivalent that does seamless audio and video streaming on every platform.

icedterminal@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 17:13 collapse

There is one actually.

github.com/revoltchat

It’s obviously a WIP. A discord clone essentially

EpicGamer@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 19:08 collapse

Last time I checked you can’t even share your screen

Fades@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 19:21 collapse

dealbreaker

addie@feddit.uk on 08 Sep 16:41 next collapse

We’ve found it to be the “least bad option” for DnD. Have a Discord window open for everyone to video chat in, have a browser window open with Owlbear Rodeo or Foundry / Forge for your tokens and character sheets, all works smoothly enough. The text chat is sufficient for sending the DM a private message; for group chat to share art of the things you’ve just run into or organise the next session.

Completely agree that for anything “less transient”, then the UX is beyond awful and trying to find anything historical is a massive PITA.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 20:24 collapse

Google Whiteboard could have been better. Hell, I can think of a dozen apps in the Google graveyard that could have been better.

But Discord still exists and they don’t, so…

superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Sep 20:03 next collapse

Its really convenient if you’ve got a group of friends spread out across the country for gaming. The voice channels allow people to jump in and out at will. No calling each other. That and bots are really eady to build for it. Sure its all unencrypted but im not putting anything of real value into it.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 20:22 collapse

The NSA agent assigned to monitor me has a character on my Foundry instance.

Kanda@reddthat.com on 08 Sep 20:04 next collapse

My dumbass friends who work in tech thought IRC was too much of a hassle. So we ended up on dickschord

ZiemekZ@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 22:14 collapse

You know that IRC has waaaaay less features, right?

Kanda@reddthat.com on 09 Sep 04:34 collapse

Yeah but we’ve only used text for years now, so go doodle your features

Swampman@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 15:36 collapse

Back in 2016 I managed to get all of my gaming friends on discord simply by saying “It’s like Skype but it doesn’t suck”

We simply needed something that worked and let us do voip calls without having to jump through the hoops of setting up ventrilo, mumble or teamspeak. Skype was so aggressively bad that any alternative was like finding a waterpark in the middle of the desert.

Fades@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 19:21 next collapse

are you fucking kidding me?? TEN MB IN 20 FUCKING 24.

Discord is such fuckin TRASH

anneiam@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 19:43 next collapse

Being part of multiple servers becomes such a painful experience with that interface…even with the “folders” and the search palette.

njordomir@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 02:46 collapse

I was a member of a number of groups in a larger gaming community most of which migrated from Reddit/Mumble to Discord. It destroyed the quality and accessibility of written content and lore and I wish it had never happened. Then again, we can’t go back to reddit at this point either.

Guess I’ll be posting my screenshots in 640x480 from now on!

Xylight@lemdro.id on 08 Sep 19:40 next collapse

A feature that’s be nice is giving you a higher upload limit if you make your upload temporary.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 20:21 collapse

Or let you host from your own machine, rather than paying Discord for the privilege of using their wildly overpriced services.

immutable@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 20:40 next collapse

Hosting the image on discords CDN allows you not to give out your IP address to any person that comes across the link, prevents you from getting hammered with download requests if your upload becomes popular, and allows your content to be accessed when your own machine goes to sleep or has any kind of networking interruption.

Before discord people used to self host teamspeak or some other software. One of the big things you don’t have to think about is the person you just made a joke about or beat in an online game trying to DDOS your machine, because they don’t know where you are.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 08 Sep 20:52 collapse

Hosting the image on discords CDN allows you not to give out your IP address to any person that comes across the link

You don’t need the whole image, just the route to your machine to retrieve the data. Glorified Bit.ly.

One of the big things you don’t have to think about is the person you just made a joke about or beat in an online game trying to DDOS your machine

Definitely a perk of a bulk centralized system. But the pricing model is still messed up. If Teamspeak sold you gems to buy widgets to mask your IP, I still wouldn’t pay for the service.

DacoTaco@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 07:54 collapse

I hate discord a lot, but this feature kinda destroys the reason discord exists. We used to have irc which is direct communication and needs both systems to be online ( yes, bouncers exist, but they arent perfect ). We moved away from irc so systems didnt need to be online and it was all in the cloud. Direct communication/file sharing from pc would kinda revert all that lol

( lets gooooo, bring irc back :p )

p8v8x716ln@endlesstalk.org on 08 Sep 20:24 next collapse

Good, fuck gen z kiddos

Brutticus@lemm.ee on 08 Sep 22:33 next collapse

I primarily use Discord as a one stop shop to play and run dnd campaigns. I first hopped on it around 2017, and its was way better than any other group chat app. Around the pandemic all my groups started playing on it and it became relatively seamless. I joined exactly one streamers discord but that is totally it. In general I wouldn’t expect it to be a good archive, or forum, nor do I expect it to be secure. I use armchord on PC. I started using it before it was enshittified. For what it does, it does it pretty well.

For the record, I have used matrix and Signal. I think both have the issue that a critical mass of my friends don’t use them. I liked Signal a lot when it had SMS support. I used it as a my primary SMS app, and some of my friends had signal as well, so that was cool. now its more like a specialized messenger app, and I fucking hate having yet another one of those on my phone. Matrix encryption keys are giant stumbling blocks to my friends who do give a fuck. I play ttrpgs with some people who could not give a fuck. I would have to set up the server, set up the account, and then I would have have to do the encryption key for them. And like people say, Matrix logs you out every little while. You can turn notifications off and totally forget about it. For my non techy friends, this is literally a bridge too far.

I literally have two friends who think Matrix is cool. No one else even has an account, much less a server. And the support to meet people who have this app is very limited. Cool, but I think it will always be a niche.

essteeyou@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 00:28 collapse

It took me a lot of convincing to get my friends on Signal instead of WhatsApp. I believe WhatsApp was talking about adding advertising or charging money, and I used that to get people to switch.

This reminds me of the argument I see from Linux users that Linux is just as easy to set up as Windows. I think it doesn’t occur to people making that argument that most people never even set up Windows. It’s just on their computer when they get it.

The setup needs to be fast and easy for people to consider it. Nobody will spend even 5 minutes figuring something out these days.

Edit to add that a bunch of younger people have never had a computer or laptop. They do their computer stuff on a phone or possibly a tablet and they definitely never did anything technical like reinstall the OS.

njordomir@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 02:39 collapse

How do you understand this without falling into the defeatist mindset that the sheeple deserve to be imprisoned in the state of enshitification that their ignorance, laziness, and unwillingness to learn has helped build? Put down your iPhone, or go check into your local FEMA camp. I hate to be negative like this, but people really seem to be willing to give up everything for convenience and bling.

essteeyou@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 03:16 collapse

esstee

People can choose what to spend their time doing. Some of us choose to be able to install operating systems, other choose to become master gardeners. Who’s to say which one is right or wrong? The gardeners probably don’t have any issues using WhatsApp, even if there is advertising in it, because it solves the problem they have. Then they go back to the thing they’re experts at instead, saying things like “why can’t these tech sheeple grow a radish? send them all to jail.”

joel_feila@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 16:06 collapse

You dont have to be an expert, i barely know anything about the kinux cli but i still use linux daily

essteeyou@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 16:32 collapse

Most people have never installed an operating system, and I’ve never seen a laptop running Linux for sale at Best Buy or wherever, so there’s a huge barrier for entry for the average person.

I’m sure most people would be fine with Linux day to day if it was set up for them, but they’re not going to download an ISO, boot from it, and install an OS if they don’t have to.

These same people, to stick with my example, might grow delicious tomatoes, better than those you buy at the supermarket. Can anyone grow some tomatoes? Pretty much. Does anyone really have to? No.

recapitated@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 01:06 next collapse

Matrix works pretty good.

bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 02:29 next collapse

Yeahh no shit! Been using it for a short while now, glad Im able to find a couple groups to chat with, such an underrated service/protocol or whatever. I hope it and element keep getting better maybe I can get more friends to use it! Been tryna ditch Instagram cus half for the reason I use it nowadays is simply to keep in touch with friends and family as I don’t use any other messaging service ATM.

PMmeYourPenis@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 16:54 collapse

Is there a Matrix for dummies guide? It seems difficult to get started with, finding the right client etc.

recapitated@lemmy.world on 10 Sep 04:13 next collapse

It’s kinda like lemmy here, but a little more pain because not only do you have to pick your provider, but you also need to be very mindful of how your key pair is managed. Like… don’t just uninstall a client without going through the effort of trusting and verifying a new one first, or you may lose the ability to decrypt a lot of history and also break trust with relationships you have.

Security first is a major concern in the system, so it doesn’t leave a lot to the imagination unfortunately.

That said, once you convince yourself to set it up, and convince anyone else to do the same, it works pretty nicely. It’s like an inner venn diagram of discord, telegram and IRC.

recapitated@lemmy.world on 10 Sep 04:15 collapse

I also haven’t used it in a few years. Chat systems in general don’t cooperate with the way my brain works.

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 02:21 next collapse

the enshitification will go faster now i bet

KeenFlame@feddit.nu on 10 Sep 06:57 collapse

They want your data, everything you upload to discord belongs to that corporation. Corporations do not have souls

Smokeless7048@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 04:58 next collapse

Unlike other platforms, we store your files for as long as you need them, so it is crucial that we manage our storage sustainably

I mean, its great that they offer that, but all my files dont need to be permemnant. I would love the ability to review and delete old files

GaMEChld@lemmy.world on 09 Sep 16:27 collapse

Yeah, makes no sense that they store some pdf I was dragging over to someone one time. Super inefficient. They should allocate an amount of storage per user that then rolls and deletes the oldest files when the cap gets exceeded to make room for the new files.

KeenFlame@feddit.nu on 10 Sep 06:56 collapse

It’s probably because it’s their property now and personal data is precious

GaMEChld@lemmy.world on 12 Sep 01:32 collapse

Maybe, but then they’d want more data, not complaining about needing to limit it. Or maybe it’s just because they want lots of small files like text, and not waste it on inefficient sound and video files.

KeenFlame@feddit.nu on 12 Sep 10:21 collapse

They want more data and literally can’t store it efficiently enough. You can read their eula and see, they instantly own anything you upload and you no longer have rights to it, which is absolutely bonkers and pretty dubious in many countries if this is even legal. We found out when they overviewed the security of our studio and we use other communication software now because of it. They could literally argue that they own the assets to the games we make if we send concepts to each other.

GaMEChld@lemmy.world on 13 Sep 23:13 collapse

Hmm, I wonder if they would get in trouble if someone uploaded child porn to their servers.

KeenFlame@feddit.nu on 10 Sep 06:55 next collapse

No it’s not

Next issue

KeenFlame@feddit.nu on 10 Sep 18:13 collapse

Nice! They get less free identity data an own less copyright