Honeybees are not the bee population that needs to be saved.
AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
on 05 Mar 15:14
nextcollapse
And the honeybee populations least in need of saving are the big commercial operations this tech seems targeted toward. (These operations typically park their hives in random rural locations between jobs, where their bees raid and outcompete local pollinators and carry diseases from region to region.)
And more specifically, it’s pollinators in general that need help, honeybees excluded.
OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
on 05 Mar 16:44
nextcollapse
Any tech to save pollinators and especially honey bees is a major major global win. The honey market has been long since adultered with mass amounts of fake products. Bee colonies are declining at unprecedented rates. Pollinators as a whole are a mere fraction of what they used to be. Look at the science. It’s atrocious.
We can help on a very small scale by planting a variety of native plants and not using pesticide or herbicide. I don’t know much about the risks of fertilizer on a small scale, but it’s generally not needed for native plants anyways.
I know many local bee keepers and it’s depressing as hell when the colonies collapse for no real reason. They steadily have been in decline for years cutting in half then half again. Bouncing back is rare. It’s very stressful and turbulent.
bee populations are declining rapidly due to habitat loss, pesticides, parasites, and climate change.
Not sure why habitat loss is listed since honeybees are invasive in the U.S. We should be focusing harder on saving native pollinators.
pranjalmalewar@lemmy.world
on 06 Mar 13:03
collapse
Your point about honeybees being invasive in the U.S. is important. Habitat loss affects all pollinators, including native species that play a crucial role in local ecosystems. While honeybees are often highlighted, it’s essential to protect and restore habitats for native pollinators too. Supporting diverse pollinator populations ensures the health and resilience of our environment.
threaded - newest
Honeybees are not the bee population that needs to be saved.
And the honeybee populations least in need of saving are the big commercial operations this tech seems targeted toward. (These operations typically park their hives in random rural locations between jobs, where their bees raid and outcompete local pollinators and carry diseases from region to region.)
And more specifically, it’s pollinators in general that need help, honeybees excluded.
Any tech to save pollinators and especially honey bees is a major major global win. The honey market has been long since adultered with mass amounts of fake products. Bee colonies are declining at unprecedented rates. Pollinators as a whole are a mere fraction of what they used to be. Look at the science. It’s atrocious.
We can help on a very small scale by planting a variety of native plants and not using pesticide or herbicide. I don’t know much about the risks of fertilizer on a small scale, but it’s generally not needed for native plants anyways.
I know many local bee keepers and it’s depressing as hell when the colonies collapse for no real reason. They steadily have been in decline for years cutting in half then half again. Bouncing back is rare. It’s very stressful and turbulent.
Another thing that would have potential to help bees would be combating light pollution.
Not sure why habitat loss is listed since honeybees are invasive in the U.S. We should be focusing harder on saving native pollinators.
Your point about honeybees being invasive in the U.S. is important. Habitat loss affects all pollinators, including native species that play a crucial role in local ecosystems. While honeybees are often highlighted, it’s essential to protect and restore habitats for native pollinators too. Supporting diverse pollinator populations ensures the health and resilience of our environment.