OpenAI abandons plan to become a for-profit company (www.theverge.com)
from cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 06 May 00:20
https://lemmy.world/post/29192938

#technology

threaded - newest

toastmeister@lemmy.ca on 06 May 01:29 next collapse

Great news.

psmgx@lemmy.world on 06 May 02:44 next collapse

“we can make enough money without it”

captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org on 06 May 02:47 next collapse

“Previously, investors in OpenAI’s commercial entity were capped at making 100 times their money before the rest of its profits flowed back to the nonprofit.

With the new PBC subsidiary, OpenAI spokesperson Steve Sharpe tells me that investors and employees will own regular stock with no cap on how much it can appreciate. “

They got exactly what they want anyway. This is no victory.

NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world on 06 May 02:58 next collapse

This doesn’t make sense to me. The ultimate value of shares is in the dividends they represent, no? If there are no dividends ever, what are they sharing in? Is it just a postponement until future dividends? A share in control of activities?

I get that there’ll be speculation that will keep values increasing, and selling can net a profit, but what does the last share-holder get?

kautau@lemmy.world on 06 May 03:29 next collapse

what does the last shareholder get?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

Once the bubble pops they’ll rugpull the same way they do crypto. Either that or it will grow so large that they convince someone to aquire them wholesale

monogram@feddit.nl on 06 May 06:04 collapse

This is just every economic endeavour in existence nowadays, the issue with cryptocurrency is that it contains no guard rails (+ environmental issues)

Unless you work for a corporation, ask your employer what their exit strategy is.

MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip on 06 May 06:02 collapse

Technology and intellectual property, including patents. These are only put up for sale if the company is liquidated or declared bankrupt.

dzso@lemmy.world on 06 May 10:39 collapse

This doesn’t sound like a nonprofit.

Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org on 06 May 04:45 next collapse

investors in OpenAI’s commercial entity were capped at making 100 times their money

They should never be allowed to call this a “non-profit” (and probably even get tax exemptions?)

What a dirty lie in the first place!

A_norny_mousse@feddit.org on 06 May 07:18 collapse

Oh, thanks for pointing that out… my head was just going “Fuck Sam Altman … Fuck Sam Altman … Fuck Sam Altman … Fuck Sam Altman … Fuck Sam Altman …” —

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world on 06 May 08:55 next collapse

So they’re slowly admitting genAI is unprofitable…

doodledup@lemmy.world on 06 May 11:19 collapse

Their current structure is still profit-oriented. You should read the article maybe.

Loduz_247@lemmy.world on 06 May 16:57 collapse

The structure of OpenAI is quite strange and curious.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/bfc3cd86-d6f1-4cb6-9573-9b088f1cd098.png">

BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works on 06 May 10:45 collapse

They asked chatGPT for a business plan and it gave them hallucinations and half a business plan for a non-profit coalmining organization.