Apple refused to pay bounty to Kaspersky for uncovering vulnerability in 'Operation Triangulation' - 9to5Mac (9to5mac.com)
from AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 02:41
https://programming.dev/post/15312005

#technology

threaded - newest

cbarrick@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 03:29 next collapse

Apple Security Bounty awards may not be paid to you if you are in any U.S. embargoed countries or on the U.S. Treasury Department’s list of Specially Designated Nationals, the U.S. Department of Commerce Denied Person’s List or Entity List, or any other restricted party lists.

Kaspersky can whine all they want. Russia is embargoed. They’re not getting their money.

Kaspersky is a good company doing good work in the cyber security space. Unfortunately, because of the embargo, they may have to turn to the black market to sell future exploits. Or maybe not; I’m not totally sure what kind of ethical standards they have.

Bell@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 03:39 next collapse

Yeah sorry guys, did you forget you work for an asshole?

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 10 Jun 04:55 collapse

Apple could have tried to work with them and said something like “We’ll pay when the embargo ends”, since now Kapersky has every reason to sell their next apple exploit on the black market.

They’ve just turned a department of people successfully working to make apple more secure into a department of people working to make it less secure.

mindlight@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 05:17 collapse

Apple could have tried to work with them and said something like “We’ll pay when the embargo ends”

…aaaaand that would most likely be trying to circumvent the sanctions by essentially receiving credit from Kaspersky on delivered services.

Not saying the situation is optional, but the sanctions would be extremely toothless if it was that easy to circumvent.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 07:25 next collapse

They are extremely toothless in the sense of making continuation of the war less interesting.

Russian oil\gas\etc revenues have grown.

What the sanctions have hurt are mostly many smaller businesses and individuals. Well, big companies too, but that just makes them more dependent on state support. Which is a win for the Russian government.

Kaspersky is definitely an FSB-friendly company.

But still, most people hurt by sanctions are innocent. Well, less guilty than European politicians profiting from cooperation with Russia both before and after 2022, and remember how all those “free democratic” countries claimed Russian elections were legit when having Putin in Russia seemed to have no downsides, despite mass protests.

BorgDrone@lemmy.one on 10 Jun 07:59 next collapse

Russian oil\gas\etc revenues have grown.

Is that why Gazprom posted its first annual loss in 20 years? a loss of $6.9 billion. Because revenues have grown so much?

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 08:18 next collapse

Huge growth!

Since many of the sanctions also apply to things that are expected to fail over time, like electronics and industrial equipment, I’m sure the losses will continue to rise. Something to look forward to.

BorgDrone@lemmy.one on 10 Jun 10:27 next collapse

Exactly. These sanctions take some time to be felt. Russia is also very selective in what economic numbers it publishes. They are also artificially keeping up the exchange rate of the ruble.

These are all things that you can only keep doing for so long and it makes the crash afterwards even worse. Basically: they can pretend everything is all-right in the short term, but they have to screw themselves over in the long term to do so.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 10 Jun 11:20 collapse

Is that a falsifiable prediction?

When is it gonna hit? If it goes beyond that period, are you gonna revise your model or insist you were only off by a year, and surely it will collapse next year?

I have zero faith in Russia, but every time someone’s told me <enemy of the west> is about to collapse or overthrow the government because of sanctions, and all evidence to the contrary is fabricated, they’ve been wrong. There’s journalists and economists who’ve spent 30+ years saying that about China, Cuba, and Iran, who still somehow have jobs.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 10:36 collapse

They will continue to rise in the areas less important for war effort. Which means that the balance of power in Russia will keep getting worse.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 10:45 next collapse

That would be good news, but I’ve been kinda saturated with such since 2022.

ripcord@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 13:10 collapse

…What?

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 14:41 collapse

That’s impolite. I’m almost certain you yourself don’t speak any language other than English, like some boor.

If you really want to know “what”, then I meant that when every day every weak for a few months you hear how Russian economy is going to crumble after a few months of Ukrainian resistance, even from some professors, and it just doesn’t, and it still hasn’t, - you stop believing that.

Womble@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 18:28 collapse

Must also be why Russia’s proposed pipeline to china (to offset the sales they are no longer making to Europe) has ground to a halt because China have them over a barrel when it comes to price.

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 08:25 next collapse

[many citations needed]

Also, you seem to be putting the actions of Putin (and the consequences of allowing him to get the country to this state) on to Europe and NATO. The fact is that these sanctions would not be in place if Putin didn’t invade a neighboring country for illegal annexation (specifically, Russia violated United Nations Charter Article 2, paragraph 4).

I’m sorry to tell you that mass protests aren’t enough. As long as the Russian people are complicit (for example, by continuing to contribute to war efforts at their oil refinery jobs) and continue to allow Putin to govern, they will suffer.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 10:44 collapse

Also, you seem to be putting the actions of Putin (and the consequences of allowing him to get the country to this state) on to Europe and NATO.

I’m definitely putting it on Europe and NATO to act like some protector of democracy and then confirm Putin’s “elections” while there were widespread protests ongoing, and now when that criminal unelected regime they criminally supported invades another country, to blame people who’ve done their part to prevent it.

I’m sorry to tell you that mass protests aren’t enough. As long as the Russian people are complicit (for example, by continuing to contribute to war efforts at their oil refinery jobs) and continue to allow Putin to govern, they will suffer.

No, victims are not complicit in crimes even if being exploited to help those. You should be sorry for being a cheat.

Also I still expect your justification or apology for western governments which confirmed Putin’s “elections”. Until then any word of a westerner on this matter is worth less than a bowl of piss.

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 17:26 collapse

Only the Russian people can fix the elections. NATO and the EU have nothing to do with that, so I’m not sure why you’re blaming them for “confirming” it when the only people that “confirmed” it were the Russian people who rolled over for yet another false election.

So you are owed no apology from NATO, and I certainly don’t owe you one.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 18:56 collapse

bowl of piss

mindlight@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 10:24 collapse

They are extremely toothless in the sense of making continuation of the war less interesting.

If it was “toothless”, Putin and his propaganda machinery wouldn’t bother commenting on it so often.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 10:47 collapse

I don’t watch TV, but I’ve gotten the impression that for the last 2 years or so they’ve been talking less and less about sanctions. Which would make your idea of how this works consistent in a wrong fucking way.

mindlight@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 12:47 collapse

You have an impression about what they don’t talk about on TV based on that you don’t watch TV?

ripcord@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 13:10 next collapse

Based on the fact that they’ve accomplished almost nothing tells me they are toothless, personally.

Ratchet them way the fuck up.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 14:34 next collapse

Based on the fact that they’ve accomplished almost nothing tells me they are toothless, personally.

Eh, I’ve accomplished a few of the things which were my plan for all of my life, so now I don’t know what to do anymore with those branches, so to say.

More important, why are you so butthurt? Relax, it’s just a shitfest in the interwebs. We all get back to tea and work and our pets and hobbies and relatives and friends from it.

ripcord@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 16:50 collapse

Why in the world would you think I was talking about what YOU accomplished…? Or that I’m butthurt about anything except how toothless and ineffective the Russian sanctions have been on their main goal - which was to stop the constant murder of Ukrainians?

“Toothless” was referencing Russian sanctions, that part of the conversation didn’t suddenly shift to focus on you.

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 17:14 collapse

My bad. I think I saw the word “he” there. Agree on the sanctions, but I think their main goal was to insulate Russia and not prevent murder. Since the latter would be less about payments in Steam becoming pita and more about Russian gas and oil not getting to Europe in any form, laundered through Azerbaijan or something else too.

mindlight@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 15:09 collapse

Just curious… What are your expectations for sanctions that have been in effect for a year or so?

rottingleaf@lemmy.zip on 10 Jun 14:38 collapse

Google the word “sample”.

Also we live in the society, don’t you know? When some old lady repeats stuff about Zelensky being a drug addict or a dumb joke about democracy in Ukraine, you know it’s not her own thoughts.

Point being - last time I heard anybody talk about sanctions like that, out of nowhere with bullshit mixed in, was more than a year ago.

ours@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 08:11 collapse

How is holding the money until (and if) the sanctions are lifted, “circumventing”?

However unlikely it would be, if the sanctions are lifted (maybe Russia gets a new, sane Government, calls off its invasion, stops its international shenanigans), wouldn’t it be OK to pay this company then?

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 08:28 next collapse

It would still probably count as some sort of trade (even when delayed), which is what would violate the sanctions.

nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca on 10 Jun 18:12 next collapse

It could be argued that such delayed trade should be encouraged. Let Apple’s debt to Kaspersky build up, with interest, but it’ll only be paid once sanctions end which will only happen once pre-determined conditions are met. It’s basically an increasing incentive to change course in a way that will result in sanctions being lifted.

There are probably some pretty severe downsides to this approach though.

nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de on 11 Jun 12:22 collapse

If the point of the embargo is to pressure affected parties to enact change on the governments policies, offering the reward after sanctions are lifted would be an added incentive.

It should be allowed or even encouraged to help the power of the sanctions.

mindlight@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 10:19 collapse

In many cases it’s doing business and not just the payment!/compansation that the sanctions is about.

etchinghillside@reddthat.com on 10 Jun 04:34 next collapse

Who/what are on those other lists.

Fizz@lemmy.nz on 10 Jun 11:53 next collapse

It would be very very bad for world if the folks at Kaspersky turned to black hat activity

lud@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 15:29 next collapse

That is not for Apple to decide. They should just follow the law.

MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 18:53 collapse

I wish they opensource their framework

awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 11 Jun 11:49 collapse

Kaspersky also has a bunch of US-based subsidiaries or partners they’re selling their software through. Or Apple could have just escrowed their reward until the embargo was over.

saltesc@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 04:27 next collapse

“refused”. Okay, headline.

[deleted] on 10 Jun 05:25 next collapse

.

Psych@lemmy.sdf.org on 10 Jun 10:33 next collapse

Should’ve just sold on black market . Better luck next time .

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 10 Jun 11:22 collapse

You trusted me? You fucking idiot. -Tim Apple

dev_null@lemmy.ml on 10 Jun 16:05 collapse

What has trust go to do with anything. Apple cannot pay them due to sanctions. There is nothing to indicate they don’t want to pay them, they are just legally not allowed to do so.

alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml on 10 Jun 16:31 collapse

So do something else. Or indicate you will pay them when it is legal to do so. Kapersky’s guy recommended Apple donate the bounty to a charity.

BrownianMotion@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 11:18 next collapse

This is not really a story, is it.

I worked for an Australian company, that was bought by an American company. Instantly we were required to do business as per American law, such as embargo’s. We lost many customers (businesses) that honestly had nothing to do with the actual reason for the embargos. For example Iran has an American embargo because of nuclear refinement, but we just wanted to sell “knives and forks” to them. Nope - they might use those forks in their refinement centrifuges… This is what happens (but also why embargos work).

Kaspersky is Russian owned, so the hacks were discovered by Russian [whitehat] hackers. I’ll bet that Apple had no ability to do “business” with the company, even if it wanted to, since Russia is currently under embargo due to the Ukraine conflict.

Now if Kaspersky spent time undermining it’s own failure of a government, and putting an end to its dictatorship, things would probably work out better for everyone in Russia.

technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 10 Jun 15:11 next collapse

but also why embargos work

Ah yes Iran is falling due to lack of forks. \s

I’m pretty sure the politicians and rich people in Iran are fine. Embargos “work” (if at all) by violently punishing the poor.

Now if Kaspersky spent time undermining it’s own failure of a government, and putting an end to its dictatorship

Do you ask the same of american corporations?

Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu on 10 Jun 17:25 next collapse

Ah yes Iran is falling due to lack of forks. \s

They were told to fork off (I’ll see myself out).

[deleted] on 10 Jun 17:53 next collapse

.

far_university1990@feddit.de on 10 Jun 20:58 next collapse

Do you ask the same of american corporations?

If goverment can be disrupted by hack, the faster that happen the better. Then they maybe learn to have better security.

Stamau123@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 23:40 collapse

Iran’s President sure was falling due to a lack of helicopter parts

Blackmist@feddit.uk on 10 Jun 17:41 collapse

Is that the case though. You can buy a copy of Kaspersky anti virus right now if you live in the US. They have a US office. You can legally send them money.

exanime@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 21:00 collapse

Or put the money in escrow pending resolution of the embargo … This is, I think, the easiest, most responsible solution to show good faith

lengau@midwest.social on 10 Jun 22:06 next collapse

Apple

Good faith

Lol good one!

exanime@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 23:21 collapse

Yes agreed… I was trying to point out that just not paying is a dick move

Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works on 12 Jun 12:26 collapse

Yeah thank you. There’s a ton of ways to “hold” the money legally so Apple can still be separated from some of its money.

RaoulDook@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 13:35 next collapse

“Apple refuses to send money to security company inside of embargoed country, to maintain compliance with USA law.”

suction@lemmy.world on 11 Jun 11:59 collapse

Security company which is most likely controlled by the Kremlin

[deleted] on 10 Jun 17:29 next collapse

.

dezmd@lemmy.world on 10 Jun 17:40 collapse

No, Russia fucked Kaspersky on this by invading Ukraine.

To be blunt, your spelling is atrocious even if you are not a native english speaker.

Propaganda fueled alligator tears, cognitive dissonance, or just looney tunes bullshit?

HelloHotel@lemm.ee on 10 Jun 17:47 next collapse

This is why I shouldnt comment when angry… You will say dumb shit you will reget later. So yes, looney tunes bullshit.

Allero@lemmy.today on 10 Jun 23:34 collapse

No, Apple fucked themselves because one of the largest security firms now has much less incentive to work white hat.

dezmd@lemmy.world on 11 Jun 09:35 collapse

It’s just more manufactured outrage. There’s enough reasons to take issue with Apple, this is not the example to use.

hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works on 10 Jun 23:54 next collapse

Just pay them, Apple.

riodoro1@lemmy.world on 11 Jun 11:39 collapse

„Apple doesn’t want to send money to russia which is also illegal”

News 2024