DeepSeek: how China’s embrace of open-source AI caused a geopolitical earthquake. (theconversation.com)
from Cat@ponder.cat to technology@lemmy.world on 12 Feb 19:18
https://ponder.cat/post/1612931

#technology

threaded - newest

maplebar@lemmy.world on 12 Feb 22:00 next collapse

“open source” “AI”

Fitik@fedia.io on 12 Feb 22:01 next collapse

DeepSeek isn't Open source tho

filister@lemmy.world on 12 Feb 22:06 next collapse

This is more or less the most open source you can get at the moment. And it is way better than OpenAI which is open only in the name.

And listening to JD Vance the other day talking in Paris how the US plans to usurp that technology, I really hope they succeed, as we need more democratic access to AI and not controlled by a single nation.

Fitik@fedia.io on 12 Feb 22:17 collapse

Hmm, I thought it was open-weights only, but I think you might be right, I've checked HuggingChat and it's one of the options, so you're probably right. And yes, it's better than OpenAI

ilmagico@lemmy.world on 12 Feb 22:36 collapse

Yeah, if it’s truly open source then I want to see the training data i.e. the “source”

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on 13 Feb 00:50 collapse

It’s not reallyyyy open source . But I suppose neither is almost any LLM.

The OSI (Open Source Initiative) definition mandates that training data be disclosed and open.