India shifted launch of its Chandrayaan-3 moon lander to avoid space objects (spacenews.com)
from FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 2023 22:33
https://lemmy.world/post/6413165

The delay was only 4 seconds. This time. But with 30,000 trackable objects in orbit and more every day, this is going to become commonplace and the delays are going to be worse.

#technology

threaded - newest

AllBlue22@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 2023 23:40 next collapse

I understand the sentiment but a 4 second delay is hardly a story.

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world on 06 Oct 2023 23:41 next collapse

A 4 second delay can mean losing a launch window.

smallaubergine@kbin.social on 07 Oct 2023 01:00 next collapse

4 seconds? Usually launch windows are in hours and days right? Unless you have barely any fuel margin and you're trying to hit a very very specific orbit I can't imagine 4 seconds being a huge issue. But I'm no orbital dynamicist

FaceDeer@kbin.social on 07 Oct 2023 05:41 collapse

It's not a huge deal, and if it were then the mission is already balanced on a knife's edge and shouldn't have been designed that way in the first place. There are plenty of technical problems that could cause a 4-second delay.

[deleted] on 07 Oct 2023 07:33 collapse

.

NewNewAccount@lemmy.world on 07 Oct 2023 01:32 collapse

It’s four seconds this time. With more and more debris building up over time, this problem is only going to get worse.

FaceDeer@kbin.social on 07 Oct 2023 05:38 next collapse

Why is it "going to get worse"? A 4-second delay might need to be done for launches more frequently, but I don't see why the delays would get longer than that - debris moves out of the way at the same speed regardless of how much of it there is. This doesn't seem like a big deal. If a 4-second delay risks killing your mission then you probably should have designed the mission with more leeway in its launch window to begin with. There are a huge number of technical issues that could easily cause a 4-second delay.

Of course, that doesn't result in a headline that draws clicks.

Edit: I just read the article. "It's going to get worse" doesn't appear anywhere in it. You just made that up.

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world on 07 Oct 2023 10:18 collapse

Do you think there will be less things in orbit in the future or more? Because it’s less ‘made that up’ and more ‘inferred based on what happens in reality.’

FaceDeer@kbin.social on 07 Oct 2023 17:11 collapse

As I said, "more things in orbit" does not imply longer delays. It would mean that launches would have to delay 4 seconds more frequently, not that they would need to delay longer than 4 seconds.

If a 4 second delay is a problem then your mission is badly designed from the start since there are very many reasons you might encounter a 4 second delay.

vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org on 07 Oct 2023 07:33 collapse

“30000 trackable objects in orbit” is nothing. Somebody doesn’t quite understand the scale.