This porn company makes millions by shaming porn consumers (finance.yahoo.com)
from L4s@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 10:00
https://lemmy.world/post/9706944

This porn company makes millions by shaming porn consumers::Strike 3 Holdings says it’s the creator of ‘artistic’ and ‘inspiring’ pornography. Some judges call it a copyright troll that makes millions by threatening to out those who download its films.

#technology

threaded - newest

bassomitron@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 12:52 next collapse

It’s insane this type of extortion strategy is still legally and financially viable.

bratosch@lemm.ee on 19 Dec 2023 06:29 collapse

To be fair, it’s directed at people who’ve already stolen

solrize@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 13:31 next collapse

Prenda Law anyone? Cautionary tale. You can look it up.

piyuv@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 14:12 collapse

It’s mentioned in the article

BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 14:21 next collapse

Important context missing from the headline and opening paragraph: they’re going after BitTorrent users.

The opening makes it sound like they’re threatening their own paying customers (or maybe people that just visit the site) with exposure unless they pay “hush money”.

tabular@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 17:04 collapse

I’m sorry, it’s okay because they use BitTorrent? wtf? As I recall, the company argue in court that a mere IP address is enough to proceed with a lawsuit. They already try to ruin lives, this is more of the same.

BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 20:11 collapse

So the litigant is filling lawsuits against IP addresses or did they ask the ISP for the customers info? Not trying to take the side of “Big Porn” but I have a hard time defending something that’s clearly against the law. By all means steal porn but get a VPN or something.

tabular@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 21:47 collapse

They have done both in the past. Source is Lawful Masses with Leonard French

They can fail to legally compel an ISP for customer info (or the individual paying for the service) because an IP address doesn’t specifically link to one person. At best it links to a router, in a house with a single occupant who pays the ISP. That still doesn’t guarantee the owner is the one who used the network at the time (could share internet with visiting guests, neighbors or be a victim of hacking). Often there are multiple people in the house, or it’s an apartment, or it’s freaking public access. An IP recorded from a file sharing protocol infers diddly squat but judges are not known for being adapt at computer literacy, an IP is sometimes enough for it to proceed.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 16:21 next collapse

If I had a choice between giving them $5 000 or my Russian little person fart porn fetish coming out then everyone’s going to know my little fetish.

kamenlady@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 20:45 next collapse

Then everyone will recommend you Brazilian little person fart porn fetish.

SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 20:49 collapse

I find the Brazilian flavour to be a little frivolous for my tastes while the Russian variety is colder and more utilitarian.

It just really does it for me, you know?

kamenlady@lemmy.world on 18 Dec 2023 21:23 collapse

Fair point.

Akasazh@feddit.nl on 18 Dec 2023 17:58 collapse

Cool niche, user name checks out

jwt@programming.dev on 19 Dec 2023 07:05 collapse

It treats this Court not as a citadel of justice, but as an ATM

Risky use of that abbreviation in the context of this article…