Mississippi's age assurance law puts decentralized social networks to the test (techcrunch.com)
from airportline@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 11:47
https://lemmy.zip/post/47428286

#technology

threaded - newest

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 12:41 next collapse

puts decentralized social networks to the test

No it doesn't. Fucking ignore them. The fuck are they gonna do? Write you a strongly worded letter? It's Mississippi, they're not educated enough to even manage that.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 13:12 next collapse

What are they gonna do? Start fining the owners of the instances……

Decentralised doesn’t mean “no one in charge” - it means lots of people in charge of lots of parts. The fediverse would be the easiest social media network to bend to the governments will because it’s not billion dollar companies running it, and just the threat of fines or a lawsuit will make any instance owner shit their pants.

Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 13:20 next collapse

It’s like that time they tried to ban torrent sites, sure a few will fall, however more or more will rise up.

plz1@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 13:23 next collapse

Not if the instance isn’t subject to their jurisdiction.

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 13:51 collapse

this guy is one of those people who thinks everywhere is under US jurisdiction.

plz1@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 14:26 collapse

FreedomAdvocate? Yeah, username checks out…

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 14:33 collapse

his username tells you everything about his personality that anyone needs to know.

[deleted] on 29 Aug 13:39 collapse

.

[deleted] on 29 Aug 14:02 collapse

.

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 14:18 collapse

no, I forgot all about you. but piefed warns users about shitty people. everywhere you go, no matter the instance, you carry a big warning next to your name that you can't see and can never escape.

OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 14:27 next collapse

SHIT I need that, just looked through post history and he’s got a lot of ‘my body my choice’ answers to vaccines too.

Well, one more blocked knucklehead

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 14:36 next collapse

he'd probably be pissed if he knew piefed also hides any replies of his with downvotes lol

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:26 collapse

lol you think I care what a bunch of people championing censorship of dissenting views think?

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 22:34 collapse

I absolutely think you're fragile enough to care, because if you didn't you would have just ignored my comment and moved on because it didn't matter.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:40 collapse

Nah, in fact I sleep better at night knowing those people are angry just knowing that I exist :)

Hilarious you calling anyone else fragile though haha. You’ve done nothing but show how you can’t stand people not agreeing with you, actively trying to tell others people proactively to block me. If that doesn’t scream fragile then I don’t know what does :)

Fragile people get upset and cry for censorship when they come up against people with different opinions. Strong people have no issue debating and conversing with people with differing opinions. You’re the former, I’m the latter.

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 23:04 collapse

I don’t debate people John Brown would have shot.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:30 collapse

By “a lot” you literally mean one when responding to someone trying to “gotcha” me yesterday hahaha.

Quick questions - do you think vaccines should be mandatory? What should the punishment be for not getting them? Which ones are mandatory?

What other things with your body does the government get control of? Should the government be able to mandate abortions if, say, you already have 1 child and they want to implement a 1 child only policy?

FalseTautology@lemmy.zip on 29 Aug 17:40 next collapse

I’m sorry, what? I’m new to Lemmy and a m using summit app, is there a way for me to utilize this?

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 18:20 collapse

if you are new, consider moving to a piefed instance like piefed.social. the feature is not a part of Lemmy at this time.

Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Aug 23:35 collapse

Alternatively, you can use an app like Voyager which has a getting feature.

It’s easy knowing not to bother engaging with someone who has “Asshole” next to their name in red.

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 30 Aug 00:25 collapse

yes, voyager is quite good. although it should be noted that the user warning and user notes are two separate features on piefed, so even if you haven't added a note to a user, piefed will still warn you that they have a bad reputation.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:27 collapse

Thanks for letting me know this - I was reading about piefed and considering signing up to give it a go. Now that I know it’s an echo chamber ultra pro censorship thing I’ll avoid it like the plague it is :)

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 13:23 next collapse

The fuck are they gonna do?

Arrest random teenagers and claim their browser history or installed app list marks out as pedophiles

FalseTautology@lemmy.zip on 29 Aug 17:38 collapse

If you stay in Mississippi past the moment that you realize you live in Mississippi you get what you deserve. I’m surprised animals and insects are still willing to live there.

goatinspace@feddit.org on 29 Aug 20:18 collapse

Lets relocate all residents of Mississippi near your location.

FalseTautology@lemmy.zip on 29 Aug 22:17 collapse

I would like nothing more than to indoctrinate them into my cult.

miked@sh.itjust.works on 29 Aug 17:25 collapse

If the instance is in the States it will have issues.

dan1101@lemmy.world on 30 Aug 12:47 collapse

Why is that though, are other US states in any way bound by the laws of Mississippi? They have no representation in MS.

shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip on 29 Aug 13:01 next collapse

Nostr and fediverse: hold my beer

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 13:13 collapse

I don’t think you understand how laws work if you think the fediverse is immune to things like this.

Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub on 29 Aug 13:50 next collapse

I don’t think you know how jurisdiction works.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 14:01 collapse

I don’t think you do. In fact I know you don’t.

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 14:31 collapse

you don't know shit, which is why you're so confident about it. the same reason 4chan isn't worried about the age laws in the UK is the same reason Lemmy.world isn't worried about what one counsin-fucking southern yeehaw backwater in the US says is illegal.

mississippi can't do shit to Lemmy.world, even if they threw billions into lawsuits. which they can't, because since republicans can't balance a budget to save their lives, mississippi can't even afford to give the people who are forced to live there clean drinking water. but here you are, thinking the state that's last in education, in the "first world" nation that's last in education , is going to start going around the world and making them listen to what some racist white descendant of plantation owners thinks is moral. fucking hilarious. I live in the US myself, and I'm not even going to listen to this law for my instance.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:20 collapse

You might want to do some reading about things like GDPR :). You also need to do some reading on how governments cooperate with other foreign governments.

Grenfur@pawb.social on 29 Aug 13:51 next collapse

Immune, no, insanely hard to police? Hell yeah. The thing with these laws is that it’s pretty easy for MS to sue Reddit and force them to comply. They have one centralized location to complain to. You can’t just call John Lemmy and have him comply. Would it be impossible for a state government to contact every single instance owner? maybe? But they’re not going to do it. Even if they made an attempt the instances hosted in other countries couldn’t give less shits about some southern US state.

Nostr is a whole other beast… it’s currently littered with things illegal in just about every country on the planet but that shit’s still there so I can’t imagine MS could do anything there either.

TLDR: Immune, no. Neigh impossible to enforce, yes.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 14:00 collapse

They could very easily contact the owners of the Lemmy.world instance, for example, and there goes the biggest part of Lemmy.

You act like that is hard for them to do. It’s not.

RaoulDook@lemmy.world on 29 Aug 14:08 next collapse

Those owners can tell them to fuck off too, since they’re not in US jurisdiction.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:32 collapse

I forgot governments don’t co-operate with foreign governments. GDPR certainly doesn’t have to be followed outside the EU, right?

RaoulDook@lemmy.world on 02 Sep 17:28 collapse

That is correct

nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Aug 15:22 next collapse

Quick question, what country do you think Lemmy World is hosted in?

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:14 collapse

Completely irrelevant.

Grenfur@pawb.social on 29 Aug 18:26 collapse

If I remember right .world is hosted in Finland. Who likely doesn’t care about MS politics. They’d have to lobby the Finnish government, who, if they did capitulate would start an awful president. So they won’t as MS has 0 authority there. But, lets assume that they did, or that MS went to all of the ISPs and had them block .world. That’s thousands of dollars, hundreds of hours, lawyers, and paperwork. And the .world users in MS just download their config files and move to .de, .ca, or .uk. And now MS gets to repeat the entire process at three more countries who couldn’t care less about their laws. The would waste unfathomable dollars and hours chasing this mouse and get nowhere. So they just won’t. It’s posturing for the big tech companies. Same as with porn. The big 3 or 4 will just block the state and move on, and the rest and those hosted in other countries will continue like nothing happened. The conservatives will claim they won ‘for the children’, nothing will really change.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:11 collapse

You act like the government doesn’t absolutely love wasting money on stupid shit like this lol. It’s their bread and butter.

Also you’re overlooking, or are unaware of, things like GDPR and what other countries are doing in forcing foreign countries to apply their laws.

JustJack23@slrpnk.net on 29 Aug 13:51 next collapse

How are you so consistently wrong?

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 13:58 collapse

Do you think that laws don’t apply to instance owners? Why?

_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus on 29 Aug 14:27 collapse

I love you just assume other states or countries give a shit what some red state thinks. the vast majority of fedi instances are not in mississippi, and the fines are not criminal charges to begin with. even if they were, good luck getting a blue state to extradite over something stupid like this.

missississpi made a law with no teeth, and fedi is going to ignore it like they should because there isn't shit some backwards US state can do.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:22 collapse

You act like it’s only Mississippi, a single state, that is going to be pushing these same laws. You’re in for a rough awakening.

shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip on 29 Aug 14:49 collapse

I don’t think you understand how decentralization works if you think these laws could possibly be applied to the global internet.

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au on 29 Aug 22:18 collapse

I don’t think you understand how much 99.99% of people are going to absolute shit their pants when they get governments ordering them to block content or be fined and sent to jail, especially when their country’s government will likely cooperate with the foreign government ala GDPR/DSAR.

Mangoholic@lemmy.ml on 29 Aug 20:35 next collapse

Its so ironic how roghts are erroded under the guise of child protection, while they protect pedophiles.

deathbird@mander.xyz on 30 Aug 00:38 collapse

Sidenote: when did Masnick become such a choad?