Tesla releases API pricing, dev says would cost $60 million per year to run his 3rd-party app (electrek.co)
from cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to technology@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:07
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/32362237

Similar vibes than Reddit api pricing

#technology

threaded - newest

just_another_person@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:10 next collapse

Duh.

PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca on 28 Nov 20:25 next collapse

Reminds me of the Fall Out Boy song “Dead on Arrival”.

jewbacca117@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:54 collapse

Or, one of the original punk bands, DOA

MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works on 28 Nov 22:29 collapse

Or the old saying “Dead on Arrival”

Rentlar@lemmy.ca on 28 Nov 20:33 next collapse

Hehehe, we all know how that’s like. I’m sure this income will truly be used to improve their services and support robust and reliable API infrastructure.

dohpaz42@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:35 next collapse

I hate subscription services. And I hate money-grubbing corps. Especially when they try to profit off of your own data.

That said, this is not that as infeasible as it sounds. The dev for Tessie reportedly has 400k users. That’s roughly $12.50/month per user. Modestly speaking, if the dev charged their users $13/mo, he’d profit $2.4 million per year. For $15/mo, he would profit $12 million per year.

That’s probably what Tesla is hoping their devs would do. And I’m sure a lot of Tesla owners could afford the fee.

conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works on 28 Nov 20:39 next collapse

You’re ignoring transaction costs.

Also $15/month is batshit insane.

dohpaz42@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:48 collapse

Yes, I didn’t account for the transaction fees. But I believe my point still stands. If people find enough value in it, they’d probably pay for it; and that’s why Tesla is charging what they are.

I do agree with you about it being batshit crazy. If it were me, I sure as hell wouldn’t want to pay $15/mo for that. But I try to be a cheapskate where I can.

takeda@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:58 next collapse

I would imagine most of those 400k users wouldn’t pay that much either.

halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 21:09 collapse

We can probably look at the reddit paid API change as a real world approximation of free to paid conversions versus users just dropping usage. Not reddit usage overall, but a third party app that stayed and needed to start charging users because of the paid API. Not sure if there are any apps that stuck around and released that sort of information to reference.

Alexstarfire@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 22:19 collapse

Did any stick around? I thought they all folded.

russjr08@bitforged.space on 28 Nov 23:06 next collapse

Relay for Reddit (Android) is still going it seems.

wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:26 collapse

RedReader is still going, and is still free. I’ve been using it since essentially its first release over a decade ago. I was the first to suggest the dev accept donations, around 4 years ago, as it’s a one-man job and it used to get regular updates. And the dev has stated he wants to add lemmy functionality alongside the existing reddit code, so users can switch between the two like an account switch, and maintain the UI they are fond of.

(I’m using Thunder currently while I want for RR lemmy support, but obviously I quite like the app, have recommended it to many)

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Nov 04:21 collapse

value in it, they’d probably pay for it; and that’s why Tesla is charging what they are.

Tesla is charging what they’re charging to eliminate competition, but still say they’re an open platform for anyone.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 28 Nov 20:42 next collapse

well that's some solid bootlicking lol

how much does it cost tesla to provide API access? or we don't discuss their costs structure and profit margin? we only do that for the guy doing the actual work lol

dohpaz42@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 21:01 collapse

Not sure which side of the argument you’re taking. But, to answer your questions…

how much does it cost tesla to provide API access?

Not as much as they would want you to believe. Most APIs are written once, and only updated if a major change in the backend happens. The majority of any operating costs would go into cloud services, if the telemetry from the car is sent to Tesla first. I don’t own a Tesla, so I don’t know for sure. I would imagine it’s, because that would allow Tesla better metrics on app usage.

or we don’t discuss their costs structure and profit margin?

Whose? Tesla or the app developers? I’m not against a business making a profit. It’s kind of the point. They provide some sort of service, and as a customer we pay some sort of fee. The problem as I see it, some companies (like Twitter, Reddit, and Tesla for example) are not balancing the age-old “supply and demand” model of economics. Of course that’s my opinion.

we only do that for the guy doing the actual work

Huh? Please explain.

lol

I don’t get it. Why do people end their otherwise non-funny statements with “lol”?

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 28 Nov 21:16 collapse

Tesla tubby is price gouging.

You came. Explaining how this price is fine since the app dev can make some money based on some basic math while not doing the same for telsa tubby.

Why this bias? How much money is telsa making per head, what is their cost structure? Should you have discussed this if we gonna justify this price gouging trick?

"Lol" here is sarcasm btw

Ps. Since they are data mining you already, could at least fucking provide api access for free which was the model pre covid mostly.

Now these parasites are data mining you and want you to pay for it 🤡

At least people are taking notice but I doubt this corpo trash will revert unless end user starts punish their profits.

Natanael@slrpnk.net on 28 Nov 20:46 next collapse

And then there’s 20 apps at $15/month each which collectively costs like $2 to run

bizarroland@fedia.io on 28 Nov 21:47 collapse

Per user costs for a website is on the number of pennies a month and most of that is for electricity.

I can plug in a $750 second-hand server with a xeon processor, 40 TB of storage and 128gb of ram and easily serve all of the needs of several thousand users on essentially any website type for $1.50 a day.

Sure, if you throw in video and a lot of bandwidth then the number would go up, but for pictures and text and website interaction on the par of bluesky or twitter or mbin sans hosted video it would work very well.

If I reached the point where I needed to expand for the raw processing I can just throw another $1,000 and $45/month in electricity at it and double how much I can handle.

Computers are stupid cheap. Internet services are stupid cheap. Asking for more than a dollar a person per month for anything that doesn't have licensing fees on it (like tv/movies) or very high bandwidth usage (like YouTube) is a greedy rip off.

That being said, at those prices I would not make anything for running the service, and that also would not cover additional development costs for any new features that needed to be added, but even so, unless your goal is to disenfranchise users you should not charge more than a buck a month or hell, $10 a year per person for all of their access to your service.

GoodEye8@lemm.ee on 28 Nov 21:47 next collapse

Selling literal shit at a restaurant also isn’t unfeasible if the customer doesn’t care about eating shit. But nobody is going to eat shit and nobody (normal) is going to pay $10+ a month to get mostly gimmick features. At a glance there’s barely anything useful in the API.

Maggoty@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 22:04 collapse

You’ve accounted only for the API pricing. They already charge 7-20 USD per month. So their prices are going to jump to 19.50-32.50 USD a month.

That’s not feasible.

JoMiran@lemmy.ml on 28 Nov 20:39 next collapse

Fuck Elon. Fuck Tesla.

I was their target demographic and Elon made sure that I never even consider their trash. I went BMW instead.

takeda@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 20:55 next collapse

This is why Elonia is asking trump to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Other car manufacturers started biting into Tesla market share this year.

db2@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:58 next collapse

Poor Queen Elonia.

independantiste@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 04:04 collapse

He want to add tarrifs and he is also asking Trump to remove government subsidies on new EV purchases, raising the barrier to entry in the US for EVs

Cocodapuf@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 13:33 collapse

There’s no way he’s asking for that. If you can find a source for that claim I’d love to see it. But it’s about the dumbest thing musk could do.

independantiste@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 13:43 collapse

investopedia.com/tesla-and-other-ev-stocks-drop-o…

Cocodapuf@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 14:32 collapse

Wow… Well I maintain that is about the dumbest thing he could do, but I apologize for doubting you.

scutiger@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 17:12 collapse

It’s a good way to make money by shorting his competitors’ stocks.

TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works on 28 Nov 21:47 next collapse

never owned a BMW, or a Tesla for that matter, but I’ve heard they’re just as bad when it comes to being money hungry

JoMiran@lemmy.ml on 28 Nov 22:20 next collapse

There is no such thing as a benevolent corporation. Don’t feed the fascists. Don’t give your money to Elon.

EDIT: Autocorrect derp

themoken@startrek.website on 28 Nov 22:45 collapse

I mean, fuck Elon and Tesla but if you’re spending money on a car you’re giving it to a bastard one way or another. The CEOs of Ford, BMW, et. al. might not be making asses of themselves on the global stage, but I’m sure they’re still horrible. Even used cars run on gas 99% of the time.

n2burns@lemmy.ca on 28 Nov 22:50 collapse

There are levels of bad. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good (or in this case, only slightly better).

kamenlady@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:25 next collapse

A friend bought a new BMW. Everything is controlled with an app. There’s also an interface in the car itself, obviously, but the app has more functions.

Things like seat heating, air conditioner, enhanced cruise control and all the fancy things are only available if you subscribe to one of the three offerings.

I just glanced over the app, so i don’t remember the names, but it went like the usual: basic, premium, platinum.

Prices were in the range of 200, 400, 700 euros a fucking month.

kautau@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:49 next collapse

Yeah choosing BMW is a strange choice against something like Tesla when they are doing the same sort of thing. I won’t criticize the “I’m rich so I bought an expensive car” thing, that can happen elsewhere, but the idea that BMW is the lesser of the evils isn’t really accurate.

I wish we were in a world where we could more easily avenge our terrible upbringing in this system moment after moment like Geralt, where if we’re to choose between the lesser of two evils, we’d rather not choose at all.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0i88t0Kacs

hogmomma@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 00:35 collapse

Are you saying that you can’t use the A/C without subscribing to their app?

iamanurd@midwest.social on 29 Nov 01:54 collapse

I think they are very mistaken about the options requiring a subscription and their price. Most of the options you could get a subscription for also are available as a one time purchase… the same way they were in the past. Heating and air conditioning aren’t among those options, they come standard in every car.

BMW did drop the subscription for heated seats after backlash. That one was stupid. The other options I’m a little torn on. There are costs associated with developing the software used for most of the options like driving assistance. I have no problem paying for that development, and the subscription lets me try it for a month to see if it’s worth it. As long as there is the ability to outright buy the option instead of locking into a perpetual subscription I’m chill with it. I also hope that once unlocked, the option is still available when resold. This part I’m not so sure about, but mine seemed to maintain the options purchased by the original owner.

It’s not a super recent article, but a list of options and pricing is available at the bottom of this page: kbb.com/…/bmw-quietly-launches-in-car-subscriptio…

kamenlady@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:57 collapse

I only had the chance to peek and after reading your comment, it sounds very plausible that general heating is a basic function. I’m sure i saw the seat-heating, in the lowest price subscription though. It must have been before they dropped the subscription for it. The paid air conditioning included air purifing with hepa and carbon filters and some iirc Plasmacluster Ion technology.

I should have been a little more specific …

Even by not subscribing to the paid subscriptions he said he had to subscribe to the basic subscription, which enables the app.

It looked like they will also drop a random paid feature into the basic for a limited time, every few weeks another feature, so people get to test it. That’s what the ad in the app suggested.

I didn’t think about the one time purchase to be honest. I assume it to be featured in a submenu, to make it less prominent than the subscription, in order to get a bigger number of subscribers.

tibi@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 11:12 collapse

That is correct, but at least BMW knows how to make decent cars that won’t trap you in in an emergency.

peopleproblems@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 00:22 next collapse

That BMW iDrive looks good but if it’s all app and touchscreen based… Imma skip.

TBH though, all the damn nice EVs are touch screens or bubble crossovers.

Why the fuck do I want to drive a bubble. I want to drive an electric car. Take the Ford Mustang, put the electric parts in it, and don’t turn it into a crossover. Take the Toyota 86, put electric parts in it. Do not turn it into a cross over.

Idk take any fucking car that looks like a fun car and goddamn it, put electric parts in it, don’t add touchscreens, and don’t stick your lips on the wand of soap and blow into the frame making it a goddamn bubble crossover.

person420@lemmynsfw.com on 29 Nov 01:21 next collapse

Because it’s not that easy. Batteries are big, people want 250+ miles on a charge and battery tech isn’t there for standard sedans and smaller.

I just went through this and ended up with the mach-e (which I’m very happy with) but it still weighs about as much as my minivan (almost 5000lbs).

peopleproblems@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 01:39 collapse

All EVs are nearly 5000lbs. The xDrive i4 I mentioned is 5063lbs

But the interior DOES have buttons so it’s back on my like list.

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d9df1fd7-2c41-45aa-ae28-d51840a55e47.png">

person420@lemmynsfw.com on 29 Nov 01:59 collapse

There was something about the i4 I just didn’t like. I think it was how it felt kind of like an m3 to me. In the sense that if all you care about is going fast, then it’s a great car, but it’s not the luxury of the 5 or 7 series, which is what I think of when I think of BMW.

I’m too old for a car like that, and don’t drive enough to justify the i5 price, so I went economical (in comparison at least) with the mach-e. It’s fun to drive, has enough gitty-up-and-go for me, and it’s comfortable.

Though I got reeeeeeally close to saying fuck it and getting the i5.

iamanurd@midwest.social on 29 Nov 09:55 collapse

I’m waiting for the price on used i5s to drop a bit before I trade my car in for one. Since they’re only a year old, they’re still super pricy. i4 is a bit small for me if I have people in the back.

The 530e is pretty perfect for me in the meantime. Only 20 mile range on full electric, but that works pretty perfectly for me since I can charge at home and at work. On longer trips I can still burn dinosaurs, but I only fill the tank up a few times per year. I think I’ve put gas in it 6 times this year, and that includes a couple ~3 hour trips.

I’ve thought about Tesla, but there’s so much I don’t like about them.

peopleproblems@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 15:37 collapse

I’ve got a RAV4 that will last quite a while if I need space. In 6-12 months, hopefully after I buy I home, I’m going to need a car that says “single software engineer dad with midlife crisis money” and my boy loves the interior of the i4 coupe.

I’ll look at the i5 though

weew@lemmy.ca on 29 Nov 01:35 collapse

Ioniq 6.

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 00:53 next collapse

I went Audi but to be completely honest Hyundai and Kia make the best EVs.

person420@lemmynsfw.com on 29 Nov 01:18 next collapse

I just got the Ford Mach-e last weekend and I’m super happy with it.

BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 03:54 collapse

Yeah, I like the Mach-e a lot too. I think it maxes out at 150 kW of charging speed, which is the same as my Audi. But the Hyundai does 240 kW and that’s super speedy!

JoMiran@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 03:42 collapse

I needed a single payment lease and BMW does those with zero hassle.

VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 29 Nov 01:12 next collapse

BMW lobbies against non-car based infrastructure and car industry regulation here in Germany. Biggest shareholder is the Quandt family, who are descendant from literal Nazis, and now use part of their billions to fund the conservatives (at least they aren’t giving it to the far-right. Yet.)

So yeah, fuck Elon, but fuck BMW too.

JokklMaster@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 01:37 collapse

Yeah fine me a car company that’s not like that. Living in the US it’s a necessity to have a car so just gonna nix that argument. I bought a Toyota to get ultimate reliability (yes Honda is basically equal) but I’m sure they both have done equally terrible shit. And when I’m not in grad school I want to go back to a BMW because they are great cars to drive. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism so just try to enjoy your life where you can.

VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 29 Nov 02:18 collapse

On the one hand, sure. On the other hand, if you’re saying you bought from brand A, not B, specifically because the big boss of B is a shithead, I feel like it’s valid to point out the ways the big boss of A is shit too.

Since everyone is shit, I dunno, buy used, I guess.

emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de on 29 Nov 04:22 next collapse

“Theres no ethical consumption under capitalism, so what do you expect me to drive a used car like a PEASANT? If i cant consume 100% ethically ill just consume however i want, and i want a fancy german treat car so just shut up okay”

JoMiran@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 04:38 collapse

It’s good information and something I will take into account for next time.

iamanurd@midwest.social on 29 Nov 01:38 next collapse

Same

muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee on 29 Nov 02:18 next collapse

Did u have to unlearn how to use an indicator?

Isnt that a mandatory class before they let u buy one?

peopleproblems@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 04:43 collapse

You know I haven’t been to a dealership yet to find out.

ColdWater@lemmy.ca on 29 Nov 11:30 next collapse

BMW does have shady monetization tactics with their newer car, but Subaru shred almost every other car brands to dust

Kbobabob@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 12:59 collapse

Are Subaru cars still loud AF? I had a 2002 Impreza, and a 2012 and both had lots of road noise with everything in the car popping or cracking with every bump.

spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 16:07 next collapse

Of course, and that’s part of the charm. They bag out like a pair of leather slippers. I read something recently about them using a shit ton more adhesive in the new Forester so maybe it’s improving? My 2015 isn’t that bad, but I hate driving in general so basic appliance standards is fine by me.

JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Nov 21:04 collapse

Okay that’s not just me, thank god. I thought something was just wrong with the sound deadening on my Forester, especially because my 30 year old Mazda 323 is at least 50% quieter. Nope, its what makes a Subaru, a Subaru.

Mossheart@lemmy.ca on 29 Nov 20:31 next collapse

How is it driving without turn signals? Granted, given they put them as buttons on the friggin steering wheel in the new Teslas, maybe not much different?

JoMiran@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 21:48 collapse

I am sad to say that the old joke is becoming obsolete. These new cars are smart. If you try to change lanes without a turn signal, the car beeps loudly to tell you that you have drifted. Our company also has a Sprinter van that will actually pull you back into your lane. Sad times.

Mossheart@lemmy.ca on 02 Dec 18:13 collapse

Turn signals aren’t for you, they’re for other drivers. I can’t hear the other car yelling at their driver, I just see them decide to cut into my lane with no warning or signal.

Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world on 30 Nov 19:40 collapse

I thought BMW wanted a subscription for heated seats. You know, the seats already in your car but software locked with a paywall.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 28 Nov 20:42 next collapse

rent seeking strikes back

ryper@lemmy.ca on 28 Nov 21:23 next collapse

Similar vibes than Reddit api pricing

Reddit got the idea from Elon’s twitter API fees. This is Elon being consistent(ly terrible).

etchinghillside@reddthat.com on 28 Nov 21:42 next collapse

What’s the data? The article says the app was fleet management? So location and remote opening doors or something?

Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 22:17 next collapse

I use an app called Tessie. It’s $5 a month for the rest of my life but i do like it . Keeps track of battery usage, trips, and links to Alexa.

lectricleopard@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:16 next collapse

Why Alexa?

Other than that, a $1 notepad and a pencil will do usage tracking just fine for years. You can’t take a trip unless you’re already sitting in the car where you can see and write down the info.

meliaesc@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:24 collapse

I’ve decided that we were just fine without the internet, please send your comment to me via written correspondence, since you have your notepad ready anyway.

lectricleopard@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 03:32 collapse

The internet allows us to communicate quickly over distances we couldn’t otherwise without a long time between messages. What does this app do that I can’t do cheaper and easier with pencil and paper?

I’m not opposed to technology, but I’m not paying for it if there’s no benefit.

Grippler@feddit.dk on 29 Nov 06:31 collapse

But it does it both easier and better than pen/paper because it does it automatically without them needing to even think about it. And it’s already available electronically so they can graph it and run statistics on their usage and trips…you know, actually use the data for something purposeful.

With pen/paper they just have a sheet they can’t do anything with. They now have to manually enter all this data to use it for anything, which is a lot on unnecessary manual effort.

lectricleopard@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 06:40 collapse

Ok.

On my phone, I can use Google sheets (or excel or whatever) and get all the benefits, except for the automatic recording. For $5/mo in perpetuity?

I’m not anti app. I don’t understand why someone would pay this much for this function.

Grippler@feddit.dk on 29 Nov 07:23 collapse

If you want all the metrics that it logs automatically, you’re going to be spending 20min every time you drive anywhere logging everything manually. And then you’re still not getting the continuous logging during drives. Plus you still need to do all the data processing yourself on top of that.

I get why some people pay for these things.

etchinghillside@reddthat.com on 28 Nov 23:51 collapse

Gotcha - I guess I’m still not following though. Twitter and Reddit upped API fees because the data could be used to train LLMs.

Obviously if you had access to everyone’s driving/Tesla data - that’d be valuable - but I am assuming the API data is only for the owners using these the apps like you mentioned.

Is the data available across all users or are they prepping to release some kind of anonymized user data?

jaybone@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:17 collapse

I can’t eee how blocking API use helps train LLMs.

Even if the users has a 3rd party app, it’s still making the API calls, so whatever data is already on the server side.

etchinghillside@reddthat.com on 29 Nov 02:32 next collapse

I think you might be misinterpreting me.

bitchkat@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:55 collapse

Most of these apps run via the app providers servers. So while each subscriber provides an apikey that only gets data on their car(s), the app provider can save every single api response and whatever they want with it.

Grippler@feddit.dk on 29 Nov 05:26 collapse

You can do basically everything you can do from teslas own app, but automated and even a little more. For example I use it to automatically control charging power to match the surplus of my solar panels, that keeps my grid-use for my car to 0kWh for roughly 5 months of the year. And I can set the charging power lower than I can in the Tesla app (app is 5A minimum, API goes to 0A), which is convenient for the solar charging.

And of course you can pull battery data, odometer etc. with it as well.

thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 22:00 next collapse

Tesla can eat penis.

Diddlydee@feddit.uk on 28 Nov 22:17 next collapse

A bag of.

Stegget@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:48 next collapse

A whole bag?

[deleted] on 29 Nov 15:40 collapse

.

MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca on 28 Nov 23:37 collapse

Penises should be loved.

simplejack@lemmy.world on 28 Nov 23:42 next collapse

One more reason I’m glad I bought a car with CarPlay / Android Auto support.

Yearly1845@reddthat.com on 29 Nov 04:39 collapse

Can’t speak to apple but AndroidAuto basically only allows google apps on it already. I can’t take my third party map app and use that instead if google maps.

Apparently this is no linger true. Hooray!

ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca on 29 Nov 05:04 next collapse

CarPlay allows third party maps for sure.

Yearly1845@reddthat.com on 29 Nov 13:19 collapse

So I looked into it again and yeah it looks like this changed within the last few years. Neat! The last time I looked was back in 2020 and none of the apps I wanted to use worked on AndroidAuto. When I looked into it back then one of the devs said google was blocking them, which is par for the course for google.

My car is so old it still has a cassette player, so this isn’t something I regularly look into; just whenever I get a rental or something. Thanks for the correction.

DesolateMood@lemm.ee on 29 Nov 05:48 next collapse

Damn that’s crazy I didn’t realize my third party map app was actually just Google maps

simplejack@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 06:17 next collapse

I’m confused. Non google maps can run on Android auto and can even run on the Home Screen view. Same for CarPlay and alternatives to Apple Maps.

amongstthetrees@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 16:51 collapse

I’m not sure what exactly the previous commenter said but map apps in particular only show up if installed through the Play Store. I found that out after trying to get Organic Maps working through F-Droid and Aurora Store. If you’re rooted you can change the app’s ‘installed from’ field to the Play Store and it will show up.

simplejack@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 17:22 collapse

My guess is that Google, like Apple, it’s pretty nervous about letting developers go crazy with UIs that are used while driving.

I know that, for CarPlay, the approval process is more ridged than with a mobile or desktop app.

My guess is that Google and Apple don’t want to be found liable for dangerous / distracting technology.

amongstthetrees@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 17:30 collapse

Its only “Navigation” apps though, media and messaging apps work just fine in Android Auto from another source or sideloaded.

simplejack@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 17:55 collapse

Interesting. TIL.

[deleted] on 29 Nov 06:37 collapse

.

LiveLM@lemmy.zip on 29 Nov 00:29 next collapse

I’m surprised devs didn’t see the writing on the wall after Twitter all but murdered its API

dubyakay@lemmy.ca on 29 Nov 02:13 collapse

Wasn’t that still Dorsey twitter though?

LiveLM@lemmy.zip on 29 Nov 10:02 collapse

I could swear it was too, but I double checked before the comment.
Elon closed the deal on Oct 28, 2022 according to Wikipedia, and the first API woes I remember was the killing of third-party clients, which happened in Jan 19, 2023

_number8_@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 01:29 next collapse

API pricing is such a shitty obnoxious dogshit practice that is now of course becoming standard because of course it is. internet barely costs money come the fuck on make a quality product

It used to be a respected standard for developers and hosts to be somewhat open and friendly to 3rd party devs, because ultimately they’re customers and they’re helping recruit and retain customers, they should be treated with respect. just because it’s innovative and disruptive to invent the machine gun doesn’t mean it’s good

smitty825@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:18 next collapse

The internet (ie bandwidth) is cheap, but running servers, providing documentation and tech support all costs a decent amount of money.

However, treating an API as a profit center is a joke. These are literally companies developing software that makes the experience of owning a Tesla better. Making things unaffordable for those companies is putting short term profits over long term success of your product

Gingernate@programming.dev on 29 Nov 02:23 collapse

But 90k is nothing to Tesla, it’s just a paywall to keep the third party devs put while being able to claim to be open

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 29 Nov 12:40 collapse

while being able to claim to be open

Marketing is happy while dafdy gets to squeeze

Anyway, look at their actions, not their propaganda

JackbyDev@programming.dev on 29 Nov 05:09 next collapse

I have the slightest bit of sympathy. So many companies got their shit scraped and fed into AI models. They lost out. They’re afraid it will happen again.

Empricorn@feddit.nl on 29 Nov 19:55 collapse

They didn’t lose anything, that’s our data.

JackbyDev@programming.dev on 30 Nov 00:04 collapse

I mean, I get your point, that’s why I said “slightest”. I’m basically just saying I understand their perspective.

ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 11:54 collapse

just because it’s innovative and disruptive to invent the machine gun doesn’t mean it’s good

That’s a great Maxim.

WildPalmTree@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 12:50 collapse

I didn’t think there would be a pun in there but, man, you found it! 👍

ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 14:23 collapse

Well, I am a Prodigy at that sort of thing!

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 29 Nov 01:43 next collapse

So musk pulled a Reddit spez?

Not surprising as musk is a scammer who got incredibly lucky, always has been.

Fuck spez and fuck musk

douglasg14b@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:21 next collapse

It’s only going to get worse year over year as we move towards a dystopian corporation ran future.

The U.S. leading the pack on testing how much a rich person can get away with while directly interfering with a d profiting from the government, which is funded by the people.

It’s just another grift, but this time in the open, corporate sponsored politicians being elected as presidents is going to become the norm. The only thing it takes is money to influence an undereducated populace.

DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 04:52 next collapse

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

intensely_human@lemm.ee on 29 Nov 05:38 collapse

Or until the populace gets smarter.

digdilem@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 08:16 collapse

No sign of that happening yet, especially with the results of a certain election in a certain country.

sunzu2@thebrainbin.org on 29 Nov 12:42 collapse

The only thing it takes is money to influence an undereducated populace.

We got the government the average person deserves...

bitchkat@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:47 next collapse

Didn’t they already do this with Xitter?

jcg@halubilo.social on 29 Nov 04:15 collapse

Yes the blue bird website did it first iirc

Yearly1845@reddthat.com on 29 Nov 04:37 collapse

So musk pulled a spez who pulled a Dorsey

Almost like they’re all greedy pigboys or something… 🤔

bitchkat@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 05:04 collapse

No, the api changes were musk not dorsey

AtariDump@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 15:39 next collapse
fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 16:16 collapse

.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 02 Dec 05:22 collapse

Awesome username!

fluxion@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 02:01 next collapse

Imagine trying to sell cars and then pulling some shit like this

Etterra@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 04:02 next collapse

Its Tesla; y’all should be dumping that shit anyway.

kalleboo@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 05:28 next collapse

Another reminder to developers to not bother with public APIs, just screen-scrape or reverse-engineer the official app private API.

auzy@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 11:14 next collapse

Then you’re at risk of getting sued for cracking the encryption or the API breaking constantly

The real reminder is don’t integrate with devices which you can’t trust

auzy@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 15:40 collapse

Yeah guys. Downvote me. This is literally part of my day job.

In our industry we call not using an official API a dumpster fire API. Because more than once it has completely broken eventually, and there are a few manufacturers warned will break in the upcoming future

CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 16:04 collapse

Is it illegal to scrape? I mean most companies and governments scrape huge amounts of data all the time without getting anyones permission, hell the entire business of a search engine is basically WeScrape4U.

lemonskate@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 19:17 collapse

If you extract a key from a proprietary client to decrypt a private API, it definitely is illegal. If you do this as a corporation, it would also be easy to detect by abnormal usage patterns tied to your account and presents you as a nice big set of pockets to get sued.

Just screen scraping isn’t illegal, but is fragile as fuck and will break at the worst time and you have no ability to implement version control to manage it.

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online on 30 Nov 16:53 collapse

Personally I wouldn’t want to be the guy forced to write scrapers with how much they break on any modern site

glassware@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 11:30 next collapse

Really the lesson is, don’t run a business that 100% depends on another company.

fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 16:14 collapse

This. It’s a recipe for disaster. I think enough (tech-related) companies have shown now, that they first want to lock you in, and then if they got you, want to bleed you out…

daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 29 Nov 16:19 collapse

Virgin API user vs chad scrapper.

flames5123@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 06:58 next collapse

There goes TeslaFi… fuck. I use that all the time to see my global map and keep track of my stats (like power usage on long drives), and auto enabling of certain features at certain times, like heat/ac after work.

Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 18:08 collapse

These changes only affect the Fleet API. TeslaFi is fine for now.

flames5123@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 20:12 next collapse

Ah! I see! TeslaFi uses the owner API. Wheeew. Hopefully this will be fine for most apps.

flames5123@lemmy.world on 05 Dec 21:50 collapse

Just got an email that TeslaFi uses the Fleet API, so this definitely affects them.

Rookeh@startrek.website on 29 Nov 07:01 next collapse

Something to note: Tesla has two vehicle APIs, the Fleet API for commercial accounts and the Owner API for individuals. This change currently only impacts the Fleet API.

If you are an individual owner who accesses your vehicle data from the Owner API (usually via a self hosted tool like TeslaMate), this does not affect you. Yet.

ayyy@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 09:24 next collapse

Hey kid, don’t waste your breath defending corporations. You will end up being wrong in the end, and before that you just look like a fool.

Rookeh@startrek.website on 29 Nov 09:29 collapse

Highlight where in the above post I am defending anything.

jaek@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 12:59 collapse

Isn’t it tacitly defending this pricing model?

I’ve worked in commercial environments where we’ve had the rug pulled on us in exactly this manner.

Sure today Tesla isn’t charging you, but the moment it is expedient for them, they will.

A lot of users here will have had the same experience with Reddit – it’s not unprecedented.

Rookeh@startrek.website on 29 Nov 14:13 next collapse

Not at all.

Lemmy is overwhelmingly militantly anti-Tesla, which is understandable considering who owns it, but it does mean that users tend to interpret any neutral or factual statements (basically anything that is not outright criticism) as having a pro-Tesla bias.

In this case, all I am stating is the fact that this specific change currently only affects corporate users. That could of course change in the future.

There is a rich history of cloud based data providers pulling the rug from under users with no warning. Look at what happened to Nest users when Google took over.

TachyonTele@lemm.ee on 29 Nov 16:23 collapse

Providing and clarifying information isn’t automatically defending something.

modus@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 13:32 collapse

I’m not a developer, so excuse me if this is a dumb question. Is the API supplying data that is provided by the OBDII interface? Or is it more than that?

Rookeh@startrek.website on 29 Nov 14:00 collapse

There is most likely an overlap on what you can get from the OBD port, but generally speaking the API will provide more high level info e.g driving status, mileage, live location - and the OBD port will provide more low level data e.g. detailed battery stats from the BMS, energy usage, etc.

modus@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 18:06 collapse

I see. Thanks.

MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml on 29 Nov 12:00 next collapse

There’s no laws against profiteering?

GhiLA@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 13:52 collapse

Tesla is an American company, in Texas, at that.

It wouldn’t matter if there were.

cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 29 Nov 15:24 next collapse

stop buying tesla, stop supporting spacex, and stop buying starlink

hirage@lemmy.eco.br on 29 Nov 15:49 next collapse

And stop using Xitter.

captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org on 29 Nov 18:02 next collapse

^^ this. In America the only vote that really matters is the one you do with your wallet.

lud@lemm.ee on 29 Nov 18:09 collapse

But what launch provider should I use then?

Boeing? No, I don’t think so.

cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 29 Nov 20:18 collapse

don’t use any. space programs are wholly unnecessary

WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 20:23 next collapse

I agree that manned space programs are unnecessary and unmanned should be very limited. Starlink shouldn’t have been allowed. Unfortunately the US government let telecoms off the hook when it came to serving rural areas.

lud@lemm.ee on 29 Nov 21:20 next collapse

You don’t like GNSS?

Also space programs have been the source of a lot of world changing inventions.

cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 29 Nov 21:30 collapse

because spending money on space exploration when people are homeless and hungry is wrong

stevedice@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 21:42 next collapse

Are you 12?

VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 30 Nov 07:31 collapse

Are you? stfu or go invent a microwave that prevents neoliberal mayors and govenors (at least in the US’s system) from sicking cops on their own constituents while giving the real estate contracts to their buddies who are only interested in building McMansions. 🤡

Edit: As a rule I dont get dragged into pointless debates.

Im as enthusiastic for space as they come.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pjdJa122I4

Simply put, until we address the root causes of systemic injustice which are low hanging fruit, and by that I mean do away with the parasitic billionaires who prevent that, any venture into space shall be doomed to come crashing back down for the self-canniblizing fascism which imperialism is.

It’d be funny, if it werent so sad, to see clearly the indignance and hipocrisy from those who believe themselves so enlightended, double down on the “importance of space” exploitation, capital extraction and colonization…without ever considering the rest of the picture.

I used to be bothered by the lyric

spendin all their OUR money building rockets they can shoot into the stars

Neoliberals had their chance with this fucking dynamic, and blew it.

I have no interest in a future in space that is owned by assholes and authoritarians. That doesnt mean i give up on Star Trek. It means I recognize this society is barreling ignorantly toward the bell riots.

GladiusB@lemmy.world on 30 Nov 07:50 next collapse

Whataboutism. Just because you don’t find space exploration necessary (it absolutely is), does not mean you find homelessness tolerable and it doesn’t even relate.

stevedice@sh.itjust.works on 30 Nov 18:08 next collapse

What does this have to do with space exploration, you absolute child?

stevedice@sh.itjust.works on 30 Nov 20:13 collapse

So you’re saying your comment has fuck all to do with space exploration and you were just looking for an excuse to drag everyone into a conversation about capitalism.

As a rule I dont get dragged into pointless debates.

Funny.

[deleted] on 30 Nov 21:08 collapse

.

ryedaft@sh.itjust.works on 30 Nov 08:00 collapse

GPS is terrible and I hate being able to find places

GhiLA@sh.itjust.works on 29 Nov 18:15 next collapse

…Ok, now what? Is evil defeated yet?

edit: He’s a fucking cabinet member. Think of something real unless you all want to go hit him with pillows in disgust.

cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 29 Nov 21:19 collapse

if boycotts didn’t work they wouldn’t try to criminalise them

filister@lemmy.world on 30 Nov 07:20 next collapse

Free speech for me but not for thee, vibes.

SuperSleuth@lemm.ee on 30 Nov 19:56 collapse

Because criminalizing having a different political view definitely sustains democracy.

zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com on 29 Nov 20:46 next collapse

SpaceX will be the only game in town once the new administration eviscerates nasa

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online on 30 Nov 16:48 next collapse

Starlink is the only decent satellite internet provider

[deleted] on 30 Nov 18:46 collapse

.

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online on 30 Nov 23:32 collapse

And be locked down to awful local companies? Starlink was cheaper, faster and more reliable than the Canadian alternatives

I know it’s not always the case, but even then, it’s a global choice versus a local one when it comes to travelling beyond just boats and giving a guaranteed service

Edit: Woah. Wireless Internet has a lot of issues in Canada, limited speeds, slowdowns, hidden fees… You get rid of that by paying double and getting also double the speed and without anything else hidden

Albeit you’re stuck to starlink services, but that’s just a downside of satellite internet

Hadriscus@lemm.ee on 30 Nov 18:24 collapse

I would have no other alternative for internet access unfortunately

piecat@lemmy.world on 30 Nov 18:46 next collapse

If you’re on a boat… fair enough.

Otherwise, look into WISPs… Wireless Internet Service Providers. Great for rural areas, the infrastructure is point-to-point radios, so it’s super easy to go large distances without the cost of fiber or copper cables.

Best part is, if you have any neighbors that are interested, they’ll often give you a discount if you let them put a sector antenna on your barn/silo. Or they can also erect a short tower if you let them too.

If there aren’t any in your immediate area, reach out to ones nearby. They’re always looking to expand.

SuperSleuth@lemm.ee on 30 Nov 19:54 next collapse

If it were that simple, and they were comparable/better than starlink, they’d be a lot more prominent than they are, no? You’re leaving out information.

piecat@lemmy.world on 01 Dec 00:55 collapse

It really is that simple. I wouldn’t chose it over wired, but it’s still pretty good. You’re going to beat the latency of satellites every time.

en.wikipedia.org/…/Wireless_Internet_service_prov…

Hadriscus@lemm.ee on 30 Nov 20:52 collapse

Thanks I’ll look into that, never heard of it. I’m on an island

Woht24@lemmy.world on 30 Nov 19:08 collapse

You could live like the first 2020 years of our timeline.

Hadriscus@lemm.ee on 30 Nov 20:53 collapse

I don’t understand your sentence can you rephrase ?

[deleted] on 29 Nov 15:36 next collapse

.

umbraroze@lemmy.world on 29 Nov 20:37 next collapse

When Twitter (and Reddit) pulled this off, I was just mildly pissed. Can’t do interesting things with my data, oh no.

…Image that, except it’s an expensive luxury car you’re no longer allowed to do interesting things with.

Sam_Bass@lemmy.world on 30 Nov 19:02 collapse

Greed twists all minds.